Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEE2018 Mondays 8 am - 11 am
In this lab a standard roof truss was observed, its calculated values and experimental values were
compared. Weights were added to it and the spring balance readings were recorded on the raw
data sheet. The theoretical and experimental values were calculated, and sources of error and
uncertainty were discussed. The results obtained during this lab are the values of S1(1.46 lbf)
and S2(2.04lbf) that summed to 3.5 lbf. Method of Sections, including a Free Body Diagram,
+ ↻Σ MA= 0
[W1(26 Cos30)]+[W2(52Cos30)]+[W3(78Cos30)]+[S2(104Cos30)] + [W4(30)] + [W5(60)]= 0
(W1)(22.52) + (W2)(45) + (W3)(67.55) + (S2)(90) + (W4)(30) + (W5*60) =0
(0.5)(22.52) +(1)(45) + (1)(67.55) + (S2)(90) + (0)(30) + (1)(60) =0
S2= 183.81/ 90
S2= 2.04 lbf
ΣFy=0
S1 + S2-(W1 + W2 + W3 + W4 + W5) =0
S1 + 2.04 - (0.5 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 1)= 0
S1= 1.46 lbf
JOINT A
ΣF y =0
S1 + ( F AB)(Sin30) = 0
F AB = -S1/ Sin30
=-1.46/(Sin30)
F AB= 2.92lbf
ΣFx=0
( F AB)(Cos30) + F A C =0
F A C = -(-2.92)(Cos30) = 2.528lbf , therefore, Tensile
DISCUSSION
The combined values of S1 and S2 give 3.5 lbf, while the total of the external loads placed on the
system10lbf. This shows that the calculations of the S1 and S2 values were not accurate and
precise. The experimental values of the force in members were not close to the theoretical
values. This may be due to human errors. Errors in the experiment such as parallax error may be
the cause for this vast difference. Or due to mathematical errors in calculations done by the
researcher. To minimize these errors, students should read the equipment at eye level, as well
and redo calculations to ensure they are correct. Source of error and uncertainty Sources of error