Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessed by-
Engr. Md. Mehedi Hasan
Lead Structural Engineer,
Sthapona Consultants
M.Sc. (Structural Engineering, BUET) B.Sc. (BUET),
MIEB -24748, Rajuk Reg. DMINB-CE0233.
Submitted by
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 2
1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVE .......................................................................................................... 3
2 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS ........................................................................................................... 4
2.1 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH FROM CORE TEST ............................. 4
3 ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY .............................................................................. 5
3.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ........................................................................................................ 5
3.2 CODES AND PRACTICES ..................................................................................................... 5
3.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY ........................................................................................................ 6
3.4 LOADS ........................................................................................................................................ 6
3.4.1 DEAD Loads ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.4.2 Live Load........................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.4.3 Wind Load (W) ............................................................................................................................................... 6
3.4.4 Earthquake Load (E) .................................................................................................................................... 7
5 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 20
6 RECOMMENDATION ...................................................................................................................... 20
7 DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................................... 20
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT
List of Tables
Table 1.1.1: Basic information ............................................................................................ 2
Table 4.1.1: Adequacy Check for Isolated Footing for Soil Bearing Capacity ................ 13
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The existing boiler building of SQUARE APPARELS LTD. is currently in operation as a single-
storied building composed of RCC Frame.
A team from ALLIANCE conducted visual assessment of the factory building. They
recommended to perform DEA of the building. On this recommendation, SQUARE APPARELS
LTD. has engaged Sthapona Consultants for performing DEA along with checking architectural
and structural drawing of the building.
For DEA one of the key inputs is the concrete strength. Six cores from different locations of
columns have been collected to test the concrete strength. These cores have been sent and
tested in BUET Lab by UTM (universal testing machine) to find its compressive strength. It has
been found that stone chips were used as coarse aggregate. Equivalent concrete strength (As
per ACI-562) for column is 3225 psi. Core test result of BUET is presented in DT-NDT Report. As
no test was performed rebar yield strength was considered 60 Ksi according to NTPA guideline.
Considering BNBC referred loading, we analysed the structure & found that all of the R.C.C.
columns, R.C.C. Floor beams, grade beams, shear walls are adequate. All the foundations are
adequate both in bearing & punching shear capacity. So, no retrofitting is required for the
analysed structure.
We recommend the factory authority to run their operation by following the allowable load
layout plan, to comply the building with BNBC 2006.
Page | 1
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The boiler building of SQUARE APPARELS LTD. is currently in operation as a single storied RCC
building located at Zamirdia, Habirbari, Bhaluka, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Having Latitude:
24.293900°N and Longitude: 90.383890°E.
Information Description
Structural System Frame work of the building is composed of R.C. column Beam,
slab.
Construction materials Concrete with stone chips for foundation, column, grade beam,
floor beam and floor slab.
Page | 2
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Page | 3
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
2 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
Page | 4
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Page | 5
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
The principal material of construction is reinforced concrete. As per investigation and design
drawings, the following material properties have been used:
❖ Yield strength of steel (Rebar), fy = 60,000 lb/in2
❖ Compressive strength of concrete, fc' = 3225 lb/in2
❖ Young's modulus of concrete, Ec = 57,000fc'
The above concrete strength is Equivalent concrete strength found using Core test result from
BUET Lab. The yield strength of rebar is considered based on NTPA guideline.
3.4 LOADS
The loads that may act upon the structure are as follows:
Live load is the gravity load due to non-permanent objects like machines, furniture, and human.
Analysis has been carried out base on load recommended by BNBC (2006). For checking if
needed reduced live load (42psf) are also used to find present condition of the structure.
Page | 6
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
located in Mymensingh, for which the following basic parameters are used in wind load
calculation,
Regarding the earthquake resistant structural design, it essential that the specific design code
is followed. For the analysis and design checking of this building, Equivalent Static Force
Method of BNBC (2006) is followed. The main considerations for calculation of earthquake load
are given below.
A full three-dimensional modelling of the structure has been developed using frame and
plate/shell elements. At base level, the columns are assumed to be hinged due to isolated
foundation.
Page | 7
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
The basic sources of loads are described in earlier section. These loads are applied on the model
in seven basic categories. These are as follows:
These seven basic load cases are analysed in ETABS v16.2.1. The results are then combined in
accordance with the specifications set forth by BNBC. BNBC specifies a number of combination
options. These are as follows:
For Concrete Structure:
❖ 1.4 D
❖ 1.4 D + 1.7 L
❖ 0.9 D + 1.3 (W or 1.1 E)
❖ 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
❖ 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 L + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
❖ 1.4 (D + L + E)
Where D stands for total DEAD load i.e. D = DL + SDEA REPORT, L stands for live load i.e. L=LL,
W stands for wind load and E stands for earthquake load. When these seven basic load cases
are combined accordingly considering the direction of lateral loads, then according to BNBC
2006, we obtain, after simplification, the following thirty combination cases:
❖ Combination Case 1: 1.4 D
❖ Combination Case 2: 1.4 D + 1.7 L
❖ Combination Case 3: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wx
❖ Combination Case 4: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wx
❖ Combination Case 5: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wy
❖ Combination Case 6: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wy
❖ Combination Case 7: 1.05 D + 1.275 Wx
❖ Combination Case 8: 1.05 D - 1.275 Wx
❖ Combination Case 9: 1.05 D + 1.275 Wy
❖ Combination Case 10: 1.05 D - 1.275 Wy
❖ Combination Case 11: 0.9 D + 1.3 Wx
❖ Combination Case 12: 0.9 D - 1.3 Wx
❖ Combination Case 13: 0.9 D + 1.3 Wy
❖ Combination Case 14: 0.9 D - 1.3 Wy
❖ Combination Case 15: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.4025 E x
Page | 8
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
But in ETABS analysis, we do not calculate combination cases 27, 28, 29 & 30.
For the assessment of garments building we consider the load combination provided by the
Guideline for RMG (November 08, 2013) by BNBC for RC structures. The following load
combination is used for the assessment:
Page | 9
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
The floor finish is slightly variable at different locations of the building and load was applied as
per requirement.
Page | 10
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Considering the bearing capacity of 3.35 ksf and concrete compressive strength of 3,225 psi,
all the foundations are found adequate both for bearing capacity and for punching shear
capacity.
Page | 11
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Page | 12
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Table 4.1.1: Adequacy Check for Isolated Footing for Soil Bearing Capacity
Provided
Bearing FoS (From Ultimate Load Reaction Available FoS Remarks
Joint Foundation Foundation
Capacity Soil Test Bearing Capacity (DL + LL) (For Existing (Minimum
Label Type Size
Report) Foundation) FoS=2.0)
sft ksf kip kip
1 F1 27.5 3.35 3 276.38 68.70 4.02 OK
2 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 98.78 3.36 OK
3 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 95.18 3.48 OK
4 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 88.94 3.73 OK
5 F1 27.5 3.35 3 276.38 67.67 4.08 OK
6 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 83.99 3.95 OK
7 F3 69.4 3.35 3 697.92 118.72 5.88 OK
8 F3 69.4 3.35 3 697.92 112.60 6.20 OK
9 F3 69.4 3.35 3 697.92 93.50 7.46 OK
10 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 83.93 3.95 OK
11 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 84.01 3.95 OK
12 F3 69.4 3.35 3 697.92 118.82 5.87 OK
14 F3 69.4 3.35 3 697.92 112.72 6.19 OK
13 F3 69.4 3.35 3 697.92 93.57 7.46 OK
15 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 83.96 3.95 OK
16 F1 27.5 3.35 3 276.38 70.66 3.91 OK
17 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 107.24 3.09 OK
18 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 104.53 3.17 OK
19 F2 33.0 3.35 3 331.65 95.14 3.49 OK
20 F1 27.5 3.35 3 276.38 70.61 3.91 OK
Page | 13
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Page | 14
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
RCC Column layout plan is shown in Figure 4.2.2 from Design Drawing.
Page | 15
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Page | 16
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Page | 17
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Provided Reinf. At
Beam Id. In Provided Reinf. Required Reinf. Required
Middle-Bottom
Drawing At Top-Edge (in2) (in2) Reinf. (in2)
(in2)
GB1 2.57 As Shown 2.082 As Shown
GB2 1.872 As Shown 1.56 As Shown
Page | 18
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Page | 19
[SQUARE APPARELS LTD. (Boiler Building)] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
Provided Reinf. At
Beam Id. In Provided Reinf. Required Reinf. Required Reinf.
Middle-Bottom
Drawing At Top-Edge (in2) (in2) (in2)
(in2)
FB1 2.22 As Shown 1.734 As Shown
FB2 2.57 As Shown 1.908 As Shown
FB3 1.872 As Shown 1.56 As Shown
FB4 2.22 As Shown 1.734 As Shown
TB1 0.936 As Shown 1.734 As Shown
5 CONCLUSION
6 RECOMMENDATION
We recommend the factory authority to run their operation by following the allowable load
layout plan, to comply the building with BNBC 2006.
7 DISCLAIMER
The assessment engineer made the above observations & recommendations from Core test,
NDT results & mathematical modelling of the building. We applied our best engineering
judgments. We do not bear responsibility for any deviation from the predicted behaviour of
the structure caused by uncertainties of performance or calamities.
Page | 20