Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a

Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By

Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and
Limit State Design Method
(M.TECH PRESENTATION 1)
Presented By: Under Guidance of:
Mr Praveen Rajbhandari Dr. Prasanjit Saha
2019000041 Assistant Professor
MTech in Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering) Department of Civil Engineering
2 CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Objective
4. Methodology
5. Work plan and Timeline
6. Future work

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 INTRODUCTION
3
Performance Based Seismic Design (PBSD)
 PSBD is a philosophy rather than prescriptive guide. It allows for design that follow the
purpose of design code without necessarily satisfying the letter of the codes.
 It is outside the prescriptive code procedure and third party peer review is typically required.
 The goal of PSBD is when the building is subjected to varying level of hazard the building
performs in such a way that agreed upon acceptance criteria are satisfied.
 The designed is generally based on 1. Service level earthquake(SLE) 2. Design basis
earthquake and 3. Maximum considered earthquake (MCE)
 The acceptance criteria are
i. Strain and Deformation Limit
ii. Drift limit
iii. Demand capacity ratio along with the strength calculation.

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 Contd..
4 Response Reduction factor
 It is the factor by which the base shear induced in a structure, if it were to remain elastic, is reduced
to obtain the design shear. It depends upon
i. Seismic damage performance of the structure characterized by ductile and brittle deformation.
ii. Redundancy in the structure.
iii. Overstrength inherent in design process
 R = Rµ+ RΩ
where Rµ = Response reduction considering the system ductility
And RΩ = Response reduction considering system over-strength

Effectiveness of Surface Applied Corrosion Inhibitor on Steel Reinforcement Bars in Concrete

 LITERATURE REVIEW
S.N Author/s
5 1 Xiong M and Huang Y
Chunyu Zhang and Ying Tian
2   seismic design of reinforced concrete
Zhipeng Zhai, Wei Guo,,
3 Yaozhuang Li, Zhiwu Yu,
Hongpeng Cao and Dan Bu
 
Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
Paper Name
Novel perspective of seismic
performance-based evaluation and
design
for resilient and sustainable slope
engineering
Simplified performance-based optimal
frame buildings
An improved performance-based
plastic design method for seismic
resilient
fused high-rise buildings
 
Journal, Year
Elsevier Journals, 2019
Elsevier Journals, 2019
Elsevier Journals, 2019
 
Results
 The differences in the superstructures, seismic performance levels, and slopes indices
have their own unique characteristics, which should be extensively investigated and
discussed
 Effective and reasonable earthquake ground motion and stochastic dynamics should be
applied in seismic stability assessments to accurately grasp the dynamic performance of
slopes from the viewpoint of seismic dynamic reliability.
 The new generation of PBSD design approaches, such as the resilience-based assessment
and design approach, should be introduced into seismic performance evaluation and
design.
 Compared with the conventional strength-based design, the proposed optimal PBSD
leads to 30% reduction in the needed flexural strength for the beams and columns, 26%
reduction in the cross-sectional area, and 21% reduction in the overall cost.
 It is found that drift limits are exceeded by less than 5% for occasional and rare
earthquakes, whereas plastic hinge rotation limits are satisfied under any considered
level of seismic hazard
 The proposed design procedure is simple and can simultaneously and effectively achieve
the design of multiple performance objectives for SLE, DBE and MCE hazard level. And
its effectiveness for designing seismic resilient fused high-rise building has been proved.
 The inter-story drift ratio of the designed energy-dissipative column (EDC) and
MF(Moment resisting frame MF system is less than the limitation in the code, indicating
that the designed EDCMF system has good seismic performance against strong ground
motions.
 Contd..
6 S.N Author/s Paper Name Journal, Year Results
Jianze Wang, Kaoshan Seismic performance-based design and risk analysis of Elsevier Journals, 2018  Collapse risk increased the most due to combined effect of mass and vertical
4 Dai, Yexian Yin, thermal power plant   irregularities.
Solomon Tesfamariam building with consideration of vertical and mass
irregularities  Under small earthquake intensities the thermal power pant with combined
  irregularities had higher risk in functional disruption.

 Vertical irregularities generated larger detrimental effect than mass irregularity

Siamak Sattar Evaluating the consistency between prescriptive and
5 performance-based
seismic design approaches for reinforced concrete
moment frame buildings
 
Elsevier Journals, 2018
 
 The findings show that ASCE 7 and ASCE 41 are not consistent with respect to
the expected performance of reinforced concrete special moment frames, which
can potentially impact the resiliency of buildings in the same building community
designed using loading, modeling, and analysis recommendations within the two
standards.
 The outcomes illustrate the need for changes to the assessment and design
standards provisions by building code developers if a consistent structural seismic
performance is desired.

Kunal P Shukla and Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a
6 Sejal P Dalal Reinforced Concrete Building By Performance-Based
  Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 
Elsevier Journals, 2017
 
 Response Reduction Factor for IS code method and PBPD Method is 5.59 and
18.52 respectively
 Though R for IS code method is almost same as mentioned in IS code, still hinges
are developed in column as well, which suggests that Strong Column- Weak Beam
does not hold true.
 In PNPD although Ductility Factor is % still hinges are formed only at beams, so
still there is a scope of increasing ductility factor

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 Contd..
7 S.N Author/s
Alfredo Gonzaleza,
Paper Name
Performance-based seismic design framework for RC
Journal, Year
Elsevier Journals, 2017 
Results
Diaphragms with usual levels of web and chord reinforcement tend to develop a single
7 Enrico Spaconeb and floor diaphragms in dual systems crack at the critical region.
Roberto Nascimbenec  
   Highly reinforced diaphragms, in contrast, can have much longer plastic hinge lengths,
and will develop multiple smeared cracks as the plasticity is spread over a larger ‘fan’
area, much like a wall.
R. Allahvirdizadeh, Probabilistic comparative investigation on introduced Elsevier Journals, 2017  Recorded inter-story drift values in cases which the performance was controlled by the
8 M. Khanmohammadi performance-based seismic design and assessment local criteria are generally 50–100% greater than the conventional allowable values.
and M.S. Marefat criteria  
     Probability of exceeding local limits at a lateral inter-story drift equal to the acceptable
values of the regulations is mostly less than 10%. Therefore, current global thresholds
will generally control the performance of RC moment resisting frames. It may lead to
designs with same deficiencies as force-based approaches.
 
 It was observed that in nearly all cases the allowable maximum inter-story drift is
smaller than the experienced inter-story drift values when the local criteria controls the
performance. This statement is true even for lower or higher exceeding percentages and
all performance levels. Then, it can be concluded that the conventional inter-story drift
limits always control the performance of moment-resisting RC frames.

Mohd. Zameeruddin Review on Recent developments in the performance- Elsevier Journals, 2016  Damage variables are integrated with the performance evaluation procedure,
9 and Keshav K. Sangle based seismic performance evaluation and damage assessment can be performed in a single analysis,
design of reinforced concrete structures thus facilitating design procedures and saving time.
   
 The next generation PBSD (FEMA 445) procedure conveys the need to express
the performance objectives regarding the primary concerns of stakeholders (viz.,
repair cost, casualties, and downtime).Therefore, DIs must be integrated within the
performance evaluation procedure.

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
8
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
 The gap in the literature is that all the other researchers have design and evaluate Response
Reduction factor on reinforced building on the basis of Performance Based Seismic
Design.
 In this research, I am evaluating Response Reduction factor of a reinforced concrete dual
system building on the basis of Performance Based Seismic Design and Limit State
Design.

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design
Method
 OBJECTIVES
9

 To evaluate Response Reduction Factor For IS code or Limit State

Design (LSD) and Performance Based Seismic Design (PBSD).

 To determine the failure pattern in PBSD.

 To study the in-plane forces developed due to irregular T-shaped

floor plan of the building.

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 METHODOLOGY
10 In this methodology we will analyze and evaluate :

• 20-story T-Shaped residential building

• 73-meter tall
• 1 basement for amenity area and car park
• Dual system (Reinforced concrete special moment
resisting fame with special reinforced concrete
shear walls)
• ETABS 2018 will be used for analysis and
design
• Linear elastic response spectrum analysis will
be used for Service level earthquake (SLE)
• For maximum considered earthquake (MCE)
nonlinear time history analysis will be used. Figure : T-shaped Dual System Building

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 Contd.. Flowchart
INITIAL DESIGN OF BUILDING
11

IS CODE PBSD

LATERAL FORCE AND LATERAL FORCE AND

BASE SHEAR BASE SHEAR
DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION

FRAME STUDY AND FRAME STUDY AND

DESIGN DESIGN

COMPARATIVE
PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION

1.Column and beam

moment comparison
2.Response reduction
factor evaluation

3.Falure Pattern

Fig. Evaluation using PBSD and IS code

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
12 WORKPLAN

THE TASKS TO BE COMPLETED IN THIS STUDY ARE :

 TASK 1 : LITERATURE REVIEW AND FINALIZATION OF TOPIC
 TASK 2 : OBJECTIVES
 TASK 3 : METHODOLOGY
 TASK 4 : EXPERIMENT/ MODELING
 TASK 5 : COMPARISON OF RESULTS
 TASK 6 : THESIS WRITING
 TASK 7 : FINAL PRESENTATION

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 TIMELINE
13

MONTH TASK1 TASK2 TASK3 TASK4 TASK5 TASK6 TASK7

JULY -AUG              

             
SEP
             
OCT
             
NOV
             
DEC- JAN
             
FEB
             
MARCH
             
APRIL-MAY
             

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
14 Future Work
 Modelling, analyzing and designing the building using IS code.
 Similarly, analyzing the structure using Service level earthquake(SLE)and making sure that the
building remains primarily elastic. This can be done by using linear elastic response spectrum
analysis.
 Subject the building to larger earthquake like maximum considered earthquake(MCE) using non
linear time history analysis to determine the post yield behavior of components
 Compare the result using appropriate acceptance criteria.
 Finally comparative performance evaluation of frame structure are done.

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
 Reference
 [1] M. Xiong and Y. Huang, “Novel perspective of seismic performance-based evaluation and design for resilient and sustainable slope
15 engineering,” Eng. Geol., vol. 262, p. 105356, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105356.
 [2] C. Zhang and Y. Tian, “Simplified performance-based optimal seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings,” Eng. Struct., vol. 185,
no. January, pp. 15–25, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.108.
 [3] Z. Zhai, W. Guo, Y. Li, Z. Yu, H. Cao, and D. Bu, “An improved performance-based plastic design method for seismic resilient fused high-rise
buildings,” Eng. Struct., vol. 199, no. September, p. 109650, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109650.
 [4] J. Wang, K. Dai, Y. Yin, and S. Tesfamariam, “Seismic performance-based design and risk analysis of thermal power plant building with
consideration of vertical and mass irregularities,” Eng. Struct., vol. 164, no. August 2017, pp. 141–154, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.001.
 [5] S. Sattar, “Evaluating the consistency between prescriptive and performance-based seismic design approaches for reinforced concrete moment
frame buildings,” Eng. Struct., vol. 174, no. July, pp. 919–931, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.080.
 [6] K. P. Shukla and S. P. Dalal, “Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Cement Concrete Building Designed by Performance
Based Plastic Design Method and Limit State Design Method,” Procedia Eng., vol. 173, pp. 1854–1861, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.235.
 [ 7] A. Gonzalez, E. Spacone, and R. Nascimbene, “Performance-based seismic design framework for RC floor diaphragms in dual systems,”
Procedia Eng., vol. 199, pp. 3546–3551, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.512.
 [8] R. Allahvirdizadeh, M. Khanmohammadi, and M. S. Marefat, “Probabilistic comparative investigation on introduced performance-based
seismic design and assessment criteria,” Eng. Struct., vol. 151, pp. 206–220, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.029.
 [9] M. Zameeruddin and K. K. Sangle, “Review on Recent developments in the performance-based seismic design of reinforced concrete
structures,” Structures, vol. 6, pp. 119–133, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2016.03.001.
 [10] Y. Lu, I. Hajirasouliha, and A. M. Marshall, “Performance-based seismic design of flexible-base multi-storey buildings considering soil-
structure interaction,” Eng. Struct., vol. 108, pp. 90–103, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.031.
 [11] I. Muljati, F. Asisi, and K. Willyanto, “Performance of force based design versus direct displacement based design in predicting seismic
demands of regular concrete special moment resisting frames,” Procedia Eng., vol. 125, pp.1050–1056, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.161.
 [12] A. Mondal, S. Ghosh, and G. R. Reddy, “Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames,” Eng. Struct.,
vol. 56, pp. 1808–1819, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038.

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method
16

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of a Reinforced Concrete Dual System Building By Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Limit State Design Method