You are on page 1of 10

TRUST SCHOOL TARGET SETTING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMS

FOR

Principals, Headmasters and Senior Assistants

Academic Year 2020


(Private & Confidential)

PERSONAL INFORMATION

NAME ZURRATUL ‘AIN BT BUKHARI

School SK COMBINED, KUCHING

Position ADMINISTRATIVE SENIOR ASSISSTANT [ PENOLONG KANAN 1]

Years of Service in
Years in Service 27 YEARS 13 YEARS
current school

Reviewer PN KAREN ONG AH BAK Position HEADMASTER

Verifier Position
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

Annual Performance Management Plan

Specific Target Mid- Year End Year


Leadership Target 1 Success Criteria Possible Evidence Review Level
Statement
Link to Malaysian Professional Standards for The action plan is developed to the level The action plan is developed and
Leaders: of student achievement data includes a actioned which has an impact on the At-Risk
review of current strategies - namely : best strategies that teachers use and
2.2 Uses data to improve student outcomes support teachers , meeting in use data for the students.
Student Outcome Data Action Plan
accordance with the year / academic -upgrade/provide support plan for the
Link to TSSP: action plan teachers especially from establishing to Level 2 data
TSSP Indicator 3.5: The school meets, exceeds, enhancing in terms of pdp
TSIP Tracker
student key performance targets for statutory
-Triangulation analyse the students
assessments . Academic action plan will be updated LO/LW data
achievement as the pdp competencies
twice a year according to the needs .
of teachers embedded through LO/LW
Link to PBPPP: Academic data On-Track
and academic data
 A2.5: Information
-tracking and monitoring significant
 A4.1: Government Policies
indicator TOV
 Student Outcome
Measurement: Section 1: Teaching and
Learning: Increased Knowledge and Skill

Mid-Year Year End


Reviewer
Feedback
&Comment

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 2
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

Annual Performance Management Plan

Specific Target Mid- Year End Year


Leadership Target 2 Success Criteria Possible Evidence Review Level
Statement
Link to Malaysian Professional Standards Improve the learning environment in
for Leaders: Level 2 classroom so that it is At-Risk
commensurate with GT classrooms , The classroom environment should
3.2 Provides a conducive environment (physical including classrooms example and look to encourage learning ,
and /or emotional) for students will involve all students, including including reading materials , PMS Document
preschool and PPKI . learning resources and teaching .
Link to TSSP: This is to encourage reading and PMS Committee
The system was introduced to thinking .
2.3 The learning environment (physical and ensure that all classes have a Minute of Meeting
emotional) supports effective learning. student work samples displayed and -Meet the best level in physical and
annotated including monthly Audit emotional Environment audit Rubric LW Data (eLW)
Link to PBPPP:
-The student work are display on Monthly Audit Classroom Data On-Track
 A1.2 : Planning and Development board always change regularly
of Teaching
 A2.3 : Physical Development
 A3.2 : Proactive in Action
A1.1 Achievement of Aims

Mid-Year Year End


Reviewer

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 3
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

Feedback
&Comment
Annual Performance Management Plan

Specific Target Mid- Year End Year


Leadership Target 3 Success Criteria Possible Evidence Review Level
Statement
Link to Malaysian Professional Standards for -Develop talent management and -All GPKs and 50% 0f the
Leaders: succession planning strategies and existing ATs/MLs develop as At-Risk
document Focus Learning Walk (eLW)
leaders of learners, strong
1.2. Distributed Leadership contribution to school Focus Lesson Observation
Link to TSSP: academic improvement
- Panel Heads become leaders LO Feedback Data
TSSP indicator 1.2. There is effective,values driven, -Through moderation
of learners, involve
school wide leadership at every level, and the range between teachers & AT/ML Minutes of Meeting on the
collaborative techniques in
of leadership styles utilised is appopriate observation feedback working group
meetings and effective budget
Link to PBPPP: - Create moderator of AT/ML work plan
On-Track
competencies
 A1.4 : Supervising and Monitoring PMS teacher target plan
 A2.4 : Human Resources
% analysis of Art Task

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 4
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

Mid-Year Year End


Reviewer
Feedback
&Comment

Annual Performance Management Plan

Specific Target Possible Mid- Year End Year


Leadership Target 4 Success Criteria Review Level
Statement Evidence
Link to Malaysian Professional Standards for
Leaders: At-Risk

Teaching substitute teachers will be

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 5
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

4.2 Deploys staff effectively to address student needs. checked and monitored through LWS LW to " Teach -in " was conducted ,
with data analyzed for effectiveness the data is analyzed and used to
Link to TSSP entails . The presence of additional determine the maximum School timetable
classes and teaching and learning are instructional time .
1.6: Staff utilisation and succession management monitored . LW Data
processes contribute towards school improvement and Students in grades 1-4 can solidify
sustainability. Innovative solutions will be identified in their reading proficiency and thought “Teach in”schedule
order to create more opportunities for through differentiation .
Link to PBPPP:
students in Gr 1-4 must be supported Tool Kits ( Teach in) On-Track
with differentiated literacy and - create teach in bank Literacy
 A1.2: Planning and Development of
Teaching numeracy / PBD resources eg books, PBD Data Yr 1-4
worksheets/tools kits/games

Reviewer Mid-Year Year End

Feedback
&Comment

Annual Performance Management Plan

Mid- Year End Year


Leadership Target 5 Specific Target Success Criteria Possible Evidence Review Level

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 6
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

Statement
Link to Malaysian Professional Standards for - PMS continues with PMS is set properly ,
distributed leadership. documentation is current and At-Risk
Leaders:
PMS Committee meets PMS Committee meets
5.3 Provide effective supervision and evaluation of regularly to oversee the regularly (4 times a year) to
all teachers. process and ensure that ensore that Quality
all documents are embedded PMS Document
Link to TSSP:1.5: Performance management of all
updated
staff is a rigorous process that contributes towards Teachers Target successfully PMS Committee meeting
- Teachers goals are
school improvement and sustainability. completed , supports TSIP
SMART, challenging and agenda
and enable teachers to
1.6: Staff utilisation and succession management relevant to the TSIP and
demonstrate best practices in TSIP
processes contribute towards school improvement enable teachers to
their chosen field. Follow in
and sustainability. demonstrate best
relation to target teachers PMS Target setting –
practices in the field of
Link to PBPPP: and action made each month. analyse
choice
A1.2: Planning and Development of Teaching Schedule of checking & On-Track
follow AT/ML work plan

Coaching and mentoring


in their field

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 7
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

Mid-Year Year End

Reviewer
Feedback
&Comment

Annual Performance Summary

Leadership Target Progress

Starting
Leadership Targets/TSSP Indicators Mid- Year Review
Finishing Level
Progress or
Value-added
Level (agreed at Target Setting
score (1-5)
meeting)

2. 2.2 Uses data to improve student outcomes/ TSSP Indicator 3.5: The school
meets, exceeds, student key performance targets for statutory assessments
At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

2. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

3. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 8
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

4. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

5. At-Risk On-Track 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Raw Score (25) Overall Level
TOTAL

Starting Developing Establishing Extending Enhancing


Rubric
0-5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 25

Reviewee
Feedback
&Comment

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 9
Trust Schools
Performance Management System Rubric forSenior Leadership Team (SLT)

Reviewer
Feedback
&Comment

Target Setting Reviewee’s Signature: Reviewer’s Signature: Verifier’s Signature: Date: Click here to enter a date.

Mid-Year Reviewee’s Signature: Reviewer’s Signature: Verifier’s Signature: Date: Click here to enter a date.

End of Year Reviewee’s Signature: Reviewer’s Signature: Verifier’s Signature: Date: Click here to enter a date.

© Copyright LeapEd™ Services 2016 Duplication or Infringement is Prohibited


EDD/PMS Rubric for SLT/KRS&NKO/19th Jan 2016 10

You might also like