Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
Herrera relates that a soldier named Villadiego had already penetrated
to this kingdom shortly before, by order of Cortes, but was never heard of
again. His guides were supposed to have killed him for his trinkets, dec.
iii. lib. iii. cap. iii. Mercator, 1569, Mechoacan; Laet, 1633, Mechoacan,
province and city, with Gttayangareo, Maltepeque, Taximaroa; West-Lnd.
Spieghel, 1624, Mechoacha; Jefferys, Mechoacan, state and city, with Zurzonza,
etc.; Goldschmidt s Cartog. Pac, Coast, MS., ii. 476.
*
The governor even offered his submission, according to Herrera, * y que
crehia q aquel gran senor (his king) embiaria presto sus embaxadores a Cortes,
ofreciendole su persona, casa y Reyno. Id. He leaves the intimation that
Montano went after the Tarascans had leftj others make him join their party.
46 RAIDS ALONG THE SOUTH SEA.
EXPEDITION or MONTANO.
6
Pirowan-Quencandari, as Brasseur de Bourbourg assumes him to be. Hist.
Nat. Civ., iv. 521-
48 RAIDS ALONG THE SOUTH SEA.
7
For a descriptionof the presents see llerrera, dec. iii. lib. iii.
cap. vi.
Among others the interpreter was rewarded with the caciqueshiD of
Xocotitlan.
CORTES AND THE TARASCAN NOBLES. 49
viii. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 217, allows Olid afterward to receive these or
similar presents.
*
De dode los Mexicanos.llamaron Cazonzin, que significa alpargate
. .le
viego. Herrcra, dec. iii. lib. iii. cap. viii. But this name was a title, as
fully explained in Native Rate*, v. 516, 525; Alegre, Hist. Camp. Jesus, i. 91;
Uktmaipain, Ui*t. Conq. t ii. 78.
OLID S MISSION. 51
15
No account is given of an expedition in the letter of May 1522, only
of the visit of the king s brother; but in the relation of October 1524 he
speaks of it, and so early therein as to indicate that it was sent not long after
the despatch of the previous letter. Cartas, 275.
Algunos meses despues de
vuelto el Rey, says Beaumont, Cr6n. Mich., iii. 49; but it is probable that
the king did not come until the expedition had entered Michoacan.
Alegre
aasumes that it accompanied the king s brother, but this is too early. Hist.
Comp. Jesus, i. 92, although according well with Bernal Diaz loose intima
tion. Hist. Verdad., 159.
1G
Gcrnara reduces the force to 40 horse and 100 foot. Hist. Hex-, 2 1 7, and
Ixtlilxochitl adds 5,000 Tezcucans. //or. Crueldades, 55.
17
It h frequently referred to the Mexican name of and
by Huitzitzitla, its
corrupt forms of Chincicila, etc.
18
Brasseur de Bourbourg places this occurrence
wrongly before the king s
brother is sent to Mexico, and assumes that as soon ae news arrives of their
approach a regular army is sent by the king to repel the invaders. Hist. Nat.
Civ., iv. 526.
52 RAIDS ALONG THE SOUTH SEA.
23
In Herrera, dec. iv. lib. iv. cap. ii., Juan del Valle is mentioned as the
discoverer of Tehuantepec, for which he obtained a coat of arms. In dec. iii.
lib. iii. cap. xvii. a discovery expedition to Tehuantepec under Guillen de la
,
Loa, Castillo, Alferez Roman Lopez, and two others, is spoken of as if sub
sequent to the above, their route being through Zapotecapan, along Chiapas,
and through Soconusco, a distance of 400 leagues. Chico and three others are
said to have explored the coast from Tehuantepec to Zacatula, but this is
doubtful, since the intermediate Tutupec was hostile. Others sent through
Jalisco never returned. Cortes states that his two parties numbered two
Spaniards each, but they may have been leaders, and were certainly
accom
panied by Indians. They appear to have returned before the end of October.
Cartas, 259, 262. In Cortes, Residencia, ii. 118-19, Juan de Umbria is said
to have been leader of one party. On his return he was imprisoned for two
years on the charge of having omitted Cortes name in taking possession
of
the sea. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 219, assumes that two parties went through
Michoacan, and Prescott hastily amplifies the achievements of one party,
although the chroniclers never mention even what became of it. J/ex-.,
iii.
237.
According to Herrera this should have been the Chico party, but
24 it is
doubtful.
Mercator, 1574, has Cacatula; Munich Atlas,
23
Native Races, ii.~ 109.
vi., Cacatola, same name a little farther north; Ogilby, 1671, Zacatula; Laet,
1633, It. Zacatula and Zacatula city; Jefferys, 1776; Zacatela, province and
city; Kiepert, Sacatula, Cartog. Pac. Coast, MS., ii. 384.
26
Evidently Juan Rodriguez, the leading brigantine captain, vol. i. 615,
though Bernal Diaz alludes to him as if he were a different man. Panes, in
Monumentos Domin. Esp., MS., 59.
27
Chiefly Tezcucans, says Ixtlilxochitl, ReL, 429. Zurita speaks of oppres
sion and hardships to which these allies were subjected. Pacheco and Carde
nas, Col. Doc., xiv. 414.
56 RAIDS ALONG THE SOUTH SEA.
first attention,
however, since the sovereign so de
sired it, for by it the route to the Spice Islands would
33
be greatly shortened. While hopeful that it would
be found, he suggested that the trade might in any
case be secured by this western route, if New Spain
were made the entrepot, goods being readily conveyed
34
overland by the aid of the natives. The departure
of Cortes for Honduras, in pursuit both of Olid and
the delayed the proposed expeditions by sea,
strait,
although the smallest vessel was sent by one of the
officials on a short vain search for certain islands
which aboriginal tradition placed to the south. 35 It
was but the delay of bitter disappointment.
Mota
Padilla assumes that Alvarez was specially commissioned by Cortes
to undertake the conquest Several follow him, though they place the date-
earlier thau his 1526 But Cortes clearly indicates the version of my text,
58 RAIDS ALONG THE SOUTH SEA.
Cr6n. Mich., iii. 502. Owing to their confusion about early events little reli
ance can be placed on the names connected with the invasion.
41
Not to Mexico as the above writers assume. Sabido por rrd, inande"
traer preso al capitan, y le castigue. Cort^, CJartas, 276. Success would
have obtained reward for the disobedience. Avalos is said to have held cut in
his district, but this is uncertain.
42
Herrera, followed, by Beaumont and others, gives the same force as
Cortes, but places it under Sandoval. d .c. iii. lib. iii. cap. xvii.
NUEVA GALICIA. 59
43
mountaineers, prevented success in Impilcingo, and
lie passed on to Zacatula. Increasing his force to
about twice its original strength, he thereupon marched
on Colima. After a hotly contested battle at Alima,
he compelled the king and his allies to retire to the
44
mountains, with heavy loss. The rest of the country
45
hastened to submit, and to assure possession he founded
a town named Coliman after the country, for which
Cortes appointed a municipality. Olid thereupon
returned with a rich booty, including some pearls,
Avalos being left in charge of the colony, numbering
about one hundred and fifty Spaniards, and a force of
allies.
46
As in Michoacan, the settlers speedily grew
discontented at the rapid dwindling of the much
lauded wealth of the country, and many deserted.
This encouraged the still hostile royalists in the moun
tains, and when the remaining colonists demanded
their tribute from the repartimientos they found most
of the natives united in a general revolt. 47 An ap
peal for aid was made to Cortes, and this time lie
despatched Sandoval, who so effectually suppressed
the revolt that none was ever again attempted. 43
Aleyre, Hist., Comp. Jesus, \. 93. Salazar, Hist. Con</., 95, swells the number
a little.Herrera s final episode under Olid and Villafuerte is entirely out of
place, and has helped to increase the general confusion among later writers.
Villafuerte does not appear to have approached Colima. His knowledge of
ships and ship-building caused him to be sent in command of the first colony
to Zacatiila, some time before the disbanded colony from Michoacan made the
first entry into Colima.
CO RAIDS ALONG THE SOUTH SEA.
49
Relacion de los senores de la provincia de Ceguatan, adds Cortes to
excuse his evident belief in the Amazon story. Carton, 288. Gomara
suggests
that it may have originated from the name of a district
there, Cihuatlau,
meaning place of women. Hist. Mex., 220-1; Oviedo, iii. 447-8.
5d
Mota
Padilla, Hint. N. Gal, 70, followed by Gil and Hernandez, in Soc.
Geoy. Boletln, viii. 476, 2da ep. ii. 479, give the date 1526-7, but the
M<:r.
in the town, a
religious ceremonies at the temple
pyramidal structure some sixty steps high, dedicated to
Piltzinteolli, the child god/ to whom sacrifice was
57
offered in simple fruit and flowers. The army was
lodged in the palace and its gardens, and welcomed
by as many women as there were Spaniards. This
thoughtful consideration on the part of the queen
was not appreciated, for Francisco, after beholding
the women, sent them back, and enjoined his men to
observe good conduct. Assisted by a young neophyte
from Father Gante s school, he thereupon sought
to convert the queen, who professed great interest.
Whether she was actually converted is not clear, but
she certainly tendered an offer of allegiance.
Francisco Cortes did not find so much gold as he
had expected, and although the provinces of Centiz-
5g
pac and Acaponeta, to the north of Tololotlan Eiver,
were reported rich, he resolved to return along the
59
coast. After two days march southward, he came
upon an army of some twenty thousand warriors
drawn up in battle-array, their bows adorned with
little flags of cotton of different colors, though chiefly
purple, a dye obtained from a shell -fish left by the
retiring tide on the rocks. This appearance caused the
6*
Spaniards to name the locality Valle de Banderas.
57
A
description of this curious temple, and the subject sacrifices, are given
in Native Races, iii. 447-8.
58
Rio Tololotlan, Santiago, or St Jago. Ogilby writes, 1671, R. Baranica;
Dampier, R. St Jago, near its mouth St Pecaque; Laet, 1633, S. layo:
1(399,
Jefferys L R. Barania, or St Jago, near by Sintiquipaque, Guaxacatlan; Kie-
pert, 1852, Rio St Jago Tololotlan. It is also known as Rio Grande, and de
Lerma. Carton. Pac. Coast, MS., ii. 532.
59
Cortes had ordered him to proceed up the coast 150 to 200 leagues, but
lie went only 130,
owing to insufficiency of force and grass. Ten days jour
ney beyond flowed a large river, probably a strait, of which curious things
were said. Ports also existed. Cartas, 492. This distance covered no doubt
the turnings of the route, and a stretch of imagination, and gives 110 idea of the
point attained. Beaumont assumes that the army did go as far as Acaponeta,.
where Cacique Xonacatl peacefully submitted, convinced by oracles of the
heavenly mission of the strangers. Cr6n. Midi., iii. 480-1. Mota Padilla.
allows Cortes to turn back, but he leaves at Jalisco the
neophyte Juan Fran
cisco, to carry on the conversion till friars should be sent. Juan. Aznar, of
the party, offered to return with friars if the
place were granted him in eii-
comienda. This was done, but Aznar failed to come back. H
ist. N. Gal., 72.
Munich Atlas, 1532-40, Banderas; Dampier, 1699, Valderas; Jefferys,
"
65
Supplementary authorities containing additional matter of more
list of
or less value relating topreceding chapters: Puga, Cedulario, 8, 20, 24, 43,
86; Oviedo, iii. 424-39, 446-8, 461-7; Pacheco and Cardenas, Col, Doc., xiii.
62, passim; xxvi. 149-59; Carte s, Escritos Sueltos, 23-6, 42-51, 149-50;
Archivo Mex., Docs., i. 53, 157-8, 236-7, 417; ii. 118-19, 255-6; Icazbalceta,
Col. Doc., i. 464-9; Ramirez, Proceso, 15; Ternaux-Compans, Voy., serie i.
ii. torn. v. 187; iii. 182;
torn. ix. 287-8; se"rie
Squier s MS., xix. 35-6; Chi-
malpain, Hist. Conq., ii. 78-107; Las Casas, Hist. Apolog., MS., 30-2;
Duran, Hist. Ind., MS., ii. 518-21 ; Ixtlilxochitl, Relaciones, in Kingsborough s
Mex. Antiq., ix. 427-9; Monardes, Hist. Medic. Occid., 23 et seq. ; Moreno,
Fragments, 27-30; Cortes, Hist. N. Esp., 330-6,347-50, 373-4, 382-5; Gon
zalez Ddv ila, Teatro Ecles., i. 4-6; Remesal, Hist. Chyapa, 1, 2; Prescott s
Mex., ii. 48-9; iii. 237-9, 270-2; also notes in Mex. editions; Humboldt,
Essai Pol., ii. 673-4, 691; Helps Cortes, ii. 154-7; Monumentos Domin. Esp.,
MS., 59; Vetancvrt, Menologia, 105; Salazar y Olarte, Conq. Mex., 43-101;
Alaman, Disert., i. 161-3, 191-3, app. 148-54; Rivera, Gob. Mex., 16, 17;
Brasseur de Hourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., iv. 380-5, 516-72; Kerr s Col. Voy.,
78-101; Villa-Senor y Sanchez, Theatro, ii. 112; Barcia, Hist. Prim., i.
171-3; Mayer s Mex. Aztec, i. 80-1; Jalisco, Mem. Hist., 20-3, 168; Medina,
Ghr6n. de San Diego de Mex., 245-6; Rivero, Mex. in 1842, 7-11; Russell s
Hist. Am., i. 251; Cavo, Tres ,Siglos, i. 11-15; Voyages, Selection of Curious,
31-2; West-Indische tfp^rM, 268-73, 315-19; Galvano s Discov. , 151-2; Santos,
Chronologia Ilospitalaria, ii. 489-90; Soc. Mex. Geog., Boletin, ii. 468, 478-9;
iv. 640-2; vi. 197-204; vii. 160-1, 187-8; viii. 475, 477, 532; 30th
Cong., 2d
Sess., II Com. Rept. 145, pp. 128-32; Nic. Municip. Independ., 8; Orozco y
.
Berra, Geog., 276; Stevens Notes, 45; Overland Monthly, xiii. 365-7; Find-
lay s Directory, i. 259-60; ii. 132-3; Cortesii, von dem Neuen Hispanien, ii.
46-5; A a, Naaukeurige Versameling, x. 253-83; Spaggiari, Libel Bimest,
xxxix.-xlviii.; Dice. Univ., vili. 702-4; Bitrney s Hist. Voy., i. 119; Zamacois,
Hist. Mcj., ii. 733-5; iv. 65-90, 177-8, 307-8, 383-5, 507; Carriedo, Eetudios
Hist., 92; Greenhow s Or. and Cal., 49 ; March y Labores, Marina Espanola,
ii. 195; Harris, Col.
Voy., i. 272-3; Giordan, L lsthme Tehuan., 12-14; But-
eierre, L Emp. Mex., 331-49.