Report

On

Structural Analysis & Design

Of

Humla School
Educational Building
Ward No.-05, Humla Rural Municipality, Humla, Nepal
Submitted To:
Humla Rural
mUNICIPALITY office
Humla, Nepal

Structural Consultant:
SIDDHARTHA ARCHITECT AND STRUCTURAL
CONSULTANT
Ward No.-3
Butwal Sub-Metropolitan, Rupandehi, Nepal
Prepared by:
Er. Praveen Rajbhandari
Structural Engineer
NEC Regd. No.- 12025 Civil ‘A’
December, 2022
 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This report comprises the summary of the structural analysis & design of educational
building. The report consists of the design procedure adopted, assumptions made and
input and output from the design and analysis. It is assumed that the Client will
completely follow the Structural Design specified in the form of Design Drawings
attached with this report.

The Designer will not be responsible if any alteration to the structural system and
configuration made by Client without consultation and permission from the Designer.

The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the
concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may be
provided to the Client or the concerned Authority upon request.

…………………………….
Er. Praveen Rajbhandari
NEC NO: 12025 Civil “A”
(STRUCTURAL ENGINEER)
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Salient Features ............................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Project Information .......................................................................................................... 1
1.2.2 Building Features............................................................................................................. 1
1.2.3 Site Condition................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Analysis Technology and Methodology ........................................................................... 2
1.4 Codes and Standard used................................................................................................. 4
1.5 Software Used .................................................................................................................. 4
2 Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Material properties .......................................................................................................... 4
2.1.1 Concrete ........................................................................................................................... 4
2.1.2 Reinforcement Steel ......................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Section Properties ............................................................................................................ 5
2.3 Loadings........................................................................................................................... 5
2.3.1 Load Cases ....................................................................................................................... 5
2.4 Estimation of Load ........................................................................................................... 7
2.4.1 Unit Weight (Dead Load)................................................................................................. 7
2.4.2 Live Load ........................................................................................................................... 9
2.4.3 Seismic Load .................................................................................................................. 12
3 Analysis Output .............................................................................................................. 12
3.1 Equivalent static method data for linear analysis (EQ Analysis) .................................. 12
3.2 Story Drift ...................................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Modal time period and mass participation .................................................................... 15
3.4 Modal period and frequencies ....................................................................................... 15
3.5 Soft-Story Irregularity Check......................................................................................... 16
3.6 Force Diagram............................................................................................................... 18
3.6.1 Axial Force Diagram ..................................................................................................... 18
3.6.2 Shear Force Diagram .................................................................................................... 19
3.4.3 Moment Diagram ............................................................................................................. 20
3.5 Joint Reactions ............................................................................................................... 21
4 Design of Structural Members ....................................................................................... 23
4.1 Design Input and Output ................................................................................................ 23
4.1.1 Section Input Diagram ................................................................................................... 23
4.1.2 Design Output Diagram ................................................................................................. 25
4.2 Design of Slab ..................................................................................................................... 31
4.3 Design of Beam and Column .............................................................................................. 33
4.3.1 Sample Beam Design ....................................................................................................... 33
4.3.2 Sample Column Design .................................................................................................... 35
4.4 Staircase Design from excel sheet ...................................................................................... 37
4.5 Footing Design from SAFE 2016 ........................................................................................ 39
5 Summary of the Analysis and Design ............................................................................ 42
6. Building Separations: .................................................................................................... 47
7. References ............................................................................................................................. 48
List of Figure
Figure 1: First Floor Plan of Building .......................................................................... 2
Figure 2: 3D Modelling ................................................................................................. 3
Figure 3: Frame Load (Wall Load) in 3D ................................................................... 8
Figure 4: Frame Load (Wall Load) in Grid 1-1 .......................................................... 9
Figure 5: Area Load (live load<=3) First Floor......................................................... 10
Figure 6: Floor Finish Load (Dead Load) on First Floor .......................................... 10
Figure 7: 1.5(DL+LL)- Axial Force diagram in Grid 3-3 ........................................... 15
Figure 8: 1.5(DL+LL)- Axial Force diagram in Grid B-B .......................................... 15
Figure 9: Envelope -Shear Force diagram in Grid 3-3 ............................................... 16
Figure 10: Envelope -Shear Force diagram in Grid B-B ............................................ 16
Figure 11: Envelope -Moment diagram Grid 3-3........................................................ 17
Figure 12: Envelope -Moment diagram Grid B-B ....................................................... 17
Figure 13: Section Input in Frame along Grid B-B..................................................... 19
Figure 14: Section Input In Frame Along grid 3-3 ...................................................... 20
Figure 15: Section Input In Ground Floor .................................................................. 20
Figure 16: Design Output in Frame along Elevation .................................................. 23
Figure 17: Design Output in Frame on Floor ............................................................. 25
Figure 18: Column /Beam Capacity Ratio Check ....................................................... 25
Figure 19: Column Layout........................................................................................... 38
Figure 20: Footing Layout........................................................................................... 40
List of Table
Table 1: Load Cases ...................................................................................................... 5
Table 2: Load Combination ........................................................................................... 6
Table 3: Unit Weight of Materials ................................................................................. 7
Table 4: Dead Load Calculation ................................................................................... 7
Table 5: Live Load for Residential Building ................................................................. 9
Table 6: Mass Source for Seismic Load ...................................................................... 11
Table 7: Base Reaction ................................................................................................ 12
Table 8: Storey Drift .................................................................................................... 12
Table 9: Modal Result.................................................................................................. 14
Table 10: Joint Reaction .............................................................................................. 18
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

1 Introduction
1.1 General
This report presents the structure analysis and design of educational building. The building is Special
Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) type of building. It is designed to meet both
strength and serviceability requirements when subjected to gravity and earthquake loads.
The analysis and design have been based on NBC 2020 code that is in practice in Nepal. This report
consists of the design assumptions, design methodology, design inputs and outputs, and sample
design of structural members.
1.2 Salient Features
1.2.1 Project Information

Type of building : Educational Building

Location : Ward No.-05, Humla Rural Municipality, Humla
Ground Floor Area : 515.66 Sq. m

Total land Area : sq.m

Land Coverage (%) : %

1.2.2 Building Features

The building has some special features which are listed below:
Type of Buildings : Special RC Moment Resisting Frame Structure

Shape : Regular Shape

Plinth level : As per architectural drawing

Roof floor Type : Inaccessible Terrace

Walls : Brick walls

Footing Type : Isolated, Combined and Raft foundation

Dimension : 32.8m by 25.29m

Story Height : All floors- 3.0 m

excluding stair cover

Total Height : 12 m from Ground Floor to SC

No of Story : 1st +2nd +3rd + SC

1
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 1: Ground Floor Plan of Building

1.2.3 Site Condition

Type of soil : As per as Soil Investigation Report

Safe bearing pressure : 150 KN/m2

Seismic Zone Factor : 0.3 for Humla as per NBC 105:2020

1.3 Analysis Technology and Methodology

General:
After completion of Architectural design, the layout of columns and beams are done without
affecting the Architectural functions of building so far. Structure is modeled using finite element
method.
The structure is analyzed by the linear elastic theory to calculate internal actions produced by
anticipated design loads. The analysis is carried out using state of art three-dimensional structural
analysis programs ETABS 2018. The design loads considered as per the relevant codes of practice
comprise dead load due to permanent structures, live load due to occupancy of the structure and
seismic load due to anticipated earthquake possible at the proposed location. A number of load
combinations are considered to obtain the maximum values of design stresses.
Following considerations is made during modeling, analysis and design.
• The structures are Special Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) type.
Beams and columns are considered as the structural load resisting elements. Although
non-structural components like wall plaster, infill walls, floor finishing etc. has comes
effects on structural performance, they are considered only as loading.
• For column M20 grade concrete is used. Except Column, for all structural elements, M20
grade concrete is used.
• Centre-line dimensions are followM25ed for modeling, analysis and design.
• Floor slabs are assumed to be rigid in their own plane. The slab action has
been modeled by rigid floor diaphragms. Slabs are also considered in
modeling. Slab is modeled as shell element.

2
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

• Beam and columns are modeled as frame elements.

• The main beams rest centrally on columns to avoid local eccentricity.
• Foundation is assumed to be fully rigid at the plinth level.
• The beam-column joint is not modeled in detail.
• Preliminary sizes of structural components are assumed by experience.
• Seismic loads were considered acting in the horizontal direction (along either of the two
orthogonal directions of building) and not along the vertical direction, since it isnot
considered to be significant for design of structural members suitable load combinations
as suggested by IS NBC 105:2020 are used.

Figure 2: 3D Modeling

3
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

1.4 Codes and Standard used

For the structural analysis and design, the following codes and standard are followed:
• IS 456- 2000 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete
• IS 875-1987 Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings
and structures
• NBC Nepal Building Code 105:2020

1.5 Software Used

The following software is used for the structural analysis and design.
ETABS 2018 - For analysis and design of the structures
For structural modeling of the present building, ETABS software was used. ETABS is a
special purpose finite element analysis and design program developed specifically for building
systems. With ETABS, models are defined logically floor-by-floor, column-by-column, bay- by-
bay and wall-by-wall and not as a stream of non-descript nodes and elements as in general
purpose programs. The software has very powerful numerical methods, design procedures and
international design codes, all working from a single comprehensive database. At its core, it
utilizes the same analysis engine as used by SAP2000.
Among others, ETABS can do model generation, seismic and wind load generation, finite
element-based linear and non-linear static and dynamic analysis, concrete frame design (column
and beam) and shear wall design.

2 Analysis
2.1 Material properties
2.1.1 Concrete
All components of plain and reinforced concrete unless specified in design are M25 grade.
Modulus of Elasticity [Ec]= 5000 √fckN/mm2(Cl. 6.2.3.1, IS 456:2000)
= 22360 N/mm2 for M20 Grade.
Poisson’s Ratio [U] = 0.2
Unit Weight = 25 KN/m3
Characteristic Strength [ƒck] = 20 N/mm2 for M20 grade.
The structural design strength is derived from the characteristic strength multiplied by a
coefficient 0.67 and divided by the material partial safety factor. The partial factor for
concrete in flexure and axial load is 1.5.

4
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

2.1.2 Reinforcement Steel

Characteristic strength of high yield steel is taken as TMT Fe500 for main rebar and TMT
Fe500 for shear rebar and material partial safety factor is to be 1.15.
Modulus of Elasticity [Es] = 2x105 N/mm2
Poisson’s Ratio [U] = 0.3
2.2 Section Properties
Preliminary Size of Members
The preliminary sizes of Beam, Column, and Slab were chosen based on experience.
Main Beam : 250 m x 425 mmm
Column : 400mm x 400 mm
Slab Thickness : 150 mm
During the analysis, beam, column & slab are modeled as frame elements.
2.3 Loadings
The following considerations are made during the loading on the structural model:
• The loads distributed over the area are imposed on the area element and the loads
distributed over the length are imposed on the frame elements whenever possible.
• Where such loading is not possible, equivalent conversion to different loading
distribution is carried to load the model near the real case as far as possible.
• For lateral load, necessary calculations are performed to comply with the
requirements of NBC 105:2020.
2.3.1 Load Cases
The following load cases are used for the loading during analysis.

Table 1: Load Cases

Load
Load Name Description Unit Remarks
Type
Dead Dead Self-weight of the structure KN/m2
LIVE<=3 Live Imposed Load <=3 KN/m2 On floor slab
LIVE >3 Live Imposed Load >3 KN/m2 On floor slab
Roof Live Live Roof Live KN/m2 On floor slab
WALL LOAD Dead Partition Wall Load KN/m On floor beams
FINISHES Dead Floor Finish Load KN/m2 On floor slab
EQX Seismic Seismic Coefficient NBC X+0.1Y
EQY Seismic Seismic Coefficient NBC Y+0.1X

5
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

2.3.2 Load Combination

The load combinations are based on NBC 105-2020. The following load combinations are
specified as per NBC 105, Cl: 3.6
Static Load Combination:
1.2DL + 1.5LL)
Seismic Load Combination:
DL + λLL ± EQ)
Where,
λ = 0.6 for storage facilities
= 0.3 for other usage.

The following load combinations are used during analysis

Table 2: Load Combination

S.N Type
1 1.2DL + 1.5LL
2 DL + 0.3LL+ EQx
3 DL + 0.3LL - EQx
4 DL + 0.3LL + EQy
5 DL + 0.3LL - EQy

6
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

2.4 Estimation of Load

The loads on the building are based on Indian codes of Practices. The unit weight of different
structural and non-structural elements is derived from IS 875 Part 1 and presented in below.
The load calculations are based on actual measured drawings. The self-weight of beams,columns
and slabs are calculated by the program. Similarly, the imposed loads are applied onthe slab
as area load in KN/m2 and values of imposed loads are tabulated below. The weight of infill walls
are calculated and applied on beams as line weight in KN/m.
• Partition wall load are assigned as uniformly distributed area load in slab as area load in
KN/m2.
• Floor finishing load are assigned as area load in slab.
• Single type of Live load is assigned in each panel of slab.
• A frame load is applied as parapet loading on the exterior frame of the roof level.
• The roof is assumed inaccessible and loaded with roof live load as per Indian Standard, IS
875 -1987(part2) but this load is not considered during seismic load.

2.4.1 Unit Weight (Dead Load)

Dead loads for analysis are calculated as per Indian Standard, IS 875 -1987(part1). Unit
weights of different material used are given below

Table 3: Unit Weight of Materials

S.N Type Value
1 Reinforced Concrete 25 KN/m3
2 Brick Masonry 19.2 KN/m3
3 Screed 21.0 KN/m3
4 Marble 26.7 KN/m3
5 Mosaic finish 23.1 KN/m3
6 Plaster 20.4 KN/m3
7 Steel Rebar 78.6 KN/m3

Table 4: Dead Load Calculation

1 Unit Weights of materials

Brick masonry 19.2 kN/m3
Screed 21 kN/m3
Mosaic 23.1 kN/m3
Marble 26.7 kN/m3
Reinforced Concrete 25 kN/m3
cement plaster 20.4 kN/m3

2 Heights of Beams, Walls & Parapet Walls

Depth of Beam 0.425 m

Height of Floor 3.0 m

7
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Dead Loads of Walls

Particular Height Thickness Density Load Load with windows

Calculated applied (70% opening)
(Kn/m3)
(kN/m) (kN/m)
For brick 2.575 0.23 19.2 11.371 11.37 7.95
wall

For brick 2.575 0.115 19.2 5.685 5.68 3.97

wall
For Parapet 1.3 0.115 19.2 2.87 2.87 -
wall

Figure 3: Frame Load (Wall Load) in 3D

8
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 4: Frame Load (Wall Load) in Grid 8-8

2.4.2 Live Load
The magnitude of live load depends upon the type of occupancy of the building. These are
to be chosen from code IS875:1987(part II) for various occupancies. The live load distribution
varies with time. Hence each member is designed for worst combination of dead load and
live loads. Live loads for Educational Building are given above.

Table 5: Live Load for Residential Building

S. N Area type Load Unit

1 Terrace (Accessible) 1.5 KN/m2
2 Terrace (Inaccessible) 0.75 KN/m2
Staircase Balcony and
3 4 KN/m2
Passage
4 Partition Load 1.5 KN/m2
5 Class 3 KN/m2

9
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 5: Area Load (live load>3) First Floor

Figure 6: Floor Finish Load (Dead Load) on First Floor

10
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 7: Roof live Load on Third Floor

11
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

2.4.3 Seismic Load

The seismic load is applied to the building with user defined lateral load pattern in ETABS
2018 as per NBC 105-2020. This load case is assumed equivalent static and all the necessary
data are given as per the following conditions.
To determine the seismic load, it is considered that the country lies in the seismic zone
according to NBC 105-2020. The soil type is considered as medium with 10% damping to
determine average response acceleration. The building is analyzed as moment resisting frame
without consideration of infill wall. Therefore, the fundamental time period Ta is obtained by
using the following formula:

Ta = 0.075 h0.75[Cl.5.1.2, NBC 105:2020]

H= 12 m.
Soil Type: Type B
Other factors considered for seismic load calculations are as follows
Zone factor, Z = 0.3 for Humla [Cl4.1.4, NBC 105-2020]
Importance factor, I = 1.2 [Cl 4.1.5, NBC 105:2020]
Ductility factor = 4 [Cl 5.3, NBC 105:2020]
Over Strength Factor for Ultimate limit state =1.5 [Cl 5.4, NBC 105:2020]
Over Strength Factor for Service limit state =1.25 [Cl 5.4, NBC 105:2020]
An exponent related to the structural period, K= 1.065 [Cl 6.3, NBC 105:2020]

Value of Seismic Base Shear Coefficient (ULS): 0.156 [Cl 7.1, NBC 105:2020]
Value of Seismic Base Shear Coefficient (SLS): 0.12

The seismic weight is determined based on the following mass source. (Cl: 5.2, NBC 105-
2020)

Table 6: Mass Source for Seismic Load

S. N Load Type Scale Factor
1 Dead Load 1
2 Live Load 0.3
3 Roof Live Load Nil

3 Analysis Output
The analysis results are discussed in this chapter. Both seismic coefficient and responsespectrum
methods are used. The major discussion are focused on the eccentricity, story shear, inter story
drift, maximum displacement and base shear along two orthogonal directions. The column and
beam size and reinforcement are designed for the maximum response.
3.1 Equivalent static method data for linear analysis (EQ Analysis)
The fundamental time period of the building as per NBC 105:2020, total seismic weight and
base shear in both orthogonal directions are given in Table 7.

12
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

TABLE: Load Pattern Definitions - Auto Seismic - User Coefficient

Ecc Weight Used Base Shear
Name Top Story Bottom Story C K
Ratio kN kN
EQ-X 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065
EQ-X(1/3) 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065 17419.8633 2717.4987
EQ-X(2/3) 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065 17419.8633 2717.4987
EQ-X(3/3) 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065 17419.8633 2717.4987
EQ-Y 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065
EQ-Y(1/3) 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065 17419.8633 2717.4987
EQ-Y(2/3) 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065 17419.8633 2717.4987
EQ-Y(3/3) 0.1 TERRACE Base 0.156 1.065 17419.8633 2717.4987

Load Case/Combo Weight Used FX FY MX MY MZ

kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
EQ-X 1 17419.8633 -2717.4987 0 0 -18070.6367 41603.2419
EQ-X 2 17419.8633 -2717.4987 0 0 -18070.6367 44779.8128
EQ-X 3 17419.8633 -2717.4987 0 0 -18070.6367 38426.671
EQ-Y 1 17419.8633 0 -2717.4987 18070.6367 0 -43607.0274
EQ-Y 2 17419.8633 0 -2717.4987 18070.6367 0 -46913.6078
EQ-Y 3 17419.8633 0 -2717.4987 18070.6367 0 -40300.4469
Table 7: Base Reactions

Based on program/software calculated seismic coefficient, base shear and storey shear are
as shown in the table and to calculate these parameters, the following equation has been used
as per code.
3.2 Story Drift
As per Cl. no. 7.11.1 of NBC 105, the story drift in any story due to specified design lateral
force with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not exceed 0.025 times the story height. From the
analysis the displacements of the mass center of various floors are obtained and are shown in
along with story drift.
Table 8: Storey Drift ULS
Story Load Case/Combo Direction Drift
TERRACE FLOOR EX1 X 0.001151
TERRACE FLOOR EX2 X 0.001246
TERRACE FLOOR EX3 X 0.001188
THIRD FLOOR EX1 X 0.001488
THIRD FLOOR EX2 X 0.001572
THIRD FLOOR EX3 X 0.001404
SECOND FLOOR EX1 X 0.00213
SECOND FLOOR EX2 X 0.002241
SECOND FLOOR EX3 X 0.002207
FIRST FLOOR EX1 X 0.001464
FIRST FLOOR EX2 X 0.001711
FIRST FLOOR EX3 X 0.001757
TERRACE FLOOR EY1 Y 0.001312

13
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

TERRACE FLOOR EY2 Y 0.001453

TERRACE FLOOR EY3 Y 0.001245
THIRD FLOOR EY1 Y 0.002026
THIRD FLOOR EY2 Y 0.002345
THIRD FLOOR EY3 Y 0.001707
SECOND FLOOR EY1 Y 0.002547
SECOND FLOOR EY2 Y 0.002955
SECOND FLOOR EY3 Y 0.002177
FIRST FLOOR EY1 Y 0.001524
FIRST FLOOR EY2 Y 0.001747
FIRST FLOOR EY3 Y 0.001875

It is seen that drift does not exceed the code prescribed value of 0.025 where the design
horizontal deflections shall be determined by multiplying the
horizontal deflection found from Equivalent Static Method or Modal
Response Spectrum Method by the Ductility factor (Rμ). Thus, the drift check seems to
comply with the safety value mentioned in the code.

Table 9: Storey Drift SLS

Story Load Case/Combo Direction Drift
TERRACE FLOOR EX1 X 0.000718
TERRACE FLOOR EX2 X 0.000755
TERRACE FLOOR EX3 X 0.000682
THIRD FLOOR EX1 X 0.001942
THIRD FLOOR EX2 X 0.001583
THIRD FLOOR EX3 X 0.002302
SECOND FLOOR EX1 X 0.002186
SECOND FLOOR EX2 X 0.001755
SECOND FLOOR EX3 X 0.002618
FIRST FLOOR EX1 X 0.001612
FIRST FLOOR EX2 X 0.001287
FIRST FLOOR EX3 X 0.001937
TERRACE FLOOR EY1 Y 0.000634
TERRACE FLOOR EY2 Y 0.000631
TERRACE FLOOR EY3 Y 0.000637
THIRD FLOOR EY1 Y 0.001782
THIRD FLOOR EY2 Y 0.001936
THIRD FLOOR EY3 Y 0.001916
SECOND FLOOR EY1 Y 0.001938
SECOND FLOOR EY2 Y 0.002117
SECOND FLOOR EY3 Y 0.002107
FIRST FLOOR EY1 Y 0.001331
FIRST FLOOR EY2 Y 0.001454
FIRST FLOOR EY3 Y 0.001459

It is seen that drift does not exceed the code prescribed value of 0.006 times story height
Thus the drift check seems to comply with the safety value mentioned in the code.

14
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

3.3 Modal time period and mass participation

NBC 105:2020 clause 7.3 states that number of modes to be used in the analysis should be such
that the sum total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90 percent of the total
seismic mass of the structure.
Number of Modes Considered = 12
Modal Mass Participation along X = 100%
Modal Mass Participation along Y = 100%

Table 9: Modal Result

Case Mode Period UX UY Sum UX Sum UY

sec
Modal 1 0.64 0.0243 0.2523 0.5929 0.0011
Modal 2 0.64 0.0242 0.2523 0.8812 0.0149
Modal 3 0.638 0.2863 0.0005 0.8828 0.891
Modal 4 0.634 0.2452 0.0291 0.9331 0.8914
Modal 5 0.634 0.2452 0.0291 0.9707 0.8982
Modal 6 0.622 0.0007 0.2925 0.9724 0.976
Modal 7 0.554 0.0067 0.0007 0.9825 0.9763
Modal 8 0.549 0.0163 0.0024 0.9898 0.9857
Modal 9 0.549 0.0163 0.0024 0.9944 0.9952
Modal 10 0.221 0.0017 0.0275 0.9975 0.9952
Modal 11 0.221 0.0017 0.0275 0.9976 0.9984
Modal 12 0.215 0.0293 0.0026 0.9991 0.9992

3.4 Modal period and frequencies

TABLE: Modal Periods And Frequencies
Period Frequency CircFreq Eigenvalue
Case Mode
sec cyc/sec rad/sec rad²/sec²
Modal 1 0.704 1.42 8.9207 79.5788
Modal 2 0.672 1.489 9.3545 87.5073
Modal 3 0.651 1.537 9.6583 93.2823
Modal 4 0.228 4.392 27.5983 761.6689
Modal 5 0.216 4.631 29.0959 846.5712
Modal 6 0.211 4.742 29.7953 887.7614
Modal 7 0.134 7.45 46.8114 2191.3029
Modal 8 0.127 7.871 49.4569 2445.9875
Modal 9 0.124 8.062 50.6566 2566.0915
Modal 10 0.099 10.07 63.2748 4003.6999
Modal 11 0.097 10.311 64.789 4197.62
Modal 12 0.092 10.882 68.3718 4674.7003

15
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

3.5 Soft-Story Irregularity Check

Stiffness Irregularity Check in Y-Direction

Soft-Story Irregularity Check Extreme Soft-Story Irregularity Check

Ki Ki Ki Ki

Kmi = avg(Ki-1,i-2,i-3)

Kmi = avg(Ki-1,i-2,i-3)
Ki+1 Kmi Ki+1 Kmi
Stiffness Y-
Story check check check check
Direction

0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7

SC
19935.015

THIRD
240298.816 12.05 Regular 19935.02 12.05 Regular 12.05 Regular 19935.02 12.05 Regular

SECOND
348720.933 1.45 Regular 130116.92 2.68 Regular 1.45 Regular 130116.92 2.68 Regular

FIRST
644437.352 1.85 Regular 202984.92 3.17 Regular 1.85 Regular 202984.92 3.17 Regular

16
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Stiffness Irregularity Check in X-Direction

Soft-Story Irregularity Check Extreme Soft-Story Irregularity Check

Ki Ki Ki Ki

Kmi = avg(Ki-1,i-2,i-3)

Kmi = avg(Ki-1,i-2,i-3)
Ki+1 Kmi Ki+1 Kmi
Stiffness
Story check check check check
X-Direction

0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7

SC 22399.222

THIRD 304306.367 13.59 Regular 22399.22 13.59 Regular 13.59 Regular 22399.22 13.59 Regular

SECOND 396738.565 1.30 Regular 163352.79 2.43 Regular 1.30 Regular 163352.79 2.43 Regular

FIRST 656563.002 1.65 Regular 241148.05 2.72 Regular 1.65 Regular 241148.05 2.72 Regular

17
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

3.6 Force Diagram

The output of forces obtained from ETABS analysis for Envelope have presented below as a
sample only. The output forces are axial force, Shear force and Moments.
3.6.1 Axial Force Diagram

Figure 7: 1.5(DL+LL)- Axial Force diagram in A-A

Figure 8: 1.5(DL+LL)- Axial Force diagram in Grid 8-8

18
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

3.6.2 Shear Force Diagram

Figure 9: 1.5(DL+LL)-Shear Force diagram in Grid A-A

Figure 10: 1.5(DL+LL) -Shear Force diagram in Grid 8-8

19
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

3.4.3 Moment Diagram

Figure 11: 1.5(DL+LL) -Moment diagram Grid A-A

Figure 12: 1.5(DL+LL) -Moment diagram Grid 8-8

20
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

3.5 Joint Reactions

The reactions at the support of column for load combination of 1.5(DL + LL) are as follows:

Table 10: Joint Reaction

Story Unique Name Load Case/Combo FZ MX MY
kN kN-m kN-m
BASE 533 1.5 (DL+LL) 435.4698 -7.8054 15.2504
BASE 538 1.5 (DL+LL) 614.3906 0.2901 18.6806
BASE 543 1.5 (DL+LL) 688.1944 -0.0144 24.5809
BASE 548 1.5 (DL+LL) 614.1941 -0.3059 18.6731
BASE 553 1.5 (DL+LL) 425.0387 7.791 15.0828
BASE 573 1.5 (DL+LL) 539.7491 -10.9815 -15.7259
BASE 578 1.5 (DL+LL) 779.2349 0.4369 -17.8948
BASE 583 1.5 (DL+LL) 855.6462 -0.0251 -22.7659
BASE 588 1.5 (DL+LL) 778.8152 -0.4566 -17.9163
BASE 593 1.5 (DL+LL) 514.8086 10.9764 -15.9017
BASE 613 1.5 (DL+LL) 196.031 -5.5509 -3.6807
BASE 618 1.5 (DL+LL) 318.3394 0.28 -4.5773
BASE 623 1.5 (DL+LL) 310.427 -0.0284 -4.3634
BASE 628 1.5 (DL+LL) 318.1071 -0.3217 -4.5917
BASE 633 1.5 (DL+LL) 183.2024 5.5252 -3.4328
BASE 653 1.5 (DL+LL) 196.0405 -5.551 3.687
BASE 658 1.5 (DL+LL) 318.3519 0.2802 4.5838
BASE 663 1.5 (DL+LL) 310.3165 -0.0284 4.3628
BASE 668 1.5 (DL+LL) 318.1196 -0.3218 4.5982
BASE 673 1.5 (DL+LL) 183.2119 5.5253 3.4392
BASE 693 1.5 (DL+LL) 539.7376 -10.9812 15.7331
BASE 698 1.5 (DL+LL) 779.2692 0.4334 17.9022
BASE 703 1.5 (DL+LL) 858.4592 -0.0251 22.937
BASE 708 1.5 (DL+LL) 778.8495 -0.4531 17.9237
BASE 713 1.5 (DL+LL) 514.797 10.9761 15.9089
BASE 733 1.5 (DL+LL) 435.463 -7.8052 -15.2451
BASE 738 1.5 (DL+LL) 614.4331 0.2867 -18.6752
BASE 743 1.5 (DL+LL) 690.8808 -0.0144 -24.7742
BASE 748 1.5 (DL+LL) 614.2365 -0.3025 -18.6678
BASE 753 1.5 (DL+LL) 425.0319 7.7907 -15.0775
BASE 558 1.5 (DL+LL) 293.1163 -3.2765 13.8264
BASE 563 1.5 (DL+LL) 595.4165 -16.3165 14.1534
BASE 568 1.5 (DL+LL) 503.5486 18.726 12.5987
BASE 598 1.5 (DL+LL) 311.7584 -3.6088 -9.305
BASE 603 1.5 (DL+LL) 761.3116 -22.8039 -8.5075
BASE 608 1.5 (DL+LL) 661.9505 25.2677 -8.5541
BASE 638 1.5 (DL+LL) 227.9055 -4.0849 5.1393
BASE 643 1.5 (DL+LL) 653.5315 -17.4477 8.1704
BASE 648 1.5 (DL+LL) 520.7422 17.7409 5.4454

21
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

BASE 678 1.5 (DL+LL) 226.9875 -3.4458 -3.9396

BASE 683 1.5 (DL+LL) 673.7415 -21.3758 -8.9836
BASE 688 1.5 (DL+LL) 577.7234 23.1489 -5.8733
BASE 718 1.5 (DL+LL) 306.8475 -3.5855 9.61
BASE 723 1.5 (DL+LL) 667.1314 -17.7166 12.621
BASE 728 1.5 (DL+LL) 589.3512 18.8533 10.1277
BASE 758 1.5 (DL+LL) 290.4759 -3.9427 -11.8271
BASE 763 1.5 (DL+LL) 627.9131 -17.3116 -16.9028
BASE 768 1.5 (DL+LL) 508.1982 18.8161 -14.5165
BASE 778 1.5 (DL+LL) 348.5414 -6.3178 0.4551
BASE 783 1.5 (DL+LL) 1121.6388 -19.427 5.4726
BASE 788 1.5 (DL+LL) 1047.818 17.8632 8.254
BASE 798 1.5 (DL+LL) 207.4634 -5.9903 -4.57
BASE 803 1.5 (DL+LL) 733.9158 -10.2671 -17.6849
BASE 808 1.5 (DL+LL) 733.8612 5.1414 -19.2751
BASE 818 1.5 (DL+LL) 184.791 -2.8676 6.0414
BASE 823 1.5 (DL+LL) 545.2684 -18.3389 13.1305
BASE 828 1.5 (DL+LL) 451.9381 19.02 9.7528
BASE 838 1.5 (DL+LL) 323.7292 -3.8031 0.2316
BASE 843 1.5 (DL+LL) 842.8041 -23.1346 0.1612
BASE 848 1.5 (DL+LL) 670.1408 26.2151 0.1325

22
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

4 Design of Structural Members

4.1 Design Input and Output
4.1.1 Section Input Diagram

Figure 13: Section Input in Frame along Grid 8-8

Figure 14: Section Input In Frame Along grid A-A

23
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 15: Section Input In First Floor

24
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

4.1.2 Design Output Diagram

25
Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

26
Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

27
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 16: Design Output in Frame along Elevation

Figure 17: Column beam capacity Ratio >1.2, OK

28
Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

29
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 18: Design Output in Frame on Floor

30
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

4.2 Design of Slab

DESIGN OF F43 SLAB AT FIRST FLOOR
CASE 1
Short span S= 2.500 mts
Long span L= 5.00 mts
Assumed slab thickness t= 0.150 mts
Grade of concrete fck= 20 N/mm^2

Grade of reinforcement fy= 500 N/mm^2

Type of panel

Loads
5.00 mts
Self weight of slab w1= 3.75 kN/m^2
Floor finish 100 mm thk wpc w2= 1.50 kN/m^2
Live load - Accessible Terrace w3= 3.00 kN/m^2
Miscellaneous-Equipment Load w4= 1.50 kN/m^2 2.50 mts

Ratio of long span to short span R= 2 One Way Slab

Design Load with load factor of 1.5 Wu= 14.63 kN/m^2

Design
Coeff BM k pt Ast Dia Spacing
Short span direction
Negative moment at continuous edge 0.083 7.62 0.44 0.10 180 8 150
Positive moment at midspan 0.125 11.43 0.67 0.16 209 8 150

Long span direction

Negative moment at continuous edge 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.0 10 150
Positive moment at midspan 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.0 10 150

Minimum effective depth reqd dre= 64.34 mm

Clear cover to any reinforcement c= 15 mm
Minimum effective depth provided dpr= 122 mm greater than 'min. eff depth reqd'. Hence ok
Minimum reinforcement Amin= 180 mm^2

Deflection check

Reinf provided at midspan along short direction 335.10 mm^2 Dia 8 at 150 mm
Stress in reinforcement fs= 180.76 N/mm^2
Percentage of reinforcement provided pt= 0.2558 %
Modification factor as per fig 4 of IS:456-2000 MF= 2

Type of slab for deflection check Continuous

Basic span to effective depth ratio 26
Minimum effective depth reqd from deflection criteria 48.08 mm
Effective depth provided 131 mm greater than 'min. eff depth reqd'. Hence ok

assume depth at support = 150 mm

effective depth at support = 130 mm
CHECK FOR SHEAR :
At middle of Short edge Vy = w Lx / 3 per unit width

31
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

At middle of Long edge Vx = w Lx β

( 2β + 1 )
β = 1.7143
So, Vy = 15.31 KN
So, Vx = 17.782 KN
ζ vy = Vy / ( bd ) = 0.118 N/mm2
ζ vx = Vx / ( bd ) = 0.148 N/mm2
% steel provided along Long direction = 0.437 %
% steel provided along Short direction = 0.403 %
Permissible shear stress = Kζc
Provided thk of slab = 150 mm

k slab thickness 150 150.000 150

k 1.300 1.300 1.300

ζc % steel 0.250 0.437 0.500

ζc 0.370 0.467 0.500

Permissible shear stress, K ζ c = 0.607 N/mm2

HENCE OK
ζ c max = 2.800 N/mm2
HENCE OK

** Note: Refer Structural Dwg. for detail

32
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

4.3 Design of Beam and Column

4.3.1 Sample Beam Design

ETABS Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
FIRST FLOOR B110 757 M20 B250X425 DL+0.3LL-EQx 200 5000 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
250 425 250 0 35 35

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-104.9934 0.6159 81.502 0

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-104.9934 0.9782 0 -105.9716

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -105.9716 769 0 769 209
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 384 0 33 384

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
105.9489 0 109.8993 51.9008 780.87

33
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, T u & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
0.6159 81.502 200 375 263.66

** Note: Refer Structural Dwg. for detail

34
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

4.3.2 Sample Column Design

ETABS Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
SECOND FLOOR C135 476 M20 C400X400 DL+0.3LL-EQx 0 3000 0.701

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
400 400 56 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
320.9896 -139.0519 -69.0841 6.4198 6.4198 2742 1.71

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.73005 2575 -27.6336 0 6.4198
Minor Bend(M2) 0.73005 2575 -14.2133 0 6.4198

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 64.2943 110.823 55.0394 64.2943 443.37
Minor, Vu3 82.2154 110.823 55.0394 82.2154 443.37

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

35
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Major Ratio Minor Ratio

N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
1600 27.4 2468.1301 641.8255 320.9896 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.858 400 4.7 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.858 400 4.7 12 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

** Note: Refer Structural Dwg. for detail

36
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

4.4 Staircase Design from excel sheet

 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

** Note: Refer Structural Dwg. for detail

 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

4.5 Footing Design from SAFE 2016

Figure 18: Plan View of assigned footing with clear Dimensions and visible Grids

Figure 19: Allowable Settlement<25mm, SAFE OK

 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Figure 20: Soil Bearing Pressure<150 KN/m2, SAFE OK

Punching shear <1, OK

 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

Rebar Reinforcement area for Raft, combined and Isolated footing slab
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

5 Summary of the Analysis and Design

5.1 COLUMN OUTPUT:
Concrete Grade: M20
Steel Grade: Fe 500
Clear Cover: 40 mm

Fig: Column

Column ID Size (mm) Up to 1st Floor Up to 2nd Floor 3rd Floor to Terrace

C1 400X400 4-16ф+8-12ф 4-16ф+8-12ф 4-16ф+8-12ф

C2 400X400 8-16ф+4-12ф 8-16ф+4-12ф 4-16ф+8-12ф
C3 400X400 8-16ф+4-16ф 8-16ф+4-16ф 8-16ф+4-12ф
C4 400X400 4-20ф+8-16ф 4-20ф+8-16ф 8-16ф+4-16ф

NOTE:
1. The transverse reinforcement in the column should be 8mm ф, 4- legged @ 100mm c/c at below
and above the face of the beam for a distance of 0.8m.
2. The spacing of 8mm ф, 4- legged transverse reinforcement should be @ 100mm
c/c in lap zone.
3. Other detailing is as per structural drawings sheet.
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

5.2 BEAMOUTPUT:
Design Parameters: Concrete Grade: M20
Steel Grade: Fe 500
Clear Cover: 30 mm
Beams Rebars at Support Rebars at mid span
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Plinth Beam 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars
(250x350mm) (TH) (TH)
First Floor Beam
Along GRID 5-5, 6-6, 7- 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars
7, & 8-8 B(250x425mm) (TH) +2-16mm (EX) (TH)

Except Above all 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars
B(250x425mm) (TH) +2-16mm (EX) (TH)
SB (250x355mm) 2-16mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars
(TH) (TH)
Second Floor Beam
Along GRID 5-5, 6-6, 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars
7-7, & 8-8 (TH) +2-16mm (EX) (TH)
B(250x425mm)
Except Above all 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars
B(250x425mm) (TH) +2-16mm (EX) Bars (TH)
SB (250x355mm) 2-16mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars
(TH) (TH)
Third Floor Beam
All B(250x425mm) 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars
(TH) +2-12mm (EX) (TH)
SB (250x355mm) 2-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars 3-16mm dia. Bars
(TH) (TH) (TH)
Terrace Floor Beam
B(250x425mm) 2-16mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars
(TH) (TH)
SB (250x355mm) 2-16mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars 2-16mm dia. Bars
(TH) (TH) (TH)
Foundation Beam 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars 3-20mm dia. Bars
(300x300mm) (TH) (TH)
Vertical Stirrups 8mm dia. Vertical Stirrups @ 100mm c/c 8mm dia. Vertical Stirrups @ 150mm c/c
upto L/4 from end of support upto midspan
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

NOTE:
1. The shear reinforcement in the L/4 of beam span measured from supports face should be
8mm ф provided @ 100mm c/c and can be placed @ 150mm c/c in remaining span.
2. The shear reinforcement in the main beam in which secondary beams are tied should be
8mm ф provided @ 75mm c/c throughout.
3.The shear reinforcement in the lapping zone should be also provided @
150mm c/c 4.The shear reinforcement in the circular beam should be provided
@ 100mm c/c
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

5.3 SLABREINFORCEMENT: SLAB THICKNESS – 150mm

Main bar 10 mm and extra bar 8 mm @ 150 mm C/C.

5.4 CANTILEVERSLABREINFORCEMENT: SLAB THICKNESS – 150mm

Main bar 12 mm and extra bar 10mm @ 150 mm C/C.

5.5 Staircase Bar: WAIST SLAB THICKNESS – 200mm

Use 12mm dia. bar as main bar @ 125mm C/C and 8 mm as distribution bar @ 200 mm C/C.

5.6 Footing Summary:

45
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

SUMMARISE OF THE FOOTING WITH ITS DETAILINGSARE AS FOLLOWS

Schedule of RCC Footing- SBC 150 KN/m2

Footing Footing size Footing Depth of Top Bottom

mm (L x B) type footing
footing Rebar along footing Rebar along
length & Breadth length & Breadth
F1 2000 X 2000 Isolated 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

F2 2200 X 2200 Isolated 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

F3 2250 X 2250 Isolated 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

F4 2800 X 2800 Isolated 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

CF1 4100 X 2000 Combined 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

CF2 3500 X 2500 Combined 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

CF3 4350 X 2500 Combined 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

CF4 2800 X 4500 Combined 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

CF5 2000 X 4650 Combined 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

RF1 3000 X 4350 Combined 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

RF2 4200 X 4750 Combined 450 mm 12mm dia@150mmc/c 12mm dia@150mmc/c

Required sizes of structure were adopted

SN Structures Sizes(mm)
1 Column (400mmX400mm)

2 Beam MB (250mm X 425mm)

SB (250mm X 355mm)
3 Slab 150mm
4 Concrete grade M20 Column, M20 Beam,
Footing and Slabs
5 Steel grade Fe500 for main bar and
Fe450 (stirrups)

46
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

6. Building Separations:
Parts of buildings or buildings on the same site which are not designed to act as an integral unit
shall be separated from each other by a distance of not less than the sum of the design horizontal
deflections determined in accordance with 5.6.1. Separation spaces shall be detailed and
constructed to remain clear of debris and other obstructions. The width of such spaces shall allow
for all constructional tolerances.
The design horizontal deflections shall be determined by multiplying the horizontal deflection
found from Equivalent Static Method or Modal Response Spectrum Method by the Ductility
factor (Rμ)

TABLE: Story Max Over Avg Displacements

Maximum Average
Story Output Case Case Type Direction Ratio
mm mm
SC EQ-X LinStatic X 18.63 18.021 1.034
THIRD FLOOR EQ-X LinStatic X 15.176 13.209 1.149
SECOND FLOOR EQ-X LinStatic X 10.774 9.767 1.103
FIRST FLOOR EQ-X LinStatic X 4.383 4.135 1.06
SC EQ-Y LinStatic Y 22.002 21.069 1.044
THIRD FLOOR EQ-Y LinStatic Y 18.065 15.95 1.132
SECOND FLOOR EQ-Y LinStatic Y 12.027 10.359 1.161
FIRST FLOOR EQ-Y LinStatic Y 4.573 4.217 1.085

From Equivalent analysis maximum horizontal deflection is 22.002 mm

According to NBC 2020 clause 5.6.1
We have Minimum separation space = design horizontal deflections X Ductility factor (Rμ)
22.02 X 4 = 88 mm <100mm provided. Hence SAFE.

47
 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building

7. References
[1] IS 456- 2000 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete

[2] IS 875-1987 Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures

[3] IS 1893-2002 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures,

[4] IS 13920-1993 Code of practice for ductile detailing of reinforced concrete

[5] Structures subjected to seismic forces

[6] NBC Nepal Building Code 2020

[7] Design of Reinforced Concrete Structure – A.K. Jain

[8] Limit State Design of Substructure- Swamisharan

[9] ETABS manual

END OF REPORT

48