Professional Documents
Culture Documents
طراحی باغ شهرها
طراحی باغ شهرها
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺣﻤـﺪ ﺧﻠﻴـﻠﻰ* -ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ.
ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺭﻩ ﻗﻠﻰ ﭘﻮﺭ-ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ.
ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﺗﺎﺟﻴﻚ -ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ.
ﻧﺎﺩﺭ ﺯﺍﻟﻰ -ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮔﻴﻼﻥ ،ﮔﻴﻼﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ.
ﭼﻜﻴﺪﻩ
Introducing a model for planning and designing garden-cities in ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ »ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ« ﻳﺎ »ﺑﺎﻏﺴﺘﺎﻧﻬﺎ« ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
Iranian system of urbanism ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1389ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
S ”ince approving the blueprint of “Baghshahrha”or “Baghestanha
plans by Supreme Council of urbanism in 2010, preparation of these
ﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺍﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
plans had been stood in the agenda of agencies and engineering con- ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
sultants. Although, garden city plans of some provinces encountered ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻳﻰ ،ﮔﺎﻣﻰ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
performing challenges; but in planning the garden city plans’ policies ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ،ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺁﻧﻨﺪ
of Iran, a special study is essential. Therefore the article is to produce ﺗﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
a model for designing and planning of these settlements. In order to ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ
achieve this goal the authors, at first, are to reviewing the status of ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺳﻨﺠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﻴﻦ ،ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ
the debate in the urbanism literature of Iran and the world; extract
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﮔﻔﺘﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺳﻨﺠﻰ ﺍﺯ
required factors and appropriate criterion to circumstances of Iran.
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ -ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﮔﺮﺳﻴﻮﻧﻰ -ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻰ
Then, these indicators are converted to a closed questionnaire and
professionals, educators and experts will be questioned. It is worth ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺞ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
mentioning that the results of the survey through statistical analysis - ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
factor analysis and regression analysis – will provide optimal model. ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 100ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ
This is an applied research that using quantitative research methods ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
and analytical approach. The population for this study includes about ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻰ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﻰ
100 expert professionals. According to the pattern of designing and ﻭ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻬﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﺎ
planning of garden cities of Iran, obtained from the research, at first, ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ،ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘﻰ ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ،ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ
by forecasting residential and employment conditions for all social ﺩﺭ ﭘﻬﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ
groups in the garden cities and then establishing services, health- ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
care, educational, administrative and military needs of the villagers
in these settlements, should be created some functional attractions
ﻭﺍژﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ :ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ،ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ،ﺭﺷﺪ
in these places. Therefore, part of the urban population could be ac-
ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ.
commodated in garden cities and also, rural population would be ab-
sorbed to live there.
Kewords: garden city, rural city, sustainable development, new ur-
banism, smart growth
ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻰ ﺍﻏﻤﺎﺽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ) ،(1388-1384ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ 264
ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ )ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻭ
ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ«ﻭ »ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ« ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻰ ﺗﺎ( .ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﺗﺶ
ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭﺍژﻩ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ،ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ »ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ« ﻳﺎ »ﺑﺎﻏﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﺑﻨﺰﺭ ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ-ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﻫﺎ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ،ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻯ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻰ -ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﻭﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ،ﺑﺮ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺭ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1386ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ
ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ )March, ﺷﺮﺡ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ
.(2004ﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻰ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺗﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 1389/5/4ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ)ﻓﺘﺤﻰ.(1389 ،
ﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ
ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﭘﺮﻛﺸﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ )ﺷﻮﺍﻯ، ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ
1386؛ ﻛﻤﭙﻞ .(1388 ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻭ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺁﻭﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ
ﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ :ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ،ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺨﻠﻴﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻪ ﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺤﻼﺕ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻴﺮﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻭ
ﻋﻴﻨﻰ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻦ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻴﺪ )ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ .(1 ،1387 ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ )ﭘﺎﻛﺰﺍﺩ1386 ،؛ ﺷﻮﺍﻯ .(1386 ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ،ﺣﺲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ
ﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ )ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻯ1387 ،؛ Hao ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ 30000ﻧﻔﺮ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ
et al, 2011؛ .(Liu et al, 2010, 3ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺮ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ )ﺍﻭﺳﺘﺮﻭﻓﺴﻜﻰ ،1378 ،ﺹ .(199
ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳﻌﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ 40ﻫﻜﺘﺎﺭ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ،ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺒﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ
5000-3000ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺳﺒﺰ ،ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﻰ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ)ﻫﻤﺎﻥ( .ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ،ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﻛﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ ﺳﺒﺰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﻓﺮﻡ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺷﻌﺎﻋﻰ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺑﺮ،
ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ )ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ1387 ،؛ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻯ .(1387ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻴﻬﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺭﻭﺩ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ)Hao et al, )ﭘﺎﻛﺰﺍﺩ .(1386 ،ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ
2011؛ .(Liu et al, 2010, 3 ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺗﺮ-ﺷﻬﺮ
-2-2ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ -ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻭ ،ﺗﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻰ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ -ﻟﭽﻮﺭﺙ ) (1904ﻭ ﻭﻟﻮﻳﻦ ) -(1919ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺟﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﺷﺪ)ﭘﺎﻛﺰﺍﺩ1386 ،؛ North Hertfordshire District
No.32 Automn 2013 ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ،ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ .(Council, 2007
265 ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﺰﺍﻳﻰ ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 100ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ) .(Liu et al, 2010, 1ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻧﻰ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻛﺴﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ،1962ﻫﺮﺑﺮﺕ ﮔﻨﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺖ. ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﮔﻨﺰ ﺑﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻰ-ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ؛
ﻓﺮﺍ ﺗﺠﺪﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺒﺨﺸﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻗﻮﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ؛ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ -ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ،ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ -ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ)ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ .(1387 ،ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﺎﻥ،
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ -ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺠﺪﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ)ﻫﻤﺎﻥ( .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ
)ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﭘﻮﺭ ،1379 ،ﺹ 287ﻭ ،(288ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﭘﺎﺗﺮﻳﻚ ﮔﺪﺱ ،ﺍﺑﻨﺰﺭ ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺗﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺑﺮ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺒﻰ ﺟﺴﺖ
ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ )ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﭘﻮﺭ، ﻭ ﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ )ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ1387 ،؛ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻯ .(1387 ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ،
(321 ،1379ﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1992ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﺍﻭﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ. ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ)ﺗﺮﻧﺮ .(19 ،1376 ،ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﮕﻰ ﻫﺎ ،ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺪﺩ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺠﺪﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ،ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻰ ﻫﻮﻳﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ »ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ«» ،ﺷﻬﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ» ،«1ﺭﺷﺪ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ«
ﺑﺎﺯﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ )Falconer ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
.(et al, 2010, 1ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ»ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ« ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ،
ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ«» ،ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﻛﻼﺭﻧﺲ ﭘﺮﻯ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ) .(1 ,2004 ,Chiesuraﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ »ﺑﺎﺭﺑﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻯ ﺩﻫﻪ 1970
ﻛﻼﻧﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ :ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ)ﻧﺴﺘﺮﻥ .(2 ،1389 ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ،ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺶ
) .(Ford, 1999ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
»ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ «2ﻭ »ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﮔﺸﺖ» .ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ،ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ «3ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ).(Ford, 1999, 2 ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﭘﻰ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﮔﻰ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ،ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺨﺮﺏ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﻨﻰ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺍ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ« .ﺩﺭ ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ)Ford, 1999؛ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﻬﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺭﻳﻮ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ،ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
.(Falconer et al, 2010 ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ)ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ،1388 ،ﺹ14؛ No.32 Automn 2013
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺷﺪ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻭﺛﻮﻗﻰ ،1389 ،ﺹ .(5ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ 266
ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﺴﺎﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ
»ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ«» ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺷﺪ« ﻭ »ﺭﺷﺪ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ« ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ .ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻩ )ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻰ ،1388 ،ﺹ 23؛
ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ ،ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺳﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ،(Thinh et al, 2002, 3ﺩﻫﻜﺪﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ )ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻰ،
ﻯ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ)ﺷﺪﺕ( ،ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ،(23 ،1388ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺍﻛﻮﻟﻮژﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ )ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻰ ،1388 ،ﺹ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺳﺎﻳﻞ ﻧﻘﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ 23؛ ،(Chiesura, 2004ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺩﻭﭼﺮﺧﻪ ) ،(Yang et al, 2008ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ )ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻰ ،1388 ،ﺹ 23؛ (Yang et al, 2008ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ).(Bloustein, 2007 ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 1990ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ،ﺩﺭﻳﭽﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻤﭙﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻰ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﻧﻮﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻀﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ،ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﭘﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻯ
ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻦ ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﭘﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ،ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 1ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻰ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻯ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ،
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ،ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ
1- Sustainable city 2- T.N.D 3- T.O.D
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
1980ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ -3-2ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ
No.32 Automn 2013 ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ،ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ، ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ
267 ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﻡ
ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰ ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ
ﭘﻮﻳﺪ).(Franklin& Tait, 2002, 250 ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ
»ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻫﺮﺗﻔﻮﺭﺩﺷﻴﺮ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ «4ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ،2007 ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﻪ ﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻟﭻ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ-ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﻭﺭﺙ «5ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ :ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺭﺷﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ،ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ
ﺳﺒﺰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺳﺮﺭﻳﺰ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﺑﻰ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﺑﻬﺮﻩ
ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻤﻠﻚ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺷﻬﺮ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ)North Hertfordshire District ﺍﺳﺖ)Hin & Xin, 2011؛ Liu et al,2010؛ Hao et
» .(Council, 2007ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ «6ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ .(al, 2011
،2009ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺴﺒﺘ ًﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ»ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ »ﺑﺮﻳﺪﭼﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻠﻴﻦ « ﻭ
1
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ،«7ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻯ »ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻠﻢ ﺗﻴﺖ «2ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻨﻈﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ)Planning ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ «3ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ،
.(Commission, 2009ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ» ،ﻳﺎﺗﻴﻨﮓ ﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺭﻭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ
1- Franklin Bridget 4- North Hertfordshire District Council
2- Malcolm Tait 5- Letchworth Garden City Town Centre Strategy
3- Constructing an image: The urban village concept in 6- Planning Commission
the UK 7- Draft Urban Village Design Guidelines & Standards
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ« (2010) 1ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻰ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﭼﻴﻦ :ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ)Hao ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ «2ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ
.(et al, 2010, 1ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ،ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ-ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ)Liu et al, 2010,
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ،ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ .(135-136ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ 11ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ 6ﺷﻬﺮ
ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﭘﻮ ﻫﺎﻭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺑﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ)Hao et ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ) ،(Liu et al, 2010, 143ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ
.(al, 2010 ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ ،ﻧﺤﻮﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪ ،ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ،ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ،ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ
ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ،ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﭙﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻯ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻓﺎﺿﻼﺏ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ،ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ،
ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ،ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﺯﻳﺮﻓﺼﻞ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ
ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ،ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
ﺳﻮﺩﺍﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ،ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ No.32 Automn 2013
ﺟﻤﻌﻰ ،ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ،ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ )ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺪﻑ( ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ 268
ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘ ًﺎ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ) .(Liu et al, 2010, 136ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﻫﺎ ،ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻯ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ)ﺷﻴﻌﻪ، ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ.
1386؛ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ .(1379 ،ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ،ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻔﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ– ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻯ، ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ)ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺹ .(135ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ -ﺷﺎﻛﻠﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ. ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ
-4-2ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ،ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﭘﺮﻛﺸﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ)ﻫﻤﺎﻥ .(143 ،ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ 55 ،ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺯﺭﺍﻋﻰ
ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ )ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺹ .(137
ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺬﻑ »ﭘﻮ ﻫﺎﻭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ (2010) «3ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ ،ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺑﻮﻣﻰ »ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻧﺰﻫﻦ «4ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ« ،ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻰ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ
1- Yuting Liu, Shenjing He, Fulong Wu, Chris Webster
2- and transitional neighbourhoods Urban villages under China’s rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets r
3- Pu Hao, Richard Sliuzasa, Stan Geertman
4- The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .1ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؛
ﻣﺎﺧﺬ :ﺟﻤﻊ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ
- Hin(2011), Hao(2010),Takeuchi(1998). -ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ 27
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Macedo(2011), -ﻧﺮﺥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ 28
Liu(2010). ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Macedo(2011), -ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ 29
Hao(2010), Liu(2010), Goldshleger(2006).
ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Macedo(2011(, -ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ 30
Liu(2010), North Hertfordshire District ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ
Council(2007), March(2004).
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Joseli(2011), -ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ 31
Liu(2010), Macedo(2011), Gold-
shleger(2006).
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Macedo(2011), -ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ 32
Liu(2010).
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Macedo(2011), -ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ 32
Liu(2010).
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Macedo(2011), -ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ 33
Liu(2010), Goldshleger(2006).
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .1ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؛
ﻣﺎﺧﺬ :ﺟﻤﻊ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ
- Hao(2010), Liu(2010), Takeuchi(1998). -ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ 34
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
- Joseli(2011), Hao(2010), Liu(2010), North -ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﺯ 35
Hertfordshire District Council(2007), Takeu- ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ
chi(1998).
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Macedo(2011), -ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻰ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ 36
Liu(2010). ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
- Hao(2011), Hin(2011), Joseli(2011), Mace- -ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ 37
do(2011), Liu(2010), Goldshleger(2006). ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻬﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ،
ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻮﭘﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻰ ،ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻰ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ -ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻃﺮﺡ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﺳﺎﺳ ًﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ -ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ
ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﻪ
ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﺞ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﻢ
ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ،ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﺧﺸﻚ ﻭ ﻛﻮﻳﺮﻯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻯ ،ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮ ،ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﺎﻳﻰ
ﻭ ...ﻣﺆﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻓﺘﺤﻰ .(1389 ،ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻯ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻪ ﻯ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ 43 ،ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ، ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻯ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻙ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ 103ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻯ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﻔﺘﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻯ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻓﺎﺿﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺁﺑﻬﺎﻯ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ) (%61ﺍﺯ ﺳﻄﺤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺁﺑﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺳﺒﺰ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ) ،(%79ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ) (%63ﻭ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ) (%43ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﻃﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ12 ،
ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﺯ 55ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ
SPSSﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ 43ﻋﺪﺩ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻯ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ 1ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ،ﺑﻪ -3ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺪﻭﻟﻮژﻯ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﻯ KMOﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﺗﻠﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺳ ًﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯ ﺟﺎﻯ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ KMOﻋﺪﺩ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ
0,6ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ- ﺁﻥ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ -ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺵ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ -%50ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ .(2ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ،ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺗﻠﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻯ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻧﺎﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 100ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﺎﻡ
ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺻﻔﺮ ) (sig=0.00ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ، ﺁﺗﻰ ،ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺪﻭﻛﺎﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻯ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ،ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺶ Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ-ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ-ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎ No.32 Automn 2013
ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ 272
)ﺧﻠﻴﻠﻰ.(1389 ، ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .2ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺗﻠﺖ ﻭ KMOﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؛ ﻣﺎﺧﺬ:
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ SPSSﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ
ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ. ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻧﻈﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ »ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ« ﻭ »ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﮔﺮﺳﻴﻮﻧﻰ«
ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻰ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ
0,601 ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ KMO
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ
1,864E3 ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﻯ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭ
903 ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ،
0,000 ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﮔﺮﺳﻴﻮﻧﻰ-
ﺩﺭ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎ ﺭﮔﺮﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻩ -ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ« 1ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ 15 ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘ ًﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ 1ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ،ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺎﻧﺲ -4ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ
ﺗﺠﻤﻌﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
1- Total initial eigenvalues
ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ 14ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ 0,5ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺣﺬﻑ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﺗﺠﻤﻌﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍً ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ،ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻯ 14 ،7 ،1ﻭ 40ﺍﺯ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ)ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .(3ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ 39ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻏﺮﺑﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻓﺮﺿﻬﺎﻯ ﻧﺮﻡ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ)ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ .(4 ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ،ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻗﻢ 0,4ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ 14 ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ 14
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ،ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ،ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ، ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ 25 ،ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﻤﺎﻛﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ
ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ،ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻰ 15ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻯ
ﻧﻘﻞ ،ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺖ ،ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ،ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺍﻯ ،ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ،ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ،ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .3ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؛ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕpca :؛ ﻣﺎﺧﺬ :ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ.
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ
Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92 ﭼﺮﺧﺶ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
No.32 Automn 2013 ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ
273 ﺗﺠﻤﻌﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﺗﺠﻤﻌﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺎﻧﺲ
3,255 16,331 16,331 7,023 16,331 16,331 7,023 1
2,656 24,396 8,064 3,468 24,396 8,064 3,468 2
2,586 30,905 6,509 2,799 30,905 6,509 2,799 3
2,505 36,179 5,274 2,268 36,179 5,274 2,268 4
2,394 41,102 4,923 2,117 41,102 4,923 2,117 5
2,176 45,580 4,479 1,926 45,580 4,479 1,926 6
2,030 49,585 4,004 1,722 49,585 4,004 1,722 7
2,029 53,319 3,735 1,606 53,319 3,735 1,606 8
2,007 56,933 3,614 1,554 56,933 3,614 1,554 9
1,967 60,180 3,247 1,396 60,180 3,247 1,396 10
1,965 63,251 3,070 1,320 63,251 3,070 1,320 11
1,728 65,981 2,730 1,174 65,981 2,730 1,174 12
1,641 68,512 2,531 1,088 68,512 2,531 1,088 13
1,531 70,858 2,347 1,009 70,858 2,347 1,009 14
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .4ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺩﻳﻒ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ 10
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴﺎﺕ ﻭ
13
ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ 29
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ 1
30
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ 31
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻰ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ
36
ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺷﻬﺮ
5
ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺒﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺷﻬﺮ 23 ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻭ
2
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﭘﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ 24 ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ 37 Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ 38 No.32 Automn 2013
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﺖ ) (R=0,248ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎ)=SEE ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ 14ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
(0,31707ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ 1ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﺖ)(0,995=R ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎ ) (SEE=0,02726ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ 14ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﮔﺮﺳﻴﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻰ
ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ. ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﺗﺴﻮﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺪﻝ 14ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﮔﺮﺳﻴﻮﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺧﻄﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ 1,679ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﭘﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ )ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ (6ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
)ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ .(6 ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ 3-1
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .6ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﮔﺮﺳﻴﻮﻧﻰ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؛ ﻣﺎﺧﺬ :ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺧﻄﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
Durbin- ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ r ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻝ
ﺗﺨﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ
Watson
0,31707 0,241 0,248 0,498 1
0,28547 0,384 0,396 0,630 2
0,25052 0,526 0,540 0,735 3
0,22396 0,621 0,636 0,797 4
0,19978 0,698 0,713 0,845 5
0,17781 0,761 0,775 0,880 6
0,15302 0,823 0,835 0,914 7
0,13453 0,863 0,874 0,935 8
0,11442 0,901 0,910 0,954 9
0,09622 0,930 0,937 0,968 10
0,07680 0,955 0,960 0,980 11
0,05927 0,973 0,977 0,988 12
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
0,04459 0,985 0,987 0,993 13 Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
1,679 0,02726 0,994 0,995 0,998 14 No.32 Automn 2013
ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﻝ ،14ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ 14ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻯ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ 278
ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻯ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﺘﺎ 1ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ )ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ .(2
ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ 8ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ 2
1- Beta
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .7ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ 14ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺎﺧﺬ :ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﻫﻰ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ t ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺪﻝ
ﺿﺮﻳﺐ
ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ ﺧﻄﺎﻯ ﺗﺨﻤﻴﻦ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ
0,000 1440,000 0,003 3,868 ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ
0,000 67,137 0,498 0,003 0,181 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ1
0,000 51,050 0,379 0,003 0,138 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ2
0,000 51,945 0,385 0,003 0,140 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ3
0,000 41,796 0,310 0,003 0,113 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ4
0,000 33,032 0,245 0,003 0,089 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ5
0,000 33,558 0,249 0,003 0,091 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ6
0,000 37,483 0,278 0,003 0,101 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ7
0,000 25,514 0,189 0,003 0,089 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ8
0,000 26,535 0,197 0,003 0,072 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ9
0,000 22,189 0,165 0,003 0,080 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ10
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ 0,000 13,688 0,102 0,003 0,037 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ11
Urban Management
0,000 17,235 0,128 0,003 0,047 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ12
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
No.32 Automn 2013 0,000 20,592 0,153 0,003 0,056 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ13
279 0,000 12,254 0,091 0,003 0,033 ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ14
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺪﺍﻗﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻰ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺘﺎﻯ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ،7ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻳﺎﺩ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 8ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ
ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ »ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ« ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ« ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ،ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ»ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻋﺪﺩﻯ
ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺠﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ،ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ 9ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ )ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .(8
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ 14ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ -5ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﺒﻨﺪﻯ
ﺑﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ،
ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .8ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﻣﺎﺧﺬ :ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﻬﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ،ﮔﺎﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ 10ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺯﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻬﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻠﻰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ، ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎ،
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺳﻴﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺯﺩﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘ ًﺎ
ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺖ
ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﮔﻤﺎﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ،ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘﻰ،
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ،ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .9ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ ) ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ( ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﺑﺘﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ )(A
ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ
1 1,587 0,498 0,787 4,05
ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻰ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ
2 1,192 0,498 0,656 3,65
ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ
5 1,019 0,498 0,508 4,03
ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
6 1,018 0,498 0,500 4,09 ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ
10 0,940 0,498 0,477 3,96
ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
11 0,938 0,498 0,515 3,66 ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
3 1,175 0,385 0,791 3,86
ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
4 1,088 0,385 0,834 3,39 ﻧﻮﻉ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
19 0,737 0,498 0,656 4
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺷﻬﺮ
Urban Management
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92 21 0,706 0,385 0,530 3,46
No.32 Automn 2013
ﻣﺎﺩﺭ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﻜﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ
281 22 0,646 0,385 0,494 3,4
ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﭘﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ
7 1,001 0,379 0,728 3,63
ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
9 0,943 0,379 0,571 4,36 ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ
20 0,727 0,278 0,661 3,96 ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ
26 0,608 0,278 0,55 3,98
ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﻤﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺑﺎ
12 0,881 0,249 0,805 4,40
ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺩﻓﻦ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪ
23 0,645 0,245 0,681 3,87
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻯ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ
35 0,400 0,245 0,417 3,92 ﻓﺮﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻯ)ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ( ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
29 0,536 0,197 0,826 3,30
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻧﻰ
ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ
30 0,520 0,197 0,764 3,46 ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ Urban Management
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
24 0,624 0,189 0,835 3,96 ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ
No.32 Automn 2013
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
27 0,565 0,189 0,786 3,81 282
ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﻧﺮﺥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ
31 0,508 0,165 0,764 4,03
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺖ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ
33 0,438 0,165 0,698 3,81
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻯ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻯ
ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ
32 0,455 0,153 0,806 3,69 ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ
38 0,282 0,091 0,721 4,31 ﺑﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻄﺢ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .10ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ )ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ ) ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ( ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ(
-ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻛﻢ
-ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ
-ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ
ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ
-ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
-ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ
-ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ،ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘﻰ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ،ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ،
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻰ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ
-ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
-ﻃﺮﺡ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ
-ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺎﻧﻌﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
-ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ
-ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ -10 ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
15ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻧﻰ
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
Urban Management
-ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺑﻨﻴﻪ ﻯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺑﺎﻻ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92 -ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺒﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻯ- ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ
No.32 Automn 2013 ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
283 -ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ
-ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
-ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺷﻬﺮ
-ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻠﻰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺷﺎﻟﻴﻜﻮﺑﻰ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺠﻜﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
-ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻯ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﻯ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ Urban Management
-ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
-ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻉ No.32 Automn 2013
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ ﺳﺒﺰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ
-ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﺭﺽ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ 284
-ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﺎﻯ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
-ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺒﺰ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ،ﺑﻮﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺳﺒﺰ ﺷﻬﺮ
-ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ
-ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻤﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ
-ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﻤﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻏﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ -ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
-ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ TOD
-ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ )ﻣﺘﺮﻭ،
ﺍﺗﻮﺑﻮﺱ( ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
-ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻯ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﺍﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻬﻨﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ
ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺧﺬ
ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ .1ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ،ﻗﺎﺩﺭ) .(1387ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ :ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺘﮕﺎﻫﻬﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ .ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻯ-52 .(60) .
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻫﺎﻯ 55
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻣﻰ .2ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ،ﻛﺮﻳﻢ ) .(1388ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ .ﻣﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ،
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺪﻑ ،ﺟﻬﺖ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ.15-12 .(4) .
ﻭ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮ ﻭ .3ﺍﻫﺮﻯ ،ﺯﻫﺮﺍ؛ ﺍﺭﺟﻤﻨﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﺍﺻﻐﺮ؛ ﺣﺒﻴﺒﻰ؛ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ؛ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺧﺎﻭﺭ،
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ .ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻯ.(60) . ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ( .)1367ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ .ﭼﺎپ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ
.59-56 ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ.
.17ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ) .(1379ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ: .4ﺍﻭﺳﺘﺮﻭﻓﺴﻜﻰ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺴﻼﻑ ) .(1378ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ )
ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎ .ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ.(4) ، ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﺗﻦ( .ﭼﺎپ ﺩﻭﻡ) .ﻻﺩﻥ
.18ﻧﺴﺘﺮﻥ ،ﻣﻬﻴﻦ؛ ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻨﻰ ،ﻓﺮﺣﻨﺎﺯ؛ ﺍﻳﺰﺩﻯ، ﺍﻋﺘﻀﺎﺩﻯ ،ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ.
ﻣﻠﻴﺤﻪ) .(1389ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﺗﺎﭘﺴﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ .5ﭘﺎﻛﺰﺍﺩ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﺎﻩ .(1386) .ﺳﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ)ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻯ: )ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ( .ﺝ . 1ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ( .ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻯ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ .ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ.
ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ.100-83 .(2) .21 . .6ﺗﺮﻧﺮ ،ﺗﺎﻡ ) .(1376ﺷﻬﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ) .ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
.19ﻭﺛﻮﻗﻰ ،ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ؛ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ) .(1389ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﻮﺭﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻬﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ .ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ.1 . ﺷﻬﺮﻯ.
2)). .7ﺷﻮﺍﻯ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﺍﺯ .(1386) .ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ
20. Bloustein, Edward.j (2007). Infill Development ﺗﺨﻴﻼﺕ .ﭼﺎپ ﺳﻮﻡ) .ﺳﻴﺪ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺒﻰ ،ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ:
& Standards and Policy Guide. School of planning ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ.
public policy Rutgers. New jersey: The state uni- .8ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ،ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ) .(1386ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ
versity of new jersey new Brunswick. ﺷﻬﺮﻯ .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ.
21. Chiesura, Anna(2004). The role of urban parks .9ﺧﻠﻴﻠﻰ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ) ،(1389ﺩﺭﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Plan- ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻯ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ،
Urban Management ning. (68). 129–138. ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ.
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ 32ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 92
No.32 Automn 2013 22. Falconer, Ryan; Newman, Peter; Giles-Corti, .10ﻓﺘﺤﻰ ،ﺳﻤﻴﻪ) .(1389/10/16ﭼﺮﺍﻍ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺑﺎﻏﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ
287 Billie(2010). Is practice aligned with the princi- ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺳﺒﺰ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ(9) .
ples? Implementing New Urbanism in Perth, West- .11ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻰ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ) .(1388ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ern Australia. Transport Policy. (17). 287–294. ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ .ﻣﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ
23. Ford, Larry R (1999). New urbanism and theo- ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ.24-20 .(4) .
ries of good city form. Cities.4. 247–257. .12ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ؛ ﻧﻮﺷﺎﺩ ،ﺳﻤﻴﻪ) .(1387ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺭﺷﺪ
24. Franklin, Bridget, Tait, Malcolm (2002). Con- ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ .ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ. (12) .
structing an image: the urban village concept in the .180-163
UK. Planing theory, 1(3), 250-272. .13ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﺍ ,ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ( .)1386ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ
25. Hao, Pu; Sliuzas, Richard; Geertman, Stan ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ .ﭼﺎپ ﺩﻭﻡ ,ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ.
(2010). The development and redevelopment of .14ﻛﻤﭙﻞ ،ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺕ؛ ﺳﻮﺯﺍﻥ ،ﻓﺎﻳﻨﺸﺘﺎﻳﻦ ) .(1388ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻯ
urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat International. ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ)ﺳﺪﻩ ﻯ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ( .ﺝ ﺍ) .ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻗﻮﺍﻣﻰ
1-11. ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﺫﺭﺧﺶ.
Geertman, Stan؛ Sliuzas, Richard؛26. Hao, Pu .15ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﭘﻮﺭ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ) .(1379ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ،
(2011). The development and redevelopment of ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ) .ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﺎﻳﻰ،
urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat International. ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ :ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ.
27. Hin, Li Ling; Xin, Li (2011). Redevelopment .16ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻯ ،ﻣﺠﻴﺪ؛ ﻳﻤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﭘﺮﻳﺴﺎ ) .(1387ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺷﻬﺮ:
of urban villages in Shenzhen, China e An analysis 38. Yang, Zhongzhen; Chen, Gang; Yu, Bin(2008).
of power relations and urban coalitions. Habitat In- Car ownership level for a sustainability urban en-
ternational. vironment. Transportation Research Part D. (13).
28. Liu, Yuting; He, Shenjing; Wu, Fulong; Web- 10–18.
ster, Chris (2010). Urban villages under China’s
rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets and transi-
tional neighbourhoods. Habitat International, 34,
135-144.
29. Macedo, Joseli (2011) .Maringá: A British Gar-
den City in the tropics. Cities.
30. March, alan (2004). Democratic dilemmas,
planning and Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City.
Planning Perspectives,19,409-433.
31. North Hertfordshire District Council (2007).
Letchworth Garden City Town Centre Strategy.
www.north-herts.gov.uk.
32. Palframan ,Lisa (2010). A sustainability strat-
egy for the Letchworth Garden City Heritage Foun-
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
dation. university of Hertfordshire. Urban Management
33. Planning Commission (2009). Draft Urban Vil- 92 ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ32 ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
No.32 Automn 2013
lage Design Guidelines & Standards. Public Hear-
288
ing.
34. Scrogin, Annabelle (1937). garden city in eu-
rope and america . university of illinoise.
35. Song, Yan; Knaap, Gerrit-Jan(2003). New ur-
banism and housing values:a disaggregate assess-
ment. Journal of Urban Economics. (54). 218–238.
36. Takeuchi, Kazuhiko; Namiki, Yutaka; Tanaka,
Hiroyasu (1998). Designing eco-villages for revi-
talizing Japanese rural areas. Ecological Engineer-
ing,11,177–197.
37. Thinh, Nguyen Xuan; Arlt, Gunter; Heber,
Bernd; Hennersdorf, Jorg; Lehmann, Iris(2002).
Evaluation of urban land-use structures with a view
to sustainable development. Environmental Impact
Assessment Review.(22). 475–492.