Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHODOLOGY
The present study used descriptive, quantitative research for research design, it is more
systematic and controlled than qualitative, research methods have a statement of the problem
descriptive research is basically to answer questions such as who, what, where, when, and how
much. So, this design is best used when the main objective of the study is just to observe and
report a certain phenomenon as it is happening. The researcher will observe or report the
effectiveness of eLearning system among high school students of Barangay Concepcion in this
time of pandemic. The descriptive research design will be used in this study to determine the
Fifty officially enrolled high school students of Barangay Concepcion took part for this study.
They were mostly third year and fourth year high school students (14 to 17). These 32 females
and 18 male participants are all experiencing eLearning system this time of pandemic. The
study last for four weeks or twenty (20) class days (January 11,2021 to February 1, 2020)
conducted from the Barangay Concepcion. The researcher used simple random sampling for
the sampling procedure it is a way of choosing individuals in which all members of the
accessible population are given an equal chance to be selected. By the simple random
sampling the researcher selects lottery technique for getting a sample. High School students,
male and female, experiencing eLearning of Barangay Concepcion is the given respondents of
the researcher. 50 respondents are the research target sample size. Using simple random
sampling for the sampling procedure. First, the researcher will obtain how many officially high
school students that are experiencing and know the eLearning system. Second, after the
researcher gathered the total population of all high school students that are experiencing and
know the eLearning system, the researcher will seek a permission to the Barangay Captain of
Barangay Concepcion if he allows his residents to be a sample for the research study. Third,
after the barangay captain approved to the researcher permission to allow his residents to be
part of research study, the researcher will give all the overall population a different code name
for the private purposes. Fourth, the researcher will put it in the lottery box that is the technique
of the researcher that will be using for determining the sample, after every code number has
been put in the lottery box, the researcher will randomly draw 50 samples for the target sample
3.3 Instruments
The researcher used Questionnaires for research instruments, Questionnaire is the type of data
the instrument itself will measure what is suppose measure and it will be concluded to be valid.
Questionnaire is the type of data collection instrument I will use for obtaining data, by the
Content Validity, an instrument that is judged with content validity meets the objectives of the
study. It is done by checking the statements or questions if this elicits the needed information.
Test-retest Reliability. It is achieved by giving the same test to the same group of respondents
twice. The reliability will be established, because the instrument itself give the same result of the
same number of respondents. The consistency of the two scores are checked. 15-item tool
using a two-point Likert scale to indicate respondents’ attitude towards the effectiveness of
eLearning system among high school students of Barangay Concepcion. The instrument
consists of an equal number of positively and negatively worded. statements with response
options of Yes and No. Positive items have a higher percentage of Yes and are reversed for
negative items.
The researcher gathered the data by the following steps and procedure; the researcher seeks a
permission to the Barangay Captain of Barangay Concepcion to allow his residence to be part
of the research study that going to conduct by the researcher her to gathered data for her
research study. The researcher prepared her research instrument for the gathering of data. The
researcher determines the samples size and corresponding respondents. The researcher asks
consent form for those 18 above high school students and parents consent to those minor high
school students to be part of the corresponding respondents for the data gathering. The
researcher provides clear instruction to the respondents. The researcher will administer the
research instrument and research intervention for clarification. The researcher collects the data
that she has gathered for those respondents that already finished to response. The researcher
summarizes the data that she had gathered into tabular form. The researcher encodes the
summarize data that she gathered for the analyzation. The researcher analyzes the
(parametric) the results of the surveys will be analyzing to determine the effectiveness of
eLearning system among the high school students of Barangay Concepcion in this time of
pandemic. Descriptive statistics will be generated on each of the 15 research questions, which
were will be separated under their three main headings. These descriptive statistics included the
mean scores for each question, as well as the frequency distributions for each response. These
means it will analyze using a univariate using regression to estimate the relationships between a
dependent variable and one or more independent variables. The researcher will recognize that
using regression comes with estimate relation. This estimate relation of regression is that the
dependent variable will have estimating the relationships between more independent variables
that the same across the group being studied. The data used within this study attempted to
address this estimate the relationships between a dependent variable and one or more
independent variables through the stabilization of the sample size utilizing the effectiveness of
eLearning system among high school students of Barangay Concepcion in this time of
pandemic. statistical technique that the researcher used is percentage using the formula
𝑃𝐸𝑅𝐶𝐸𝑁𝑇𝐴𝐺𝐸 (%) = (𝑃𝐴𝑅𝑇÷ 𝑊𝐻𝑂𝐿𝐸) 𝑋100) the only a portion from the whole is what the researcher
has to formulate.
Table 1 Data gathered by the researcher regarding the effectiveness of eLearning system among the
system. High school students answered yes from the research question (1) Do you have a
gadget available at home has a total number of 41 out of 50 with a total percentage of 82%,
High school students answered no from the research question (1) Do you have a gadget
available at home has a total number of 9 out of 50 with a total percentage of 18%. From the
question (2) Is eLearning cost effective has a total number of 45 that says yes out of 50 with a
total percentage of 90%, High school students answered no from the research question (2) Is
eLearning cost effective? has a total number of 5 out of 50 with a total percentage of 10%. From
the question (3) Is there any Availability of ready access to eLearning courses? has a total
number of 39 that says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of 78%, High school students
answered no from the research question (3) Is there any Availability of ready access to
eLearning courses? has a total number of 11 out of 50 with a total percentage of 22%.From the
question (4) Would you find it useful has a total number of 47 that says yes out of 50 with a total
percentage of 94%, High school students answered no from the research question (4) Would
you find it useful) has a total number of 3 out of 50 with a total percentage of 6%.From the
question (5) Is eLearning beneficial as it is an interactive mode has a total number of 43 that
says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of 86%, High school students answered no from the
research question (5) Is eLearning beneficial as it is an interactive mode has a total number of 7
out of 50 with a total percentage of 14%.From the question (6) Would you be motivated to use it
has a total number of 46 that says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of 92%, High school
students answered no from the research question (6) Would you be motivated to use it has a
total number of 4 out of 50 with a total percentage of 8%.From the question (7) Have you been
distracted on using eLearning has a total number of 7 that says yes out of 50 with a total
percentage of 14%, High school students answered no from the research question (7) Have you
been distracted on using eLearning has a total number of 43 out of 50 with a total percentage of
86%.From the question (8) Do you believe that improving knowledge through eLearning is
better than traditional learning has a total number of 36 that says yes out of 50 with a total
percentage of 72%, High school students answered no from the research question (8) Do you
believe that improving knowledge through eLearning is better than traditional learning has a
total number of 14 out of 50 with a total percentage of 28%.From the question (9) Do you think
face to face learning is more important for in depth as a practical teaching? has a total number
of 13 that says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of 26%, High school students answered no
from the research question (4 Do you think face to face learning is more important for in depth
as a practical teaching has a total number of 37 out of 50 with a total percentage of 74%.From
the question (10) Are you having a hard time understanding materials on your own has a total
number of 8 that says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of 16 %, High school students
answered no from the research question (4) Are you having a hard time understanding
materials on your own has a total number of 42 out of 50 with a total percentage of 84%.From
the question (11) Have you been disturbed for online class because of electricity problems and
internet connection has a total number of 11 that says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of
22 %, High school students answered no from the research question (11) Have you been
disturbed for online class because of electricity problems and internet connection has a total
number of 39 out of 50 with a total percentage of 78%.From the question (12) Have you
understood the full course (content) provided by your teachers in your online class has a total
number of 47 that says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of 94%, High school students
answered no from the research question (12) Have you understood the full course (content)
provided by your teachers in your online class has a total number of 3 out of 50 with a total
percentage of 6%. From the question (13) If you could get a chance to select the method of
education, then would you still prefer to study through eLearning has a total number of 43 that
says yes out of 50 with a total percentage of 86 %, High school students answered no from the
research question (13) If you could get a chance to select the method of education, then would
you still prefer to study through eLearning has a total number of 7 out of 50 with a total
percentage of 14%. From the question (14) Can you Adapt the difficulties on implementing
newer eLearning modules and tools has a total number of 44 that says yes out of 50 with a total
percentage of 88 %, High school students answered no from the research question (14) Did you
Adapt to the difficulties of implementing newer eLearning modules and tools has a total number of 6
out of 50 with a total percentage of 12%. From the question (15) Do you able to solve your
typical problems through eLearning has a total number of 40 that says yes out of 50 with a total
percentage of 80 %, High school students answered no from the research question (15) Do you
able to solve your typical problems through eLearning has a total number of 10 out of 50 with a
validated and item analyzed adopted 15 item English academic performance questionnaire
developed by David Lagabaster et.al 2010, taken from English achievement and student
motivation, which will be administered before and after instruction. statistical tool that will be
utilized for the analyses of the descriptive data, t-test, and regression will be used as the
inferential statistical tools to determine the relationship and significant differences among the
variables in the study. All inferential tests will be set at 50% up will considered as effective and
NO
32%
YES
68%
YES -
NO -
Figure 1 showed the result of the survey conducted to officially enrolled high school students of
Concepcion in this time of pandemic. From the graph, 68% have said yes that eLearning system
is effective among high school od Barangay Concepcion. And 32% have said no that eLearning
system is not effective among high school od Barangay Concepcion. From the data 68% are
likely said that there is an effectiveness regarding eLearning system among high school
Concepcion.
HA1: The content structure of e-learning is effective among students of Barangay Concepcion.
4. Theoretical framework
In the study, the data were collected from the officially enrolled high school students of Barangay
Concepcion. Questionnaire was sent to 50 students, received from 50 and the response rate is totally
100%. A structured questionnaire is used as the data collection instrument. Most of the statements of
the questionnaire has taken from the other previous conducted research on the effectiveness of
eLearning. The questionnaire contains 2- point Likert scale. Eight variables are used to measure the
effectiveness of e-learning including contents structure, usability, faster learning, quick responsiveness,
learning quality, time and cost friendly, usability outside of the class and appropriate for working
independently. Cronbach's Alpha test is used to test the reliability of the data. Frequency distribution
and the percentage have been shown to analyze the survey questionnaire. Factor analysis has been
performed to measure the factors loading. To prove the hypotheses developed in the study, one sample
t-test has been performed. SPSS 20.0 has been used to analyze all the data.
. A given e-Learning solution must, therefore, entail these factors to be effective when compared
to face-to-face teaching. In a meta-analysis in higher education, Bernard et al. (2004) found that
overall, there was no significant difference in achievement, attitude, and retention outcomes
between distance education, which included online education, and the traditional face-to-face
education. However, there was significant heterogeneity in student learning outcomes for
asynchronous activities, activities that have to be done at the same time or at each person’s
convenience respectively, showed that the mean achievement effect sizes for synchronous
work were better for the traditional format, but asynchronous work favored distance education.
In other words, there are better learning outcomes in the traditional format for activities that
have to be done simultaneously and better outcomes in the mediated distance format for
activities that can be done at various times. Moreover, researchers also found, using weighted
multiple regression, that the methodology of the studies accounts for most of the variations in
learning outcomes followed by pedagogy and media (Bernard et al., 2004). Otherwise stated,
the medium of distance education, whether it is mail correspondence or the TV or the Internet,
explains the least of the variation in learning outcomes, which supports Clark’s (1994) claim and
is later confirmed by Means et al. (2010). Other studies have also arrived at similar conclusions.
For instance, a recent systematic review comparing the learning of clinical skills in
undergraduate nurse education between the online format and the traditional found that there
was no significant difference between the two formats (McCutcheon, Lohan, Traynor, & Martin,
2015).
In 2005, a year after Bernard et al. published their study, another group published an analysis
on the effectiveness of distance education. Zhao et al. (2005) analyzed prior literature, which
included the Russell’s 1999 study among other meta-analyses, and found that the overall mean
effect size was close to zero, but there was a modest size standard deviation. They then used a
rigorous methodology to trim studies with weak methodology or ones that did not provide
adequate information and arrived at some rather interesting findings. Zhao et al. found the
presence of the Hawthorne effect where there was a tendency to find favorable findings for
distance or online education if the researcher was also the instructor of the course. They also
found that the “right” mixture of human and technology, i.e., hybrid or blended learning, was
particularly effective. Implications of this study are that courses that can combine the strengths
of eLearning system and traditional learning system are more effective than courses that use
mainly one format and it is possible that as digital and online technologies improve and mature,
5.1. Findings
The study found that e-learning is faster, time and cost friendly, appropriate to work
independently, add value to the learning of the students, usable for the purpose of active
learning, faster, quick response, applicable outside the class room and quality of e-learning is
defined based on how well the e-Learning performed, compared to traditional face-to-face
teaching with the same content. Thus, the same definitions of effectiveness are used for both e-
Learning and face-to-face teaching, and e-Learning must outperform face-to face teaching in
order to be considered effective. With this in mind, it becomes important to take another critical
look at the key factors. This means that some of the factors like interaction and practice may
have surfaced as critical during the review, because these factors illustrate the strong sides of
face-to-face teaching.
The researcher used Cronbach’s alpha test to evaluate the reliability of the factors and to
understand how far they are internally consistent. The outcome of the test can be seen from
table 2 and it shows that the coefficients ranged from 0.667 to 0.519, indicating that factors are
considered to be internally consistent. The values of all the factors are higher than 0.50 except
for the factor-06 (Time and Cost friendly) which indicates there is a strong association and
An exploratory factor analysis has been performed to identify the underlying relationships
among the variables which have been used to measure the effectiveness of e-learning in
The researchers developed eight hypotheses to measure the effectiveness of e-learning among
the students. The result shows that the degree of freedom is 653. The outcome of the test of
Usability of the outside of the class (UOC) 25.87 653 3.73 0.000
The above table shows that for one sample t-test at 5% significant level and at 95% confidence
level the p-value [Sig. (2-tailed)] for content structure (CS) is .000 (p< .05) which supports the
hypothesis HA1 and approves the content structure of e-learning is worthy to add value to the
learning of the students. The p value for usability (U) is smaller than .05 which approves that e-
learning is usable for the purpose of active learning. Hypothesis HA3 has also been proved
because the p value for faster learning (FT) is below than .05 which supports that the e-learning
is effective for faster learning. For the variable quick responsiveness (QR) p value is less
than .05 which supports the hypothesis HA4 (e-learning is effective to get quick response). The
outcome of t-taste for learning quality (LQ) is p< .05 and the HA5 has been proved which
supports that the quality of e-learning is good. The p values for the variable time and cost
friendly (TCF) is smaller than .05 which proved H6A and supports that e-learning is time and
cost friendly. The p value for the outside of the class (UOC) is p< .05 which approved the
hypothesis HA7 that e-learning is applicable outside the class room. Hypothesis HA8 has been
proved by the outcome of p value which is lower than .05 and it supports that e-learning is
appropriate to work independently (AWI). So, the hypotheses are statistically proved by not
accepting the null hypothesis because the p values of the variables are far below from .05. The
study shows that the mean of all the factors almost near to 4 which indicates most of the
they are aware of it. In overwhelming rate students are using different kinds of e-learning, tools,
techniques and platform for the purposes of learning. There are eight hypotheses developed in
the study and all of them are significantly accepted that indicates that e-learning is highly
effective for the students. The outcome of the study discloses that the content structure of e-
learning is worthy to add value to the learning of the students, it is usable, time and cost friendly,
faster and applicable in the learning process. Except the variable learning quality, all the items
in each factor are highly loaded which indicates that eLearning is effective.
6. Recommendations
Based on the analyses in the previous chapters, the following recommendations are proposed:
Do not measure effectiveness simply for the sake of measuring. Know what
measurements because it can be positive and negative or both positive and negative.
7. Conclusions
In light of the findings, the following conclusion is drawn, It is asserted that gauging the impact
learning systems. This paper reports on the impacts that the e-learning systems have had on
student participants’ performance with regard to the depth of learning, customization of learning
pace, student productivity, and student satisfaction. The conclusion of the study is that the use
Despite of the positive result of the study the researcher it nevertheless, has a several
limitations. first, the limited respondents conducting the research study. Second, the limited
applicable approach of researcher for data gathering because of pandemic that makes it harder
for the researcher to approach the respondents for the data gathering. Third, the type of
research design of the study because it can be experimental and descriptive design quantitative
research.
References
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L. Huang, B.
(2004). How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and
McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating
the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010, September). Evaluation of
http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical
analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. The Teachers College Record,
107(8), 1836–1884.
Questions Yes No