See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/263426524

Are There Impacts of Urban Heat Island on Future Climate Change?

Article  in  Advances in Climate Change Research · June 2013

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1248.2013.133

CITATIONS READS

15 622

3 authors:

Zong-Ci Zhao Yong Luo

Tsinghua University Tsinghua University
114 PUBLICATIONS   9,358 CITATIONS    93 PUBLICATIONS   4,148 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Jianbin Huang
Tsinghua University
67 PUBLICATIONS   1,028 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Construct surface temperature dataset with method of optimal interpolation View project

ESM and CEM coupling and application View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Zong-Ci Zhao on 27 June 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH 4(2): 133–136, 2013
www.climatechange.cn
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1248.2013.133
OPINION
Are There Impacts of Urban Heat Island on Future
Climate Change?
ZHAO Zong-Ci1,2 , LUO Yong1,2 , HUANG Jian-Bin1
1
Center for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2
National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
The United Nations world urbanization prospects
2009 report points out, that at present more than 50%
of the world’s population is living in urban area, and
it is expected that by 2050 this figure will reach 70%
[UN, 2009]. Therefore, there is need to pay more at-
tention to the impacts of urban heat island effects on
future climate change.
1 Observed contribution of urban heat
island effect on warming
The impacts of urban heat island effect on cli-
mate change in China and the world have been mostly
conducted with meteorological station data for about
last 50 years. Both the urban heat island effect and
its contribution to climate warming have been calcu-
lated. For the quantification of urban heat island ef-
fect, one method is that observation stations are di-
vided into degrees in accordance with city population,
corresponding to the calculated population changes in
different periods. Another method is that differences
between the temperature at urban station and rural
(countryside) station (or nearby sea surface tempera-
ture, SST). A recent study based on remote sensing
data shows that heat island effect of the global mean
daily temperature is 2.6◦ C in summer, and 1.4◦ C in
winter [Zhang et al., 2010]. Research on China [Zhao,
1991; Ren et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2008] indicates that
urban heat island effect contributes to climate warm-
ing by about 30%. Table 1 summarizes the contribu-
Received: 4 February 2013
Corresponding author: ZHAO Zong-Ci, Zhaozc@cma.gov.cn
1
tion of urbanization to the warming for some studies
in China [Zhao, 2011]. Because many gauge stations
in China are located in urban regions, they are in-
fluenced by urbanization processes more clearly than
before. Urban heat island effect is strengthening cli-
mate warming. Early research found that the mean
warming was 0.06◦ C per decade in China for 1951–
1989, in which urbanization caused the mean warm-
ing of 0.05◦ C per decade and accounted for 83% of
the total warming [Zhao, 1991]. It means that the
key warming action was from urban heat island ef-
fect during 1950s–1980s. Recent study indicates that
temperature increasing was obvious in China for 1961–
2004, the mean warming was 0.06–0.09◦ C per decade
up to 0.10◦ C per decade in some significant areas. The
annual mean warming rate due to urban heat island
effect was 27%, and 18%–38% for the four seasons.
It means that urban heat island effect contributed to
1/5–1/3 of the total warming in China in the last 50
years. Warming due to urban heat island effect in
China was significant [Ren et al., 2008]. A new inves-
tigation estimated urban heat island effect in compar-
ison with the nearby SST which was not influenced by
urbanization. The warming trend in China for 1951–
2004 was 0.22◦ C per decade. At the same time, the
warming trend of SST was 0.14◦ C per decade. Ur-
ban heat island effect caused warming of 0.08◦ C per
decade, which was 36% of the total warming. Ur-
ban heat island effect in China was more obvious than
before due to urban population increase, urban areas
134 ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH
extension, social sphere and economy development.
The main warming trend in China for the last several
decades was from the anthropogenic emissions [Jones
et al., 2008]. Summarizing those investigations, the ur-
banization in China for the last several decades con-
tributed to the warming by 1/5–1/3. The warming
caused by urbanization in China cannot be neglected.
The warming contributions by urbanization in China
are stronger than those in developed countries [Jones
Table 1 Contribution rates of urban heat island effect on warming in China
Author Number of stations
Zhao [1991] 160
Ren et al. [2008] 752
Jones et al. [2008] 728
728
728
2 Earth system model simulation on the
impacts of urban heat island on fu-
ture climate change
Recent studies were concentrated on the impacts
of urban heat island on future climate by using cli-
mate models such as HadAM4 (UK) and CAM3.5
(USA). The former investigated urban heat island ef-
fect between doubled CO2 and the present concentra-
tion [McCarthy et al., 2010]. The latter studied urban
heat island effect between the IPCC SRES A2 scenario
and the present day [Oleson et al., 2010]. The com-
mon result is that urban heat island effect on climate
may not be static. Therefore, they proposed that cli-
mate models should nest urban models.
Climate between urban and rural areas were con-
trasted by using the earth system model CCSM4
of CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
phase 5) with several scenarios [Oleson, 2012]. The
CCSM4 is an earth system model with land model
(CLM4) which includes the parameterizations of ur-
ban surface types. Based on it, an urbanization model
is nested to CLM4, named CLMU. The urbanization
model is a three-dimensional model with parameter-
ization processes, i.e., heights of roofs, sunlit walls,
and shaded walls of buildings, as well as pervious land
surface (such as grasslands of residential lawns and
parks) and impervious (such as roads, parking lots
and sidewalks) canyon floor. The urbanization model
et al., 2008; Zhao, 2011]. It needs to be pointed out
that a small warming appeared during 1950s–1980s
in China, and the warming by urban heat island ef-
fects in China was about 80% of the total. However,
it is different for the last 20 years of the 20th cen-
tury. Although urban heat island effect strengthened
in this period, its contribution was not as high as that
in 1950s–1980s due to the significantly increased total
warming (Table 1).
Time series (years) Contribution rate (%)
1951–1989 (39) 83
1961–2004 (44) 27
1951–2004 (54) 36
1954–1983 (30) 81
1981–2004 (24) 18
has 15 layers for temperature and hydrological cycle
in vertical direction, and up to 5 additional layers for
snow based on snow depth. Urban areas consider land
features including building height and street width.
According to the CMIP5 experiment design [Taylor
et al., 2012], the CCSM4 runs the historical experi-
ments with both anthropogenic and natural forcings
for 1850–2005, and three RCP (Representative Con-
centration Pathway) experiments (RCP8.5, RCP4.5
and RCP2.6). Five ensembles have been calculated
for each experiment, respectively. The definition of
urban heat island effect is the difference of surface air
temperature between urban and rural regions. The
simulated results indicate that: 1) Urban heat island
effect in the 20th century caused the averaged urban
warming by about 1.4◦ C compared with rural regions.
2) An obvious warming in the global, land, urban and
rural regions will very likely appear for three periods of
2011–2030, 2046–2065, and 2080–2099 as projected by
the model with RCPs, respectively. The model with
RCP8.5 projects a global mean warming of 0.66◦ C,
1.91◦ C and 3.48◦ C for three periods relative to 1986–
2005, respectively. A lower warming for RCP4.5 and
RCP2.6 is noted. The global land warming is promi-
nent. 3) Impacts of urban heat island on future mean
temperature, maximum and minimum temperatures
will continue to have a warming effect. 4) Differences
of temperature between urban and rural areas for the
three periods in RCP8.5 are more significant than in
 ZHAO Zong-Ci et al. / Are There Impacts of Urban Heat Island on Future Climate Change? 135

RCP2.6 and RCP4.5. Urban heat island effect de-
creases as time goes by due to more warming in rural
areas than in urban areas (Table 2).
Further calculations focused on heat island effects
in 11 regions of the world for December to Febru-
ary (DJF) and June to August (JJA) in the present
day (1986–2005) and 2080–2099 relative to 1986–2005
as projected by the model with RCP8.5, respectively
(Table 3). It is found that: 1) Whether in DJF or JJA
of the present day, urban heat island has a warming
effect as simulated by the model. In DJF for exam-
ple, the lowest warming is in East Africa (0.94◦ C),
the highest warming is in Central Asia (2.26◦ C). Re-
sults for East Asia which are related to China show a
warming of 1.93◦ C in DJF and 1.29◦ C in JJA. 2) The
model with RCP8.5 projects a significant warming in
11 regions for 2080–2099. The warming is 2.68–4.43◦ C
in DJF and 3.20–4.87◦ C in JJA. The warming in East
Asia is 3.69◦ C. 3) Under RCP8.5 for 2080–2099, urban
heat island effect contributes slightly less to the warm-
ing, in 11 regions for DJF, except for East Africa. It
decreases by 0.14◦ C in East Asia. For the same pe-
riod, the model under RCP8.5 projects the warming
to be decreasing in 6 regions for JJA and –0.10◦ C in
East Asia [Oleson, 2012].
3 Evidence of regional climate models
to simulate urban heat island effect
Kusaka et al. [2012] tested urban heat island ef-
fect by a regional climate model WRF. WRF has a
horizontal resolution of 4 km and a vertical resolution

Table 2 Ensemble mean global (GL), land, urban (U), and rural (R) 2-m air temperature, and urban minus rural
temperature for 1850–1869 and 1986–2005 from the history simulations, and those results for three future time
periods from RCP8.5, RCP4.5, and RCP2.6 simulations [Oleson, 2012] (unit: ◦ C)
Scenario Period 2-m air temperature Urban minus rural
GL Land U R Ta Tmax Tmin
History 1850–1869 13.34 7.39 17.51 16.06 1.45 0.56 2.02
1986–2005 14.30 8.56 18.35 16.93 1.42 0.55 1.98
RCP8.5 2011–2030 0.66 0.84 0.72 0.73 1.41 0.53 1.96
2046–2065 1.91 2.48 2.12 2.16 1.38 0.48 1.93
2080–2099 3.48 4.48 3.75 3.82 1.35 0.42 1.91
RCP4.5 2011–2030 0.58 0.75 0.65 0.65 1.42 0.53 1.98
2046–2065 1.29 1.65 1.44 1.43 1.43 0.53 2.00
2080–2099 1.62 2.03 1.76 1.75 1.43 0.49 2.00
RCP2.6 2011–2030 0.60 0.77 0.68 0.68 1.42 0.53 1.97
2046–2065 0.88 1.12 0.97 0.98 1.41 0.52 1.98
2080–2099 0.85 1.04 0.91 0.91 1.42 0.53 1.97
Note: Projections are relative to 1986–2005. Ta , Tmax , and Tmin are daily mean, daily maximum and minimum temperatures,
respectively

Table 3 Regional averages of 11 areas for the present (1986–2005) heat island (urban minus rural temperature),
climate change (land air temperature) and heat island change (2080–2099 minus 1986–2005)
in RCP8.5 simulation (unit: ◦ C) [Oleson, 2012]
Region Present heat island Climate change Heat island change
DJF JJA DJF JJA DJF JJA
NW America 1.80 1.58 3.80 4.49 –0.16 0.00
NE America 2.04 2.00 4.43 4.66 –0.17 0.11
Central America 1.01 1.06 3.35 3.62 –0.13 –0.11
South America 1.13 1.60 3.65 3.64 –0.08 –0.01
EU 1.35 1.60 2.68 5.06 –0.16 0.16
West Africa 1.86 1.02 3.75 3.52 –0.11 –0.06
Middle East 1.04 1.32 3.80 4.87 –0.10 0.01
East Africa 0.94 1.18 3.35 3.39 0.01 0.00
Central Asia 2.26 1.14 4.19 3.71 –0.02 –0.06
East Asia 1.93 1.29 3.69 3.69 –0.14 –0.10
AU-NZ 1.07 1.44 3.52 3.20 –0.09 –0.13
Note: AU-NZ refers to Australia and New Zealand
 136 ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH
of 35 layers. A 1-layer urban cover model (UCM) over
the Tokyo Metropolitan Area and a simple slab urban
model (SLAB) are nested to WRF, respectively. UCM
included urban features and distribution of streets.
The multi-layer thermodynamic equation was used to
calculate temperature and heat flux on roofs, walls and
roads. SLAB calculated temperature by surface ther-
modynamic equation. The model simulated climate
change in August of 2004–2007. The results simulated
by WRF nested to UCM or SLAB were compared with
Table 4 Surface temperature bias and RMSE over the entire analysis domain at indicated times for simulations by
WRF nested to UCM or SLAB and observations (unit: ◦ C) [Kusaka et al., 2012]
City model Bias RMSE Bias at 05:00
SLAB –0.6 (–0.3) 2.5 (2.8) –2.0 (–2.6)
UCM –0.4 (0.7) 2.1 (1.8) –0.1 (1.0)
Note: 05:00 and 15:00 are Japanese standard time; urban values are in the parentheses
Finally, it is to be emphasized that only a few
studies are concentrated on the impacts of urban heat
island effect on climate change by using earth system
models and regional climate models nested to the com-
plicated urban cover models. Therefore, the studies
are tentative. How to design and nest city models is
worth studying. Some research results need further
analysis, examination, and confirmation.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the 973 Project (No.
2010CB950500) and National Natural Science Foundation
(No. 41175066).
References
Jones, P. D., D. H. Lister, and Q.-X. Li, 2008: Ur-
banization effects in large-scale temperature records,
with an emphasis on China. J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D16122, doi: 10.1029/2008JD009916.
Kusaka, H., F. Chen, M. Tewari, et al., 2012: Nu-
merical simulation of urban heat island effect by the
WRF model with 4-km grid increment: An inter-
comparison study between the urban canopy model
and slab model. Journal of the Meteorological So-
ciety of Japan, 90B, 33-45, doi: 10.2151/jmsj.2012-
B03.
McCarthy, M. P., M. J. Best, and R. A. Betts.,
2010: Climate change in cities due to global warm-
ing and urban effects. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L09705, doi:10.1029/2010GL042845.
View publication stats
the observations, respectively. Based on calculating
the bias and root mean square error (RMSE) between
simulations and observations, it is found that WRF
with UCM are better than WRF with SLAB (Table 4).
It means that regional climate model (such as WRF)
nested to a complex city model (such as UCM) is bet-
ter than nested to a simple one (such as SLAB). This
result evinces from the other side that an earth sys-
tem model (CCSM4) nested to an urban model is very
important as Oleson [2012] provided.
RMSE at 05:00 Bias at 15:00 RMSE at 15:00
3.1 (3.3) 0.6 (1.8) 2.4 (2.8)
2.0 (1.8) –0.8 (0.4) 2.4 (2.0)
Oleson, K., 2012: Contrasts between urban and rural
climate in CCSM4 CMIP5 climate change scenarios.
J. Climate, 25(5), 1390-1412, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-
11-00098.1.
Oleson, K. W., G. B. Bonan, J. Feddema, et al.,
2010: An examination of urban heat island charac-
teristics in a global climate model. Int. J. Climatol,
31, 1848-1865, doi:10.1002/joc.2201.
Ren, G.-Y., Z.-Y. Chu, J.-X. Zhou, et al., 2008:
Urbanization effects on observed surface air temper-
ature in North China. J. Climate, 21, 1333-1348.
Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffeer, G. A. Meehl, 2012:
An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment de-
sign. BAMS, 93, 485-498, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-
11-00094.1.
UN (United Nations), 2009: World urbanization
prospects, the 2009 revisions, population division.
47pp.
Zhang, P., M. L. Imhoff, R. E. Wolfe, et al., 2010:
Characterizing urban heat islands of global settle-
ments using MODIS and nighttime lights products.
Can. J. Remote Sens., 36, 185-196.
Zhao, Z.-C., 1991: Temperature change in China for
the last 39 years and urban effects. Meteorological
Monthly (in Chinese), 17(4), 14-17.
Zhao, Z.-C., 2011: Impacts of urbanization on climate
change. in: 10,000 Scientific Difficult Problems:
Earth Science (in Chinese), 10,000 scientific diffi-
cult problems Earth Science Committee Eds., Sci-
ence Press, 843-846.