Sir Syed University of Engineering & Technology

ANSWER SCRIPT

Date: 7/4/2020
Roll Number: SE17-010
Section: A
Name: FAISAL AHMED
Course Name: SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Degree Program: BSSE
Total number of pages
8
being submitted:

Q1.

Concept

• Intranet-Based Site.

• Information On Dusk Amusement Of Organization Gatherings And Sports.

• How To Get Included.

• Scores And Estimations.

• Pictures.

• Low Cost Approach To Improve Worker Wellbeing And Assurance.

Preferences

 Builds Groups.
 Promotes Wellbeing/Better Wellbeing/Better Efficiency.
 Increases People Group Name Acknowledgment.
 Low Cost Or No Expense For Essential Framework.

Phase 1

 Static Page.

Page 1 of 9
  Activity Type, Dates, Region, Contact.
 Developed Evening Time By Volunteers Or As A Class Undertaking.

Phase 2

 Statistics.
 Online Enlistment.
 More Resources Required For Site Progression/Support.
 Potential Outside Sponsorship.

Phase 3

 Scores.
 Pictures Of Events.
 More Information, For Instance, Driving Headings To Games.
 One Singular Low Upkeep Allocated To Make/Care For Site.

Q2

Who Are Stakeholders

Accomplices Are The People Who May Be Influenced By The Accomplishment, Or

Dissatisfaction Of A Project. Thusly, Thought Of Their Acknowledgment Regarding The
Endeavor Is Critical For Its Success. Accomplices May Have Confident Or Critical
Evaluation Of An Assignment, And A Great Part Of The Time Don't Agree With Each Other.
Examination Of Any Instance Of Stakeholder Communications Analysis, Will Speak To That
Reconcilement Of Stakeholder Point Of View Transforms Into A Test For The Project
Management Gathering.

The Term In Like Manner Implies Individuals Who Have Placed Resources In The Business.
In Any Case, Stakeholder Furthermore Joins The Organization's Hr Since They Have
Colossal Eagerness For The Project, And Are Influenced By Its Results. Leasers Are Also
Associated With The Stakeholder Grouping.

Page 2 of 9
A Requirements Gathering Meeting Is A Huge Device To Make Communications With
Stakeholders, And Fuses Joint Application Development, Or Jad Sessions, Conceptualizing
Methodology, And Talking Procedures. Reacting To Requests By The Jad Help Gathering
Will Reveal Evaluations Of The Stakeholders Concerning The Project Goals, And Various
Issues Related To The Business. The Project Contracts Are Become Remotely After Real
Communications With The Best Possible Stakeholders.

Stakeholder Communications Analysis

A Stakeholder Communication Plan Is A Huge Part In Project Management, And Ought To

Be Purposely Figured. Its Configuration Will Generally Fuse The Stakeholder Perceived
Occupations, And The Arranged Management Procedure. An Instance Of A Stakeholder
Communications Analysis Is Appended Underneath:

 Official Sponsor: The Executive Sponsor Has The Authoritative Project Sway, And Is
Responsible For Course Of Action Of Benefits For The Project, Settles Issues Concerning
Augmentation And Various Changes, Sanctions Rule Desires, And Presents Top Management
Heading. The Affiliation May Dole Out The Step By Step Key Attempting To The Project
Sponsor.
 Assignment Sponsor: The Project Sponsor Follows Up To Assist Executive Sponsor For Step
By Step Conventional Activities, And Is Subject For Different Endeavor Decisions. They
Will Get Decision From The Executive Sponsor, If The Subject Is Of A Noteworthy Level.
 Customer Project Manager: For Gigantic Endeavors, The Customer May Set Up A Central
Contact Person Who Is Assigned As The Customer Project Manager. For Example, In
Adventures Related To It, The Game Plan Will Be Made By The It Project Manager. He Will
Work In Close Coordination With The Customer Project Manager For The Game Plan
Utilization.
 Directing Committee: This Involves The Top Stakeholders Who Give Key Activity To The
Project. They Don't Replace The Project Sponsor, Yet Give Key Commitment To The
Project. This Social Occasion Fuses The Customers, Noteworthy Stakeholders, And The Top
Endeavor The Board. A Part Of These People May Similarly Be A Person From The Project
Change Control Board.
 Accomplice: These Particular Individuals Or Social Occasions Have Some Interest, Or Stake,
Related To The Errand Results. The External Stakeholders Join The Financial Specialists,
Authoritative Laborers, Merchants, Sellers, State Affiliation, And Nearby Social Affairs. The
Internal Stakeholders Contain The Organization, Staff, Etc.

Page 3 of 9
 Suppliers: These Are The Associations Or People Who Give Stock, Material, Programming,
Hardware, Apparatus, Or Organizations To A Project.
 Customers: These Individuals Or Social Events Being The Certified Customers Of The
Assignment Desires Are Seriously Drawn In With The Project Works Out, For Example,
Perceiving The Requirements And The Testing Structures.

Q3.

Page 4 of 9
Page 5 of 9
Q4.

Given The Particularly Described Essentials And Nonattendance Of Confinements, The

Spiral Model Would Be The Best Choice. You Could Fight For The Waterfall Model,
Disregarding The Way That The Project Is Gigantic And An Evolutionary Model Is
Apparently Required. The Incremental Model Isn't Required Since There Is A Ton Of
Time, Staff, And Money For The Project.

A Controlled Gathering Affiliation Would Be Legitimate. The Project Is Tremendous

And Doesn't Require Progression Since Microsoft Has Recently Done Most By Far Of
That, So A Reasonable Gathering Affiliation Isn't Suitable. Alternately, A Controlled
Gathering Affiliation Is Likely Imperative Given The Size Of The Project.

Q5.

ROLL NO 2017-SE-010

W = 010 mod 0 +10 = 10

Z = D.O.B is 01-05-2000, 5 + 10 = 15

W + Z = 10+15= 35

Suppose X = 30 and Y = 31

EQ: W + X+ Y+ Z = 100

10 + 30 + 31 + 15 = 86

CRITERIA WEIGHT NPV SCORE

Enhances new W = 10% <0 25

product
development

Page 6 of 9
 Streamlines X = 30% 0 - $100,000 25
operations

Increases cross- Y = 31% $100,000 - $200,000 50

selling

Has good NPV Z = 15% $200,000 - $400,000 75

TOTAL = 86 > $400,000 100

CRITERIA PROJECT 1

SCORE WEIGHT WEIGHTED SCORE

Enhances New 10 10% 1.9

Product Development

Streamlines 20 30% 6
Operations

Increases Cross- 80 31% 24.8

Selling

Has Good NPV 75 15% 15

NPV at 10% = ((200,000-500,000) / 1.1^1) + ((400,000-100,000) / 1.1^2) + ((600,000-100,000) /

1.1^3) = 350864

Total weighted score = 1.9 + 6 + 24.8 + 15 = 47.7

CRITERIA PROJECT 2

Page 7 of 9
 SCORE WEIGHT WEIGHTED SCORE

Enhances New Product 50 10% 9.5

Development

Streamlines Operations 50 30% 15

Increases Cross-Selling 50 31% 15.5

Has Good NPV 25 15% 5

NPV at 10% = ((300,000-700,000) / 1.1^1) + ((700,000-200,000) / 1.1^2) = 49587

Total weighted score = 9.5 + 15 + 15.5 + 5 = 45

CRITERIA PROJECT 3

SCORE WEIGHT WEIGHTED SCORE

Enhances New 0 10% 0

Product Development

Streamlines 50 30% 15
Operations

Increases Cross- 80 31% 24.8

Selling

Has Good NPV 100 15% 20

NPV at 10% = ((0-300,000) / 1.1^1) + ((600,000-100,000) / 1.1^2) + ((500,000-100,000) / 1.1^3) +

((400,000-100,000) / 1.1^4) = 645926

Total weighted score = 0 + 15 + 24.8 + 20 = 59.8

Page 8 of 9
Conclusion:

Project 1: NPV = 350864 & weighted score = 47.7

Project 2: NPV = 49587 & weighted score = 45

Project 3: NPV = 645926 & weighted score = 59.8

Page 9 of 9