The document discusses various physical treatment methods for modifying the surface of natural fibers for use in green composites, including plasma, corona, UV, heat, electron radiation, and fiber beating treatments. These physical treatments can improve adhesion between fibers and matrices by changing surface properties without altering composition. Examples are provided of different fiber-matrix composites that demonstrated improved mechanical properties after specific physical treatments like plasma and UV.
The document discusses various physical treatment methods for modifying the surface of natural fibers for use in green composites, including plasma, corona, UV, heat, electron radiation, and fiber beating treatments. These physical treatments can improve adhesion between fibers and matrices by changing surface properties without altering composition. Examples are provided of different fiber-matrix composites that demonstrated improved mechanical properties after specific physical treatments like plasma and UV.
The document discusses various physical treatment methods for modifying the surface of natural fibers for use in green composites, including plasma, corona, UV, heat, electron radiation, and fiber beating treatments. These physical treatments can improve adhesion between fibers and matrices by changing surface properties without altering composition. Examples are provided of different fiber-matrix composites that demonstrated improved mechanical properties after specific physical treatments like plasma and UV.
GOKUL R 2020508015 Physical treatment: • Physical treatments (i.e. plasma, corona, ultraviolet (UV), heat treatments electron radiation and fibre beating) have been also used to modify the surface of natural fibers for their use in green composites . • These treatments improve the adhesion between the fibre and matrix by changing the surface properties of the fibres without changing their structural composition . • However, physical treatments are more expensive compared to chemical ones, mainly because of the equipment involved in the surface modification processes. Plasma Treatment: • The plasma treatment is a technique that modifies the surface of natural fibres through a gas ionization process. • Several gases can be used, such as oxidizing gases (H2O, O2 and N2O), inert gases (Ar or He), active gases (NH3) which generate amino groups and polymerizing gases (monomer gases for direct polymerization, Ar or He pre-treated). • Plasma treatment can be carried out under atmospheric pressure and vacuum pressure and at low and high temperatures. • However, for natural fibers low temperatures are preferred because of the flammable constituents of the natural fibres. • It was showed that plasma treatment induces surface etching which improve the surface roughness of the fibre and result in a better interface with the matrix through mechanical interlocking. • In addition, it can introduce various functional groups on the natural fibre surface, which form strong covalent bonds with the matrix, thus resulting in strong fibre–matrix interface. • An important factor to be considered in plasma treatment is the exposure time, since the longer the exposure period, the higher the possibility of the fibre surface to suffer degradation and damage. Corona Treatment: • Corona treatment is a surface modification technique that uses plasma generated by the application of a high voltage to sharp electrode tips separated by quartz and causes the formation of electromagnetic fields that oxidize the surfaces of the fibres. • The corona discharge produces chemical and physical changes of fibres as well as increased surface polarity (due to increased carboxyl and hydroxyl groups) and increased fibre roughness. • However, this treatment has some disadvantages, such as the low depth of penetration of the electrical discharge and the difficulty to be applied to three-dimensional surfaces including natural fibres . • On the other hand, the great advantage in relation to the other physical treatments, mainly plasma treatment, is the fact that the process has low cost and energy consumption, as do not need vacuum chambers for low temperatures. • Gassan and Gutowski used corona plasma to treat jute fibres to be used in epoxy composites. The treatments increased the polarity of fibres but decreased fibre strength and tenacity leading to reduced composite strength with corona treatment. • Oudrhiri et al. treated aloe vera fibres with corona discharge during 5, 10 and 15 min. and observed the degradation of fibres due to etching mechanism caused by corona. Ultraviolet Treatments: • The ultraviolet treatment is a technique that uses electromagnetic radiation ranging from 100 to 400 nm. • The process causes chemical changes (C–C, C–O, C–F, C–Si) in the surface of the natural fibres and promotes the cleaning of fatty acids, waxes and other constituents exposed on the fibre surface. • The main advantage of this technique is its simplicity, low investment and versatility when compared to other physical treatments. • Benedetto et al. investigated the effects of UV irradiation on banana composites for 7 and 15 days. They found better mechanical and thermal properties of the composites. • Gassan and Gutowski used UV to treat jute fibres and found 30% increase in the flexural strength of composites. Thermal Treatments: • Thermal treatment is one of the physical methods which involves heating of the natural fibre between the temperatures 100 and 200°C. • This process reduces the moisture content, and the lignocelluloses bundles are detached into single filaments. • By heating the fibres at moderate temperatures, the crystallinity of the fibre also increases. • The thermal treatment can increase the physical adhesion between the fibres and the matrix and also increase the mechanical properties of the composites. • However, longer thermal exposure can alter the chemical and physical compositions which may be prejudicial for the composites properties. Ultrasound Treatment: • Ultrasound has been defined as very high frequencies of sound, above 20 kHz . • Generally used for medical and diagnostic purposes, the use of ultrasound has also been tried for cellulosic fibers. • Laine et al. studied the influence of ultrasonic irradiation at 23 kHz on the physical and chemical properties of pulp fibers, reporting an increase in the fiber wall porosity and a slight increase in the carbonyl group content of the fibers due to the oxidation of carbohydrate hydroxyls. • Although ultrasound at lower frequencies produces more violent cavitation, the effects are highly localized. On the other hand, cavitation is less violent at higher frequencies owing to shortened life time of cavitation bubbles. Gamma radiation: • Gamma radiation treatment is made by depositing energy on the plant fiber in the composite and radicals were produced on the cellulose chain by hydrogen and hydroxyl abstraction, ruptures of some carbon-carbon bonds and chain scission. Peroxide radicals are generated when matrix polymers are irradiated in the presence of oxygen. • By the help of the active sites which gamma radiation produced in fiber and matrix, better bonding between the filler and polymer matrix was obtained. The mechanical strength of the composite was improved consequently . Examples: 1. Composite- Flax-polyethylene Treatment: Plasma treatment (30 mtorr and 1 min at 30W.) Effects: Plasma treated fibres presented a considerably improved tensile strength and Young’s modulus (tensile strength and Young’s modulus increased by 18.6% and 32%, respectively. 2. Composite- Jute-epoxy Treatment: Corona discharge (40-100 W, 10–88 cm/min) UV (53 mm focal point; 80 W) Effects: Flexural strength was negatively impacted by the corona treatment. However, the UV treatment presented an increase of up to 30%. 3. Composite – Aloe vera Treatment: Corona discharge (10 kV, 10 kHz, 1μs pulse) 5, 10 and 20 min treatment time. Effects: Mechanical properties were negatively impacted by the treatment. 4. Composite – Banana-epoxy Treatment: UV (7 and 15 days) Effects: The 7 day case presented significant increases in tensile strength and modulus. However, the 10 day case presented negative effects. References: • Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering “Fiber Technology for Fiber-Reinforced Composites” .
A Comparative Study of Mechanical Properties of Zinc Acrylate Epoxy nanocomposites Reinforced by AL2O3 and Cloisite®30B and Their Mixture: Tensile Strength and Fracture Toughness: A Comparative Study of Mechanical Properties of Zinc Acrylate Epoxy nanocomposites Reinforced by AL2O3 and Cloisite®30B and Their Mixture: Tensile Strength and Fracture Toughness