Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Online / On-site
Cartographic Connections
Across Detroit’s Digital Divide
Detroit is digitally divided. As investors pour money into the residential and commercial development
of areas like Downtown, Midtown, and Corktown, residents in marginalized neighborhoods do not
have the same access to information and communication technologies, nor the necessary skills to use
information effectively once they are connected. Referred to as “digital redlining,” this disinvestment
in infrastructure for less affluent, non-white communities is commensurate with discrimination. Many
of those affected are school-aged kids that need the Internet to complete their homework, submit
job applications, or simply socialize with their classmates. While research shows that most teens have
some access to the Internet via schools, libraries, or public WiFi connections, these young people are
at a severe disadvantage if their households are unable to get online. As various organizations work
to build a robust digital ecosystem, and urban development is influenced by broadband or wireless
accessibility, what kinds of egalitarian spaces emerge under such piecemeal techno-infrastructure?
If the Internet fosters a more complex sense of belonging, how is the built environment reconfiguring
to support evolving social structures and promote inclusion? How is access (or lack thereof) to
these virtual networks challenging conventional understandings of public and private space? How do
teenagers in the iGeneration occupy or navigate a metropolis that is significantly offline?
To address these questions, this project uses ‘thick mapping’ to describe various social landscapes
of Detroit; to unlock latent opportunities for assembly, public discourse, and digital justice; and to
prescribe an alternative future for the city, one that is rich with innovative ways to connect physically
and virtually.
By visualizing these invisible networks, this project hopes to create a heightened sense of community,
empower citizens to create new spaces for public discourse in their neighborhoods, and redefine
what digital access and equity could look like in their urban environments.
Detroit, MI
0 1 2 3 mi
Tech Company
Tech Company
Places of Interest
0 1 2 3 mi
5 Providers
4 Providers
3 Providers
2 Providers
1 Provider
Second Grade
Third Grade
Fourth Grade
Redlining, 1939
0 1 2 3 mi
0 1 2 3 mi
Demographics
0 1 2 3 mi
Black Asian
Race
0 1 2 3 mi
$90,000 - $150,000 $30,000 - $40,000
5-10% 40-60%
10-20% 60-80%
20-30% 80-99%
Unemployment
0 1 2 3 mi
0-80 276-325
81-175 326-400
176-225 401-500
226-275 501-786
Youth Population
0 1 2 3 mi
Combined Data
0 1 2 3 mi
Sites of Interest
0 1 2 3 mi
Sites of Interest
0 1 2 3 mi
Site Speculation #3
Site Speculation #2
Site Speculation #1
Sites of Interest
0 1 2 3 mi
Site Speculation #3
Site Speculation #2
Site Speculation #1
Sites of Interest
0 1 2 3 mi
A Block
Site Speculation #2
A Building
Site Speculation #1
Sites of Interest
0 1 2 3 mi
Hierarchical / Hub-and-Spoke Non-hierarchical / Mesh
Network Structures
Hierarchical / Hub-and-Spoke Non-hierarchical / Mesh
Network Structures
Network Structures
Network Structures
Wireless Mesh
Community Center
Fiber Backhaul
University Building
Wireless Backhaul
Library
Municipal Building
Commercial Building
Housing
University Building
Hospital
Community Center
University Building
Wireless Backhaul - Utilize existing municipal towers, light poles, etc.
- Fixed point-to-multipoint
- 2.4GHz, 5GHz unlicensed and 3.65GHz
Library
Municipal Building
Commercial Building
- Connects municipal and community anchor sites (CAIs) Fiber Optic Backbone
- Leverages university and institutional resources
- New construction financed through local governments or
public/private partnerships
Housing
University Building
Hospital
Community-driven Network Architecture Source: “Without Net Neutrality, Is It Time To Build Your Own Internet?” (www.inverse.com)
Commercial Building Factory Apartment Building
Equipment Room
Router Directional Router
Existing Router
Existing Router
Ethernet Connection
Directional Router
Access Point
Access Point
Core Connections
Distributed Connections
Access Connections
There are many ways to connect from the top of Wireless routers close to the ground provide better
the network to the bottom. Cables can run from the coverage so people can connect their phones,
top layer to Access Points where users connect, or tablets or laptops to the network. Often times,
there could be a cluster of mesh nodes wirelessly these routers can be replaced with simple low-cost
distributing access to a section of a neighborhood. Access Point devices, and allow the higher layers
In other cases, point-to-point or point-to-multipoint to determine how to connect to the rest of the
(common Wireless Internet Service Provider network.
techniques) can be used to provide connections to
the Access connections.
Project Team:
Cyrus Peñarroyo, Salvador Lindquist, Reed Miller
This project was supported by the Michigan-Mellon Project on Egalitarianism and the Metropolis
University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture + Urban Planning