Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Term project
Dr.Mohammed Al-Osta
ID# 200816060
Email: eng-kovo@hotmail.com
1|Page
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Project Objectives and scope of work ................................................................................................... 4
2.1. Description of Structure ................................................................................................................ 5
2.2. Loads Calculation ......................................................................................................................... 7
2.2.1. Slab Loads ............................................................................................................................. 7
2.3. Building Geometry...................................................................................................................... 11
2.3.1. Modeling Stages.................................................................................................................. 11
2.3.2. Normal Structure ................................................................................................................. 11
2.3.3. Full Structure Modeling ...................................................................................................... 14
2.4. Loads Assigned ........................................................................................................................... 15
2.5. Ribbed Slab Design..................................................................................................................... 17
2.6. Beam Design ............................................................................................................................... 20
2.7. Column Design ........................................................................................................................... 25
2.8. Foundation Design ...................................................................................................................... 28
2.8.1. Procedure ............................................................................................................................ 28
2.8.2. Results ................................................................................................................................. 30
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 67
References ................................................................................................................................................... 68
2|Page
List of Figures
3|Page
1. Introduction
The design of the Two-story reinforced concrete structure entailed a number of steps
and calculations. Each section listed below describes one step in the process of the design.
Attached to the end of this report are sample hand calculations for each step in the design
process.
On the managerial side, the group will conduct cost estimations and comparisons study for all
alternatives which would help to improve the decision-making process and the quantity
surveying skills. In addition, the project will help the group in improving time-management
skills.
4|Page
2.1. Description of Structure
Building comprises of two story reinforced concrete structure. Basic building dimensions
are as follows:
STADD side and top view drawings of the Building are shown in Figure and Figure 2-2.
5|Page
Figure 2-2: Top View
6|Page
2.2. Loads Calculation
UP
7|Page
Minimum slab depth:
Following ACI-318-08 the minimum thickness for one-way solid slabs as shown in Figure 2-4
𝑙 𝑙
is 24 for one end continuous and 28 for both ends continuous.
Figure 2-4: Minimum Thickness for One-Way Solid and Ribbed Slabs
8|Page
𝑙 5000
One end continuous = = 208.33 𝑚𝑚
24 24
𝑙 5000
Both ends continuous = = 178.57 𝑚𝑚 Figure 2-5: Block Dimensions
28 28
Weight of Block:
1
No. of rib/m = = 2 ribs
0.5
No. of blocks/𝑚2 = 2 × 5 = 10
9.81 kN
Weight of blocks/𝑚2 = 10 × 12 × 1000 = 1.2 𝑚2
Weight of ribs:
Each one meter of ribbed slab has two ribs as shown in Figure 2-6.
Weigh of 𝑟𝑖𝑏 = (width(b) × depth(d) × number of ribs) × (density of concrete) ×
(length)
kN
Weight of ribs/𝑚2 = 2 × 0.1 × 0.2 × 25 = 1 𝑚2
9|Page
Weight of top slab (t):
Top slab weight = (minimum thickness – depth of rib (d)) × (density of concrete) × (length)
kN
Weight of toping slab/m2 = 0.07 × 25 = 1.75 𝑚2
kN
Self Weight of ribbed slab = 1 + 1.2 + 1.75 = 3.95 𝑚2
10 | P a g e
2.3. Building Geometry
According to the Architectural drawings, the building is mainly composed of a 13.5 m X
13.5 m rooms with main beams spanning over 5, 3.5 and 3 meters with a center-to-center of
column spacing of 5 and 3.5 meters. In addition, the building includes a rectangular bathroom
with a thickness of 0.15 meters and with area of10.5 𝑚2 .
11 | P a g e
Side view dimensions of the two structures are shown in Figure 2-7-2.
12 | P a g e
Top view dimensions are shown in Figure 2-8 .
13 | P a g e
2.3.3. Full Structure Modeling
14 | P a g e
2.4. Loads Assigned
𝐾𝑁
Dead load on grade beam is 17.375 as shown in Figure 2-10.
𝑚
15 | P a g e
𝐾𝑁
Dead load on parapet is 12.2 as shown in Figure 2-11.
𝑚
16 | P a g e
2.5. Ribbed Slab Design
Using ACI-318-08 chapter 8.3.3, Check the ACI limits which is shown in Figure 2-12.
17 | P a g e
Figure 2-13: ACI Moment Coefficients (1)
18 | P a g e
5.0 m 3.5 m
𝑊𝑢 = 1.2(𝐷𝐿) + 1.6(𝐿𝐿)
𝐾𝑁
𝑊𝑢 = 1.2(6.95) + 1.6(2.5) = 12.34 𝑚
1) 𝑀𝑢 = 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 × 𝑊𝑢 × 𝑙𝑛 2
𝑀𝑢
2) 𝑅𝑛 =
∅𝑏𝑑 2
𝑓𝑦
3) 𝑚 = 0.85𝑓′
𝑐
1 2𝑚𝑅𝑛
4) 𝜌 = (1 − √1 − )
𝑚 𝑓𝑦
3 ×√𝑓𝑐′ 200
5) 𝜌min = but not less than
𝑓𝑦 𝑓𝑦
6) 𝐴𝑠 = 𝜌𝑏𝑑
19 | P a g e
2.6. Beam Design
Critical beam found to be beam # 200 as shown in Figure 2-16.
20 | P a g e
From STAAD.pro analysis, max (-ve) moment
𝜋
𝑀𝑢 = −33.6𝐾𝑁. 𝑚 , 𝐴𝑠 = 3 × 4 × 122 = 339.3 𝑚𝑚2
As Shown in Figure .
21 | P a g e
Figure 2-19: Steel arrangement of beam#200 (2)
Calculating moment capacity of the beam in compression and tension, then check it
with the applied moments.
𝑎 𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 339.3×420
𝑀𝑛− = 𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − 2) , 𝑎 = 0.85𝑓 𝑏 = 0.85×40×200 = 20.96 𝑚𝑚
𝑐
20.96 1 1
𝑀𝑛− = 339.3 × 420 (460 − ) × 1000 𝑚𝑚 × 1000 𝑁 = 64.059 𝐾𝑁. 𝑚
2
𝑎 𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 339.3×420
𝑀𝑛+ = 𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − 2) , 𝑎 = 0.85𝑓 𝑏 = 0.85×40×200 = 20.96 𝑚𝑚
𝑐
20.96 1 1
𝑀𝑛+ = 339.3 × 420 (460 − ) × 1000 𝑚𝑚 × 1000 𝑁 = 64.059 𝐾𝑁. 𝑚
2
22 | P a g e
Check (-ve) moment:
For Stirrups:
From STAAD.pro analysis and design the values of Vu, Vc and Vs as well as specifications of
shear reinforcement is shown below in Figure and Figure .
23 | P a g e
Figure 2-21: Specifications of shear reinforcement of beam #200
Check:
24 | P a g e
2.7. Column Design
Critical Column found to be beam # 127 as shown in Figure .
The column output given by STAAD.pro for column # 127 is shown in the
following table and Figure .
25 | P a g e
Figure 2-23: Output of column#127
To check the column reinforcement, checking whether the column is short or long should be
done first. If the column is long the effect of slenderness should be taken in consideration, if
not, no need to consider the effects of slenderness.
𝑘𝑙𝑢
Slendernen ratio→ 𝑟
Check:
𝑘𝑙𝑢 𝑀1
Since the structure is braced frame if ≤ 34 − 12 𝑀2 it is short column, otherwise it is
𝑟
long column.
𝑀1 11.96
34 − 12 = 34 − 12 = 32.85
𝑀2 125.14
Since the column both fixed ends 𝑘 = 1
𝑙𝑢 = 3.5 𝑚
𝑘𝑙𝑢 1(3.5)
= = 34.7 > 33.73, so it is long column.
𝑟 0.101
26 | P a g e
Equations used:
87000 87000
𝑥𝑏 = × 𝑑 → 𝑥𝑏 = × 29.5 = 29.48 𝑖𝑛
𝑓𝑦 +87000 60.9+87000
29.5−1.57 𝑓𝑦
𝜀𝑠 = × 0.003 = 0.0028 > → 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑦𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑑
29.5 𝐸𝑠
25.1
𝑀𝑛 = 1705 (10.64 − ) + 274.3(10.64 − 2.4) + 298.4(10.64 − 2.4) = 1462.49 𝐾𝑖𝑝 − 𝑓𝑡
2
𝑀𝑛 1462.49
𝑒= → = 10.4
𝑝𝑛 1680.9
27 | P a g e
2.8. Foundation Design
Foundations design was done using STAAD.foundation software.
2.8.1. Procedure
1) Analyze the structure using STAAD.pro.
2) Import STAAD.pro file into STAAD.foundation. Figure shows the distribution
of isolated footings.
28 | P a g e
4) Define cover and soil parameters as shown in Figure 2-26:
29 | P a g e
2.8.2. Results
Below are two tables of footings sizes and reinforcement. Typical steel arrangement
and footing sizes are shown in Figure 2-28 and Figure 2-29.
30 | P a g e
Foundation geometry for shear wall
Isolated Footing 21
31 | P a g e
Input Values
Footing Geomtery
Column Dimensions
Column Rectangular
Shape :
Column 0.75 m
Length - X
(Pl) :
Column 0.35 m
Width - Z
(Pw) :
Pedestal
Include No
Pedestal?
Pedestal N/A
Shape :
Pedestal N/A
Height (Ph) :
Pedestal N/A
Length - X
(Pl) :
Pedestal N/A
Width - Z
(Pw) :
32 | P a g e
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
------------------------------------------------------
33 | P a g e
Design Calculations
Footing Size
34 | P a g e
Applied Loads - Strength Level
Axial Shear X Shear Z Moment X Moment Z
LC
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm)
5 74.877 99.102 5.015 1.482 -348.409
6 -279.122 -0.531 137.333 17.802 0.941
7 -67.530 -185.540 -5.085 -1.439 488.882
8 281.613 0.436 -82.371 -13.372 -0.766
9 203.757 -6.409 -1.239 2.688 6.289
10 16.648 -2.920 -0.046 0.267 2.133
11 285.260 -8.973 -1.735 3.763 8.804
12 271.146 -12.363 -1.561 3.654 10.959
13 261.157 -10.611 -1.533 3.493 9.679
14 304.410 71.590 2.525 4.412 -271.181
15 21.211 -8.116 108.379 17.467 8.299
16 190.484 -156.123 -5.555 2.075 398.652
17 469.799 -7.343 -67.384 -7.472 6.934
18 380.960 147.952 6.491 5.865 -547.775
19 -185.438 -11.461 218.200 31.977 11.185
20 153.108 -307.475 -9.669 1.191 791.890
21 711.737 -9.914 -133.327 -17.902 8.455
22 261.157 -10.611 -1.533 3.493 9.679
23 261.157 -10.611 -1.533 3.493 9.679
24 261.157 -10.611 -1.533 3.493 9.679
25 261.157 -10.611 -1.533 3.493 9.679
26 303.185 152.795 6.909 4.791 -551.795
27 -263.213 -6.618 218.618 30.903 7.166
28 75.333 -302.632 -9.251 0.117 787.871
29 633.962 -5.072 -132.909 -18.976 4.435
30 183.381 -5.768 -1.115 2.419 5.660
31 183.381 -5.768 -1.115 2.419 5.660
32 183.381 -5.768 -1.115 2.419 5.660
33 183.381 -5.768 -1.115 2.419 5.660
35 | P a g e
Final Footing Size
36 | P a g e
20 23.4557 5.6150 5.6837 23.5244
37 | P a g e
13 55.866 386.674 1869.768 340.213
Critical Load Case And The Governing Factor Of Safety For Overturning And
Sliding - X Direction
38 | P a g e
Critical Load Case And The Governing Factor Of Safety For Overturning And
Sliding - Z Direction
Shear Calculation
39 | P a g e
For rectangular column, = Bcol / Dcol = 2.14
Along X Direction
40 | P a g e
Check that 0.75 * Vc > Vux where Vux is the shear force for the critical load cases at a
distance deff from the face of the column caused by bending about the X axis.
Along Z Direction
Check that 0.75 * Vc > Vuz where Vuz is the shear force for the critical load cases at
a distance deff from the face of the column caused by bending about the Z axis.
41 | P a g e
Critical load case for Vuz is # 21 291.95 kN
Calculate the flexural reinforcement along the X direction of the footing. Find the
area of steel required, A, as per Section 3.8 of Reinforced Concrete Design (5th ed.)
by Salmon and Wang (Ref. 1)
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
42 | P a g e
Calculate reinforcement ratio for critical load case
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
Because the number of bars is rounded up, make sure new reinforcement
ratio < max
Total reinforcement area, As_total = Nbar * (Area of one bar) = 10.21 in2
deff = D - Ccover - 0.5 * (dia. of one bar) = 0.45 m
From ACI Cl.7.6.1, minimum req'd clear max (Diameter of one bar, 1.0, Min. 65.32 mm
distance between bars, Cd = User Spacing) =
43 | P a g e
Design for Flexure about X axis
Calculate the flexural reinforcement along the Z direction of the footing. Find the
area of steel required, A, as per Section 3.8 of Reinforced Concrete Design (5th ed.)
by Salmon and Wang (Ref. 1)
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
44 | P a g e
Nominal moment capacity, Mn = 826.46 kNm
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
Because the number of bars is rounded up, make sure new reinforcement
ratio < max
Total reinforcement area, As_total = Nbar * (Area of one bar) = 10.05 in2
deff = D - Ccover - 0.5 * (dia. of one bar) = 0.42 m
From ACI Cl.7.6.1, minimum req'd clear max (Diameter of one bar, 1.0, Min. 58.34 mm
distance between bars, Cd = User Spacing) =
Bending moment for uplift cases will be calculated based solely on selfweight, soil
depth and surcharge loading.
As the footing size has already been determined based on all servicebility load cases,
and design moment calculation is based on selfweight, soil depth and surcharge
only, top reinforcement value for all pure uplift load cases will be the same.
45 | P a g e
Design For Top Reinforcement About Z Axis
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
46 | P a g e
Design For Top Reinforcement About X Axis
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
47 | P a g e
Foundation geometry
Isolated Footing 22
48 | P a g e
Input Values
Footing Geomtery
Column Dimensions
Column Rectangular
Shape :
Column 0.35 m
Length - X
(Pl) :
Column 0.75 m
Width - Z
(Pw) :
Pedestal
Include No
Pedestal?
Pedestal N/A
Shape :
Pedestal N/A
Height (Ph) :
Pedestal N/A
Length - X
(Pl) :
Pedestal N/A
Width - Z
(Pw) :
Design Parameters
49 | P a g e
Unit Weight of Concrete : 25.000 kN/m3
Strength of Concrete : 25.000 N/mm2
Yield Strength of Steel : 415.000 N/mm2
Minimum Bar Size : # 6
Maximum Bar Size : # 40
Minimum Bar Spacing : 50.00 mm
Maximum Bar Spacing : 500.00 mm
Pedestal Clear Cover (P, CL) : 50.00 mm
Footing Clear Cover (F, CL) : 50.00 mm
Soil Properties
------------------------------------------------------
50 | P a g e
Design Calculations
Footing Size
51 | P a g e
Applied Loads - Strength Level
Axial Shear X Shear Z Moment X Moment Z
LC
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm)
5 143.492 39.564 0.810 2.667 -89.934
6 -51.735 -0.158 133.489 212.281 0.228
7 -161.307 -116.049 -0.540 -1.791 131.958
8 51.575 0.137 -59.207 -172.287 -0.191
9 295.056 5.351 -7.561 -5.781 -4.472
10 44.544 3.108 0.009 0.022 -2.647
11 413.078 7.491 -10.585 -8.094 -6.261
12 425.337 11.393 -9.058 -6.903 -9.602
13 398.611 9.529 -9.064 -6.916 -8.014
14 468.860 38.072 -8.425 -4.804 -77.314
15 312.678 6.294 97.718 162.887 -5.184
16 225.021 -86.419 -9.505 -8.370 100.199
17 395.327 6.530 -56.439 -144.767 -5.519
18 628.197 72.830 -7.768 -2.648 -151.908
19 315.834 9.275 204.519 332.734 -7.648
20 140.520 -176.150 -9.928 -9.781 203.118
21 481.131 9.747 -103.795 -282.574 -8.319
22 398.611 9.529 -9.064 -6.916 -8.014
23 398.611 9.529 -9.064 -6.916 -8.014
24 398.611 9.529 -9.064 -6.916 -8.014
25 398.611 9.529 -9.064 -6.916 -8.014
26 495.137 68.117 -5.509 -0.935 -147.920
27 182.774 4.562 206.778 334.446 -3.660
28 7.459 -180.863 -7.669 -8.068 207.107
29 348.070 5.034 -101.536 -280.861 -4.330
30 265.550 4.816 -6.805 -5.203 -4.025
31 265.550 4.816 -6.805 -5.203 -4.025
32 265.550 4.816 -6.805 -5.203 -4.025
33 265.550 4.816 -6.805 -5.203 -4.025
52 | P a g e
Reduction of force due to buoyancy = -0.00 kN
Effect due to adhesion = 0.00 kN
Min. area required from bearing pressure, Amin = P / qmax = 3.203 m2
Area from initial length and width, Ao = Lo * Wo = 1.00 m2
53 | P a g e
Summary of Adjusted Pressures at 4 corners Four Corners
54 | P a g e
8 2152.745 4.964 9.536 7438.992
Critical Load Case And The Governing Factor Of Safety For Overturning And
Sliding - X Direction
55 | P a g e
Critical Load Case for Overturning about X-Direction : 27
Governing Overturning Moment : 437.833 kNm
Governing Resisting Moment : 2354.800 kNm
Minimum Overturning Ratio for the Critical Load Case : 5.378
Critical Load Case And The Governing Factor Of Safety For Overturning And
Sliding - Z Direction
56 | P a g e
Shear Calculation
57 | P a g e
One-Way Shear Check
Along X Direction
Check that 0.75 * Vc > Vux where Vux is the shear force for the critical load cases at a
distance deff from the face of the column caused by bending about the X axis.
58 | P a g e
Along Z Direction
Check that 0.75 * Vc > Vuz where Vuz is the shear force for the critical load cases at
a distance deff from the face of the column caused by bending about the Z axis.
59 | P a g e
Design for Flexure about Z axis
Calculate the flexural reinforcement along the X direction of the footing. Find the
area of steel required, A, as per Section 3.8 of Reinforced Concrete Design (5th ed.)
by Salmon and Wang (Ref. 1)
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
60 | P a g e
Nominal moment capacity, Mn = 608.24 kNm
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
Because the number of bars is rounded up, make sure new reinforcement
ratio < max
Total reinforcement area, As_total = Nbar * (Area of one bar) = 7.79 in2
deff = D - Ccover - 0.5 * (dia. of one bar) = 0.45 m
From ACI Cl.7.6.1, minimum req'd clear max (Diameter of one bar, 1.0, Min. 65.07 mm
distance between bars, Cd = User Spacing) =
61 | P a g e
Design for Flexure about X axis
Calculate the flexural reinforcement along the Z direction of the footing. Find the
area of steel required, A, as per Section 3.8 of Reinforced Concrete Design (5th ed.)
by Salmon and Wang (Ref. 1)
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
62 | P a g e
Nominal moment capacity, Mn = 497.34 kNm
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
Because the number of bars is rounded up, make sure new reinforcement
ratio < max
Total reinforcement area, As_total = Nbar * (Area of one bar) = 7.64 in2
deff = D - Ccover - 0.5 * (dia. of one bar) = 0.42 m
From ACI Cl.7.6.1, minimum req'd clear max (Diameter of one bar, 1.0, Min. 58.41 mm
distance between bars, Cd = User Spacing) =
Bending moment for uplift cases will be calculated based solely on selfweight, soil
depth and surcharge loading.
As the footing size has already been determined based on all servicebility load cases,
and design moment calculation is based on selfweight, soil depth and surcharge
only, top reinforcement value for all pure uplift load cases will be the same.
63 | P a g e
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
64 | P a g e
Design For Top Reinforcement About X Axis
The strength values of steel and concrete used in the formulae are in ksi
Required = 0.00180
Since OK
65 | P a g e
Conclusion
I had the opportunity to learn how to use STAAD Pro software to analyze and design
two-way solid slab as well as one-way ribbed slab. Also, a hand calculation check on analysis
of the results of typical structural members gave us knowledge about checking the adequacy
of design to meet the criteria set by codes of practice. Furthermore, i was exposed to STAAD
Pro Foundation Software, which gave us new ideas about designing the foundations of a
building.
Additionally, in CE 315 project i had the chance to design a beam, column and foundation.
66 | P a g e
References
ACI Committee. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08)
and Commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2008.
67 | P a g e