You are on page 1of 4

DIAGNOSIS - Provides basis for selection of

- Formulating client’s problem intervention to achieve outcomes for


statement w/c the nurse is accountable
- Process of data analysis - The statement of actual or potential
- Problem identification health status of a client:
- Form of decision making that the -- is derived from nursing assessment w/c
nurse uses to arrive a judgment and requires intervention from domains of
conclusion about client response nursing
- And art of identifying disease from -- Nurse can legally identify or pro which
it’s signs and symptoms they can prescribe primary intervention for
- A statement or conclusion the treatment or intervention of disease
concerning the nature of some
phenomenon DIFFERENCE B/WN ND & MEDICAL
- Also refer as the analysis of the DIAGNOSIS
cause or nature of the condition, = based on an assessment of the client and
situation or a problem both are accompanied by expected clinical
- Depends on the assessment phase outcomes and interventions
w/c may affect planning, ND : -- address human responses to a
implementation and evaluation health state, problem, or condition
-- reflect nursing’s holistic philosophy
TERMS USED : MD : -- are used by physicians to identify or
Diagnosing - refers to the reasoning determine a specific disease, condition, or
process pathologic state
Diagnosis - is a statement or conclusion -- label disease states
regarding the nature of a phenomenon
Diagnostic labels - the standardized NANDA TYPES OF NURSING DIAGNOSIS
names for the diagnoses 1.Actual Diagnosis
NANDA - North American Nursing 2.Risk D
Diagnosis Association 3.Possible D
Nursing Diagnosis - the client’s problem 4.Wellness D
statement, consisting of the diagnostic label 5.Syndrome D
+ etiology
1. ACTUAL DIAGNOSIS - is a client
NURSING DIAGNOSIS problem that is present at the time of
- Is the client’s problem statement, the nursing assessment
consisting of the diagnostic label + - Present associated w/ S&S
etiology (causal relationship b/wn a - Problem identified by the nurse that
prob and its related / risk factors is already in existence
- Clinical judgment about the - EX. Ineffective breathing pattern
individual, family or community’s
response to actual or potential 2. RISK DIAGNOSIS - is a clinical
health condition needs processes judgment that a problem does not
exist, but the presence of RISK
FACTORS indicates that a problem associated w/ this syndrome include
is likely to develop Impaired Physical Mobility, Risk for
- Problem may occur but are not Impaired tissue integrity, Risk for
currently in existence Activity Intolerance, Risk for
- EX. A client w/ a compromised Constipation, Risk for Infection, etc.
immune system is at higher risk of
acquiring an infection COMPONENTS OF A NANDA NURSING
Therefore, the label RISK FOR DIAGNOSIS
INFECTION is use to describe the 1. PROBLEM (DIAGNOSTIC LABEL)
client’s health status - Title used in writing a nursing
diagnosis
3. WELLNESS DIAGNOSIS - - Taken from NANDA’s standardized
describes human responses to taxonomy of terms
levels of wellness in an individual, - It describes the client’s response to
family or community that have a an actual, possible, and risk health
readiness for enhancement problem or to a wellness condition
- Identifies the individual or aggregate 2. ETIOLOGY (RELATED FACTORS &
condition or state that may be RISK FACTORS)
enhance by health promoting - The causal relationship between a
activities problem and its related or risk
- EX. Readiness for enhanced factors
spiritual being or Readiness for - EX. Diagnostic label (Problem)
enhanced family coping Constipation

4. POSSIBLE DIAGNOSIS - Is one in - Etiology


w/c evidence about a health problem Long-term laxative use
is incomplete or unclear Inactivity and insufficient fluid intake
- It requires for a data to support or to 3. DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS - cluster
refute the diagnosis of S&S that indicate presence of particular
- EX. An elderly widow who lives diagnostic label
alone is admitted. The nurse notices - Types of Nsg. Diagnosis
she has no visitors and is pleased w/ Actual Nsg Dx
attention and conversation from the Risk Nsg Dx
staff. Until data are collected, the - Defining characteristics
nurse may write a nursing diagnosis Client’s signs/sx
of POSSIBLE SOCIAL ISOLATION No subjective/objective signs are present
related to UNKNOWN ETIOLOGY.
COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM - present
5. SYNDROME DIAGNOSIS - Is a and seen w/ one disease but the human
diagnosis that is associated w/ a response pattern in eerie individual differs
cluster of other diagnosis EX. PC (Potential Complication) of child
- Risk for Disuse Syndrome may be bearing: postpartum hemorrhage
experienced by long-term bedridden
clients. Cluster of diagnoses DIAGNOSTIC PROCESS
-- Uses critical thinking skills of analysis & P: statement of the client’s response
synthesis (NANDA label)
- Critical thinking skills : is a cognitive E: factors contributing to or probable
process in w/c a person reviews data and causes of the responses
considers explanation before forming S: defining characteristics
opinion manifested by the client
- Analysis : separations into components 3 parts are joined by the words: “As
breaking down of whole into parts Manifested By” or “AMB”
- Synthesis : putting together of parts into a EX. Hypothermia r/t increased
whole metabolic rate AMB temp - 37.9°C,
skin warm to touch
DIAGNOSTIC PROCESS HAS 3 STEPS:
1. Analyzing Data 1-part statements:
2. Identifying health problems - For wellness diagnosis & syndrome
3. Formulating diagnostic statement nursing diagnosis
- Consist of a NANDA label only
1. ANALYZING DATA EX. A. Readiness for enhanced childbearing
Compare data against standards process
Cluster cues B. Rape Trauma syndrome
Identify gaps & inconsistencies
2. IDENTIFYING HEALTH Variations of the basic formats
PROBLEMS, RISKS & 1. Unknown etiology - defining
STRENGTHS characteristics are present, contributing
Determining problems and risks factors unknown
Determining strengths EX. Pain r/t unknown etiology
3. FORMULATING DIAGNOSTIC 2. Complex (etiology) factors - too many
STATEMENTS etiologic factors/ too complex to state in a
brief phase
Basic 2-part statements: EX. Constipation r/t insufficient fiber intake,
insufficient oral fluid intake, pain upon
EX. Problem (P) + Etiology (E) defecating
P: statements of the client’s Constipation r/t complex factors
response (NANDA label) 3. Possible (problem/etiology) - nurse
E: factors contributing to or probable believes more data are needed about
causes of the responses client’s problem/etiology
EX. Possible situational low self-esteem r/t
Two parts are joined by the words: loss of job & rejection by family
“related to” or “r/t” Complicated grieving possibility related to
EX. Ineffective airway clearance r/t lack of social support
weak cough reflex 4. Secondary to (2°) - used to divide the
etiology into 2 parts, making the statement
Basic 3-part statements more descriptive and useful
P+E+Signs/Sx (PES format)
-The part of ff a secondary to is often a X - Risk for injury: falls r/t poor
pathophysiologic or disease process or a housekeeping
medical diagnosis ✔- Risk for injury: falls r/t cluttered floors
EX. Impaired skin integrity r/t immobility 2°
cast 3.Make sure that both elements of the
5. Adding a 2nd part to the NANDA label - statement do not say the same thing
adding a second part to the general X - Chronic pain r/t headache
response to make it more precise ✔ - Chronic pain: headache r/t unknown
EX. Impaired skin integrity: pressure sore r/t etiology
immobility 2° cast
Headache r/t increased cranial pressure 4.Precise & Clear - use terms generally
understood by other professional & avoids
EXERCISES: abbreviations
Hyperthermia X - Toileting self care deficit r/t inability to
r/t increased metabolic rate get OOB w/o help
AMB Temp - 37.9°C, skin warm to touch
5. Cause & Effect are correctly stated
Says, “nahihirapan akong huminga”, RR - ✔ - Impaired oral mucous membrane r/t
28 bpm, orthopneic, nasal flaring, wheezing deficient fluid volume AMB oral lesions
heard upon auscultation, has Asthma X - Deficient fluid volume r/t altered oral
= Ineffective breathing pattern r/t mucous membrane AMB oral lesions
constriction of bronchioles 2° Asthma AMB
dyspnea, RR - 28bpm, orthopneic, nasal 6. Use nsg terminology rather than medical
flaring, wheezing heard upon auscultation terminology to describe probable cause of
the client’s response
Has difficulty getting to toilet and carry out ✔ - Ineffective airway clearance r/t increased
proper toilet hygiene, needs assistance of tracheobronchial secretions
wife, says “I’m too weak to do it” X - Ineffective airway clearance r/t
= Self care deficit (toileting) level 2 r/t Pneumonia
weakness AMB difficulty getting to toilet and
carry out proper toilet hygiene, needs 7. NANDA labels can be used for both
assistance of wife problems & etiologies
✔ Self care deficit (Level 2) r/t activity
GUIDELINES FOR WRITING ND intolerance 2° ineffective airway clearance &
disturbed sleep pattern
1.Uses legally advisable language ✔ Hyperthermia r/t deficient fluid volume 2°
-should not affix or refer negatively to diarrhea
aspects of pt care ✔ Dressing/grooming self care deficit (level 2)
X - Impaired skin integrity: pressure sores r/t r/t activity intolerance (level IV) 2° heart disease
not being turned frequently enough
✔ - Impaired skin integrity: pressure sores r/t 8. Concise - if etiology is wordy, use “...r/t
inability to turn self complex factors”

2.Uses nonjudgmental language

You might also like