Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Education
Region IV – A CALABARZON
Schools Division of Laguna
District of Liliw
LILIW CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Liliw
Noted:
Reviewed by:
researcher used purposive sampling where the respondents are the LCES
young journalists for school year 2020 – 2021 taking into account the
situation during this time of the pandemic. This action research was
young journalists after virtual training to assess their learning made this
study original.
The result of this study denotes that the level campus journalism
“Excellent”.
provide a school system and assist learners to discover their full potential
thereby, enable them to create their own destiny in the global community.
declared the policy of the state to uphold freedom of the press even at the
and developing moral character, The Banahaw Breeze and Ang Balitang
for their Purposes, which shall be utilized to train interested pupils in the
in campus journalism were directly related, that is if the former is low, the
latter will also be low and vice versa. An important feature of this academic
as the use of online platforms for their classes. Campus Journalism this
Limjuco (2016) the more proficient the student writers are, the more
relevant articles can be found in the issues of the student papers and the
higher the quality of the write-ups are. Campus journalism intervention and
an output of each participant; and further equip young journalists with the
the increase of young journalists’ performance even in this time of the new
normal in education.
1.1 relevance
1.2 readiness
2.1 phase 1
2.2 phase 2
performance?
Methodology
School for the school year 2020 – 2021 as subjects of this study.
b. Sampling
important information and data necessary for research that take into
c. Data Collection
resources. Monitoring and Evaluation Tool was also used to record the
to be used in this study. The descriptive survey method was used in this
analyze and interpret the collected data from the survey or observation
distributed to the respondents for the evaluation or the impact of the said
e. Ethical Issues
and phase 2 of virtual campus journalism training. On the first day of the
while on the last day of the training 17 journalist’s or 100% were present.
terms of relevance. It can be seen on the table that the overall mean score
Excellent.
Relevance x SD Remarks
The virtual trainings achieved its
4.94 0.24 Excellent
stated objectives
The level of detail was relevant and
4.88 0.33 Excellent
appropriate
The trainings provided new
4.82 0.39 Excellent
learnings about Campus Journalism
Weighted Mean = 4.88 Standard Deviation = 0.20 Remarks= Excellent
Legend:
5 4.20-5.00 Excellent
3 2.60-3.39 Average
1 1.00-1.79 Poor
from the mean score of 4.94 and standard deviation of 0.24 while the level
4.88 mean score and standard deviation of 0.33. Likewise, the training
provided new learnings about campus journalism as also shown from the
is “Excellent”.
terms of readiness. It can be seen on the table that the overall mean score
Excellent.
Readiness x SD Remarks
The trainings were helpful for young
4.88 0.49 Excellent
journalists
The trainings helped increase the
capacity of young journalists in 4.94 0.24 Excellent
processing information
The speakers provided updated
5 0 Excellent
style in journalism
Weighted Mean = 4.94 Standard Deviation = 0.24 Remarks= Excellent
Legend:
5 4.20-5.00 Excellent
3 2.60-3.39 Average
1 1.00-1.79 Poor
training was really helpful for young journalists as presented from the
“Excellent”.
as Excellent.
Legend:
5 4.20-5.00 Excellent
3 2.60-3.39 Average
1 1.00-1.79 Poor
Table 4 presents the computed mean level campus journalism
training as shown from the mean score of 4.82 and standard deviation of
0.39.
of resources is “Excellent”.
the table that the overall mean score of campus journalists’ outputs is
Improvement”
Journalists’ Standard
Mean interpretation
Outputs deviation
Did not meet
Phase 1 60.44 45.38
Expectation
Legend:
interpreted as “Did not meet expectations” from the mean score of 60.44
and 45.38 standard deviation while the mean level of campus journalists’
outputs during phase 2 shown 91.22 mean score and standard deviation
Conclusions
The result of this study denotes that the level campus journalism
“Excellent”.
computed t-value is -2.23 with the degree of freedom of 7 and critical value
of 2.36.
Project JoWorksKI in the New Normal was effective and can be utilized
Recommendations
appropriate. It is also important to make sure that the training will provide
styles in journalism.
learning. Keep inspiring others and finding new teaching and innovation
REFERENCES
B. Others