You are on page 1of 58

Running the Completion

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Running the Completion

z Preparations at the wellsite

z The Tools

z Running Procedures

z Connections

z Packers

z SSSVs

z Installing the Tree

z Well Hand-Over
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

1
Wellsite Preparations

What do we need to run a completion?

z In your syndicate group make a list of


everything you will need on your rig to install
the completion in Team Exercise 2.

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Wellsite Preparations

What do we need to run a completion?


‹ Sub-Assemblies
‹ Tubing
‹ Control Line
‹ X-mas Tree
‹ Wellhead Adapter Flange
‹ Pipe Handling Gear
‹ Tubing Tongs
‹ BOP rams
‹ Slickline Equipment
‹ E-line Equipment??
‹ People ….. lots and lots of people!!!
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

2
The Tools

z The Rig
‹ Hoisting
‹ Rotating
‹ Pumping
‹ Well Control

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Drilling Rig

Typical Heavy Land Rig


– Depth Rating… 6,000 m
– Drawworks ……3000 HP
– Pump Power…3200 HP
– Rig Staff……………60
– Costs USD 15k per day
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

3
Land Rigs “Abu Dhabi/Canada”

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

DESERT RIG – Oman (Lekhwair)


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

4
HELI RIG

when you have to…

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Sit on Bottom SWAMP BARGE


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

5
Fulmar Production Platform

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Stena Tay – DP semi-submersible


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

6
DRILLSHIP – Neddrill-2

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Stena Seawell – Well Intervention Vessel


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

7
The Hoisting System

• Derrick
• Draw-works
• Crown
Block
• Traveling
Block
• Hook
• Anchor

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

DRILLER Operating Hoisting System Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

8
DRAWWORKS System

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

When Pressure applied to the Drilling Brake


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

9
Kelly & Rotary Table

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Top Drive

1 Compensating Link
2 Rotary Swivel
3 El. Motor
4 Gear Box
5 Gear Lock
6 Swivel coupling
7 Link Tilt Actuators
8 Link Hanger
9 Knuckle Links
10 IBOP
11 Torque Wrench
12 Links
13 Drill Pipe Elevator
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

10
ROTARY
SLIPS

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Slips

Elevator
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

11
Circulation
System

WASTE
PIT

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

MUD PUMPS Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

12
Mud Tank System

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Pipe Handling Gear

z Single Joint Elevators

z Single Joint Compensator

z Tubing Elevator

z Tubing Slips

z Stabbing Guides

z Quicklock thread protectors

z Pickup / Lay down machine for 13Cr tubing


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

13
Tubing Tongs

z Hydraulic tongs
‹ Electric / diesel powered hydraulic power-pack located in safe area

z Integral back-up system

z Variable speed

z Torque controller

z Soft-torque features

z Torque-turn analysis system

z Non-marking jaws for 13Cr tubulars

z Safety features
‹ Minimum interface
‹ Interlock on jaw covers

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

BOP Preparation

z Must be a set of pipe rams in BOP that can close


around tubing

z Variable pipe rams required for tapered tubing string

z Top pipe rams generally changed out and tested prior


to running completion

z Some companies rely on annular preventer – brave!!!


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

14
Preparing the Completion

z Tubing preparation serves two purposes


‹ ensures pipe body and threads protected
when being moved to the drill floor
‹ handling of tubing on drill floor kept to an
absolute minimum

z Laying out pipe


‹ Last joint into the well is first on bottom
layer furthest from catwalk
‹ Box ends nearest rigfloor
‹ Work in and up from there!
‹ Keep sub-assemblies separate

z Numbering
‹ Different options but be consistent
‹ Number sub-assemblies A… and B…
‹ Number Pup Joints

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Cleaning and Inspection

z Cleaning threads
‹ No diesel or wire brushes
‹ Fast cleaning solvents (Shellsol)
‹ High pressure steam cleaners and air dryers
‹ Clean pin end thread protectors as well

z Drifting
‹ Use non-metallic API drifts (42” long)
‹ Always drift from pin end to box end (avoids box seal damage)
‹ Use softline or air to move drift – avoid steel cable / rods / wire

z Inspection
‹ Check threads for galling
‹ Check seal areas for smoothness
‹ Ensure anti-galling treatment applied
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

15
Measurement and Pipe Tally

z Ideally pipe should be measured twice


by different people

z Use steel tape – check it is in good


condition

z Make-up Loss – two options:


‹ Use tape jig to allow for loss
‹ Measure total length and adjust lengths later
(spreadsheet)
‹ Be consistent and clear (beware
crewchanges!!!)
‹ Lengths sometimes marked on pin ends of

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


pipe

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Running the Completion

z Tubulars picked up from catwalk to drillfloor


‹ Pulled up by single joint elevator on rigfloor air
winch
‹ Lifted up by crane
‹ Picked up using manual pick-up / laydown
machine
‹ Picked up using automatic pipe handler

z Tubing Made up to string


‹ picked up on single joint elevator
‹ Stabbed into previous joint
‹ Made up using power tong

z String Lowered
‹ Single joint elevator removed, main elevator
installed
‹ String picked out of slips
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

‹ String lowered into well

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

16
Mechanical Handling of Tubulars

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Handling Tubulars
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

17
Tubing Elevators

Side Door

Centre Latch

Slip-Type

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Slip Type Elevator


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

18
Flush mounted slips

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Single Joint Compensator

z Positioning of the pin in the box during make-up is critical


‹ If no weight transferred to box, make-up cannot take place
‹ If too much weight transferred, stabbing and alignment becomes difficult,
galling may occur due to high contact loads
‹ Extremely difficult to achieve accurate weight transfer with driller’s brake

z Controlled and accurate weight transfer is the key to successful


make-up.

z SJC installed between rig travelling block and single joint


elevator
‹ weight of the pipe neutralised
‹ controlled downward penetration of the pipe is possible during make-up
‹ highly recommended for both make-up and break-out of premium
connections
‹ Essential for corrosion resistant alloy (CRA) tubulars
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

19
Single Joint Compensator

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Stabbing the pipe

z protect the threads and seals from


standing up on the shoulder of the box end

z tubing joint needs to be held vertically over


the stabbing guide and lowered in a
controlled manner to maintain the
alignment and guide the pin end into the
thread engagement of the box.

z the pipe should not be rocked;

z pipe should be rotated with a strap wrench


to initially engage threads
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

20
Stabbing Guides

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Making the Connection

z Correct make-up torque essential


‹ optimum stress distribution throughout thread connection
‹ ensure a pressure tight seal
‹ Prevents joint failure / back-off

z Over-torquing may
‹ damage threads or seals
‹ Cause crimping of the pin
‹ Cause belling outwards of the box

z Make-up torque generally specified by thread


manufacturer. Dependant on
‹ connection type
‹ grade of material
‹ size and weight of tubing.

z Make-up torque will vary with different thread


compounds

z Make-up speed also important:


‹ High speed makeup causes damage – over torque,
thread galling, seal damage
‹ Max speed: 25 rpm (CRA: 15 rpm)
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

21
Tong
Features

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Dual Completions
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

22
Dual Completion Tong

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Torque vs Turns

z Correct make-up cannot be judged on torque alone


‹ Crossed threads
‹ Dirty threads
‹ Galled threads

z Essential to obtain correct pin penetration into the box


‹ To form a pressure tight seal by producing adequate bearing pressure.
‹ To achieve sufficient thread engagement to produce load-carrying efficiency.

z Torque vs turns has to be analysed


‹ Torque turn data published by connection manufacturers
‹ Torque-turn measurements possible using instrumented tongs

z On-site analysis of torque-turn graphs best practical means of identifying


potentially leaking connections before they are run into the hole
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

23
Premium Thread Requirements

z Premium connection design requires that


a certain amount of the make-up torque
is applied to the metal-to-metal seal area
so that pressure integrity is maintained
under all expected loads

z Problem:
‹ how to determine the amount of torque going
into the seal / shoulder area.

z Solution:
‹ accurately identify the point of initial seal
/shoulder contact and supply sufficient torque
from that point.

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

24
Recommended field make-up torque
Size (O.D.) Nominal Wall 55 75 - 80 - 95 105 - 110 - 115
Weight Thick- ksi ksi ksi
ness
in. lb / ft in. min. opt. max. min. opt. max. min. opt. max.

5" 13.0 .253 3780 4200 4620 4110 4560 5010 4370 4850 5330
15 .296 4230 4700 5170 4630 5140 5650 4820 5350 5880

18.0 .362 5140 5710 6280 5540 6150 6760 5800 6440 7080

20.3 .408 6190 6870 7550 6840 7590 8340 7170 7960 8750

20.8 .422 6320 7020 7720 6840 7590 8340 7170 7960 8750
21.4

23.2
.437

.478
ple6470 7160 7870

6840 7590 8340


7170 7960 8750

7470 8300 9130


7470 8300 9130

7830 8700 9570

24.1 .500

a m 6840 7590 8340 7470 8300 9130 7830 8700 9570

5½" 15.5
17.0

20.0
.275
.304

.361
ex 4230 4700 5170
4560 5060 5560

5340 5930 6520


4630 5140 5650
4950 5500 6050

5860 6510 7160


4880 5420 5960
5220 5790 6360

6120 6800 7480

23.0 .415 6390 7090 7790 7170 7960 8750 7470 8300 9130

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


26.8 .476 6840 7590 8340 7470 8300 9130 8150 9050 9950

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

TORQUE / TURN GRAPH


Target Torque/Turn Zone
Max
Torque

Min
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Zero
Turns Min Max
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

25
TORQUE / TURN GRAPH
Target Torque/Turn Zone
Max
Torque

Min

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Zero
Turns Min Max
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

TORQUE / TURN GRAPH


Target Torque/Turn Zone
Max
Torque

Min
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Zero
Turns Min Max
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

26
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Typical 'Tapered Connection' Profile


Max
Opt

Torque applied to
Shoulder
Torque

MSP
Shoulder Engagement

Thread and Seal


Interference
Thread
Interference
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

27
Typical 'Non-Tapered Connection' Profile

Max
Opt

Torque applied to
Shoulder
Torque

MSP
Shoulder Engagement

Seal Interference

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Typical NKK Connection Profile


Max
Opt
MS
P
Torque applied to Shoulder
Torque

Shoulder Engagement

Thread and Seal


Interference
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

28
Shoulder Detection
Max
Opt

5
Torque

4
3
1 2

Ref

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Turns

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Shoulder Rejection Area

Max
Opt
Torque

MSP

MSP = (Maximum Shoulder Position)


Maximum torque minus manufacturers
recommended torque applied after shoulder
engagement (a % of Optimum torque)
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

29
Minimum Shoulder Position

z Most Premium connection manufacturers require that a


certain amount of the make-up torque is seen to be
applied to the metal-to-metal seal area before the
shoulder engages to give confidence that the pin and
box seals have engaged correctly.

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Shoulder Rejection Area

Max
Opt
Torque

MSP

LSP (Lowest Shoulder Position )


Manufacturers recommended torque applied
before shoulder engagement (a % of Optimum)
LSP
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

30
3rd generation torque-turn system capabilities

z Continuously monitors Torque and Turns.

z Controls Tong (speed and torque applied).

z Ensures a minimum % of Optimum Torque is applied to Seal


(LSP).

z Identifies Shoulder engagement.

z Ensures a minimum % of Optimum Torque is applied to


Shoulder (MSP).

z Can be used as a pressure testing medium (PLS).

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Connection Rejection Criteria

z Excess Turns. (Over Turns)

z No Shoulder engagement. (No Shoulder Detected)

z Shoulder below LSP.

z Poor Profile after shoulder.

z Shoulder above MSP.

z Excess Torque. (Over Torque)


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

31
Over Turns
Max
Opt
Torque

MSP

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

No Shoulder Detected
Max
Opt
Torque

MSP
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

32
Shoulder below LSP
Max
Opt
Torque

MSP

LSP

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Poor Profile after shoulder


Max
Opt
3
2
4
1
5
Torque

MSP
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

33
Shoulder above MSP
Max
Opt
5
4
3
2
1 5
4
3
Torque

2
1

MSP

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Over-torque

Max
Opt
Torque

MSP
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

34
Good Connection
Max
Opt
5654
0.94
2132
Torque

0.89
MSP

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Other possible problems

z Some profiles indicate a possible problem – but might


still have a good seal

z Operator decision needed for


‹ Poor Profile
‹ Dip prior to Shoulder
‹ Turns after shoulder
‹ Insufficient Detail
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

35
Torque Poor Profile

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g
Torque

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

36
Torque

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Dip prior to shoulder


Torque

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

37
Torque Turns after shoulder

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Insufficient Data
Torque

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

38
Quiz

z In your groups consider the following graphs:


‹ What is the graph telling us?
‹ Would you accept the connection?

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Max
Opt

No. 1
Torque

MSP
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Ref
Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

39
Max
Opt

No. 2
Torque

MSP

Ref

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Turns

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Max
Opt

No. 3
Torque

MSP
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

Turns
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

40
Max
Opt

No. 4
Torque

MSP

Ref

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


Turns

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Computer controlled make-up

z Systems now control and analyse connection in real time:

z After Stabbing
‹ tubular speed gradually increased by the computer until the required RPM is
reached
‹ If torque exceeds preset safety limit, the process halts
‹ protects the connection from excessive torque during vulnerable stage of the
make-up process.

z Running In
‹ computer controls RPM at desired value until a preset torque below reference
torque, is reached
‹ make-up is interrupted in a controlled manner to enable gear changing (manual).

z After Gear Change


‹ computer controls gradual acceleration of tubular RPM until new low gear RPM
setting is reached
‹ computer controls the RPM until the shoulder point is reached
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

41
Computer controlled make-up …(2)

z Shoulder Point
‹ Shoulder point identified by computer – determines if it has occurred
between LSP and MSP
‹ If OK make-up is allowed to continue
‹ If outside limits make-up is aborted to prevent damage to connection.

z Approach To Target
‹ computer decreases tubular RPM as the torque value approaches the
target make-up value
‹ When target torque is reached, the computer can either terminate the
make-up with a controlled release of the torque or go into torque hold
mode.

z Torque Hold
‹ Computer controls torque at a constant preset level for a preset time
period.

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


‹ torque is released in a controlled manner

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Leak Testing

z Requirement for leak testing while running or after the


tubing has been landed depends on the type of
completion, production conditions, location, etc.

z During the running of tubing three methods available


‹ External hydro-testing
‹ Internal hydro-testing
‹ Internal gas testing
‹ Gas based testing most accurate
‹ Operationally challenging
{ Limited pipe dope must be used
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

{ Leaks can take 10 -15 mins to appear

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

42
External Testing

z Two packing elements


set around the pipe
above and below the
connection

z System pressurised with


water

z Leakage detected
pressure drop in water

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Internal Hydro-Test

z Tool activated by water


pressure which expands
opposing cup packers

z Leakage is detected by a drop


in test pressure.
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

43
Internal Gas Test

z Wrap around device containing helium sensing


probe installed externally onto the connection

z Pack-off device installed internally across


connection

z Connection tested with Nitrogen/helium gas


mixture

z Leakage detected by the presence of helium at


the external sensing probe

z Safety Note:
‹ beware use of high gas pressures
‹ ensure gas can escape should the connection leak
severely
‹ Ensure wrap-around sleeve cannot be blown off

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

CRA Handling Precautions

z Non-marking jaws

z Soft grip tongs

z Micro-grip elevators and slips

z Pipe handling machines


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

44
Non-marking Tubing Slips

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Non-Marking Jaws
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

45
CRA precautions

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Correctly bundled tubulars


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

46
Packers

z Prior to running a packer check the following:


‹ Correct size and type (cross check with drawings);
‹ Slips - cutting edges of teeth (internal/external);
‹ Springs - location and integrity
‹ sleeves - positioning of;
‹ shear pins/screws - number and correct material
‹ set screws - insertion/removal as required;
‹ Elastomers - correct hardnesss and condition;
‹ Clearances between components;
‹ 'O'-rings, chevron and other seals - location and integrity;
‹ screw threads - condition
‹ polished/honed surfaces - condition

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

SSSVs

z WRSSVs generally not run with completion


‹ Protective sleeve installed in landing nipple
‹ Control line should be pressurised while running completion

z Tubing Retrievable Valves


‹ Function test and pressure test at surface prior to running the completion.
‹ Run with a hold open tool (HOT) to hold valve in the open position
throughout the completion operation (flow-tube activated type).
‹ Control line should be kept pressurised while running valve
‹ Do not conduct a pressure test on a "TR"-type valve unless the pressure
below the valve can be monitored at surface.
‹ If a TR-SSSV closes with a plug below it and pressure is trapped below it
there is serious risk of damaging the SSSV when re-opening it.
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

47
Reopening an OTIS DLS TRSSSV with pressure
trapped below (example only!!)
1. Pressure up the tubing string until there is an indication that the valve is being
pumped-through. (If the well is plugged below the TR-SCSSV indication of pump-
through may not be noticeable, resulting in an even higher, pressure below the
valve).

2. Apply control line pressure to re-open the valve.


Caution:
Control line pressure must not exceed 4000 psi above tubing pressure and/or 2000 psi
above the working pressure of the valve. Care should also be exercised so as not to
exceed the Xmas tree rating.

3. The pressure rating of the control line may be the limiting factor during this re-
opening operation.

4. Due to the importance of recognising WHEN the valve is pumped off-seat, the use
of a small capacity pump and continuous recorder is considered mandatory. A
wireline run may be conducted to ensure the valve is open, care should be taken not
to run/jar into a closed valve.

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

SCSSV Control Line

z 1/4in OD continuous steel tubing is generally standard for control lines


‹ available in carbon steel, stainless steel and copper-nickel based alloys
‹ can be encapsulated in various jackets
‹ can be supplied in dual form with/without a stress cable
‹ mechanical strength of material needs to be appropriate for the conditions during
installation.

z Prior to running the control line in a completion, it should be thoroughly


flushed with clean control fluid and pressure tested.

z During running, a nominal pressure should be maintained on the control line


and it should be kept under tension

z Control line should be securely clamped at each tubing connection to both


protect the line and retain it against the tubing.

z Hydraulic tensioning machines are available to assist in running the control


line.
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

48
SCSSSV control lines

z Control line or cable protectors that straddle the collar reduce the
number of protectors required and give protection to the control
line where they are most susceptible to damage.

z 'Swagelok' connections are commonly found to connect control


lines
‹ Come completely assembled, finger-tight - ready for immediate use
‹ Disassembly before use can result in dirt or foreign material entering the
fitting causing leaks.

z As a check on correct installation it is recommended that a


Swagelok inspection gauge be used

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

General running considerations

z Ensure that elevators, slips, and power tubing tongs are in proper working
order, and correct dies are fitted.

z Do not use pipe wrenches for manual make up of joints. Apply pipe thread
lubricant sparingly to pin thread, and sealing areas.

z Ensure that the correct torque is applied, modifying the manufacturers'


recommended figure, if necessary, to suit the thread lubricant used.

z Drift each joint of tubing to ensure that no gloves, rags or other foreign bodies
have found their way inside.

z Record the serial number of each item as it is made-up in the string - this
includes the numbers marked on the tubing joints on receipt.

z Confirm the operating envelopes of the equipped are appropriate for the
expected working parameters.
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

49
Completion considerations …(2)

z Supervisors keeping tally should cross-check with each other from time to
time to ensure that the string is being made up according to the programme.

z Run seal assemblies very slowly into/through packer bores.

z Running a tubing string with a plug installed in a landing nipple situated close
to the bottom of the string should be avoided.
‹ Problems with debris accumulation on top of plugs are very frequent when applying
this technique making retrieval difficult.
‹ Pump out plugs can help to overcome this problem

z Check hanging weight up and hanging weight down methodically and


accurately when required to do so.

z After tagging the packer with its seal assembly, ensure that any pressure
build-up in the tubing can be bled-off when running the seal assembly through
the packer to avoid seal damage.

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Completion considerations …(3)

z If required to make reference marks when setting down/spacing


out, do so accurately, taking care not to damage any special
surface finish.
z Check the completion fluid for correct composition and maintain the required
levels in the tubing and annulus.

z When carrying out pressure tests, build-up pressure slowly, in stages to the
maximum figures, maintain pressure for the recommended time, and record
on a suitable pressure recorder.

z Note that test pressures and times may be limited if the well is perforated
below the packer to be tested, since the test pressure may also act on the
formation.

z After spacing out, drift the complete string, using suitable wireline drifts.
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

50
Depth Control

z Wireline set packer/tailpipe assemblies


‹ Depth needs to be relative to casing / liner
‹ Depth also needs to be relative to reservoir
‹ Gamma Ray curve is principal correlation
tool
‹ Some packer tools do not have GR

z Useful to have correlation marker in


casing or liner string
‹ Pup joint installed in casing string just above
reservoir

z Mechanically set packers


‹ Correlation by GR/CCL in critical wells
RA tag can also be used

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


‹

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Space out of completion

z Completions need to be landed with bottom in:


‹ Tension
‹ Compression
‹ Free hanging

z Tension achieved by use on an SRT/LDO ram type head

z Compression achieved by setting down weight on the


packer prior to landing off the tubing hanger

z Free hanging achieved by use of dynamic seal assembly


(PBR / ELTSR)
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

51
Tubular Space Out

z Packer or PBR either run with completion or pre-set

z Depth variations make it impossible to get length of


tubulars right by use of a tubing tally

z Convention is to “tag” the packer to determine exact


depth prior to installing the tubing hanger

z String then pulled back and the length between hanger


and packer adjusted before installing the tubing hanger:
the space-out

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

# 236 (9.4m)

2.4m
Space Out Exercise 9.75m

# 235 (9.1m)
Top of THS
0.3m
z Permanent packer has been run and set on Hang-off Point
electric line
Tbg Hanger Sub-Assbly # 234 (9.6m)
z Completion string including anchor latch, nipple
and ELTSR has been run into the hole (ELTSR
5.4m
pinned in the fully closed position)
1.7m
# 233 (9.4m)
z Anchor latch stabbed into the top of the packer
and tested by applying some overpull (less than
the shear release force for the ELTSR).

z With the latch holding, a mark is made on tubing 6.2m


ELTSR

joint 236 which is sitting through the rotary table.

z Completion program calls for the completion to be Nipple


landed off with 2m of the ELTSR inner mandrel Tubing and Pups available: Anchor Latch
inside the outer sleeve 2 x 0.95m
1 x 1.2m
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

2 x 1.5 m
How should we space out the completion?? 2x 3 m Permanent Packer
1 x 9.1m, 1x 8.6m,
1 x 9.6m 3 x 9.4m
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

52
# 235 (9.1m)
z Top of joint 234 below HOP: # 233 (9.4m)
Landing
Joint
‹ 11.5 - (9.75 + 0.3) = 11.5 – 10.05 = 1.45m.

z String then released and pulled back to that


the ELTSR is in the correct position (2m # 234 (9.6m) # 232 (9.3m)
overlap): Pup
Joints
‹ Distance to be pulled back = 6.2 – 2 = 4.2m
‹ Top of joint 234 = 1.45 – 4.2 = -2.75m above # 233 (9.4m)
hang-off point
‹ Top of joint 233 is therefore -2.75 + 9.6 =
6.85m below hang off point.

z Completion string now at the correct


position, top of joint 233 is where we require 2.0m
2.0m
it. Have to fill the distance (6.85m) with the
tubing hanger assembly and additional pup-
joints
‹ Length required = 6.85 – 1.7 = 5.15m

z Pup joints to be used:


‹ 1 x 3m
‹ 1 x 0.95m

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


‹ 1 x 1.2m
‹ Total: 5.15m
ELTSR in correct position Jt 233 back to DF String hung off &
S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g spaced out correctly

Space-Out Best Practise

z Multiple Pup joints should not be installed immediately


below the hanger
‹ Difficult to make up – no room for tongs and slips
‹ Complicates installation of shallow-set plugs
‹ Complicates fishing with a spear during workover

z Once space-out has been determined:


‹ Pull back 2 or 3 joints (surface wellheads)
‹ Install pup joints
‹ Install full tubing joint
‹ Install Tubing Hanger sub-assembly
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

‹ RIH and land off using landing joint

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

53
Pressure Testing

z Completion pressure tests vary between OUs.


‹ Multiple tests while running / single test at end
‹ Tubing test prior to setting packer, annulus test after setting packer
‹ Tubing test without plug after setting packer to test packer from below

z Good practise is to pressure test entire completion prior to:


‹ stabbing into packer (permanent packer)
‹ setting packer (hydraulic packer)
‹ picking up tubing hanger assembly
‹ Objective is to test string while it is still recoverable

z Some OUs conduct intermediate pressure tests


‹ Standing valves sometimes run in bottom nipple
‹ Risk of junk obstructing the lock mandrel fishing neck
‹ Well control issues if barefoot completion

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Pressure Testing Considerations

z Consider implications of a leak


‹ How will it be observed
‹ Will it apply high pressures to other equipment

z Have a feel for how much fluid will be needed


(Wellplan)
‹ Calculate the theoretical volume
‹ Check system if you pump significantly more

z Never try to fix a surface leak under pressure


Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

54
Preparing to install the X-mas Tree

z Many methods of landing the tubing and leading control line(s)


from the wellhead - precautions to be taken include:
‹ check all sealing or matting surfaces for damage before bringing them
together;
‹ check all sealing elements (metal ring gaskets, etc.) for damage and
ensure freedom of movement in grooves or recesses;
‹ check that the tubing hanger nipple is central and vertical;
‹ use flange protectors (seal pads) where recommended;

z Generally requires removal of BOPs


‹ Adequate lines of defence must be in place (barrier policy)
‹ Generally a deepset plug, kill brine and tubing hanger plug

z Tubing Hanger Plug


‹ Traditional practice was a BPV or TWCV in the wellhead
‹ ACME square threads prone to damage / corrosion / erosion

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


‹ Increasingly replaced with plug c/w lock mandrel in nipple profile

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Tubing Hanger Back Pressure Valve

z tubing back pressure valve (BPV) fitted in the top of the tubing
hanger

z Installed in left handed square thread or hanger nipple (landing


nipple profile)

z Valve dressed with left hand thread or locking dogs

z Valve installed either by screwing it into the hanger using an


extension rod or is set in the hanger using wireline toolstring

z BPV allows circulation down the tubing but automatically closes


against well pressure.
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

55
Tubing Hanger Valves

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Two Way Check Valve

z Holds pressure from both


directions

z Used for pressure testing the


X-mas Tree

z Should not be used when


removing BOPs etc – cannot
be equalised or pumped
through
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

56
X-mas Tree Installation

Following general points apply:

z Adapter flange should be initially installed hand tight.


‹ The Xmas tree should be lowered into position and the adapter flange rotated as
necessary to enable the Xmas tree to be orientated to correspond with the flowline
hook-up.
‹ When the tree is aligned the bolts/clamps should be tightened.

z Plastic injection and pressure testing should be carried out carefully and
methodically
‹ Adhere to torque and test pressures stipulated in the programme or standard
procedures
‹ Injection of the plastic is considerably eased if it is slightly warmed using hot water,
but it must not be melted
‹ When pressure tests are completed, injection screws should be backed out, ports
filled with plastic packing and screws and plugs refitted in the injection ports
‹ Following testing, the test pressure should be bled off from the test port, the test
apparatus removed and the check valves and plugs refitted.

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

X-Mas Tree Pressure Testing

z Xmas tree body pressure tested against the two-way


check valve or plug in the tubing hanger.

z Test carried out in two stages:


‹ with flow and kill wing valves closed and choke open;
‹ with valve downstream of choke and kill wing valve closed
and flow wing valve and choke open.

z After successful test, two-way check valve/plug


recovered from the tubing hanger
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

57
Well Handover

z Asset holder needs to be assured that the end product meets


reliability/maintainability and technical integrity requirements to
meet planned well availability.

z Handover procedures must suit specific operating environments


– must ensure:
‹ well is in a safe condition to accept hydrocarbons
‹ its operating envelope is properly specified

z The handover must cover the following points:


‹ Verification of well status
‹ Condition of all valves and equipment on transfer;
‹ Documentation of well parameters, operating envelopes, well status,
commissioning/pressure tests, annulus pressures (MAASP) and all other

Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V


pertinent well data (i.e. vendor literature, operating instructions, etc.)

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

Well Hand-over process

z Handover may include a Well Handover Status Form

z Consideration needs to be given to the involved parties,


i.e. activity executor, asset holder and other service
provides and appropriate areas of responsibility defined
and focal points identified.

z It is recommended that the asset holder (new or


existing well) is responsible for:
‹ correct and complete information about asset;
‹ take initiative for handover process;
‹ prepares and seeks relevant authority and forms.
Copyright 2001 SIEP B.V

S h e l l EP Le
Le a r n i n g

58

You might also like