Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Physical Properties
2.2.1. Bulk density
2.2.2. Particle size distribution
2.2.3. Total porosity and its components
2.2.4. Air-filled porosity and root respiration
2.2.5. Pore distribution
2.2.6. Water release curve
2.2.7. Hydraulic conductivity
2.2.8. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity
2.2.9. Effects of substrates’ physical characteristics on irrigation management.
2.3. Chemical Properties
2.3.1. Charge characteristics
2.3.2. Phosphorus retention
2.3.3. Effects of substrates’ chemical characteristics on nutrition management.
2.4. Substrate Analysis
2.5. Description of substrates
2.5.1. Inorganic substrates
2.5.1.1. Sand
2.5.1.2. Rockwool and glasswool
2.5.1.3. Expanded minerals
2.5.1.3.1. Perlite
2.5.1.3.2. Expanded clay
2.5.1.3.3. Vermiculite
2.5.1.3.4. Zeolites
2.5.1.4. Pumice
2.5.1.5. Tuff and other volcanic materials
2.5.1.6. Synthetic organic substrates
2.5.2. Organic substrates
2.5.2.1. Peat
2.5.2.2. Composts
2.5.2.3. Tree waste products
2.5.2.3.1. Coir dust
2.5.2.3.2. Tree bark
2.5.2.3.3. Sawdust, wood fibre and wood chips
2.6. Literature cited
Abstract
Overall profitability of intensive (especially greenhouse) crops, grown in soilless
substrates, is higher than those grown in soil. This is due to their superior physical and
chemical properties, to their initial low infestation rate with pathogenic pests and due to their
ease of disinfestation among growing cycles. The result is a worldwide rapid expansion of the
use of substrates during the last decades. This chapter deals with the physical properties of
substrates and their effect on irrigation regime and with the chemical properties of substrates
and their effects on plant mineral nutrition. It also describes the main substrates that are
currently in use and the way they are analysed.
High content of available water and an adequate air supply have been considered as the
most important physical characteristics required for container media in order to achieve
optimal growth. Water availability to plant roots is strongly related to the hydraulic
conductivity characteristics of the medium, which, in porous materials, drop dramatically with
reduction in water content. Very high water content (near container capacity) is, thus, a
prerequisite for optimal water availability. Means to maintain desired water content are
discussed.
The main factor that distinguishes fertilisation management of substrate- and soil-grown
plants is the limited volume of substrates, which means a lower buffer capacity for pH and
solution composition and a limited supply of nutrients. The limited root zone volume also
results in decreased root size and increased root density, causing higher competition among
roots and a bigger effect of root activity on the rhizosphere.
Most growth substrates possess negative permanent and/or variable charged surfaces.
Surface charge properties of substrates have a major effect on the chemical reactions taking
place in the rhizosphere, on the availability of applied cations and on their uptake efficiency.
Strong interaction between orthophosphate ions and solid phase constituents reduce
solution P concentrations following fertilizer application. The main two mechanisms involved
are: (i) fast - electrostatic reactions of adsorption onto the solid phase; and (ii) slow -
formation of new solid metal-P compounds (precipitation). Thus, availability of phosphorus in
the rhizosphere often determines the growth and productivity of crops.
Frequent irrigation and continuous fertilisation should satisfy nutritional plant demands
under most practical situations.
2.1. Introduction
Various substrates, such as rockwool, polyurethane, perlite, scoria etc, are virtually pest-
free and can easily be disinfested between growth cycles in case of disease contamination.
They also enable relatively easy control over the pH and the nutritional status of the root zone.
The main advantage of soilless- over soil-cultivation is, however, its physical characteristics
and specifically, its ability to provide simultaneously sufficient levels of both oxygen and water
to the roots. The physical properties of porous substrates are more suitable than those of soils
for the production of most horticultural crops. Much weaker matric forces in substrates,
compared to soil, hold the water. Consequently, plants grown in porous media at or near
container capacity require less energy to extract water and experience a lower risk of oxygen
deficiency, than those grown in a soil near field capacity. The above factors lead to improved
yields in terms of quality and quantity.
Lack of suitable soils, disease contamination after repeated use and the desire to apply
optimal conditions for plant growth are leading to the worldwide trend of growing plants in
media, instead of soil. Most media-grown plants are grown in greenhouses under supposedly
near-optimal production conditions. An inherent drawback of soilless vs. soil cultivation is the
fact that in the latter the root volume is unrestricted while in containerised culture the root
volume is restricted. This restricted root volume has several important effects, especially a
limited supply of nutrients (Dubik et al., 1990; Bar-Tal, 1999). The limited root volume also
increases root-to-root competition since there are more roots per unit volume of medium.
One of the purposes of this chapter is to focus on the main issues of the physical and
chemical environment of the rhizosphere and to identify the areas where more research is
needed in order to obtain a clearer picture. The other purpose is to describe the main
substrates, used in horticulture and to identify their main advantages and drawbacks.
n m
Se = [1 + ( ) ] (2)
where Se is the volumetric water content in a relative form, which is sometimes called effective
saturation, defined as
r
Se = (3)
s r
In eq. (2), , n and m are parameters that determine the shape of the retention curve. These
parameters are determined by curve-fitting techniques. The subscripts s and r in eq. (3) refer
to the saturated and residual values of θ, respectively. The latter is defined as the water
content at which the gradient dθ/d becomes zero (excluding the region near θs, which may
also present a zero gradient). Both θs and θr can be either measured or estimated along with ,
n and m. As opposed to θs that has a clear physical significance, the meaning of θr and its
estimation has not yet been resolved. Stephens and Rehfeldt (1985) reported improved model
accuracy using a measured value of θr. Fonteno and Nelson (1990) determined θr as the water
content at = 300 cm. However, Ward et al. (1983) and van Genuchten (1978, 1980)
suggested that θr should be viewed as a fitting-parameter rather than a soil property. van
Genuchten and Nielsen (1985) considered not only θr but also θs to be empirical parameters
that should be fitted to the - data. The van Genuchten model can be used in conjunction
with predictive models for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, as will be discussed in section
2.2.8.
For small m/n ratios, parameter in eq. (2) approximately equals the inverse of the air-
entry value. For large values of m/n, this parameter roughly equals the inverse of the suction at
the inflection point of the retention curve (van Genuchten and Nielsen, 1985). Parameter n is
related to the pore size distribution of the medium and the product mn determines the slope of
the () curve at large suction values. Therefore, n may be viewed as being mostly affected by
the structure of the medium (van Genuchten and Nielsen, 1985).
The equation proposed by van Genuchten (eq. 2) was applied to container media by Milks
et al. (1989a, b, c) who found that it fits the measured - θr data better than the cubic
polynomial. It has also been used by Fonteno (1989), Wallach et al. (1992 a, b), da Silva et al.
(1993a, 1995), Orozco and Marfa (1995) and Raviv et al., (2001). Fitted RCs, using eqs. (2)
and (3) are shown in Figures 2.2.6(1) and 2.2.6(2) for the RTB and RTM tuffs and the 1-2
mm fraction of tuff and sand, respectively.
There are two initial stages at which retention curves are measured: A drainage curve is
obtained by establishing a series of equilibria by drainage from zero pressure head. A wetting
curve is obtained by equilibrating samples wetted from a low water content or high suction.
The retention curve is hysteretic, i.e. the water content at a given suction for a wetting
substrate is less than that for a draining substrate (Wallach et al., 1992a). The drainage curve
that starts on complete saturation of the substrate is called the initial drainage curve. The main
wetting curve is obtained by wetting the substrate from low water content. The features of the
hysteresis of the retention curve are shown in Figure 2.2.6(3) for rockwool (da Silva et al.,
1995). The measured initial drainage and main wetting curves were successfully fitted by eq.
(2), (da Silva et al., 1995), as shown in Figure 2.2.6(3). As the substrate is wetted along the
main wetting curve and the suction approaches zero, the water content approaches a value
that is less than the TP, s, due to the presence of entrapped air (Figure 2.2.6(3). This value is
about 0.8s to 0.9s and is called the natural saturation of the satiated water content (Klute,
1986). The drainage curve starting at natural saturation is called the main drainage curve. The
main drainage curve merges asymptotically with the initial drainage curve as the suction
increases.
The main hysteresis mechanism is referred to as the inkbottle effect, because of its similarity
with the behaviour of bottles of ink with very narrow spouts. Another source of hysteretic
behaviour is hysteresis in the contact angle. The contact angle often exhibits a different value
in advancing and receding cases. A central question is when and why hysteresis must be
included when describing container media processes. The answer to this question is not yet
clear given that few studies have been performed on hysteresis in soilless container media. The
adjustment of the theory used in soil physics and its application to container media is not
straightforward. This is due to the special conditions that exist in the limited container volume
where: 1) wetting and drying frequently occur, 2) special conditions that exist at the container
boundaries (the bottom may be open to the atmosphere or in some cases continuously
saturated), and 3) the unique textural and structural properties of soilless substrates compared
to field soils. Thus, additional research is needed to increase knowledge of the effects of
hysteresis on static and dynamic distributions of water in containers filled with soilless media,
and on the availability of water to the plant.
2
Se 1
dx
0 (x)
K r (Se) = Se½ 1
(6)
1
dx
0 (x)
where Kr = K/Ks is the relative hydraulic conductivity, Se is the effective saturation (eq. 3), and
x is an integration variable.
Of the various possibilities for restricted m-n cases, the relation m = 1-1/n was shown to
perform better than other cases (van Genuchten and Nielsen, 1985). Solving eq. (2) for =
(Se), substituting the resulting expression into eq. [6] and assuming the above unique
relationship between the parameters n and m leads to:
m 2
K r (Se) = Se½ [1 - (1 - Se1/m ) ] [7]
Equations (7) and (8) describe the unsaturated relative hydraulic conductivity model of
Mualem (1976) as combined with the retention curve model of van Genuchten (1980).
Multiplying the value of Ks by Kr() will provide the K() function.
Predicted hydraulic conductivity curves, K(), for RTB and RTM tuff are shown in Figure
2.2.8(1). The measured retention curves of these substrates shown in Figure 2.2.6(1) were
used for this prediction. Predicted hydraulic conductivity curves for other soilless growing
media can be found: in Wallach et al. (1992b) for composted agricultural wastes and their
mixtures with tuff; in da Silva et al. (1993a) for sphagnum peat moss and its mixture with tuff;
in da Silva et al. (1995) for rockwool (whose retention curve is given in Figure 2.2.6(3)); in
Orozco and Marfa (1995) for perlite, in Raviv et al. (1999) for two types of pumice and in
Raviv et al. (2001) for coir and UC mix. For both types of tuff, K() decreased by more than
three orders of magnitude for an increase in suction from 0 to 25 cm (Figure 2.2.8(1)). The
predicted K() curves for the growing media mentioned above exhibit a similar trend, with a
decrease of several orders of magnitude in K over a narrow range of suctions. This hydraulic
characteristic of soilless growing media has a tremendous effect on water dynamics and
availability to container-grown plants. This subject will be discussed in the following.
Any suggested model for the hydraulic characteristic of porous media can be used for
different container growth media only after its validation for media of similar texture and
structure. As mentioned above, measurement of - data is relatively simple and validating a
mathematical model to predict retention curves by its comparison with the measured data is
straightforward. However, validation of models for K() prediction has been rarely carried
out due to the difficulty of obtaining K - data. Wallach et al. (1992a) used the steady-state
flux control method (Klute and Dirksen, 1986) to determine K - data pairs. According to
this method, a constant flux of water, q, is established at the upper end of a vertical uniformly
packed substrate column, while its lower end is maintained at atmospheric pressure. The flux,
q, which should be lower than the saturated hydraulic conductivity, Ks, is applied to a
previously saturated column, which drains to a condition of steady-state downward flow.
Upon reaching this condition, the suction distribution along the column is expected to be
relatively constant throughout its upper region. A unit hydraulic gradient should, therefore, be
established in that part of the column, and under these conditions K is numerically equal to q.
The experimental set-up for this method included a 50 cm long column (10 cm i. d.),
four tensiometers, a pressure transducer, a manual scanning valve system, and a peristaltic
pump (Wallach et al., 1992a). Each tensiometer consisted of a high-flow ceramic porous cup
(6.3 cm long, 1.95 cm o.d., air entry value > 1 bar), which was mounted in a horizontal
position, extending about 6 cm across the column. The vertical distance between tensiometers
was 10.5 cm. Each tensiometer was filled with deionised, deaerated water and the top was
sealed. A pressure transducer operating in a range of 0 to 100 cm water was mounted on a
fixed position and connected to the scanning system. The transducer (constant voltage supply
of 12 V) was adjusted and calibrated precisely to obtain the relation between voltage and
water suction. Starting at saturation, a controlled flow was maintained until the tensiometer
readings stabilized and the volumetric outflow rate was constant. Due to the unit-gradient, the
constant flux yielded K, while the suction was measured to obtain the related suction. This
process was then repeated at a series of decreasing flow rates, and each time q and h were
recorded. The experiment was performed in duplicate for RTB and RTM. For each flux,
measurements were made until a steady-state condition was attained. This usually took from
several hours to several days.
For an indirect validation of the calculated K(h) relationship, the same experimental
set-up was used. The measured values of h along the column, for each value of q, were
compared with simulated profiles, (z), obtained by solving the steady-state one-dimensional
flow equation:
d
q = K( )( + 1) [9]
dz
Rearranging eq. [9] and integrating between the bottom of the column (z = 0) and its top (z
= Z), gives:
Z (Z)
dy
dx = z = q
[10]
0 o 1+
K(y)
where x and y are integration variables. Introducing the calculated K(h) values (drying
curve) into eq. [10] and using a standard numerical integration procedure to solve the
equation, the suction was calculated as a function of the column's height.
For both RTB and RTM tuff, measured K() values (Wallach et al, 1992a) verified the
calculated K() relationship over the 0 to 25 cm suction range (Figure 2.2.8(2)). For higher
values of q, the agreement between measured and predicted values seems to be very high. As
q was lowered, however, fluctuations in tensiometer readings were observed. These
fluctuations could have resulted from the difficulty in establishing and controlling constant low
fluxes with the equipment used. Very low fluxes (< 10-4 cm min-1) were required to achieve
suctions of about 20 to 25 cm, depending on the medium. However, these fluxes are much
lower than those of drippers or mini-sprinklers used for the irrigation of container media. We
therefore conclude that the steady-state flux control method is applicable to container media
such as tuff, at least in the tested range of water suctions.
2.2.9. Effects of substrates’ physical characteristics on irrigation management
Water flows along the potential gradient from the medium, where high (slightly negative)
water potential () exists, through the plant vascular system to the leaves and to the
atmosphere, where the water potential is lower. The flow rate is proportional to the potential
gradient and inversely proportional to the sum of resistances imposed by the medium,
medium/plant interface, plant, plant/atmosphere interface and atmosphere.
Although water constitutes most of the biomass, only about 1% of the applied water is
actually retained by the plant as water per se, or as a source of hydrogen for the reduction of
CO2. The remainder is lost to the atmosphere through the process of transpiration. This
apparently wasteful process is, in fact, indispensable since dry matter production is
proportional to the ratio of actual to potential ET (de Wit, 1958). This relation results from
the following factors:
The transpiration process is a key factor in plant life in general and in photosynthesis
in particular.
Water, being a solvent, enables the translocation of ions (including essential nutrients)
and organic molecules into, within and out of the plant, driven by the transpirational
stream.
Transpiration helps to maintain plant temperature, which permits normal plant life.
It is clear from the above that maximising transpiration through increased water availability
(unlike increased transpiration due to high vapour pressure deficit [VPD]) is in the best
interests of the grower; thus high water availability is a must for profitable crop production. In
horticultural terms, this means maximizing transpiration through optimal irrigation control.
Irrigation control involves the determination of both the timing and quantity of water to be
applied. It can be approached from the point of view of potential ET according to an existing
climatic model, by using one of several sensors to report the state of substrate water, or by
using various plant response parameters, or any combination of the above (Norrie et al.,
1994). The first approach can generally be described as:
ETm = Kc • ETa [11]
Where: ETm = maximum ET under the specific climatic conditions, Kc = crop coefficient,
ETa = actual ET
The Penman - Montieth equation is the most widely used method for ET m prediction, based
on the relevant climatic data such as net radiation absorbed by leaves, temperature, VPD and
wind speed. A simplified but still accurate version of the Penman - Montieth equation was
developed for Ficus benjamina (Bailey et al., 1993). A simpler equation for use in commercial
units that are not equipped with sophisticated, computerized control, and which is based on
pan evaporation and plant-canopy height and width as input variables, has been generated
(Stanley and Harbaugh, 1989) with partial success. However, the applicability of the Penman -
Montieth equation, and presumably other climatic models for irrigation control in
greenhouses, is still questionable (Munoz-Carpena et al., 1996). Possible reasons for poor
irrigation demands by climatic models include sharp fluctuations in canopy area (e.g. in cut
flowers), the effects of pests and diseases on transpiration etc. Inputs to intensive greenhouse
cultivation, such as supplementary lighting, heating pipes, air humidity and CO2 concentration,
are not well predicted by classical, field-orientated models (Blom-Zandstra et al., 1995; Baille
et al., 1996).
The plant-related approach (the “Speaking Plant” theory) is based on parameters that can
be used to determine irrigation timing, such as: leaf water potential (with pressure chamber);
stomatal resistance for water (with diffusion porometer); canopy temperature (with
thermocouples or infrared thermometers); flow of water in the stem (with the heat pulse
method); changes in stem diameter (with dendrometer); xylem potential and soil-root interface
potential (Caron et al., 1998).
The main advantage of the plant-related approach is its ability to report water shortage
before any visual sign is apparent. The main problem with it is that it identifies events of water
shortage post factum, in terms of horticultural damage. Analysing such events can, however,
help the grower in the future. The use of these parameters is, therefore, more suitable for
research purposes and their applicability to intensive commercial growing systems is doubtful.
Their practical use is restricted to slow-growing plants due to their relatively slow response
time.
The use of medium-related parameters seems to offer the optimal solution for irrigation
scheduling. Tensiometers, which measure suction in the medium near their location, are
reliable, handy, and relatively cheap. They have been used to monitor moisture status in
containers and for decisions on irrigation scheduling. Frequent suction readings at different
locations throughout the container by electro-tensiometers provide continuous on-line
information on suction distribution throughout the container. Suction data can be translated
into moisture content by using retention curves. Means for the direct measurement of water
content have recently been introduced (Kritz and Khaled, 1995; de Groot, 1995; da Silva et
al., 1998). However, the proper interpretation of the measured suction and water content so
as to increase water availability and the efficiency of irrigation management has not been fully
resolved.
A high content of available water and an adequate air supply are considered the most
important physical characteristics of container media in order to achieve optimal growth (De
Boodt and Verdonck, 1972; Spomer, 1974; Beardsell et al., 1979a, b; Chen et al., 1980;
Fontento et al., 1981; Hanan et al., 1981; Fontento and Bilderback, 1983; Bilderback, 1985;
Tilt et al., 1987; Riviere et al., 1990). Knowledge of transpirational demand and the selection
of a container medium that contains sufficient air at low suction values, have been considered
a good basis for irrigation management. Quantitatively, De Boodt and Verdonck (1972)
introduced the concept of ‘easily available water’, EAW, which they defined as the difference
between the water content at 1 kPa and 5 kPa. These authors also defined ‘water buffering
capacity’ (WBC) as the difference between the water content of the medium at 5 and 10 kPa.
Ever since Bunt (1961) reported water retention curves for container media, much effort has
been devoted to determining the usefulness of these curves in relating water availability to
plant growth, and in quantifying such data both for descriptive and predictive purposes.
However, it is now becoming clear (see previous discussion in section 2.2.8.) that the concept
resulting from the work of Bunt (1961) and de Boodt and Verdonck (1972) namely that the
content of EAW can serve as a guiding tool for irrigation management is largely invalid.
An additional term for the relation of water availability to container grown plants is
‘container capacity’, an adjustment of the ‘field capacity’ notion, which is widely used by soil
physicists and irrigation scientists for field-irrigated crops. White and Mastalerz (1966)
defined container capacity as the amount of water retained in a containerised medium after
drainage from saturation has ceased, but before evaporation has started. A combination of
mathematical functions for the water characteristic curves and container geometry was later
shown to provide a more consistent description of container capacity (Bilderback and
Fontento, 1987; Fonteno, 1989). According to this approach, container capacity is the total
volume of water in the container, as given by its water retention curve, divided by the
container volume. This term describes the maximum water retention capacity of the medium.
Bilderback and Fonteno (1987) defined ‘available water’ as the difference between container
capacity and the water held at permanent wilting point. However, although such a value may
represent an end-point for plant survival, the proposed range does not represent the optimum
for plant growth in containers, and water is not equally available over the range from
container capacity to permanent wilting point.
Moisture extraction by roots depends on the momentary atmospheric conditions and
medium water availability, which, in turn, depends on the resistance to water flow from the
medium bulk to the medium-root interface, and water flow across the root tissues into the
root xylem. Moisture depletion in the rhizosphere induces water flow from the surrounding
medium volume to replenish the depleted water. This flux depends on the momentary value
of the hydraulic conductivity within the medium volume that encircles the roots and on the
hydraulic head gradient between this medium volume and the surface of the root:
d
q K ( ) [12]
ds
where q [L/T] is water flux through the root-medium interface, K() is the unsaturated
hydraulic conductivity, which depends nonlinearly on suction, , or water content, , (section
2.2.8), and ‘s’ is an axis pointing in any direction at the proximity of the media-root interface.
Owing to the non-linear relationship between the hydraulic conductivity and moisture content,
K(), a deviation from a certain value of induces a moderate decrease in K, while a similar
deviation from a lower value of induces a sharp decrease in K. Equation (12) is written
under the assumption that gravity has a negligible effect on water flux from the medium to the
root at the medium-root interface proximity.
The momentary balance between the actual water flux from the medium volume
surrounding the root and the potential water extraction rate (which depends mainly on the
momentary atmospheric conditions) determines whether medium moisture is fully available
to the plant. By “fully available” we mean that the water extracted from the vicinity of the
root can be fully replenished at a rate that coincides with the potential ET. When the root
rhizosphere cannot be immediately replenished, water uptake by the root will be limited by
the transport ability of medium water toward the roots, i.e. by the medium’s conductivity
near the rhizoplane.
To demonstrate the actual implication of the water-availability related parameters
mentioned above, we consider two media, peat moss and tuff, which are uniformly packed in
containers of 25 cm height. The maximum potential water uptake rate is at ‘container
capacity’, i.e. following irrigation, drainage, and water redistribution. Under such a
condition, the water content at the container bottom is close to saturation, and gradually
decreases towards the top. Once equilibrium has been reached on the completion of
drainage, the suction at any location in the container will be equal to the gravitational force
exerted by the height of that location from the bottom of the container. For such conditions,
the moisture content distribution along the container height is the retention curve of the
particular medium. These distributions for peat and tuff containers are shown in Figure
2.2.9(1). For such suction and water content distributions, one can add the characteristic
hydraulic conductivity curves of the relevant medium to the water content distribution in
order to evaluate the hydraulic conductivity at each height along the container (Figure
2.2.9(1)). The peat and tuff differ significantly in their water retention properties, peat
exhibiting a higher water-holding capacity. The two media show a high value of saturated
hydraulic conductivity, Ks (Figure 2.2.9(1)). However, as suction (expressed in the figure as
height from the container bottom) increases from 0 to 25 cm and water content decreases
accordingly, the hydraulic conductivity decreases by approximately three orders of
magnitude for peat and by approximately four orders of magnitude for tuff. As such, the
hydraulic conductivity variation in the pot has a major influence on water availability and
should be considered when criteria for water availability are postulated. The enormous and
K variation along the container height demonstrates that water is not evenly distributed
throughout the container volume; potential water availability is much higher at the container
bottom than at the top. This should also be considered prior to the installation of measuring
devices (tensiometers, TDR etc.) in the container and during the interpretation of the
measured data for operative decisions, such as irrigation scheduling, leaching, etc.
It is interesting to compare the values of and K at h=10 cm, which was considered to be
the lower suction limit of EAW definition (de Boodt and Verdonck, 1972). The moisture
content, , for peat is 0.6 (compared to 0.9 at saturation) and for tuff 0.19 (compared to
0.51 at saturation). The hydraulic conductivity at this location is 1.5·10 -2 cm min-1 for peat
(compared to 4.91 cm min-1 at saturation) and 5.5·10-3 cm min-1 for tuff (compared to 7.3 cm
min-1 at saturation). These values were estimated by the arrows shown in Figure 2.2.9(1).
Note that both and K of the peat at 10 cm height are three times larger than those of the
tuff. The lower hydraulic conductivity values in the upper part of the container indicate that
water is barely available there, in spite of the fact that the water at this location is within the
range of EAW.
A method to estimate water availability by directly measuring or K() near the roots does
not yet exist. Thus water availability needs to be related to other measurable soil-bulk
properties. It was hypothesized (Wallach et al., 1992a, b; da Silva et al., 1993a, b) and
verified (Orozco and Marfa, 1995; Raviv et al., 1999, 2001) that K() of the medium bulk
indicates the availability (amounts and rates) of medium water to plant roots and significantly
affects the plant’s performance.
A precise balance between ET and irrigation is rarely practical, mainly due to increased
salinity in the root zone. Plants do not take up some non-essential ions, thus causing a gradual
build-up of salinity (Baas and van den Berg, 1999). To prevent this, excessive amounts of
water must be supplied in order to leach accumulated salts. If the root zone is leached
frequently, the roots are never exposed to an excessively low osmotic potential. This practice
assures that o of the medium solution is maintained close to that of the irrigation water.
Frequent irrigation is beneficial also from a consideration of nutrient availability. A test case
for this issue is presented in section 2.3.3.
The main chemical characteristic of rockwool is that it is totally inert, except for some
minor effects on pH. The initial pH of the commercial material is rather high (7.0-8.0) and
values of up to 9.5 have been recorded (Smith, 1987). Therefore pH adjustment to a more
favourable range, 5.5-6.0, is required, but below pH 5.0 it dissolves. Rockwool itself has no
effect on crop nutrition and all the required macronutrients must be supplied with the water.
However, it was demonstrated that a considerable amount of Fe could be taken up from
rockwool by rose rootstocks (Rupp and Dudley, 1989) and some vegetables (Sonneveld and
Voogt, 1985). Moreover, Rupp and Dudley (1989) reported that considerable concentration
of Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn could be extracted with DTPA from various rockwool products.
Sterilization and waste disposal - Mineral wool is a sterile product. After use it can be
steamed. One of the major problems in the horticultural use of mineral wool is the
environmental issue of the waste, as it is not a natural resource that can be returned back to
nature. In the last decade, different methods of rockwool recycling have been developed. The
waste rockwool and glasswool can be used as a raw material for the production of mineral
wool, or slabs can be chopped into small particles that can be used as a component in mixed
media.
Sterilization and waste disposal - Perlite is a sterile product as it produced at a very high
temperature. After use it can be steamed and its stability is not greatly affected by acids or
microorganisms. Chemically, perlite is a stable material, which can last for several years. Marfa
et al. (1993) found that it retains its physical properties for successive crops, although our yet
as unpublished results show a significant shift in physical properties (R.W and M.R.). Perlite is
sensitive to mechanical compression, which may grind particles to powder. Being an inert
material, recycling perlite poses no environmental problems.
When the pH is low, there is a risk of toxic Al release into the solution. Mg is an important
component of the mineral structure and is the dominant adsorbed cation.
Sterilization and waste disposal - Vermiculite is a sterile product as it is produced at very high
temperatures. However, it cannot be steam-sterilized as it disintegrates during heating.
Vermiculite expanded structure collapses easily. Therefore, it is not suitable for long period of
use. It is sensitive to mechanical compression, which may grind particles to powder. Disposal
of vermiculite is not hazardous to the environment.
2.5.1.3.4. Zeolite
Production, origin and general information – Zeolites are crystalline hydrated
aluminosilicates of alkali and alkaline cations that possess infinite, three-dimensional crystal
structures (Ming and Mumpton, 1989; Mumpton, 1999). Zeolites are usually formed by
metamorphism of volcanic rocks, but may also be formed from non-volcanic materials in
marine deposits or aqueous environments (Ming and Mumpton, 1989). Due to their ion
exchange, adsorption, hydration-dehydration and catalysis properties, zeolites are widely used
in agriculture and in numerous industries for the removal of pollutants from waste and
drinking water, ion exchangers, building stones, lightweight aggregates, and pozzolans in
cement and concrete (Ming and Mumpton, 1989; Mumpton, 1999). Amelioration of the
chemical and physical properties of natural zeolite is achieved by producing synthetic minerals
and since the 50s manufactured zeolites are produced all over the world (Sherman, 1999).
Zeolites (mainly clinoptilolite) are used in soil remediation to adsorb nuclear waste or heavy
metals (Kapetanios and Loizidou, 1992; Rosen, 1996; Chlopecka and Adriano 1997;
Paasikallio, 1998; Krutilina et al., 1999; 2000). They are used in agriculture as soil
amendments for: (i) a source of P, K and NH4 nutrients in infertile soils and substrates
(Hershey et al., 1980; Chen and Gabelman, 1990; Notario del Pino et al., 1994; Allen et al.,
1995; Williams and Nelson, 1997; Dwairi, 1998); (ii) reducing N losses and nitrate
contamination (Weber et al., 1983; Ferguson and Pepper, 1987; Huang and Petrovic, 1994;
Ando et al., 1996; Kithome 1999); and (iii) improving water availability (Huang and Petrovic,
1995; Yasuda et al., 1995). Additional agricultural uses of zeolites were described by Pond
and Mumpton (1984).
Zeolites possess extremely high CEC values (2200-4600 mmolc kg-1) as well as a relatively
high bulk density (1.9-2.3 mg m-3) (Ming and Mumpton, 1989) and therefore the use of zeolite
as a single component growing substrate is not recommended. However, in mixed substrates,
which include organic (peat and compost) or inorganic materials (sand and perlite), zeolites
are widely used for flower and vegetable production all over the world (Bulgaria, China,
Cuba, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Korea, Russia, USA and Yugoslavia). The experimental use of
zeolite as a single growing substrate has been reported for several crops, such as carnation
(Challinor et al., 1995), sweet pepper (Harland et al., 1999), tomato (Rivero-Gonzales and
Rodriguez-Fuentes, 1988), and gerbera (Papadopoulus et al., 1995).
Clinoptilolite is the principal zeolite mineral used in agriculture and therefore only its
physical and chemical properties will be detailed below.
Physical characteristics - Clinoptilolite has a particle density of 2-2.1 g cm-3 (Ming and
Mumpton, 1989) and saturation water content of 34% (Mumpton, 1999). However, grinding
and sieving processes affect the chemical and physical properties of the product. The physical
properties of Turkish zeolites (clinoptilolite) differed by aggregate size, but were almost
identical to that of known materials used for substrates (perlite, basaltic and rhyolitic tuff) at
the same size (Unver et al., 1989) The volumetric pore space, AFP and EAW (defined at a
water suction of: 0, 0-1.0 and 1.0-5.0 kPa, respectively) of these zeolites are detailed in Table
2.5.1.3.4.(1) (from Unver et al., 1989):
2.5.1.4. Pumice
Production, origin and general information – Pumice is a product of volcanic activity and
usually forms from silicic lavas developed in rhyolitic composition, rich in gases and volatiles
(Challinor, 1996). Rapid releases of pressure during volcanic eruptions lead to gas expansion
and the formation of low-density materials composed of highly vesicular volcanic glass.
Pumice is common in areas rich in volcanic activity, such as the Portuguese Azores, Greek
islands, Iceland, Japan, New Zealand, Russia, Sicily, Turkey, and the U.S.A. The raw material
is mined from quarries, ground and sieved according to customer requirement. Its physical and
chemical properties are affected by its aggregate size. Pumice has been used since Roman
times as lightweight aggregates for building, stonewashing in the clothing industry, polishing
and cleaning metal, wood and glass, and as filler in the paper and plastic industries.
Physical characteristics – Pumice is a lightweight aggregate, having a low bulk density of
0.4-0.8 g cm-3, and a pore space of 70-85 % (Boertje, 1994; Challinor, 1996; Raviv et al.,
1999), depending on its origin and the sieving/grinding processes. Pumice possesses large
pores and consequently its volumetric water content decreases sharply as water tension
increases. (Boertje, 1994; Raviv et al., 1999). The water-holding capacity of pumice is
relatively low compared with rockwool, perlite or organic substrates and may limit water and
nutrient uptake by plants, especially in hot climates (Raviv et al., 1999). The volumetric pore
space, AFP and EAW (defined at a water suction of: 0, 0-1.0 and 1.0-5.0 kPa, respectively) of
three pumices are detailed in Table 2.5.1.4.(1):
The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of Sicilian and Greek pumice decreased by almost 4
and 6 orders of magnitude, respectively, as water tension increased from 0 to 10 kPa (Raviv et
al., 1999). Therefore very frequent irrigation is required for plants grown in pumice.
Chemical characteristics – Pumice is an inert aluminosilicate material composed primarily
of silica and Al-oxide, but may also contain metal oxides, calcite or salts. The chemical
composition of pumice is shown in Table 2.5.1.4.(2):
Pumice has no buffering capacity and possesses a very low surface charge, derived mainly
from impurities of carbonate and metal content (Silber, unpublished data). The material is
stable even at pH 2.5 (Silber, unpublished data). However, caution is recommended when
using new pumice material because high concentrations of Na are leached out at the beginning
of use.
Sterilization and waste disposal – Pumice is biologically inert and contains no pathogens or
weeds (Challinor, 1996). It is stable and can be reused practically indefinitely. Being a natural
product, it can be disposed of without causing environmental pollution.
Tuffs possess a buffering capacity and may adsorb or release nutrients, especially P, during
the growth period (Silber et al., 1999; Silber and Raviv, 1996). The chemical stability of tuffs
depends on their mineralogical composition. Volcanic glass dissolution is very rapid while that
of secondary minerals, such as kaolinite and halloysite, is slower. Hence, non-weathered
materials containing a high concentration of volcanic glass, like black tuff are unstable and
dissolve easily in solution below pH 6, while red and yellow tuffs are more stable (Silber et al.,
1999). Introducing plants to black, or even red tuff, after equilibration with an acidic electrolyte
(pH below 5) may be risky due to Al and Mn toxicity.
Sterilization and waste disposal – Tuff is a stable material, which can last for several years.
Growing plants may even improve the chemical properties of tuff due to the accumulation of
organic matter and low-molecular-weight fulvic acid (Silber and Raviv, 1996). Steaming, solar
heating or chemical treatments can be used for disinfestation. Disinfestation treatments of tuff
after rose growth resulted in yields (cut roses), which were superior to those of unused tuff
(Raviv et al., 1998a). The disinfestation process per se did not affect the solid phase or stability of
the tuff, but significantly affect the solubilization of organic matter. The soluble organic compounds
released during disinfestation are adsorbed later by the tuff surfaces, thereby changing its surface
charge. (Silber and Raviv, 2001). Thus, beyond their beneficial effects on pathogen populations, the
disinfestation treatments enhanced nutritional element availability.
The texture of peat is affected by the method in which it was harvested and processed. The
technique used to harvest peat depends on the climate and bog characteristics, such as the
presence of tree stumps in the bog. Peat is harvested from bogs by hydraulic mining or block
cutting. Peat compacts more through hydraulic mining. In this harvest method, peat is
shredded and removed from the bog by dredging, so its aeration porosity decreases.
Peat derived by the block-cutting method is cut into slabs as it is excavated from the bog
and shredded to a coarse texture. Block-cut peat has a higher TP and aeration porosity and
holds more available water than mined peat; however, water-holding porosity is lower in
block-cut peat as opposed to mined peat (Wilson, 1985).
In addition to classification on the basis of decomposition, four horticultural classifications
of peat exist, although variations may exist within any of these types. Peats of the same
classification often differ in quality, and even peats from the same bog taken from separate
layers can possess different chemical and physical properties. The type of plant material and
degree of decomposition largely determine peat’s value for use in a growing medium.
Sphagnum peat moss is the dehydrated remains of acid-bog plants of the genus Sphagnum.
Approximately 335 species of Sphagnum exist throughout the world, but mostly in northern,
cool regions. The upper layer of the bog’s profile consists of the least decomposed material. It
is typically light tan to brown in colour. It has a very light BD and is commonly used for plant
shipment, propagation or to line hanging baskets. Somewhat deeper layers, usually termed as
peat moss are somewhat darker in colour, more decomposed and slightly heavier. Sphagnum
moss is perhaps the most desirable form of organic matter for the preparation of growth
media. The Baltic States, Finland, Germany, Canada and Ireland are the principle regions of
Sphagnum moss production.
Hypnum peat moss. This type of peat consists of the partially decomposed remains of
Hypnum, Polytrichum and other mosses of the Hypanaceae family. In its stable form it
contains a high concentration of humic acid in a colloidal form. Drying out of this material is
difficult to reverse due to the hydrophobic nature of the resulting clods. This situation can be
prevented by a process of freezing and thawing, which breaks down the clods and creates a
granular structure. Although hypnum peat moss is usually less expensive than sphagnum peat,
it may contain plant pathogens or weed seeds as a result of the conditions under which it was
produced. To meet the criteria of this classification, over 90% organic matter must comprise
the oven dry weight of hypnum peat; 50% of this must represent plant material from the genus
Hypnum. Container tree seedlings should not be grown in media consisting of large quantities
of hypnum peat, but it is often used as a medium component for acid-intolerant crops.
Reed and sedge peat and Peat humus are more decomposed, and are characterised by a
high BD and low TP. They are not recommended as major components of growing media and
therefore will not be discussed further.
Main applications - Peat is, by far, the most important organic ingredient of growing media
for both nursery and greenhouse mixes and as a stand-alone substrate.
Physical characteristics – The physical characteristics of sphagnum peat were thoroughly
reviewed and analysed by Heiskanen (1993). After decomposition of the readily biodegradable
parts, the resistant skeleton of the sphagnum leaves forms a very porous structure, mainly
composed of sphagnol. Sphagnol, containing numerous phenolic and hydroxylic radicals,
applies strong electrostatic forces on water molecules, thus conferring peat a very high water
holding capacity. Therefore peat is usually included in a mix to increase the water-holding
capacity or to decrease the weight of the mix. Peat is inherently hydrophobic and its wetting
may be problematic. Frequently, wetting agents or lime are used to reduce hydrophobicity.
Chemical Characteristics - Sphagnum peat contains at least 95% organic matter on a dry
weight basis (Table 2.5.2.1.(2)). In addition, this peat moss contains a minimum of 75% fibre,
consisting of recognizable cells of the leaves and stems of Sphagnum. This fibrous structure
has a very high surface charge density including cation exchange capacity, which helps to
reduce leaching of applied nutrients. Dark peat moss maintains twice the cation exchange
capacity of light peats, yet does not possess as much total or aeration porosity. The conditions
in the peat bog leave the peat with very low soluble salts content. Sphagnum is usually
characterized by an acidic pH (Table 2.5.2.1.(2)). Although this may be an advantage for some
acid-loving plants (hydrangea, rhododendrons), in most cases lime or dolomite is added to
increase the pH up to the range of 5-6. The main characteristics of peat types are shown in
Table 2.5.2.1.(2).
Table 2.5.2.1.(2): Main physical and chemical characteristics of different peat types.
Peat Type Species Degree of pH % Ash %N BD
decomposition
composition (g cm-3)
Sphagnum Sphagnum Very low 3-4 1-5 0.6 - 1.4 0.07 – 0.11
Hypnum Hypnum, Low 5-7 4 - 10 2 - 3.5 0.08 – 0.16
Polystrichum,
Sphagnum spp.
Reed- Reeds, sedges, Medium 4.0 - 7.5 5 - 18 1.5 - 3.5 0.16-0.29
grasses, cattails
sedge
Humus Not High 5.0 - 7.5 10 - 50 2.0 - 3.5 0.32-0.65
distinguishable
Sterilization and waste disposal – Although sphagnum moss has been found in some cases
to contain specific fungistatic substances, which account for its ability to inhibit damping-off of
seedlings, it is generally considered as a substrate conducive to numerous soilborne diseases.
The sterilization of peat, although possible, does not alleviate the problem, as it leaves a
biological vacuum that can easily be filled by pathogenic fungi.
Disposal of used peat does not pose any environmental problem. It can be applied to soil or
reused for other containerised crops.
2.5.2.2. Composts
Compost is a general term, describing all organic matter that has undergone long,
thermophilic, aerobic decomposition. Composts can vary according to the raw material used
and to the exact nature of the process. Composts made of tree waste products will be
described in section 2.5.2.3. while the current section will deal with other types of raw
materials. Reviews describing the production and use of composts as growing media were
written by Miller and Metting Jr., (1992), Inbar et al. (1993), Epstein, (1997) and Raviv
(1998).
Production, origin and general information – Composts serving as growth media are
produced from numerous organic wastes, such as sewage sludge, municipal solid waste,
animal excreta, wastes of food industry such as rice hulls, corn cobs etc. Materials having a
high C/N ratio such as yard, municipal and agricultural trimmings can be composted on their
own, or preferably, cocomposted with materials of low AFP and/or rich in nitrogen, such as
sewage sludge, chicken manure and slaughterhouse wastes. In such cases they will serve as
bulking agents and nitrogen traps (Genevini et al., 1997). Animal excreta are of special value
for both composting and cocomposting because they contain large, diverse populations of
microorganisms, which accelerate the process. Manures are normally generated within
agricultural areas where the supply of raw material and demand for the product do not require
long-distance transportation.
Wastes of the food and processing industry are especially convenient for composting
since they are uniform, rich in organic matter and concentrated in place. In some cases, the
physical and chemical characteristics of these composts make them suitable to serve as
components in container media, thus greatly increasing their economic value. A few examples
for such raw materials are: apple pomace (van de Kamp, 1986), sugar-cane fibre (bagasse)
(Trochoulias, 1990), vegetable residues (Vallini et al., 1992), olive marc (Pages et al., 1985),
grape marc (Inbar et al., 1986), grape stalks and corn cobs (Accati et al., 1996), fish and crab
wastes (Mathur et al., 1990), cotton gin waste (Wang, 1991). Various types of shells or hulls
are particularly useful due to their inherent stability and good physical properties. Examples
are rice hulls (Einert and Baker, 1973, Accati et al., 1996) and peanut hulls (Bilderback et al.,
1982).
Main applications – In addition to their well-known use for soil amendment, an
increasingly popular use of composts is as a constituent in container media. The two main
reasons for this popularity are: (a) In many cases, non-edible crops such as ornamentals, forest
and garden trees and shrubs etc. can serve as a safe outlet for composts that may be
considered as non-desirable for food crop production, (b) Various composts act equally well
as peat moss in growth media, while their cost is considerably lower. In addition, the role of
peat bogs in atmospheric CO2 assimilation calls for peat replacement with other, renewable
organic substrates. The fact that mature composts are also suppressive to several soil borne
pathogens, to which peat is conducive, has encouraged many growers to substitute part or all
of the peat with such composts.
Composts serving as a component of container media must be stable, with relatively low
salinity, low concentration of phytotoxic ions and organic molecules, and free of
phytopathogenic organisms.
It must be reiterated that unless all these requirements are met simultaneously, the
compost may fail to serve successfully as a container medium. This may be the reason why
Cull (1981) stated “Of the nine major organic materials reviewed not one stands out as the
alternative to peat in the UK”. Since then, a wide variety of materials has been composted and
serve successfully as components of container media, and clear criteria of the suitability of
such composts have been described (Raviv et al., 1986; Inbar et al., 1993).
Physical characteristics of composts vary greatly. At the two extremes of the scale are
sewage sludge-bark compost (BD – 0.4 g cm-3, TP – 73%, AFP 17% and EAW 10%; Nappi
and Barberis, 1993) and compost made of rice hulls with 20% cow manure (BD – 0.11 g cm-3,
TP – 94%, AFP 46% and EAW 25%; Raviv and Mor, unpublished). Compost made of the
coarse fraction of separated cattle manure is closer to the middle of the scale, with a BD of
0.18 g cm-3, TP – 92%, AFP 21% and EAW 23%, (Raviv et al., 1998c). It can be concluded
that, assuming availability is not a problem, composts can be tailor-made for a wide variety of
requirements, related to physical properties. Many types of compost of high bulk density and
low TP (e.g. most sewage sludge and MSW composts) can serve only as minor ingredients in
potting mixes. Their proportion can be higher, however, when high yield or fast growth rate
are of lesser importance. On the other hand, composts with high total and air filled porosity,
such as compost made of the coarse fraction of cow manure and grape marc, can replace peat
moss successfully and even serve on their own (Raviv et al., 1998 a and b; Inbar et al., 1986).
Chemical characteristics – Perhaps the most beneficial effect of compost inclusion in a
growth medium is its nutritional contribution. Non-mature compost can immobilise a
significant amount of N, but once stabilised, compost acts, to a large extent, as a slow-release
fertiliser (Williams and Nelson, 1992; Jespersen and Willumsen, 1993). Most composts have
pH values slightly above the desirable range (Nappi and Barberis, 1993). This can be corrected
in the medium later by applying nitric or phosphoric acids, as sources of N and P, respectively.
Biological characteristics, sterilisation and waste disposal – Most stable composts, after a
proper curing stage, suppress a large range of phytopathogenic fungi (Hoitink and Kuter,
1986; Mandelbaum and Hadar, 1990; Hadar and Gorodecki, 1991). Sterilisation largely
inhibits this phenomenon (Mandelbaum et al., 1988; Raviv et al., 1998d), suggesting that most
of it results from microbial activity, although some residual activity is probably related to
fungistatic compounds existing in the composts (Hoitink and Fahy, 1986).
Disposal of sewage sludge and urban composts may pose an environmental hazard if their
heavy metal content is high. In such cases they must be sent to landfills. Otherwise, disposal of
composts can easily be done via soil application.
Mastalerz, J. W., 1977. The greenhouse environment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mathur, S.P., Schnitzer, M. and P. Schuppli, 1990. The distribution of nitrogen in peat-based
composts of manure slurries and fisheries wastes. Biol. Agr. and Hort. 7: 153-163.
Mbah, B.N. and Odili, P.N., 1998. Changes in moisture retention properties of five waste
materials during short-term mesophilic composting. Compost Sci. Utilization 6: 67-73.
Mc Bride, M. B., 1989. Surface chemistry of soil minerals. pp. 35-88 in: Dixon, J. B., and S.
B. Weed (eds). Minerals in Soil Environments. 2nd Edition,. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison,
WI., SSSA Book Series No. 1.
McKenzie, C.B., B.N. Wolstenholme and P. Allan, 1990. The current status of South African
avocado nurseries and some factors affecting clonal avocado nursery tree growth. Acta
Hort. 275: 293-300.
Meerow, A., 1994. Growth of two subtropical ornamentals using coir (coconut mesocarp
pith) as a peat substitute. HortSci. 29: 1484-1486.
Meinken, E., 1997. Accumulation of nutrients in expanded clay used for indoor planting. Acta
Hort. 450: 321-327.
Meinken, E. and P. Fischer, 1994. Hydrokulturen in Wohnraumen, Weiter optimalbereich bei
der ernahrung. Deutscher Gratenbau 48: 1348-1350.
Mesen, F., A.C. Newton and R.R.B. Leakey, 1997. Vegetative propagation of Cordia
alliodora (Ruiz & Pavon) Oken: the effects of IBA concentration, propagation medium
and cutting origin. Forest Ecol. Management 92: 45-54.
Michel, J-C. and L.-M. Riviere, 1999. La mouillabilite des substrats organiques. PHM-Revue-
Horticole 406: 72-74, 76.
Milks, R. R., W. C. Fonteno and R. Larson, 1989a. Hydrology of horticultural substrates: I.
Mathematical models for moisture characteristics of horticultural container media. J. Am.
Soc. Hort. Sci. 144: 48-52.
Milks, R. R., W. C. Fonteno and R. Larson, 1989b. Hydrology of horticultural substrates: II.
Predicting physical properties of media in containers. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 144: 53-56.
Milks, R. R., W. C. Fonteno and R. Larson, 1989c. Hydrology of horticultural substrates: III.
Predicting air and water content of limited-volume plug cells. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 144:
57-61.
Miller, F.C. and F.B. Metting Jr, 1992. Composting as a process based on the control of
ecologically selective factors. pp. 515-544 in: Soil microbial ecology: applications in
agricultural and environmental management. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York
Miller, J.H. and N. Jones, 1995. Organic and compost-based growing media for tree seedling
nurseries. World Bank Technical Paper, No. 264, xiii + 75 pp. Washington DC, USA.
Ming, D. W., and F. A. Mumpton, 1989. Zeolites in soils. pp. 873-909 in: Dixon, J. B., and S.
B. Weed (eds). Minerals in Soil Environments. 2nd Edition,. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison,
WI., SSSA Book Series No. 1.
Morel, P, L.M. Riviere and C. Julien, 2000. Measurement of representative volumes of
substrates: which method, in which objective? Acta-Hort. 517: 261-269.
Morley, P.S., M. Hardgrave, M. Bradley and D.J. Pilebeam, 1993. Susceptibility of sweet
pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars in the calcium deficiency disorder ‘Blossom-end
rot’, pp. 561-567. In: M.A.C. Fragoso and M.L. Van Beusichem (eds.) Optimization of
plant nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mualem, Y., 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated
porous media. Water Resources Res. 12: 513-522.
Mumpton F. A. 1999. La roca magica: Uses of natural zeolites in agriculture and industry.
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 96: 3463-3471.
Munoz-Carpena, R., Socorro-Monzon, A.R., Manisto, P., Trujillo, J., 1996. Irrigation
management based on water consumption for greenhouse roses growing on terrace
soils in the Canary Islands. Acta Hort. 424: 111-114.
Nappi, P. and R. Barberis, 1993. Compost as growing medium: chemical, physical and
biological aspects. Acta Hort. 342: 249-256.
Nkongolo, N.V. and J. Caron, 1999, Bark particle sizes and the modification of the physical
properties of peat substrates. Can. J. Soil Sci. 79: 111-116.
Noguera, P. M. Abad, V. Noguera, R. Puchades and A. Maquieira, 2000. Coconut coir waste,
a new and viable ecologically-friendly peat substitute. Acta Hort. 517: 279-286.
Norrie, J., Graham, M.E.D., Gosselin, A., 1994. Potential evapotranspiration as a means of
predicting irrigation timing in greenhouse tomatoes grown in peat bags. J. Amer. Soc.
Hort. Sci. 119: 163-168.
Notario del Pino, J. S., I. J. Artega-Padron, M. M. Gonzales-Martin, and J. E. Garcia-
Hernandez, 1994. Response of alfalfa to a phillipsite-based slow-release fertilizers.
Commun. Soil Sci. Plant. Anal. 25: 2231-2245.
Ofori, D.A., A.C. Newton, R.R.B. Leakey and J. Grace, 1996. Vegetative propagation of
Milicia excelsa by leafy stem cuttings: effects of auxin concentration, leaf area and rooting
medium. Forest Ecol. Management 84: 39-48.
Olympios, C.M., 1992. Soilless media under protected cultivation: rockwool, peat, perlite and
other substrates. Acta Hort. 323: 215-234.
Orozco, R. and O. Marfa, 1995. Granulometric alteration, air entry potential and hydraulic
conductivity in perlites used in soilless cultures. Acta Hort. 408: 147-161.
Paasikallio, A., 1998. Effect of biotite, zeolite, heavy clay, bentonite and apatite on the uptake
of radiocaesium by grass from peat soil. Plant and Soil, 206: 213- 222.
Pages, M., Estaun, V. and C. Calvet, 1985. Physical and chemical properties of olive marc
compost. Acta Hort. 172: 271-276.
Papadopoulos, A., E. Maloupa, and F. Papadopoulos, 1995. Seasonal crop coefficient of
gerbera soilless culture. Acta Hort. 408: 81-90.
Parker, J. C., L. W. Zelancy, S. Sampath and W. S. Harris, 1979. A critical evaluation of the
extension of zero point of charge (ZPC) theory to soil systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:
668-573.
Perfect, T., 1759. The practice of gardening. Baldwin, London.
Pokorny, F.A., 1979. Pine bark container media: an overview. Inter. Plant Propagators' Soc.
Combined Proceedings 29: 484-495.
Pokorny, F.A., 1982. Horticultural uses of bark: a bibliography. Research Report No 402,
College of Agriculture, University of Georgia.
Pokorny, F. A., 1987. Available water and root development within the micropores of pine
bark particles. J. of Environmental Horticulture 5: 89-92.
Pokorny, F.A., P.G. Gibson and M.G. Dunavent, 1986. Prediction of bulk density of pine bark
and/or sand potting media from laboratory analyses of individual components. J. Amer.
Soc. Hort. Sci. 111: 8-11.
Politycka, B., D. Wojcik-Wojtkowiak and T. Pudelski, 1985. Phenolic compounds as a cause
of phytotoxicity in greenhouse substrates repeatedly used in cucumber growing. Acta
Hort. 156: 89-94.
Pond, W. G., and F. A. Mumpton, 1984. Zeo-agriculture. Use of natural zeolites in
agriculture and aquaculture. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Poole, R.T., C.A. Conover and J.N. Joiner, 1981. Soils and potting mixtures. pp. 179-202 in:
Foliage plant production. Ed. J.N. Joiner. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Prasad, M., 1997. Physical, chemical and biological properties of coir dust. Acta Hort. 450:
21-29.
Pudelski, T., 1985. Woodwaste composts as growing media for vegetables under protection.
Acta Hort. 172: 67-74.
Puustjarvi, V., 1977. Peat and its use in horticulture. Turveteollisuusliitto Ry, Publ. 3,
Helsinki.
Raviv, M., 1998. Horticultural uses of composted material. Acta Hort. 469: 225-234.
Raviv, M. and Sh. Mordechai, 1987. A suggested modification in the extraction procedure and
expression of EC values of growth media. Acta Hort. 221: 445-452.
Raviv, M. and Sh. Medina, 1997. Physical characteristics of separated cattle manure compost.
Compost Science & Utilization 5: 44-47.
Raviv, M., Y. Chen and Y. Inbar, 1986. Peat and peat substitutes as growth media for
container-grown plants. pp. 257-287 in: Organic Matter in Modern Agriculture. (Chen,
Y. and Y. Avnimelech, eds.). Martinus Nijhof/Dr. W. Junk Publ. Dordrecht. The
Netherlands.
Raviv, M., S. Silber and S. Medina, 1998a. The effect of medium disinfestation on cut rose
productivity and on some chemical properties of tuff. Sci. Hort. 74: 285-293.
Raviv, M., B. Zaidman and Y. Kapulnik, 1998b. The use of compost as a peat substitute for
organic vegetable transplants production. Compost Science & Utilization 6: 46-52.
Raviv, M., R. Reuveni and B. Zaidman, 1998c. Improved medium for organic transplants.
Biol. Agric. and Hort. 16: 53-64.
Raviv, M., S. Tarre, Z. Geler, and G. Shelef, 1987. Changes in some physical and chemical
properties of fibrous solids from cow manure and digested cow manure during
composting. Biological Wastes 19: 309-318.
Raviv, M., J.H. Lieth, D.W. Burger and R. Wallach, 2001. Optimization of Transpiration and
Potential Growth Rates of ‘Kardinal’ Rose with Respect to Root-zone Physical
Properties. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126: 638-645.
Raviv, M., R.Wallach, A. Silber, Sh. Medina and A. Krasnovsky, 1999. The effect of hydraulic
characteristics of volcanic materials on yield of roses grown in soilless culture. J. Am.
Soc. Hort. Sci., 124: 205-209.
Raviv, M., R. Reuveni, A. Krasnovsky, Sh. Medina, L. Freiman and A. Bar, 1998d. Compost
as a controlling agent against Fusarium wilt of sweet basil. Acta Hort. 469: 375-381.
Rennie, R., 1807. Essays on the natural history and origin of peat moss. A. Constable & Co.
Edinburgh.
Rhoades, J.H. 1982. Cation exchange capacity. pp. 149-157 in A.L. Page, R.H. Miller and
D.R. Keeney (Eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological
Properties. Agronomy 9, Pub. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. & Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Inc.
Madison, WI.
Rivero-Gonzales, L. A. and G. Rodriguez-Fuentes, 1988. Cuban experience with the use of
natural zeolite substrates in soilless culture. Int., Soc. for Soilless Culture, Wageningen,
405-416.
Riviere, L.M., 1992. Le fonctionnement hydrique du système substrat-plante en culture hors
sol. Report submitted to the University of Angers.
Riviere, L.M. and C. Milhau, 1984. The use of wood waste composts in the making of
substrates for container crops. Acta Hort. 150: 475-489.
Riviere, L.M., J.C. Foucard and F. Lemaire, 1990. Irrigation of crops according to the
substrate. Sci. Hort. 43: 339-439.
Robinson, D.W. and J.G.D. Lamb, 1975. Peat in Horticulture. Academic Press, London.
Roorda van Eysinga, J.P.N.L. and M.Q. van der Meijs, 1981. Disorders in red sweet pepper
fruits. Ann. Rep. Glasshouse Crops Res. Exp. Stn., Naaldwijk, 1979, 24-25.
Rosen, K. 1996. Field studies on the behaviour of radiocaesium in agricultural environments
after the Chernobyl accident. Rapport Institutionen for Radioekology Sveriges
Lantbruksuniversitat, No. 78.
Rupp, L.A. and L.M. Dudley, 1989. Iron availability in rockwool may affect rose nutrition.
HortSci. 24: 258-260.
Saharinen, M. H., 1996. Cation exchange capacity of manure-straw compost – does sample
preparation modify the results? pp. 1309-1311 in: de Bertoldi, M., Sequi, P., Lemmes, B.,
and T. Papi (eds). The Science of Composting; part 2,.Blackie Academic & Professional,
Glasgow.
Sanyal, S. K. and S. K. De Datta, 1991. Chemistry of phosphorus transformations in soil. Adv.
in Soil Sci. 16: 1-120.
Sarro, M.J., L. Gonzalez and J.M. Penlosa, 1995. Response of pepper plants to different
periods of nitrate and ammonium fertilization. Acta Hort. 412: 439-446.
Sawan, O.M., A.M. Eissa and A.F. Abou-Hadid, 1999. The effect of different growing media
on cucumber seedling production, fruit yield and quality under greenhouse conditions.
Acta Hort. 491: 369-376.
Scoggins, L., D.A. Bailey and P.V. Nelson, 2001. Development of the press extraction
method for plug substrate analysis: Quantitative relationships between solution extraction
methods. HortSci. 36: 918-921.
Selwa, J. and Lipecki, J., 1993. Effects of sawdust from wood of different species of tree on
the rooting of softwood cuttings of sour cherry and hazelnut. Folia Hortic. 5: 3-9.
Sharman, K.V. and M. Whitehouse, 1993. Nitrogen drawdown index as a predictor of
nitrogen requirements for Nephrolepis in sawdust media. Sci. Hort. 54: 23-33.
Sherman, J. D. 1999. Synthetic zeolites and other microporous oxide molecular sieves. Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 96: 3471-3478.
Shiembo, P.N., A.C. Newton and R.R.B. Leakey, 1996. Vegetative propagation of Gnetum
africanum Welw., a leafy vegetable from West Africa. J. Hortic. Sci. 71: 149-155.
Shiembo, P.N., A.C. Newton and R.R.B. Leakey, 1996. Vegetative propagation of Irvingia
gabonensis, a West African fruit tree. Forest Ecol. Management 87: 185-192.
Silber, A., 1991. Chemical properties and surface reactions of pyroclastic materials from Mt.
Peres, the Golan Heights. PhD Thesis, Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem. (in Hebrew with
English abstract).
Silber, A. and M. Raviv, 1996. Effects on chemical surface properties of tuff by growing rose
plants. Plant and Soil, 186: 353-360.
Silber, A. and M. Raviv. 2001. Disinfestation effects on the chemical properties of tuff. Acta
Hort. 554: 41-50.
Silber, A., B. Bar-Yosef and Y. Chen, 1999. pH-dependent kinetics of tuff dissolution..
Geoderma, 93: 125-140.
Silber, A., B. Bar-Yosef, A. Singer and Y. Chen, 1994. Mineralogical and chemical
composition of three tuffs from northern Israel. Geoderma, 63: 123-144.
Smith, D.L., 1987. Rockwool in Horticulture. Grower Books. London.
Sonneveld, C. and W. Voogt, 1985. Studies on the application of iron to some glasshouse
vegetables grown in soilless culture. Plant and Soil 85: 55-64.
Sonneveld, C., and C. de Kreij, 1987. Nutrient solutions for vegetables and flowers grown in water
or substrates. Serie: Voedingsoplossingen glastuinbouw, 8, 6th edition, Naaldwijk.
Sonneveld, C., J. van den Ende and P.A. van Dijk, 1974. Analysis of growing media by means
of a 1:1.5 volume extract. Comm. In Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 5: 183-202.
Sonneveld, C., J. van den Ende and S.S. de Bes, 1990. Estimating the chemical compositions
of soil solutions by obtaining saturation extracts or specific 1:2 by volume extracts. Plant
and Soil 122: 169-175.
Sonneveld, C. and J. van den Ende, 1994. Chemical analysis of peaty growing media by means
of water extraction. Comm. In Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 25: 3199-3208.
Sparks, D.L., A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke, R.H. Loeppert, P.N. Soltanpour, M.A. Tabatabai,
C.T. Johnson and M.E. Sumner, 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3-Chemical
Methods Number 5 in the Soil Science Society of America Book Series. Pub. SSSA and
ASA. Madison, WI. 1358 pp.
Spomer, L.A, 1974. Optimizing container soil amendment: the threshold proportion and
prediction of porosity. HortSci. 9: 532-533.
Sposito, G., 1981. The operational definition of the zero point of charge in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J. 45: 292-297.
Stamps, R.H. and M.R. Evans, 1997. Growth of Dieffenbachia maculata 'Camille' in growing
media containing sphagnum peat or coconut coir dust. HortSci. 32: 844-847.
Stanley, C.D. and B.K. Harbaugh, 1989. Poinsettia irrigation based on evaporative demand
and plant growth characteristics. HortSci. 24: 937-939.
Steele, A., 1826. The Natural and Agricultural History of Peat Moss. W. & D. Laing.
Edinburgh.
Stephens, D. B., and K. R. Rehfeldt, 1985. Evaluation of closed-form analytical modules to
calculate conductivity in a fine sand. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49: 12-19.
Suzuki, S., E.B. Rodriguez, K. Saito, H. Shintani and K. Iiyama, 1998. Compositional and
structural characteristics of residual biomass from tropical plantations. J. Wood Sci. 44:
40-46.
Takacs, E. and L. Tecsi, 1992. Effects of NO3-/NH4+ ratio on photosynthetic rate, nitrate
reductase activity and chloroplast ultrastructure in three cultivars of red pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.). J. Plant Physiol. 140: 298-305.
Tan, H. K., 1986. Degradation of soil minerals by organic acids. pp. 1-27 in Interactions of
Soils Minerals with Natural Organics and Microbes. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Madison, WI.,
USA.
Tarre, S., Raviv, M. and G. Shelef, 1987. Composting of fibrous solids from cow manure and
anaerobically digested manure. Biological Wastes 19: 299-308.
Tate, K.R. and B. K. G. Theng, 1980. Organic matter and its interactions with inorganic soil
constituents. pp. 225-249 in B. K. G. Theng (ed) Soils with Variable Charge. New
Zealand Soc. Soil Sci, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Tilt, K.M., T.E. Bilderback and W.C. Fonteno, 1987. Particle size and container size effects
on growth of three ornamental species. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112: 981-984.
Trochoulias, T., A.J. Burton and E. White, 1990. The use of bagasse as a potting medium for
ornamentals. Sci. Hort. 42: 161-167.
Unver, I., Y. Ataman, M. R. Canga and N. Munsuz, 1989. Buffering capacities of some
mineral and organic substrates. Acta Hort. 238: 83-97.
Vallini, G., A. Pera E. Nizzi, L. Tortorella and A. Ciurli, 1992. Vegetable residues from
garden/produce markets as recyclable biomass for high-quality compost production. Acta
Hort. 302: 363-368.
van de Kamp, M., 1986. Apple pomace can be productive. Biocycle 27(3) :39.
van Genuchten, M. Th., 1978. Calculating the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with a
new closed-form analytical model. Research Report 78-WR-08. Dept. of Civil Eng.
Princeton Univ. New Jersey. 63 pp.
van Genuchten, M. Th, 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity
of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49: 12-19.
van Genuchten, M. Th., and D. R. Nielsen, 1985. On describing and predicting the hydraulic
properties of unsaturated soils. Annales Geophysicae 3: 615-628.
Veith, J. A., and G. Sposito., 1977. Reactions of aluminosilicates, hydrous oxides, and
aluminum oxide with O-phosphate: The formation of X-ray amorphous analogs of
variscite and montebrasite. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41: 870-876.
Verdonck, O., D. De Vleeschauwer and R. Penninck, 1983. Cocofibre dust, a new growing
medium for plants in the tropics. Acta Hort. 133: 215-220.
Verdonck, O. and R. Gabriels, 1992. Reference method for the determination of physical and
chemical properties of plant substrates. Acta Hort. 302: 169-179.
Verhagen, J.B.G.M. 1999. CEC and the saturation of the adsorption complex of coir dust.
Acta Hort. 481: 151-155.
Verwer, F.L., 1976. Growing horticultural crops in rockwool and nutrient film. ISOC Proc 4 th
Int. Congr. Soilless Culture, PO Box 52, Wageningen, pp 107-119.
Vincent, G. and C. Sylvain, 1995. Concentrations of nutrients in substrates in containers,
assessing methods and heterogeneity. Acta Hort. 450: 79-86.
Von Post, L., 1937. The geographical survey of Irish bogs. Ir. Nat. J. 6: 210-227.
Wallach, R., F. F. da Silva and Y. Chen, 1992a. Unsaturated hydraulic characteristics of tuff
(scoria) from Israel. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117: 415-421.
Wallach, R., F. F. da Silva and Y. Chen, 1992b. Unsaturated hydraulic characteristics of
composted agricultural wastes, tuff and mixtures. Soil Sci. 153: 434-441.
Wang, Y.-T. 1991. Evaluation of media consisting of a cotton waste for the production of
tropical foliage species. J. Environ. Hort. 9: 112-115.
Wann, S. S. and G. Uehara, 1978. Surface charge manipulation in constant surface potential
soil colloids.: I. Relation to sorbed phosphorus. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42: 565-570.
Ward, A., L. G. Wells and R. E. Philips, 1983. Characterizing the unsaturated Hydraulic
conductivity on Western Kentucky mine spoils and soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am J. 47: 847-
854.
Weber, M. A., K. A. Barbarick and D. G. Westfall, 1983. Ammonium adsorption by a zeolite
in a static and dynamic system. J. Env. Qual. 12: 549-552.
Wever, G., 1995. Physical analysis of peat and peat-based growing media. Acta Hort. 401:
561-567
Wever, G. and A.A. van Leeuwen, 1995. Measuring mechanical properties of growing media
and the influence of cucumber cultivation on these properties. Acta Hort. 401: 27-34.
Wever, G., A.A. van Leeuwen and M.C. van der Meer, 1997. Saturation rate and hysteresis of
substrates. Acta Hort. 450: 287-295.
White, J. W. and J. W. Mastalerz, 1966. Soil moisture as related to container capacity. Proc.
Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 89: 757-765.
Wilcox, G.E., J.E. Hoff, and C.M. Jones, 1973. Ammonium reduction of calcium and
magnesium content of tomato and sweet corn leaf tissue and influence on incidence of
blossom end rot of tomato fruit. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 98: 86-89.
Williams, K. A., and P. V. Nelson, 1992. Low, controlled nutrient availability provided by
organic waste materials for chrysanthemum. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117: 422-429.
Williams, K. A., and P. V. Nelson, 1997. Using precharged zeolite as a source of potassium
and phosphate in a soilless container medium during potted chrysanthemum production.
J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122: 703-708.
Wilson, G.C.S., 1984 The physico-chemical and physical properties of horticultural substrates.
Acta Hort. 150: 19-32.
Wilson, G., 1985. Effects of additives to peat on the air and water capacity. Acta Hort. 172:
207-209.
Wojciechowski, J., M. Kanaflewski and M.W. Borys, 1969. Influence of N-NH4+: N-NO3-
ratio and N level on the blossom end rot of tomato fruit. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift
64: 312-320.
Wooldridge, J., 1719. Systema Horti-culturae or The art of gardening. Freeman, Londod.
Worrall, R., 1976. The use of sawdust in potting mixes. Combined Proc. Inter. Plant
Propagators' Soc. 26: 379-381.
Worrall, R., 1978. The use of composted wood waste as a peat substitute. Acta Hort. 82: 79-
86.
Wright, R., 1989. Evaluation of propagation mediums trough rooting response of Hedera
helix 'Ivalace'. Ivy Journal. 1989, 15: 28-32.
Wright, R.D., 1987. Nitrogen availability from urea in a pine bark medium. HortSci. 22: 70-
72.
Wright, R.D., K.L. Grueber and C. Leda, 1990. Medium nutrient extraction with the pour-
through and saturated medium extract procedures for poinsettia. HortSci. 25: 658-660.
Yasuda, H., K. Takuma, N. Mizuta and H. Nishide, 1995. Water retention variety of dune
sand due to zeolite addition. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University. 48:
27-34. In Japanese with English abstract.
Yau, P.Y. and R.J. Murphy, 2000. Biodegraded cocopeat as a horticultural substrate. Acta
Hort. 517: 275-278.
Yeager, T.H., R.D. Wright and S.J. Donohue, 1983. Comparison of pour-through and
saturated pine bark extract N, P, K, and pH levels. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108: 112-114.
Legends to figures