IT CAPSTONE DOCUMENTATION GUIDE

1. This documentation guide was based to the current IT PROJECT DOCUMENTATION (revised CHED
CMO 25 2015).

2. This guide is to show the summary of document formatting.

3. Please do not follow the italicized words inside the quantity, those are some reminders.

4. The team can use this documentation guide as a blue print or simply fill in their contents during the
documentation period.
SAMPLE SYSTEM TITLE FOR SAMPLE CLIENT

An IT Capstone Project Presented to the

Faculty of the College of Computer Studies

University of Antique

Libertad, Antique

In Partial Fulfilment for the Degree in

Bachelor of Science in Information Technology

By

Marivel F. Alonzo

Khlouie Atienza

Jelyn Cadahing

Aieza Laika Castro

Jessa Casuncad

Mery Jean Estocado

Jaymon Estoya

March 2017
(year graduated – don’t include this line)
SAMPLE SYSTEM TITLE FOR SAMPLE CLIENT

An IT Capstone Project Presented to the

Faculty of the College of Computer Studies

University of Antique

Libertad, Antique

In Partial Fulfilment for the Degree in

Bachelor of Science in Information Technology

By

Marivel F. Alonzo

Khlouie Atienza

Jelyn Cadahing

Aieza Laika Castro

Jessa Casuncad

Mery Jean Estocado

Jaymon Estoya

March 2017
 Approval Sheet

This IT Capstone Project entitled “Faculty Grading Management for University

of Antique- Libertad Campus” submitted by “Marivel Alonzo”, “Khlouie Atienza”, “Jelyn

Cadahing”, “Aieza Laika Castro”, “Jessa Casuncad”, “Mery Jean Estocado”, “Jaymon

Estoya” in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Bachelor of Science in

Information Technology is hereby approved.

BOLD & CAPITALIZE THE NAMES OF YOUR ADVISER ,PANELS, DEAN

IT Project Adviser
_____________________________________________________________________

Panelists

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panelist Panelist

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panelist

Accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science

in Information Technology.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dean, College of Computer Studies

October 2015
(date of last accepted defense – do not include this)
 Acknowledgement

____________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

- the XYZ ABC Group Roar

(group name – do not include this)

Executive Summary
Table of Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
 Chapter I

Introduction

Project Context

Every Generation there was a problem by technologies especially to the teachers

who needs an upgraded system for the grading. If necessary to build a new one system to
facilitate their task we need to do something new one system that helpable. Based, on ours
interview for the correspondents they told us about the problem of the system they
encountered because of the formula encode to the system their using every day. Grading
system is a method used by teachers to assess student’s educational performance. In early
times, simple marking procedure was used by educators. But now, a proper grading system
is followed by every educational institute. (Wilson, T. n. d). There are different methods on
how school evaluate their students. According to many teachers and students, grading
system is a good, initiative and providing valuable advantages such as reducing score
pressure, advance grading pattern, identification of weakness and strengths, easier studies.
(Wilson, T. n. d.).

Purpose and Description of the Project

Developing a different system was made for different purpose. This purpose will
examine the effectiveness for the Faculty only who making grades for the students. The
purpose of this study to know how faculties process the grades of the students and what is
the ability of grading system created by the proponent. They only can access the system by
password and username so the system can identify what subject they handle and also the
students who already enrolled to the subject.
Objectives of the Study

General Objective

The aim of this study is to develop a system that can help to the Faculties.

Specific Objectives

 To provide a grading system that let Faculties easily access by every subject handle.
 To provide computerized record keeping of grades for the name of students.
 The system will make grade processing, fast and hassle-free.

Scope and Limitations of the Project

Scope

The content of this study is about grades of the students by midterm and for the final
term. It will be more focusing on how teachers to make a grades by using this system of the
proponent created. The faculties have different formula assigned and also different students
by subject.

Limitation

The system does not cover about accessing the students to their grades. When they
click the finish button no more edition happened except to the INC. But, if blanks it
considered as a drop or INC by the students. Only faculties of the University of Antique-
Libertad Camus are only can access this system.
 Chapter II

Review of Related Literatures and Systems

Review of Related Literatures

According to Harold Wilson (2010) states that “in the aim of universities to supply

the correct grades to their students”, the idea of grading system is introduces. This involves

the computation, submission and retrieving the grades that can effectively support the

student performance and information because of the system, the retrieval of grades can be

easy.

Assaf and Magnini (2017) used the distance stochastic frontier method and a

balanced sample of leading hotel chains in the US to measure the hotel efficiency scores and

examine the effects of customer satisfaction on the hotel rankings. They concluded that there

is a significant difference between the efficiency results derived from the models that

include customer satisfaction and those that exclude customer satisfaction.

Guskey (2011) stated that educators needed a comprehensive standard-based grading

system that shows how students measure with grade level standards. Standards-based

grading was designed to report what students know with each of the grade level standards

and ensure that students are making academic progress with grade level learning objectives.

With the Common Core State Standard shift in 2009, and the need for documenting student

growth and achievement, many school systems in the United States switched from the

traditional A-F report card to standards-based numeric report card. Students with standards-

based grading were provided a report card similar to a checklist showing mastery of skills.
 Brookhart (2011) stated that for successful standards-based, grading reform, schools

must reach a “consensus on the purpose of grades”. Educators often want to give grades

based on work ethic, effort, motivation, and attendance. Grades reflect the achievement of

learning standards and supply feedback to students and parents. Conversations about grading

in school allow educators to focus on the purpose of standards-based grading, and providing

grades that reflect student learning and mastery of skills.

Review of Related Systems

 Chapter III

Technical Background

Hardware

Software

Peopleware
Networkware

START

FACULTIES

PERFORMANCE
 Chapter IV

Methodology

Requirement Analysis

Model (SDLC)

Requirements Modelling (Diagram)

Input

Process

Output

Performance

Control

Team Organizational Structure

Requirements Documentation

Operational Feasibility

Fishbone Diagram

Functional Decomposition Diagram

Technical Feasibility

Compatibility Checking (hardware / software and other technologies) – discussion only

Schedule Feasibility

WBS

Gantt Chart

Economic Feasibility

Cost and Benefit Analysis (table and discussion)

 Cost Recovery Scheme (table and discussion)

Design of Software, Systems, Products or processes

(Either of the following two (2) or combined, whichever are applicable

Data and Process Modelling

Data Design

Entity Relationship Diagram

Data Dictionary

Context Diagram

Data Flow Diagram

Program Flowchart (highlights only)

Object Modelling

Use Case Diagram

Class Diagram

Sequence Diagram

Activity Diagram

Development and Testing (where applicable)

Programming Environment (discussion only)

Front End

Back End

Test Plan

Test Case
 Description of Prototype (where applicable)

Output and User-Interface Design

Forms

Reports

Implementation Plan (Infrastructure/ Deployment) Network

Architecture

Network Model

Deployment Diagram (must observe the network model)

Lay out and module deployments must be shown

Implementation Results (must be implemented only before the final defense)

Evaluation Results (discussion, diagrams, charts, tables)

Acceptance Testing
 Chapter V

Recommendations
 Appendix A

Relevant Source Code

(Follow IT PROJECT DOCUMENT contents for the remaining pages)

 Relevant Source Code

Sample Source code:

Sample Source code, Sample Source code, Sample Source code, Sample Source code…