Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FOR
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Years of Service in
Years in Service 27 YEARS 13 YEARS
current school
Verifier Position
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)
Feedback
&Comment
Annual Performance Management Plan
4.2 Deploys staff effectively to address student needs. checked and monitored through LWS LW to " Teach -in " was conducted ,
with data analyzed for effectiveness the data is analyzed and used to
Link to TSSP entails . The presence of additional determine the maximum School timetable
classes and teaching and learning are instructional time .
1.6: Staff utilisation and succession management monitored . LW Data
processes contribute towards school improvement and Students in grades 1-4 can solidify
sustainability. Innovative solutions will be identified in their reading proficiency and thought “Teach in”schedule
order to create more opportunities for through differentiation .
Link to PBPPP:
students in Gr 1-4 must be supported Tool Kits ( Teach in) On-Track
with differentiated literacy and - create teach in bank Literacy
A1.2: Planning and Development of
Teaching numeracy / PBD resources eg books, PBD Data Yr 1-4
worksheets/tools kits/games
Feedback
&Comment
Statement
Link to Malaysian Professional Standards for - PMS continues with PMS is set properly ,
distributed leadership. documentation is current and At-Risk
Leaders:
PMS Committee meets PMS Committee meets
5.3 Provide effective supervision and evaluation of regularly to oversee the regularly (4 times a year) to
all teachers. process and ensure that ensore that Quality
all documents are embedded PMS Document
Link to TSSP:1.5: Performance management of all
updated
staff is a rigorous process that contributes towards Teachers Target successfully PMS Committee meeting
- Teachers goals are
school improvement and sustainability. completed , supports TSIP
SMART, challenging and agenda
and enable teachers to
1.6: Staff utilisation and succession management relevant to the TSIP and
demonstrate best practices in TSIP
processes contribute towards school improvement enable teachers to
their chosen field. Follow in
and sustainability. demonstrate best
relation to target teachers PMS Target setting –
practices in the field of
Link to PBPPP: and action made each month. analyse
choice
A1.2: Planning and Development of Teaching Schedule of checking & On-Track
follow AT/ML work plan
Reviewer
Feedback
&Comment
Starting
Leadership Targets/TSSP Indicators Mid- Year Review
Finishing Level
Progress or
Value-added
Level (agreed at Target Setting
score (1-5)
meeting)
2. 2.2 Uses data to improve student outcomes/ TSSP Indicator 3.5: The school
meets, exceeds, student key performance targets for statutory assessments
At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
2. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
3. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
4. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
5. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Raw Score (25) Overall Level
TOTAL
Reviewee
Feedback
&Comment
Reviewer
Feedback
&Comment
Target Setting Reviewee’s Signature: Reviewer’s Signature: Verifier’s Signature: Date: Click here to enter a date.
Mid-Year Reviewee’s Signature: Reviewer’s Signature: Verifier’s Signature: Date: Click here to enter a date.
End of Year Reviewee’s Signature: Reviewer’s Signature: Verifier’s Signature: Date: Click here to enter a date.