Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T. I. Munmulla
University of Moratuwa, Bandaranayake Mawatha, Katubedda.
thisarimunmulla@gmail.com.
Prof. I. R. A. Weerasekera
University of Moratuwa, Bandaranayake Mawatha, Katubedda.
Abstract: The effect of cement modified with graphene oxide (GO) with its optimum dosage show
significant increase in mechanical, thermal and durability properties. However, the use of GO modified
cements is not promoted due to some inconsistent or contradictory results in the literature. It has found that
the carbon content in GO can influence the characteristics and properties of the GO and the corresponding
GO modified cement. The purity of graphite used for GO synthesis and modification will affect the carbon
content in GO. This paper has compared the effect of GO with different carbon content. The
study concludes that GO with high carbon content can improve the overall performance of
GO modified cement. Thus, it indicates that GO synthesized from a high-purity epigenetic
graphite deposit (lump/vein graphite) will show higher performance than the GO
synthesized from other graphite deposits.
Keywords: Graphene Oxide (GO); High purity graphite; GO modified cement; Lump/Vein
graphite
CE 4902 – 2020 1
160416L
Figure 1:Schematic reaction scheme between carboxylic acid groups and hydration productions [Ca(OH)2
and C–S–H] of cement. (Pan, et al., 2012)
and highly dispersible in water and it will enlarge
the interval between the layers. Alkalinity in the
2. Inconsistency of the Change in Properties of
mix can deoxygenate GO increasing the
GO modified cements
aggregation. (Li, et al., 2017)
Optimum dosage of GO is the key to improve the
It can be concluded that GO with higher number of
mechanical and durability properties of the
functional groups with lesser carbon content will
modified cements in required percentages. But the
have higher rate of dispersion.
optimum GO dosage and percentile increase in
properties varies from one literature to the another. 2.2 Workability of GO modified cements
Use of 0.04 and 1.00 wt% of GO in cement was A high flowability and moderate viscosity is
reported to increased compressive strength by 25% necessary to ensure the homogenous distribution of
and 47%, and flexural strength by 20% and 44%, engineering properties of concrete.
respectively, compared to plain cement paste at 28
Main drawback in GO modification in cement is
days. (Chen, Zhou, Wang, & Guo, 2018) Another
loss of workability. Workability decreases with the
study states that the compressive strength was
GO content. Study shows that addition of 0.05 wt%
increased by over 15.1% with 0.04 wt% GO at the
of GO will reduce workability by 42% when
same curing age. (Shang Y. , Zhang, Yang, Liu, &
compared with the plain cement. (Melbourne
Liu, 2015) Another with the 0.03 wt% of GO
Patent No. PCT/AU2012/001582, 2012)
discovers that the compressive was improved by
38.9% and flexural strength by 60.7%. (Lv, Ma, Low workability is generally associated with poor
Qiu, & Zhou, 2013) compaction capacity which may lead to non-
homogeneity due to entrapped large air voids that
According to the inconsistency in these results it
are retained in the composite. But, test results have
can be concluded that the properties of GO used
shown that there were no significant differences in
may affect the properties of the modified cements.
the entrapment of air voids between modified and
Therefore, study about the chemical composition of
normal cements. (Pan, et al., 2012)
GO and the resultant effect to the modified cement
is necessary. The hydrophilic functional groups and large surface
area of GO requires extra water to wet their
In this study the effect of carbon content in GO for
surfaces which reduces free water for lubrication.
the properties of cement paste is studied.
Better dispersed GO also will reduce workability
2.1 Dispersion of GO in Cement Matrix due to increased specific surface area. (Zheng,
Han, Cui, Yu, & Ou, 2017)
Aggregation of GO will result in the formation of
weak zones and it will obstruct the full utilization Therefore, it can be concluded that GO with higher
of GO. Therefore, it is recommended to use the carbon content with lesser functional groups and
suspension of GO rather than GO powder. specific surface area will not affect the workability
parameter of modified cements significantly.
Functional groups present in the GO sheets and
alkalinity of the cement paste will affect the GO 2.3 Mechanical properties
dispersion. Functional groups make GO hydrophilic
CE 4902 – 2020 2
160416L
CE 4902 – 2020 3
160416L
3. Effect of graphene oxide produced from graphite deposit using Modified Hummers method
epigenetic graphite deposit (Vein/ lump is 65.35 wt% and oxygen content is 34.05 wt%
graphite) which is higher than the percentages obtained by
using other graphite deposits. According to the
It can be observed that increase in carbon content
experimental results the rate of hydration
into its optimum level can enhance the properties of
accelerated. GO dosage of 0.02 wt% increased
GO modified cements.
flexural strength by 83% and 0.04 wt% of GO
The quality, Carbon content of GO depend on the increased compressive strength by 26% compared
properties of parent graphite and the oxidation to the control mix without GO. 0.02 and 0.04 wt%
method used. (Botas, et al., 2012) GO increased the electrical resistivity by 11.5% and
In this section important qualities and suitable decrease the sorptivity by 29% which will improve
parent graphite to obtain good quality GO is the mechanical and durability properties of the
discussed. modified cement. (Qureshi, Panesar, Sidhureddy,
Chen, & Wood, 2019)
Naturally occurring graphite are found in three
different forms due to three different processes. 4. Conclusion
CE 4902 – 2020 4
160416L
Babak, F., Abolfaz, H., Alimorad, R., & Parviz, G. (2014). Preparation and mechanical properties of graphene
oxide: cement nanocomposites. The Scientific World Journal.
Birgisson, B., Geary, G., Mukhopadhyay, A. K., Khan, M., & Sobolev, K. (2012). Nano Technology in Concrete
Materials. Washington DC.
Botas, C., Alvarez, P., Blanco, C., Samantamaria, R., Granda, M., Ares, P., . . . Menendez, R. (2012). The effect
of the parent graphite on the structure of graphene oxide. Universidad de Alicante, Dept. Quimica
Inorganica, Alicante, Spain.
Chen, Z. S., Zhou, X., Wang, X., & Guo, P. (2018). Mechanical behavior o fmultilayer GO carbon fiber cement
composites. Construction and Building Material.
de Brito, J., & Silvestre, N. (2015). Review on Concrete Nanotechnology. European Journal of
Environmental and Civil Engineering .
Jamal, T. B., Tasnim, J., Pial, Z. B., & Rumman, R. (2016). A review paper on graphene modified cement.
Bangladesh Civil Engineering SUMMIT. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jamal, T. B., Tasnim, J., Pial, Z. B., & Rumman, R. (2016). A Review Paper on Graphene Modified Cement.
Li, X., Lu, Z., Chuah, S., Li, W., Liu, Y., Duan, W. H., & Li, Z. (2017). Effects of graphene oxide aggregates on
hydration degree, sorptivity, and tensile splitting strength of cement paste. Applied Science and
Manufacturing, 1-8.
Li, Z., Guo, X., Song, L., Song, Y., Dai, G., & Liu, J. (2019). An intensive review on the role of graphene oxide
in cement-based materials. Construction and Building Material.
Lv, S. H., Liu, J. J., Sun, T., Ma, Y. J., & Zhou, Q. F. (2014). Effect of GO nanosheets on shapes of cement
hydration crystals and their formation process . Construction and Building Materials.
Lv, S. H., Ma, Y. J., Qiu, C. C., & Zhou, Q. F. (2013). Effect of graphene oxide nanosheets of
microstructurenand mechanical properties of cement composites. Construction and Buildng
Material.
Lv, S., Ma, Y., Chaochao, Q., & Zhou, Q. (2013). Regulation of GO on cement hydration crystals and its
toughening effect. Magazine of Concrete Research.
Mohammed, A., Sanjayan, J. G., Duan, W. H., & Nazari, A. (2015). Incorporating graphene oxide in cement
composites: A study of transport properties. Construction nad Building Materials.
Pan, Z., He, L., Qui, L., Korayem, A. H., Li, G., Zhu, J. W., . . . Wang, M. C. (2012). Mechanical properties and
microstructure of a graphene oxide–cement. Cement & Concrete Composites.
Pan, Z., Li, D., Collins, F., & Duan, W. (2012). Melbourne Patent No. PCT/AU2012/001582.
Qureshi, T. S., Panesar, D. K., Sidhureddy, B., Chen, A., & Wood, P. C. (2019). Nano-cement composite with
graphene oxide produced from epigenetic graphite deposit. Composites Part B.
Saafi, M., Tang, L., Fung, J., Rahman, M., & Liggat, J. (2015). Enhanced properties of graphene/fly ash
geopolymeric composite cement. Cement and Concrete Research.
Shah, S. P., Hou, P., & Konsta, M. (2015). Nano-modification of cementitious material: Toward a stronger
and durable concrete. Sustainable Cement-Based Materials .
Shang, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, C., Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2015). Effect of graphene oxide on the rheological properties
of cement pastes. Construction and Building material.
Sun, S. (2017). Multifunctionality and smartness of multi-layer graphene filled cementitious composites. PhD
Thesis.
Tong, T., Fan, Z., Liu, Q., Wang, S., Tan, S., & Yu, Q. (2016). Investigation of the effects of graphene and
graphene oxide nanoplatelets on the micro- and macro-properties of cementitious materials.
Construction and Building Materials.
CE 4902 – 2020 5
160416L
Yu, S., Wang, X., Fan, Q., Chen, Z., Ai, Y., Sun, Y., . . . Wang, X. (2016). High Sorption of U(VI) on Graphene
Oxides Studied by Batch Experimental and Theoretical Calculations. Chemical Engineering Journal,
448-455.
Zheng, Q. F., Han, B. G., Cui, X., Yu, X., & Ou, J. P. (2017). Graphene engineered cementitious composites:
Small makes big impact. Nanomaterials and nanotechnology.
Zheng, Q., Han, B., Cui, X., Yu, X., & Ou, J. (2017). Graphene-engineered cementitious composites: Small
makes big impact. Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology.
Zhu, Y., Murali, S., Cai, W., Li, X., Suk, J., Potts, J., & Ruoff, R. (2010). Graphene and graphene oxide:
Synthesis, properties, and applications. Advanced Materials, 3906-3924.
CE 4902 – 2020 6