You are on page 1of 2

FINAL POSTER PRESENTATION PEER FEEDBACK FORM

Presenting Group: 3
Rangga Wisnu (1905086055)
Katarina Ellen (1905086043)
Nur Hanifah (1905086033)
Nismah (1905086060)
Erniah (1905086058)

Observing Group:4 (Aura Mahoni, Beatrick Rebheka, Biwi Nur, Silvia Rahma, Umiatul Baiti)

Notes:
Observed Aspects
In my point of view, the presentation was conducted very well which straightforward to
Rating the topic, the audience can understand the topic clearly with the help of poster
1 = NA/ Very Poor 4 = Good presentation. But, my suggestion is probably the presenters can speak clearly with a high
2 = Poor 5 = Excellent voice and proper intonation so that the audience can hear clearly rather than read the
3 = Fair poster presentation only.
1 2 3 4 5

Greetings X The moderator starts the presentation with a clever greeting and sets the tone for the rest of
Introductions the session with a welcoming ambiance.
Introducing the Content of X The group’s information is delivered in a straightforward and well-structured manner.
the Presentation
Language Use: Diction and X This group has a good language usage while presenting the presentation, but unfortunately
Grammatical Accuracy there are many mispronounce for some words that indicated to have wrong meaning.
Language Audience Engagement X The language use by this group already engaged the audience but only in the beginning due
to the moderator has a good greeting, but during the presentation I don’t feel engaged from
the other presenters.
Voice and Intonation X The voice and intonation from the presenters are unstable, so in many materials there are
low intonation and even too low voices when explaining the materials.
Accuracy of Content with the X The content delivered is in accordance with the material presented because it is also
Content topic of presentation closely related to the surrounding environment.
Conciseness The consistency of the material presented is appropriate, but it must be explored further in
X extracting each material framework.
Readability of text (text size, X The presenter has made a good of visuals and multimedia so the audience can easily
Visual and colour) understand the topic they are going to present.
Multimedia
Aspects Relevant use of images and X The speaker use relevant images to set a scene or convey a mood to an audience. They
graphics used as illustrations of photographs to add context to the written word. They seven use
images as a substitute for words to convey complex ideas.
Eye Contact X It is better if the presenter makes eye contact with the audience more often with a long
Academic enough duration.
Behavior
Professional Manner/ X Presenters have less body movement and it would be better if they explored more body
Posture gestures
Concluding X The conclusions presented cover the entire material and pretty clear.
Closing
Closing Remarks X The moderator close the presentation by saying thank you to the audience.

Feedback on overall poster presentation:

The poster presentation was great, they put all the main points of the points they want to explain. Their poster presentation provides key points of each materials,
then the detailed is explained by the presenters. So, for me, their poster presentation is an effective poster presentation that has been conducted.

You might also like