Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Design 1:
Note: According to Soil profile we will use weaker soil layer under
Foundation so we will use
the following values of soil properties
Cohesion (Cu) = 700 lb/ft2
4-4
2
Ref: Bowles, J. E., (1996). “Foundation Analysis and Design, (5th Edition)”, McGrawHill, New York. (Page: 222&
223)
For Shape, Depth and Inclination Factors
2
( ϕ
)
Kp= tan 45+ 2 .......................eq.2
2
(10
Kp= tan 45+ 2 )
=1.42
πtanϕ ϕ
Nq=e tan2 (45+ )=2.47=2.5
2
Nc= (Nq -1)cot ϕ =8.34=8.34
N𝛾= (Nq -1) tan(1.4 ϕ ) =0.37=0.4
3
Putting above values of factors in eq. 1.
𝑞𝑢𝑙𝑡 = c𝑁𝑐s𝑐 dc + q Nq sq dq + 0.5𝛾 B' N𝛾 s𝛾 d𝛾 q= 𝛾D
q ult 10676.94
𝑞𝑎= F .O . S = 3
𝑞𝑎 = 3558.98 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
Qall = qall x Af = 3558.98 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2 x 25𝑓𝑡2
= 88 974.5 lb
Ref: Bowles, J. E., (1996). “Foundation Analysis and Design, (5th Edition)”, McGrawHill, New
York. (Page: 303)
2
1−μ
ΔH =q 0 B' m I s I f ……….eq. A
Es
1−2 μ
I s=I 1 + I ……………….eq.B
1−μ 2
4
For I 1 and I 2 we use Table 5-2 of Bowles
'
L
Where M= ' =1
B
H 5B
N= ' = =10 as H=5B according to Bowles 308 page
B B'
and B' =B/2
I 1=0.498
I 1=0.016
So
1−2∗0.3
I s=0.498+ 0.016
1−0.3
=0.507
5
I f = Use Figure 5-7 Graph as D/B=1
so I f =0.65
For E S
1= E5−10 = 807000𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
2= E10−22=210000 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
3= E22−25=624000 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
H 1 E1 + H 2 E2 + H 3 3
E s ,av =
H
5∗807000+ 12∗210000+3∗624000
E s ,av =
20
=421350 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
=421.35 Ksf
6
1478.4∗2.5∗1−0.32
Settlement= ΔH = ∗4∗0.507∗0.65
421350
ΔH = 0.01052 inch
3189.9∗2.5∗1−0.32
Settlement= ΔH = ∗4∗0.507∗0.65
421350
ΔH = 0.0227 inch
7
Design 2
8
Calculations (for Square Foundations with B = 6 ft , L = 6 ft )
According to Soil profile we will use weaker soil layer under Foundation so we will use
the following values of soil properties
Cohesion (Cu) = 700 lb/ft2
Ref: Bowles, J. E., (1996). “Foundation Analysis and Design, (5th Edition)”, McGrawHill, New York. (Page: 222&
223)
For Shape, Depth and Inclination Factors
2
( ϕ
)
Kp= tan 45+ 2 .......................eq.2
2
(
Kp= tan 45+
10
2 )
=1.42
9
S𝑐=1+0.2Kp * B/L …………….eq.3
S𝑐=1+0.2*1.42 * 6/6
=1.28
πtanϕ ϕ
Nq=e tan 2 (45+ ) =2.47=2.5
2
Nc= (Nq -1)cot ϕ =8.34=8.34
N𝛾= (Nq -1) tan (1.4 ϕ ) =0.37=0.4
q ult 103643.50
𝑞𝑎= F .O . S = 3
𝑞𝑎 = 3454.50 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
Qall = qall x Af = 3454.50 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2 x 36𝑓𝑡2
= 124362.00 lb
10
Calculations for Settlement (for Square / Isolated Foundations with B = 6.0ft)
Using Timoshenko and Goodier (1951) Method for evaluation of distortion settlement, expressed as;
Ref: Bowles, J. E., (1996). “Foundation Analysis and Design, (5th Edition)”, McGrawHill, New York. (Page: 303)
2
' 1−μ
ΔH =q 0 B m I s I f ……….eq. A
Es
1−2 μ
I s=I 1 + I ……………….eq.B
1−μ 2
L'
Where M= ' =1
B
H 5B
N= ' = =10 as H=5B according to Bowles 308 page and B' =B/2
B B'
I 1=0.498
I 1=0.016
So
1−2∗0.3
I s=0.498+ 0.016
1−0.3
=0.507
11
I f = Use Figure 5-7 Graph as D/B=0.833
so I f =0.67
q 0=¿ 3454.50𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
For E S
1= E5−10 = 807000𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
2= E10−22=210000 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
3= E22−30=624000 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
H 1 E1 + H 2 E2 + H 3 3
E s ,av =
H
5∗807000+ 12∗210000+8∗624000
E s ,av =
25
=461880 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
=461.88 Ksf
36 960 lb
6 ft x 6 ft
= 1 026.7 lb/ft2
12
1026.7∗3∗1−0.32
Settlement= ΔH = ∗4∗0.507∗0.67
461880
ΔH = 0.00825 inch
79747.16 lb
= 2 215.2 lb/ft2
6 ft x 6 ft
2
2215.2∗3∗1−0.3
Settlement= ΔH = ∗4∗0.507∗0.67
461880
ΔH = 0.01779 inch
13
Design 3
14
Calculations (for Square Foundations with B = 7 ft , L = 7 ft )
According to Soil profile we will use weaker soil layer under Foundation so we will use
the following values of soil properties
Cohesion (Cu) = 700 lb/ft2
Ref: Bowles, J. E., (1996). “Foundation Analysis and Design, (5th Edition)”, McGrawHill, New York. (Page: 222&
223)
For Shape, Depth and Inclination Factors
2
( ϕ
)
Kp= tan 45+ .......................eq.2
2
2
(
Kp= tan 45+
10
2 )
=1.42
15
S𝑐=1+0.2Kp * B/L …………….eq.3
S𝑐=1+0.2*1.42 * 7/7
=1.28
πtanϕ ϕ
Nq=e tan 2 (45+ ) =2.47=2.5
2
Nc= (Nq -1)cot ϕ =8.34=8.34
N𝛾= (Nq -1) tan (1.4 ϕ ) =0.37=0.4
q ult 10126.62
𝑞𝑎= F .O . S = 3
𝑞𝑎 = 3375.54 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
Qall = qall x Af = 3375.54 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2 x 49𝑓𝑡2
= 165401.46.02 lb
16
Calculations for Settlement (for Square / Isolated Foundations with B = 7.0ft)
Using Timoshenko and Goodier (1951) Method for evaluation of distortion settlement, expressed as;
Ref: Bowles, J. E., (1996). “Foundation Analysis and Design, (5th Edition)”, McGrawHill, New York. (Page: 303)
2
' 1−μ
ΔH =q 0 B m I s I f ……….eq. A
Es
1−2 μ
I s=I 1 + I ……………….eq.B
1−μ 2
L'
Where M= ' =1
B
H 5B
N= ' = =10 as H=5B according to Bowles 308 page and B' =B/2
B B'
I 1=0.498
I 1=0.016
So
1−2∗0.3
I s=0.498+ 0.016
1−0.3
z =
17
18
I f = Use Figure 5-7 Graph as D/B=0.71
so I f =0.71
q 0=¿ 3375.54𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
For E S
1= E5−10 = 807000𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
2= E10−22=210000 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
3= E22−35=624000 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
H 1 E1 + H 2 E2 + H 3 3
E s ,av =
H
5∗807000+ 12∗210000+13∗624000
E s ,av =
30
=488900 𝑙𝑏/𝑓𝑡2
=488.90 Ksf
754.3∗3.5∗1−0.3 2
Settlement= ΔH = ∗4∗0.507∗0.71
488900
ΔH =0.00708 inch
1627.5∗3.5∗1−0.3 2
Settlement= ΔH = ∗4∗0.507∗0.71
488900
ΔH = 0.01527 inch
COMPARISON ANALYSIS
BEARING CAPACITY
Bearing Capacity is the capacity of soil to support the loads applied to the ground. The bearing
capacity of soil is the maximum average contact pressure between the foundation and the soil
which should not produce shear failure in the soil.
Ultimate bearing capacity is the theoretical maximum pressure which can be supported without
failure; allowable bearing capacity is the ultimate bearing capacity divided by a factor of safety.
1 & 2 Story-Component
Footing Ultimate Allowable Comparison Analysis
Size Bearing Capacity Bearing Capacity
ft x ft lb/ft2 lb/ft2 Maximum Actual/Ultimate bearing capacity is always
greater than maximum allowable bearing capacity.
With the increase in the size of the foundation, we
5x5 10676.95 3558.98 can see from the that the allowable bearing capacity
starts to decrease.
Further below we compare the expected settlement
6x6 10363.5 3454.5
and actual settlement for the 3 design footings.