Contents

Candidate Overview....................................................................................................................................1
L1 Overview.................................................................................................................................................2
L1 Summary Status..................................................................................................................................2
Details:.................................................................................................................................................2
L2 Overview.................................................................................................................................................3
L2 Summary Status..................................................................................................................................3
Details:.................................................................................................................................................4
EL Overview.................................................................................................................................................4
Question to Candidate.............................................................................................................................4
Information to Candidate........................................................................................................................5
Details:.................................................................................................................................................5

Candidate Overview
Name Description Overall

Candidate Name Krishnan Swaminathan

L1 Interviewer CHITTIBOYINA VENKATA RAJU Average

L2 Interviewer Good/Average/rejected

EL Interviewer Good/Average/rejected

Tech Stack Teradata

Overall Comment

Candidate photo

L1 Overview
L1 Summary Status
Subject Status (Good/Average/NA) Reason
 Teradata Basics Average Partially Explained

Teradata SQL Questions Average Partially written the queries

Teradata Performance Tuning Average Partially Explained

Project info and Understanding Average Written the code with hints
on DWH Concepts

ETL Informatica related Above Average Had better idea/Experience in

ETl Infa compared to Teradata

Details:
 Following are the result of given question.
 Question Subject Explanation % clear

Questions 1 Teradata Basics Explained average 50%

Questions 2 Teradata SQL Questions Average 50%

Questions 3 Teradata Performance Tuning  Below Average  40%

Questions 4 Project info and Understanding on Average 60%

DWH Concepts

Questions 5 Teradata Basics Average 60%

Question 6 Informatica ETL Related Basics Above Average 60 %

Question 7 Informatica Mapping performance Average 50%

Enhancement

Logical Coding Ability (Algo/DS/Problem Solving)

Question Subject Explanation % clear

<your problem solving Logical very basic Solved with hint 80% 
question here>
Please attach the
screenshot and link the
 reference

Logical Problem -1

<your problem solving Logical basic Done 100%

question here>
Logical Problem -2

<your problem solving Logical middle basic Having idea but unable 40% 
question here> to convert into code

Logical Problem -3

Logical Problem -1

Logical Problem -2

Logical Problem -3

L2 Overview
L2 Summary Status
Subject Status Reason

Problem Solving -1

TD

Problem Solving -2

TD

Problem Solving -3

Scenario based question

Details:
Problem Solving -1
Problem Solving -2

Problem Solving -3

EL Overview
Question to Candidate
Topics Status Remarks

Executed Project awareness Good Able to explain in detail project executed like Project
Arch/Role performed/logging/integration etc

Attitude Good When given an uncomfortable problem/ question,

response for the candidate is gauged

Awareness of the technologies Average Not comfortable with Spring or GIT or Jenkis or Java
used in the target project or Android or WebUI. Higher ramp up time

Candidates background domain Average Mostly worked on telecom, Higher ramp time
predicated.

Communication Average Candidate may not be excellent in English, was he

able to make you understand.

Candidates’ responsiveness Average Candidate is quick to grasp, he was able to ask

relevant question

Problem Solving – Provided the Good Problem Solving - 1

L1 and L2 Feedback are not
matching with the candidate’s
responses

Information to Candidate

Topics Status Remarks

 Candidates’ awareness about done In case not, talk about Altimetrik, Great Place to
Altimetrik Work rankings, Culture etc.

Explain the project and its tech done GCP, Spring boot, Microservices, Java 8, GIT, Jenkins
stack to the candidate

Details:
Problem Solving -1