Mark Ordinario

BSME 2A

ASSESSMENT TASK 5-1 A. Instruction: True or False. Write true if the

statement is True and write False if the statement is false in the space
provided.

1. TRUE Historical interpretation is based on the historian’s judgement on how the

past

should be seen.

2. TRUE We make sense of the past through historical interpretation.

3. TRUE There is only one account of the First Catholic Mass in the Philippines.

4. TRUE The significance of the martyrdom of GOMBURZA was questioned by

Historians.

5. TRUE The Cavity Mutiny is an event that led to the execution of GOMBURZA.

6. TRUE Ceylon is the pre-colonial name of Leyte.

7. TRUE The First Mass in the Philippines happened in Leyte.

8. TRUE The Cavite Mutiny Happened on 1872.

9. FALSE Montero and Izquerdo share different account of the Cavite Mutiny.

10. FALSE The Cavite Mutiny contributed in the development of Filipino

Nationalism.

ASSESSMENT TASK 5-2 B. Identification: Identify the answers to the

following statements.

1. 31st of March 1521 Exact date of the First Mass of the Philippines in

Limasawa.

2. 8 April 1521 Exact date of the First Mass of the Philippines in Butuan.

3. Francisco Albo Pilot of Magellan’s ship Trinidad.

4. Victoria Magellan’s ship that returned to Spain.

5. Antonio Pigafetta Magellan’s Chronicler.

6. Sgt. La Madrid Leader of the Cavity Mutiny.

7. February 17, 1872 Month and year of GOMBURZA’S execution

8. January 20, 1872 Month and year of Cavity Mutiny.

9. Governor-General Izquierdo The Governor General during the Cavity Mutiny.

10. Jose Montero y Vidal Spanish historian who interprets the Cavity Mutiny.

10. Jose Montero y Vidal Spanish historian who interprets the Cavity Mutiny.

ASSESSMENT TASK 5-3 C. Instruction: In your interpretation, why or how did

Governor Izquierdo and Pardo de Tavera had different accounts on the Cavite
Mutiny. Write your discussion in the space provided below.
Because of their ancestry and connections to the individuals being sought for, in

my opinion, they provided varying narratives of the Cavite Mutiny. Izquierdo, the

governor, was pro-Spanish because he was a Spanishman. He asserted that those

involved in the mutiny were attempting to topple the Spanish administration in

Cavite for this reason. Izquierdo Governor found it offensive. Pardo de Tavera, on

the other hand, was a Filipino historian. Unlike Governor Izquierdo, he didn't only

look at it from one perspective; instead, he determined the causes of the rebellion.

Because of this, Pardo de Tavera asserted that they were only on strike to protest

the high taxes being imposed on them and not to start a revolution.