Reducción de un 70% de DPMO por dimensión

central incorrecta de la pieza C01 que forma

parte del carro de planta FORD

Fecha de inicio de proyecto:

Fecha planeada para realizar el proyecto:

INSTITUTO TECNOLOGICO DE CANDIDATOS A GREEN BELT:

HERMOSILLO 1 LÓPEZ IBARRA MARITZA ALEXANDRA
2 SERRANO GUERRERO ENRIQUE ARTURO
INTRODUCCIÓN A SIX SIGMA
2
DEFINIR

DMAIC
3
 INTRODUCTION

PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA

6 pieces are manufactured for each car that our client produces. To meet the
requirements of our client FORD, to produce a total of 10 cars, our demand as
their supplier is 60 pieces.

The main problems we have when manufacturing our parts are

● A poorly executed cut that causes variation in the dimensions of pieces.
● As the parts are the main assembly, there is a high probability that in the
event of any error on the part of the other stations, the 6 main parts will
have to be produced again.

4
JUSTIFICACIÓN

This project aims to improve our processes through Six Sigma standards and
reduce the DPMOs of our products to satisfy the voice of the customer. Since we
want the satisfaction of our FORD client, it is important to improve and
standardize our production processes, adhering to their requirements, offering
them products with the desired quality and within the estimated time.

5
ALCANCE DEL PROBLEMA

The project will be limited to addressing the cutting problems

of the pieces that will be assembled to make the main base of
the FORD plant car.

6
CLIENTE CTSs

VOZ DEL CLIENTE DEFINICIÓN DE CTSs

On-time delivery of parts Comply with the delivery of 2 kits (12 pieces) twice a week

That the pieces are Inspect parts with a go, no go system

symmetrical ● Base : 20cm by 10cm
● Side: 20 cm by 5 cm
● Tire Cut: Radius 3.5
● Front and Back: 7 cm by 5 cm
● Chest: 7 cm by 12 cm
●

7
CLIENTE CTSs

VOZ DEL CLIENTE DEFINICIÓN DE CTSs

That the base ensemble That the radius of the tires are 3.5
correctly with the sides

8
MAPA DEL PROCESO

9
MODAPTS

10
MODAPTS

11
MODAPTS

12
MODAPTS

13
MODAPTS

14
 DIAGRAMA CAUSA-EFECTO

Workforce Materiales
Different
not trained cardboard
hardness
wrong dimensions

Base Width
Variation

different
calibration Poor sharpness
in cutting tools Badly obtained dimensions,
smaller measurements

Tools Measurements

15
 DIAGRAMA CAUSA-EFECTO

Workforce Material

Different
not trained cardboard
hardness
wrong dimensions

POORLY CUT SIDE

Poor sharpness
in cutting tools Change in Radius
Placement Measurements
Not Reported
Tools Measurements

16
MATRIZ CAUSA-EFECTO

17
 METRICOS KPOV (Ys)

Y1= The pieces have the dimensions requested by the

customer

Y2= On-time delivery of car assembly parts

Y3= Finish of the pieces

18
 ROLES Y RESPONSABILIDADES

Owners: Arturo Felix

The sponsor or champion: Antonio Guzman

Green Belt candidates: Maritza lopez, Enrique

Serrano

19
 SIPOC

Proveedor Material Proceso Salida Cliente

Candy Store ● Measuring ● Measure ● 2 rectangular ● Rims

arenas instruments (graduate sides with rim
(graduated d ruler) holes
rulers) ● Cut (Exact) ● Base
● Tools (Cutter, ● Glued (hot
exact, silicone)
silicone)
● carton boxes

20
LAYOUT

21
 PLANOS DE MEDICIONES Y TOLERANCIAS

The specifications of our Interior client, FORD, are the following:

22
23
24
MATERIALES
MATERIAL IMAGEN DESCRIPCIÓN

Cardboard for parts 25 x 20 x 15 cm

cardboard boxes

Hot glue sticks hot glue sticks

25
COSTOS

MATERIAL COSTO POR PIEZAS PRECIO UNITARIO

UNIDAD DE OBTENIDAS
MATERIAL CON UNIDAD
DE MATERIAL

Cardboard 25 boxes: $34 Basis: 450 Basis:$13.25

for parts Sides: 450 Sides: $13.25
Front: 450 Front: $13.25
Rear: 450 Rear:: 13.25

Silicon 300 bars: $4136 25 $13.78

26
MEASURE

DMAIC
27
BRAINSTORM KPIVs

KPVIs (Xs) PROCESS KPVOs (Ys)

X1 Type of cardboard Thickness of cardboard

Precision of the
measures taken from the
X2 base and diameter of tire Creating side pieces
Right length
part

Right length that fits the

X3 Cutting process
base

28
DEVELOP DATA COLLECTION PLAN

29
MSA (Measurement System Analysis)

30
MSA (Measurement System Analysis)

31
PERFORM FMEA

32
COLLECT DATA

33
ESTABLISH BASELINE DMPO/ SIGMA LEVELSigma a largo plazo = 0.93
Sigma a corto plazo= 0.93+1.5= 2.43

34
ID PROJECT OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the project will be to increase the six sigma
level to at least 4.5 to enter into the margin of very little variation.
This will help standardize the process and easily respond to customer
requests. While level 6 is ideal, level 4.5 will serve as a good starting
point for further improvements in the near future.

35
PROJECT CHAMPION APPROVAL

36