DEA-Report of Crown Mills BD - PART C 10-06-2018

DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT OF
CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD.
Project type: 3 Storied RCC Building Including Roof Top Shed.
Location: PLOT NOS. 17-19 & 36-38, SECTOR 2, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Client: CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD.
Assessed by-
Engr. Md. Mehedi Hasan
Lead Structural Engineer,
Sthapona Consultants
M.Sc. (Structural Engineering, BUET) B.Sc. (BUET),
MIEB -24748, Rajuk Reg. DMINB-CE0233.
Submitted by
Y OUR S AFETY IS OUR C ONCERN

1st Floor (2A), House#01, Road#10, Nikunjo-2, Dhaka-1229.
Office: +880-1762-777666.
sthaponaconsultants@gmail.com
[CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD.] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 2
1.1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVE ..................................................................................................... 3
2 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS ......................................................................................... 4
2.1 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH FROM CORE TEST .................. 4
3 ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY .......................................................... 5
3.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 5
3.2 CODES AND PRACTICES ................................................................................................ 7
3.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY .................................................................................................... 7
3.4 LOADS ...................................................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 DEA Report Loads ......................................................................................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Live Load........................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.4.3 Wind Load (W) ................................................................................................................................................ 8
3.4.4 Earthquake Load (E) ...................................................................................................................................... 8
3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 10

3.6 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATION ................................................................ 10
3.7 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 12
3.8 APPLICATION OF LOAD AND ANALYSIS .......................................................... 13
4 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 42 PSF LIVE LOAD ................. 15
4.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION ................................................................ 15
4.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN: ................................................................ 16
4.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF R.C.C. BEAMS.................................................................. 25
4.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam ........................................................................................................................ 25
4.3.2 Evaluation of Roof Beam .......................................................................................................................... 26
4.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB .......................................................................... 30

4.5 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF STEEL MEMBERS ............................................... 30
4.5.1 Evaluation of Steel Columns & Rafters ............................................................................................... 30
4.5.2 Evaluation of Steel Beams ........................................................................................................................ 35
4.5.3 Evaluation of Steel Bracings .................................................................................................................. 35
5 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 63 PSF LIVE LOAD ................. 37

5.1 HECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION................................................................... 37
5.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN: ......................................................................... 45

5.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam ........................................................................................................................ 54
5.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB .......................................................................... 59

5.5 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF STEEL MEMBERS ......................................................... 64
5.5.1 Evaluation of Steel Columns & Rafters ............................................................................................. 64
5.5.2 Evaluation of Steel Beams ...................................................................................................................... 70
5.5.3 Evaluation of Steel Bracings .................................................................................................................. 71
6 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 72
7 RECOMMENDATION ...................................................................................................... 72
8 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AFTER RETROFITTING FOR 63 PSF
LIVE LOAD ................................................................................................................................. 73
8.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION ................................................................ 73
8.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN: ................................................................ 83
8.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam and Tie Beam ........................................................................................... 96
8.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB ........................................................................ 101

8.5 CHECKING ADEQUACY SHEAR WALL ............................................................. 106
8.6 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF STEEL MEMBERS ....................................................... 110
8.6.1 Evaluation of Steel Columns & Rafters ...........................................................................................110
8.6.2 Evaluation of Steel Beams ......................................................................................................................116
8.6.3 Evaluation of Steel Bracings ................................................................................................................117
8.7 SERVISIBILITY CHECK .............................................................................................. 120

9 ADEQUACY CHECK OF ANCHOR BOLTS AFTER RETROFITTING ....... 121
10 ADEQUACY CHECK OF GUSSET PLATE (BRACING) AFTER
RETROFITTING.................................................................................................................. 122
11 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................. 122
List of Figures and Tables

*Source: Google Earth Figure 1.1.1: Location of Project ....................... 2
Figure 3.1.1: Beam-Column Framing System of the Building ........................................... 5
Figure 3.1.2: Roof top Framing System .............................................................................. 5
Figure 3.1.3: 3D View of Analytical Model ..................................................................... 6
Figure 3.4.1: Calculation of Time Period-T for Steel Part.................................................. 9
Figure 3.8.1: Applied Live Load in 5th Floor .................................................................... 13
Figure 3.8.2: Deflected Shape of the building .................................................................. 14
Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Model Snapshot. .......................................... 16
Figure 4.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Built Drawing. .................................................. 17
Figure 4.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid 1.................................................................... 17
Figure 4.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid 8.................................................................. 20
Figure 4.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid 10 ............................................................... 20

Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams. ......................................................................... 25
Figure 4.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams....................................................................... 26
Figure 4.3.3: Condition of 2nd Floor Beams. ..................................................................... 27
Figure 4.3.4: Condition of 3rd Floor Beams. ..................................................................... 28
Figure 4.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams. ................................................................. 29
Figure 4.5.1: Steel Column Layout Plan ........................................................................... 30
Figure 4.5.2: Conditions of Steel Members ...................................................................... 31
Figure 4.5.3: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-A ..................................................... 31
Figure 4.5.4: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-B ................................................. 32
Figure 4.5.5: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-C ................................................. 32
Figure 4.5.6: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-D ..................................................... 32
Figure 4.5.7: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-E ...................................................... 32
Figure 4.5.8: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-F ...................................................... 32
Figure 4.5.9: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-G ..................................................... 33
Figure 4.5.10: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-H ................................................... 33
Figure 4.5.11: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-I ..................................................... 33
Figure 4.5.12: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-J ..................................................... 33
Figure 4.5.13: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-K ................................................... 34
Figure 4.5.14: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-L .................................................... 34
Figure 4.5.15: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-N ................................................... 34
Figure 4.5.16: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-P .................................................... 34
Figure 4.5.17: Conditions of Steel TB .............................................................................. 35
Figure 4.5.18: Conditions of Steel Bracings ..................................................................... 36
Figure 5.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan ............................................................................... 37

Figure 5.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model ..................................................................... 38
Figure 5.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Model Snapshot. .......................................... 45
Figure 5.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Built Drawing. .................................................. 46

Figure 5.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams. ................................................................. 58
Figure 5.4.1: Deformed Shape for DL+LL ....................................................................... 59
Figure 5.4.2: 2nd Floor Slab Bottom Reinforcement Requirement in Direction-1 for 63 psf
Live Load (unit-in2/ft.) ...................................................................................................... 60
Figure 5.4.3: 2nd Floor Slab Top Reinforcement Requirement in Direction-1 for 63 psf
Live Load (unit-in2/in.) ..................................................................................................... 61
Figure 5.5.1: Steel Column Layout Plan ....................................................................... 64
Figure 5.5.2: Conditions of Steel Members ................................................................... 65
Figure 5.5.3: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-A ..................................................... 65
Figure 5.5.4: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-B ................................................. 66
Figure 5.5.5: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-C. ................................................ 66
Figure 5.5.6: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-D ..................................................... 66
Figure 5.5.7: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-E ...................................................... 66
Figure 5.5.8: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-F ...................................................... 67
Figure 5.5.9: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-G ..................................................... 67
Figure 5.5.11: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-I ..................................................... 68
Figure 5.5.12: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-J ..................................................... 68
Figure 5.5.13: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-K ................................................... 68
Figure 5.5.14: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-L .................................................... 68
Figure 5.5.15: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-N ................................................... 69
Figure 5.5.16: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-O ................................................... 69
Figure 5.5.17: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-P .................................................... 69
Figure 5.5.18: Conditions of Steel TB .............................................................................. 70

Figure 5.5.19: Conditions of Steel Bracings ..................................................................... 71
Figure 8.1.1: Footing Layout Plan .................................................................................... 73
Figure 8.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model ..................................................................... 74
Figure 8.1.3: Bearing Capacity Check .............................................................................. 81
Figure 8.1.4: Punching Shear Capacity Check.................................................................. 82
Figure 8.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing. .............................................. 83
Figure 8.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot. ............................................... 84

Figure 8.2.23: Condition of Column in Grid F ................................................................. 94
Figure 8.2.24: Condition of Column in Grid G ................................................................. 95
Figure 8.2.25: Condition of Column in Grid L ................................................................. 95
Figure 8.2.26: Condition of Column in Grid M ................................................................ 95
Figure 8.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams. ............................................................... 100
Figure 8.4.1: Deformed Shape for DL+LL ..................................................................... 101
Live Load (unit-in2/ft.) .................................................................................................... 102
Live Load (unit-in2/in.) ................................................................................................... 103
Figure 8.5.1: Vertical Reinforcement Requirement on Grid 1a ............................... 106
Figure 8.5.2: Shear Reinforcement Requirement on Grid 1a ................................... 106
Figure 8.5.3: Vertical Reinforcement Requirement on Grid 3a ............................... 107
Figure 8.5.4: Shear Reinforcement Requirement on Grid 3a ................................... 107
Figure 8.5.5: Vertical Reinforcement Requirement on Grid Ca .............................. 108
Figure 8.5.6: Shear Reinforcement Requirement on Grid Ca .................................. 108
Figure 8.5.7: Vertical Reinforcement Requirement on Grid Cb .............................. 109
Figure 8.5.8: Shear Reinforcement Requirement on Grid Cb.................................. 109
Figure 8.6.1: Steel Column Layout Plan ..................................................................... 110
Figure 8.6.2: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-A ................................................... 111

Figure 8.6.3: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-B ............................................... 111
Figure 8.6.4: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-C ............................................... 111
Figure 8.6.5: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-D ................................................... 112
Figure 8.6.6: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-E .................................................... 112
Figure 8.6.7: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-F .................................................... 112
Figure 8.6.8: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-G ................................................... 112
Figure 8.6.10: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-I ................................................... 113
Figure 8.6.11: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-J ................................................... 113
Figure 8.6.12: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-K ................................................. 114
Figure 8.6.13: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-L .................................................. 114
Figure 8.6.14: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-N ................................................. 114
Figure 8.6.15: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-O ................................................. 115
Figure 8.6.16: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-P .................................................. 115
Figure 8.6.17: Conditions of Steel TB ............................................................................ 116
Figure 8.6.18: Conditions of Steel Bracings on Grid-1 .................................................. 117
Figure 8.6.23: Conditions of Steel Bracings on Grid-13 ................................................ 118
Figure 8.7.1: Capacity of Anchors in Tension ................................................................ 121

List of Tables
Table 1.1.1: Basic information ............................................................................................ 2
Table 5.1.1: Foundation size check for 63 psf Live Load ............................................ 39
Table 5.1.2: Punching shear check for 63 psf Live Load ............................................ 42
Table 5.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab ............................................................................. 63
Table 8.1.1: Foundation size check for retrofitting ...................................................... 75
Table 8.1.2: Punching shear check for retrofitting ...................................................... 78
Table 8.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab ........................................................................... 105
APPENDIX-I: RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS
APPENDIX-I: DT & NDT REPORT
APPENDIX-III: PLATE LOAD TEST REPORT

[CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD.] DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The existing Factory building of CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD. is currently in operation as a 3-
storied building composed of RCC Frame and a prefabricated steel roof.
A team from ALLIANCE conducted visual assessment of the factory building on May 22, 2014.
They recommended to perform DEA REPORT of the building. On this recommendation,
CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD. has engaged Sthapona Consultants for performing DEA Report
along with checking architectural and structural drawing of the building.
The structural and architectural drawings were verified by Ferro-scanning, dimensions

measurement, plaster removing, foundation explorations etc.
For DEA Report one of the key inputs is the concrete strength. Eight cores from different
locations of columns have been collected to test the concrete strength. These cores have been
sent and tested in BUET Lab by UTM (universal testing machine) to find its compressive
strength. It has been found that brick chips were used as coarse aggregate. Equivalent concrete
strength (As per ACI-562) for column is 2271 psi. Core test result of BUET is presented in DT-
NDT Report. Rebar yield strength was found 72.5 Ksi.
Considering NTPA referred loading (42 pound per square feet live load), we analysed the
structure & found that a large number of R.C.C. columns are inadequate. R.C.C. Floor beams
are adequate. R.C.C. grade beams are adequate. Large number of steel column & Rafter are
overstressed. Steel bracings are overstressed.
Considering BNBC referred loading (63 pound per square feet live load), we analysed the
structure & found that a large number of R.C.C. columns are inadequate. Only few R.C.C. Floor
beams are slightly overstressed which are considered adequate. R.C.C. grade beams are
adequate. Large number of steel column & Rafter are overstressed. Steel bracings are
overstressed.
We recommend to rectify the overstressed member to comply the building with BNBC 2006 as
per the provided rectification design. We recommend to separate the expansion joint location
where connected by floor tiles and fill-up those places with fire-proof materials.
We also recommend to demolish the non-engineered external steel stair as per the provided
demolishing plan.
Page | 1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The factory building of CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD. is currently in operation as a 3
storied plus a prefab steel roof located at 17-19 & 36-38, SECTOR 2, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Having Latitude: 22°17'17.67"N and Longitude: 91°46'38.54"E. It’s all members are composed
of R.C.C. and a steel shade is present on Roof Top.
*Source: Google Earth Figure 1.1.1: Location of Project
Table 1.1.1: Basic information
Information Description
Structural System Frame work of the building is composed of R.C. column Beam,
slab and steel shade on top.
Floor Area Total floor area: 1,95,000 SFT (Approx.)
Number of Stories 3 stories plus a prefabricated steel roof.
Construction Year 1997-2006
Foundation Type Isolated Foundation
Construction materials Concrete with brick chips for foundation, column, grade beam,
floor beam and floor slab, prefab steel for roof.
Page | 2
1.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVE

Sthapona Consultants was assigned to prepare DEA report of the factory building of CROWN
MILLS (BD) LTD. The scope of work of the project has been shown below, which includes
recommendations made by The ALLIANCE team,
(i). Ferro-Scanning in Column, Beam and Slab for Rebar Detection

(ii). Validate available structural design drawings
(iii). Verify architectural drawings and
(iv). The Structural Integrity Assessment of the building, which includes the following
items:
 Highlight any variations between as-built and structure design drawings (if
applicable)
 Result of testing of materials
 Results of geotechnical assessment and testing/investigation
 Details of assumptions, loading, inputs and results of computer modelling
 Detail assessment of the performance of all structural members under the seismic
load, earthquake load and gravity load
 Commentary on adequate/inadequacy of elements of the structure and further
action plan
Page | 3
2 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
2.1 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH FROM CORE TEST

8 cores from different locations of columns have been collected to test the concrete strength.
These cores have been sent and tested in BUET Lab by UTM (Universal Testing Machine) to
find its compressive strength. It has been found that brick chips were used as coarse aggregate.
Equivalent concrete strength (As per ACI-562) for column 2271 psi. Core test result is presented
in DT-NDT Report.
n kc
Core Test Core Modified
Core Diameter
Result Diameter Strength 2 2.4
ID Effect
(psi) (inch) (psi)
1 3090 2.68 1.0396 3212.4 3 1.47
2 2930 2.68 1.0396 3046.0 4 1.28
3 3250 2.68 1.0396 3378.7 5 1.2
4 3520 2.68 1.0396 3659.4 f c (avg)= 2885 psi 6 1.15
Standard Deviation of
5 2700 2.68 1.0396 2806.9 668.12 psi 8 1.1
Core strength=
6 1710 2.68 1.0396 1777.7 Coefficient of variation, V= 0.23 10 1.08
7 1910 2.68 1.0396 1985.6 Number Of Sample, n= 8 12 1.06

Coefficient of variation
8 3090 2.68 1.0396 3212.4 1.1 16 1.05
modification factor, k c =
f c (eq)= 2271 psi 20 1.03
>25 1.02
Calculation of Equivalent Concrete Strength as per ACI 562 for Column
So, Concrete Strength for Column is 2271 psi.
Page | 4
3 ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY
3.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

The structural system of the factory building is 3 storied composed of RCC members
plus a prefab steel roof. Figure 3.1.1 shows the condition of framing system.
Figure 3.1.1: Beam-Column Framing System of the Building
Figure 3.1.2: Roof top Framing System
The building is classified as Ordinary moment resisting frame. General 3D view of the building
has been presented in Figure 3.1.3
Page | 5
Figure 3.1.3: 3D View of Analytical Model
Page | 6
3.2 CODES AND PRACTICES

For the present project, relevant sections of Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC, 2006)
have been used for analysis. For the reinforced concrete design check, American Concrete
Institute (ACI 318-99) code has been consulted as and when became necessary to complement
the BNBC.
3.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY
The principal material of construction is reinforced concrete. As per investigation and design
drawings, the following material properties have been used:
 Yield strength of steel (Rebar), fy = 72,500 lb/in2
 Compressive strength of concrete, fc' = 2271 lb/in2
 Young's modulus of concrete, Ec = 45,000fc'
The above concrete strength is Equivalent concrete strength found using Core test result and the
strength of steel is based on the test result from BUET Lab.
3.4 LOADS
The loads that may act upon the structure are as follows:
3.4.1 DEA Report Loads

DEA Report loads (D) are those gravity loads which remain acting on the structure permanently
without any change during the structures normal service life. These are basically the loads
coming from the weight of the different components of the structure. For the sake of convenience
in the analysis, sometimes this kind of loads are divided into two types, namely a) self-weight
of the structure (SW) and b) the weight coming from the non-structural permanent components
of the building. In concrete building the weight of slabs, beams, and columns etc. which form
the main structural system is considered the self-weight (SW). The weights of floor finish, water
proofing layer, partition walls and other non-structural permanent components generally
constitute the rest of the total DEA Report load. For the analysis and design checking of the
building, following are the values of DEA Report loads,
 Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 135 pcf

 Unit weight of brickwork = 120 pcf
 Floor finish = Variable (1” ~ 3.5”)
3.4.2 Live Load
Live load is the gravity load due to non-permanent objects like machines, furniture, and human.
Analysis has been carried out base on load recommended by BNBC (2006). For checking if
needed reduced live load (42psf) are also used to find present condition of the structure.
Page | 7
3.4.3 Wind Load (W)

Bangladesh is typically a storm prone area where due consideration to the thrust due to storm
must be given in the analysis and design of building and structures. Wind load due to storm is
typically modelled as lateral thrust force causing sway or overturning of the building. Detailed
specifications on wind loading on buildings are outlined in BNBC (2006). The present project
is located in Chittagong EPZ, for which the following basic parameters are used in wind load
calculation,
 Basic wind speed, Vb= 260 km/h

 Exposure category = A
 Structure Importance coefficient CI =1.00
3.4.4 Earthquake Load (E)

Proper structural design of any building structure must include loads due to earthquake shaking.
Although there has been no major incident of earthquake hazard in the recent past of Bangladesh,
earthquakes are not uncommon in this area. Scientific geological study of the earth crust below
Bangladesh shows that Bangladesh does fall in moderate to high seismic risk zone. Statistical
evidence from past major and minor earthquake incidents shows that a major earthquake is
overdue in the recent times of geological scale. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare against any
possible earthquake hazard. It should be kept in mind that the objective of earthquake resistance
building design is not to make a strong building which can resist any damage due to earthquake.
Instead, earthquake resistant design basically aims at minimizing the possible damage and
casualty to an acceptable level.
Regarding the earthquake resistant structural design, it essential that the specific design code is
followed. For the analysis and design checking of this building, Equivalent Static Force Method
of BNBC (2006) is followed. The main considerations for calculation of earthquake load are
given below.
 Zone co-efficient, Z = 0.15 (zone 2, As Per BNBC 2006)

 Structure importance co-efficient, I = 1.00 (Standard Occupancy, Table 6.2.23, BNBC
2006)
 Response modification co-efficient, R = 5.0 (OMRF, Table 6.2.24, BNBC)
 Site co-efficient, S3= 1.5 (type 3 soil as suggested in Table 6.2.25, BNBC)
Page | 8
Figure 3.4.1: Calculation of Time Period-T for Steel Part
Page | 9
3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS

Depending on the type of project, there are several well-established methods among which Finite
Element Method (FEM) is perhaps the most sophisticated and all-encompassing one. For
analysis and design checking of the building, powerful finite element based structural design
software package ETABS v16.0.3 has been employed for analysis. Some aspects of the analysis
process are discussed in the following paragraphs.
A full three-dimensional modelling of the structure has been developed using frame and
plate/shell elements. At base level, the columns are assumed to be hinged due to isolated
foundation.
3.6 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATION
The basic sources of loads are described in earlier section. These loads are applied on the model
in seven basic categories. These are as follows:
 Self-weight of structure (SW).

 Floor finish and partition wall (SDEA REPORT).
 Live load on roof (LL).
 Earthquake load on North-South Direction (Ex).
 Earthquake load on East-West Direction (Ey).
 Wind load on North-South Direction (Wx).
 Wind load on East-West Direction (Wy).
These seven basic load cases are analysed in ETABS v16.0.3. The results are then combined in
accordance with the specifications set forth by BNBC. BNBC specifies a number of combination
options. These are as follows:
For Concrete Structure:
 1.4 D
 1.4 D + 1.7 L
 0.9 D + 1.3 (W or 1.1 E)
 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
 0.75 (1.4 D + 1.7 L + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E))
 1.4 (D + L + E)
Where D stands for total DEA Report load i.e. D = DL + SDEA REPORT, L stands for live load
i.e. L=LL, W stands for wind load and E stands for earthquake load. When these seven basic
load cases are combined accordingly considering the direction of lateral loads, then according
to BNBC 2006, we obtain, after simplification, the following thirty combination cases:
 Combination Case 1: 1.4 D
 Combination Case 2: 1.4 D + 1.7 L
 Combination Case 3: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wx
Page | 10
 Combination Case 4: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wx

 Combination Case 5: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 6: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 7: 1.05 D + 1.275 Wx
 Combination Case 8: 1.05 D - 1.275 Wx
 Combination Case 9: 1.05 D + 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 10: 1.05 D - 1.275 Wy
 Combination Case 11: 0.9 D + 1.3 Wx
 Combination Case 12: 0.9 D - 1.3 Wx
 Combination Case 13: 0.9 D + 1.3 Wy
 Combination Case 14: 0.9 D - 1.3 Wy
 Combination Case 15: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 16: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 17: 1.05 D + 1.275 L + 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 18: 1.05 D + 1.275 L - 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 19: 1.05 D + 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 20: 1.05 D - 1.4025 Ex
 Combination Case 21: 1.05 D + 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 22: 1.05 D - 1.4025 Ey
 Combination Case 23: 0.9 D + 1.43 Ex
 Combination Case 24: 0.9 D - 1.43 Ex
 Combination Case 25: 0.9 D + 1.43 Ey
 Combination Case 26: 0.9 D - 1.43 Ey
 Combination Case 27: 1.4 D + 1.4 L + 1.4 Ex
 Combination Case 28: 1.4 D + 1.4 L - 1.4 Ex
 Combination Case 29: 1.4 D + 1.4 L + 1.4 Ey
 Combination Case 30: 1.4 D + 1.4 L - 1.4 Ey
But in ETABS analysis, we do not calculate combination cases 27, 28, 29 & 30.
For the assessment of garments building we consider the load combination provided by the
Guideline for RMG (November 08, 2013) by NTPA for RC structures. The following load
combination is used for the assessment:
Combination Case 1: 1.2 DL + 1.6LL

Combination Case 2: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Wx
Combination Case 3: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Wx
Combination Case 4: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Wy
Combination Case 5: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Wy
Combination Case 6: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Ex
Combination Case 7: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Ex
Combination Case 8: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL + 1.0Ey
Combination Case 9: 1.05 DL + 1.25LL - 1.0Ey
Page | 11
3.7 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

In any finite element analysis, applying appropriate boundary conditions are important. Without
appropriate boundary conditions the model of building structure may not be stable. On the other
hand, application of excessive restraints may render the structure too stiff resulting in
development of unreasonable stresses. For a structure like this building, it is reasonable to
assume that the bases of columns are not fully restrained in all directions.
Page | 12
3.8 APPLICATION OF LOAD AND ANALYSIS

A static analysis is performed using the loadings and combinations of loads (mentioned earlier)
for the factory building. Some pictorial representation of the analysis results is shown in figures
below.
The floor finish is slightly variable at different locations of the building and load was applied as
per requirement. A representation of Live Load applied on floor slab is represented below:
Figure 3.8.1: Applied Live Load in 5th Floor
Page | 13
Figure 3.8.2: Deflected Shape of the building
Page | 14
4 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 42 PSF LIVE LOAD
4.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION

Provided structural drawings of the project shows that isolated foundations had been used for
this project. As some of the RCC columns, beams etc. are overstressed at NTPA loading
conditions, no check for foundation at this reduced load case is shown. Foundation check is
shown for BNBC loading conditions.
Page | 15
4.2 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF COLUMN:

Column layout plan from model snap shot is shown in Figure 4.2.1. Results has been shown
based on model grid. Assessment of columns (P-M-M Interaction Ratio) considering 42 psf live
load. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value greater than 1.0 is considered
as inadequate.
*For clarity please see the soft copy
Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Model Snapshot.
Page | 16
RCC Column layout plan is shown in Figure 4.2.2 from Design Drawing.
Figure 4.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Built Drawing.
Figure 4.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid 1

(Sections having P-M-M ratio more than 1 are Inadequate)
Page | 17

(Sections having P-M-M ratio less than 1 are Adequate)


Page | 18



Page | 19



Page | 20



Page | 21



Page | 22



Page | 23

Page | 24
4.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF R.C.C. BEAMS
4.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam

Following figure4.3.1 shows the condition of grade beam under lateral loading. All grade beams
are adequate loading for NTPA load combination. *For clarity please see the soft copy
Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams.
Typical Provided Reinf. At Typical

Beam Id. In Provided Reinf.
Required Reinf. Middle-Bottom Required
Drawing At Top-Edge (in2)
(in2) (in2) Reinf. (in2)
TB1 2.91 1.604 1.455 0.778
GB1 1.94 0.474 0.97 0.774
Page | 25
4.3.2 Evaluation of Roof Beam

Following figures represent the condition of beams according to 42 psf live loading. Represented
Figures are showing required reinforcements. Required reinforcement < Provided
Reinforcement denotes adequacy. All floor beams are adequate in positive reinforcement
requirement.
Figure 4.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams.
Page | 26
Figure 4.3.3: Condition of 2nd Floor Beams.
Page | 27
Figure 4.3.4: Condition of 3rd Floor Beams.
Page | 28
Figure 4.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams.
Required Reinf. Provided Reinf. At Required Reinf.

In Typical Middle-Bottom In Typical
Beams (in2) (in2) Beams (in2)
B1 1.94 1.400 0.970 0.818
B2 2.91 1.400 2.910 0.600
B3 2.91 1.000 2.910 0.800
B4 1.455 1.200 1.455 0.900
B1A 1.455 0.624 1.455 0.065
B1B 0.624 0.149 0.624 0.101
Page | 29
4.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB

According to NTPA analysis some structural members are overstressed. No check of slab
adequacy is shown for NTPA guideline. Slab adequacy check is shown for BNBC guideline on
later part of this report.
4.5 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF STEEL MEMBERS
4.5.1 Evaluation of Steel Columns & Rafters

Results has been shown based on model grid. Assessment of columns (P-M-M Interaction
Ratio) according to NTPA guideline. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value
greater than 1.0 is considered as inadequate. The analysis results show that some of the steel
columns & bracings are overstressed as per NTPA guideline (recommended loadings & load
combinations).
Figure 4.5.1: Steel Column Layout Plan
Page | 30
The following figures shows the failure of columns & rafters up to the particular level.
Figure 4.5.2: Conditions of Steel Members
Figure 4.5.3: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-A

Page | 31
Figure 4.5.4: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-B
Figure 4.5.5: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-C
Figure 4.5.6: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-D

Figure 4.5.7: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-E

Figure 4.5.8: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-F

Page | 32
Figure 4.5.9: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-G

Figure 4.5.10: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-H

Figure 4.5.11: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-I

Figure 4.5.12: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-J

Page | 33
Figure 4.5.13: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-K

Figure 4.5.14: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-L

Figure 4.5.15: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-N

Figure 4.5.16: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-P

Page | 34
4.5.2 Evaluation of Steel Beams

Following figure shows the condition of tie beams under lateral loading. Most of the tie-beams
are adequate under lateral loading.
Figure 4.5.17: Conditions of Steel TB
4.5.3 Evaluation of Steel Bracings

The following figure shows the condition of bracings under lateral loading. Most of the bracings
are inadequate under lateral loading.
Page | 35
Figure 4.5.18: Conditions of Steel Bracings
Page | 36
5 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 63 PSF LIVE LOAD
5.1 HECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION

Provided structural drawings of the project shows that Isolated Foundation on Timber pile is
used in this building (Figure 5.1.1). We have checked adequacy of footing size & thickness
considering ALLIANCE Loading Condition. Soil test report of the building are available. The
soil test was tested and reported by “Grihayan Ltd.” On March 2017.
Figure 5.1.1: Foundation Layout Plan
Page | 37
Figure 5.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model
Page | 38
Table 5.1.1: Foundation size check for 63 psf Live Load
Provided
Bearing FoS (From Ultimate Load Reaction Available FoS Remarks
Joint Foundation Foundation
Capacity Soil Test Bearing Capacity (DL + LL) (For Existing (Minimum
Label Type Size
Report) Foundation) FoS=2.0)
sft ksf kip kip
579 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 131.78 9.62 OK
580 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 187.17 6.78 OK
581 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 170.07 7.46 OK
583 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 172.61 7.35 OK
584 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 170.97 7.42 OK
585 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 171.96 7.38 OK
586 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 169.43 7.49 OK
587 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 171.89 7.38 OK
588 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 260.04 4.88 OK
589 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 160.08 7.92 OK
590 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 129.68 9.78 OK
591 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 290.03 4.37 OK
592 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 217.90 9.07 OK
593 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 204.00 9.69 OK
722 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 204.79 9.66 OK
724 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 204.21 9.68 OK
725 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 204.41 9.67 OK
727 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 203.59 9.71 OK
729 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 203.12 9.73 OK
730 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 312.96 6.32 OK
731 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 220.59 5.75 OK
734 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 212.34 9.31 OK
735 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 194.86 10.15 OK
736 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 196.87 10.04 OK
737 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 195.34 10.12 OK
738 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 196.44 10.07 OK
739 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 195.39 10.12 OK
740 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 193.63 10.21 OK
741 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 210.82 9.38 OK
742 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 167.68 7.56 OK
745 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 210.77 9.38 OK
746 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 197.49 10.01 OK
747 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 197.46 10.01 OK
748 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 196.90 10.04 OK
749 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 197.01 10.04 OK
750 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 196.17 10.08 OK
751 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 194.11 10.19 OK
752 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 237.61 8.32 OK
753 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 150.09 8.45 OK
754 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 186.80 6.79 OK
755 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 229.71 8.61 OK
756 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 214.31 9.23 OK
757 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 202.28 9.78 OK
758 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 203.92 9.70 OK
759 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 202.86 9.75 OK
760 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 204.16 9.68 OK
761 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 203.31 9.73 OK
762 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 207.28 9.54 OK
763 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 261.21 7.57 OK
764 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 157.06 8.08 OK
765
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 161.81 11.88 OK
776
766
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 275.02 6.99 OK
777
779
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 287.73 6.68 OK
768
780
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 295.58 6.50 OK
769
781
770 F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 333.10 5.77 OK
782
783
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 338.19 5.68 OK
771
Page | 39
Provided
Label Type Size
sft ksf kip kip
772
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 288.76 6.66 OK
784
785
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 298.26 6.45 OK
773
774
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 326.69 5.88 OK
786
767
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 288.64 6.66 OK
778
775
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 197.87 9.72 OK
787
595 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 171.80 7.75 OK
603 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 165.34 8.05 OK
788 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 179.32 7.43 OK
789 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 183.45 7.26 OK
790 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 217.61 6.12 OK
791 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 223.86 5.95 OK
792 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 97.99 13.59 OK
793 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 162.98 8.17 OK
794 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 172.17 7.73 OK
795 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 168.17 7.92 OK
796 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 194.22 6.86 OK
797 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 198.41 6.71 OK
798 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 188.22 7.08 OK
799 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 189.40 7.03 OK
800 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 272.60 4.89 OK
801 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 196.44 6.78 OK
802 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 224.74 5.93 OK
803 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 230.61 5.77 OK
804 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 213.36 9.27 OK
805 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 208.57 6.38 OK
806 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 277.03 4.81 OK
807 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 176.56 7.54 OK
808
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 165.60 11.13 OK
809
810 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 235.22 8.41 OK
811 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 244.68 8.08 OK
812 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 250.51 7.89 OK
813 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 263.32 7.51 OK
814
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 246.76 7.47 OK
815
816 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 310.13 6.38 OK
870 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 248.95 7.94 OK
871 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 251.27 7.87 OK
872 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 232.70 8.50 OK
Page | 40
Provided
Label Type Size
sft ksf kip kip
873 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 264.61 7.47 OK
874
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 272.42 6.76 OK
875
876 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 321.09 6.16 OK
877 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 313.64 6.30 OK
878 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 244.59 8.08 OK
879 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 246.04 8.04 OK
880 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 228.02 8.67 OK
881 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 239.12 8.27 OK
882
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 259.37 7.10 OK
883
884 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 275.25 7.18 OK
885 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 272.18 7.26 OK
886 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 259.44 7.62 OK
887 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 254.67 7.76 OK
888 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 241.62 8.18 OK
889 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 252.17 7.84 OK
890
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 268.47 6.86 OK
891
892 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 265.13 7.46 OK
893 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 264.06 7.49 OK
912 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 310.19 6.37 OK
905
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 212.35 8.68 OK
896
906
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 220.99 8.34 OK
897
908
899
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 238.69 7.72 OK
907
898
910
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 224.42 8.21 OK
901
894
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 302.37 6.09 OK
903
904
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 233.18 7.90 OK
895
906 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 97.56 20.27 OK
909
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 220.46 8.36 OK
900
902
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 173.94 10.59 OK
911
913 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 263.09 7.52 OK
914 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 241.43 8.19 OK
915 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 253.76 7.79 OK
916
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 255.82 7.20 OK
917
918 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 250.36 7.90 OK
919 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 250.83 7.88 OK
920 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 253.36 7.80 OK
921 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 247.28 8.00 OK
922 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 229.86 8.60 OK
923 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 242.10 8.17 OK
924
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 246.46 7.48 OK
925
926 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 239.74 8.25 OK
930 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 240.09 8.24 OK
931 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 285.25 6.93 OK
932 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 294.45 6.72 OK
933 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 295.26 6.70 OK
937 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 305.77 6.47 OK
940
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 298.71 6.17 OK
941
950 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 271.75 7.28 OK
942 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 284.73 6.94 OK
943 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 271.02 7.30 OK
944 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 261.92 7.55 OK
945 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 353.85 5.59 OK
946 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 357.57 5.53 OK
947 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 281.52 7.02 OK
948
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 292.09 6.31 OK
949
951 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 349.78 5.65 OK
952
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 184.61 9.98 OK
953
571
572
576
575
574
CF1 900.0 5.34 2.5 12015.00 855.25 14.05 OK
573
732
733
744
743
Page | 41
Table 5.1.2: Punching shear check for 63 psf Live Load

Factored Reaction Column Column Punching
Foundation
Joint Foundation Column (At Column Length, Width, Shear DCR for
Thickness Remark
Label Type Type Center) L B Capacity Punching
(1.4*DL+1.7*LL) in in in kip
579 F5 C3 190 18 17 14 297 0.64 OK
580 F5 C3 274 18 17 14 297 0.92 OK
581 F5 C3 249 18 17 14 297 0.84 OK
583 F5 C3 253 18 17 14 297 0.85 OK
584 F5 C3 250 18 17 14 297 0.84 OK
585 F5 C3 252 18 17 14 297 0.85 OK
586 F5 C3 248 18 17 14 297 0.84 OK
587 F5 C3 252 18 17 14 297 0.85 OK
588 F5 C3 378 18 17 14 297 1.27 NOT OK
589 F5 C3 232 18 17 14 297 0.78 OK
590 F5 C3 190 18 17 14 297 0.64 OK
591 F5 C2 427 18 16 16 301 1.42 NOT OK
592 F6 C2 327 18 16 16 301 1.09 NOT OK
593 F6 C2 308 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
722 F6 C2 309 18 16 16 301 1.03 NOT OK
724 F6 C2 308 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
725 F6 C2 308 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
727 F6 C2 307 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
729 F6 C2 307 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
730 F6 C2 462 18 16 16 301 1.53 NOT OK
731 F5 C2 323 18 16 16 301 1.07 NOT OK
734 F6 C2 319 18 16 16 301 1.06 NOT OK
735 F6 C2 294 18 16 16 301 0.98 OK
736 F6 C2 297 18 16 16 301 0.99 OK
737 F6 C2 295 18 16 16 301 0.98 OK
738 F6 C2 297 18 16 16 301 0.98 OK
739 F6 C2 295 18 16 16 301 0.98 OK
740 F6 C2 292 18 16 16 301 0.97 OK
741 F6 C2 318 18 16 16 301 1.06 NOT OK
742 F5 C2 246 18 16 16 301 0.82 OK
745 F6 C2 317 18 16 16 301 1.05 NOT OK
746 F6 C2 298 18 16 16 301 0.99 OK
747 F6 C2 298 18 16 16 301 0.99 OK
748 F6 C2 297 18 16 16 301 0.99 OK
749 F6 C2 297 18 16 16 301 0.99 OK
750 F6 C2 296 18 16 16 301 0.98 OK
751 F6 C2 293 18 16 16 301 0.97 OK
752 F6 C2 354 18 16 16 301 1.17 NOT OK
753 F5 C2 220 18 16 16 301 0.73 OK
754 F5 C2 276 18 16 16 301 0.91 OK
755 F6 C2 347 18 16 16 301 1.15 NOT OK
756 F6 C2 322 18 16 16 301 1.07 NOT OK
757 F6 C2 305 18 16 16 301 1.01 NOT OK
758 F6 C2 308 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
759 F6 C2 306 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
760 F6 C2 308 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
761 F6 C2 307 18 16 16 301 1.02 NOT OK
762 F6 C2 313 18 16 16 301 1.04 NOT OK
763 F6 C2 387 18 16 16 301 1.28 NOT OK
764 F5 C2 230 18 16 16 301 0.76 OK
765 F4 C1 91 18 14 14 282 0.32 OK
776 F4 C1 144 18 14 14 282 0.51 OK
766 F4 C1 165 18 14 14 282 0.59 OK
777 F4 C1 241 18 14 14 282 0.86 OK
779 F4 C1 251 18 14 14 282 0.89 OK
768 F4 C1 174 18 14 14 282 0.62 OK
780 F4 C1 264 18 14 14 282 0.94 OK
769 F4 C1 173 18 14 14 282 0.62 OK
781 F4 C1 153 18 14 14 282 0.54 OK
770 F4 C1 169 18 14 14 282 0.60 OK
782 F4 C1 167 18 14 14 282 0.59 OK
783 F4 C1 330 18 14 14 282 1.17 NOT OK
771 F4 C1 168 18 14 14 282 0.59 OK
Page | 42

Foundation
Thickness Remark
771 F4 C1 168 18 14 14 282 0.59 OK
772 F4 C1 168 18 14 14 282 0.60 OK
784 F4 C1 258 18 14 14 282 0.92 OK
785 F4 C1 270 18 14 14 282 0.96 OK
773 F4 C1 170 18 14 14 282 0.60 OK
774 F4 C1 202 18 14 14 282 0.71 OK
786 F4 C1 279 18 14 14 282 0.99 OK
775 F4 C1 181 18 14 14 282 0.64 OK
787 F4 C1 246 18 14 14 282 0.87 OK
595 F1 C3 116 22 17 14 425 0.27 OK
603 F1 C3 171 22 17 14 425 0.40 OK
788 F1 C3 251 22 17 14 425 0.59 OK
789 F1 C3 240 22 17 14 425 0.57 OK
790 F1 C3 260 22 17 14 425 0.61 OK
791 F1 C3 266 22 17 14 425 0.63 OK
792 F1 C1 313 22 14 14 406 0.77 OK
793 F1 C3 322 22 17 14 425 0.76 OK
794 F1 C3 141 22 17 14 425 0.33 OK
795 F1 C3 238 22 17 14 425 0.56 OK
796 F1 C3 253 22 17 14 425 0.59 OK
797 F1 C3 247 22 17 14 425 0.58 OK
798 F1 C3 285 22 17 14 425 0.67 OK
799 F1 C3 291 22 17 14 425 0.69 OK
800 F1 C3 276 22 17 14 425 0.65 OK
801 F1 C3 276 22 17 14 425 0.65 OK
802 F1 C3 395 22 17 14 425 0.93 OK
803 F1 C3 289 22 17 14 425 0.68 OK
804 F2 C3 330 25 17 14 535 0.62 OK
805 F1 C3 338 22 17 14 425 0.80 OK
806 F1 C3 313 22 17 14 425 0.74 OK
807 F1 C1 306 22 14 14 406 0.75 OK
808 F3 C1 406 33 14 14 856 0.47 OK
809 F3 C1 256 33 14 14 856 0.30 OK
810 F2 C2 117 25 16 16 542 0.22 OK
811 F2 C2 123 25 16 16 542 0.23 OK
812 F2 C2 353 25 16 16 542 0.65 OK
813 F2 C2 365 25 16 16 542 0.67 OK
814 F3 C1 372 33 14 14 856 0.44 OK
815 F3 C1 391 33 14 14 856 0.46 OK
816 F2 C2 171 25 16 16 542 0.32 OK
869 F2 C2 193 25 16 16 542 0.36 OK
870 F2 C2 455 25 16 16 542 0.84 OK
872 F2 C2 376 25 16 16 542 0.69 OK
873 F2 C2 377 25 16 16 542 0.70 OK
874 F3 C1 351 33 14 14 856 0.41 OK
875 F3 C1 397 33 14 14 856 0.46 OK
876 F2 C2 197 25 16 16 542 0.36 OK
877 F2 C2 206 25 16 16 542 0.38 OK
878 F2 C2 473 25 16 16 542 0.87 OK
879 F2 C2 463 25 16 16 542 0.85 OK
880 F2 C2 369 25 16 16 542 0.68 OK
881 F2 C2 369 25 16 16 542 0.68 OK
882 F3 C1 344 33 14 14 856 0.40 OK
883 F3 C1 361 33 14 14 856 0.42 OK
884 F2 C2 195 25 16 16 542 0.36 OK
885 F2 C2 190 25 16 16 542 0.35 OK
886 F2 C2 409 25 16 16 542 0.76 OK
887 F2 C2 405 25 16 16 542 0.75 OK
888 F2 C2 391 25 16 16 542 0.72 OK
889 F2 C2 383 25 16 16 542 0.71 OK
890 F3 C1 365 33 14 14 856 0.43 OK
891 F3 C1 381 33 14 14 856 0.44 OK
892 F2 C2 207 25 16 16 542 0.38 OK
893 F2 C2 193 25 16 16 542 0.36 OK
912 F2 C2 397 25 16 16 542 0.73 OK
Page | 43

Foundation
Thickness Remark
905 F3 C1 395 33 14 14 856 0.46 OK
896 F3 C1 462 33 14 14 856 0.54 OK
906 F3 C1 143 33 14 14 856 0.17 OK
897 F3 C1 177 33 14 14 856 0.21 OK
908 F3 C1 147 33 14 14 856 0.17 OK
899 F3 C1 186 33 14 14 856 0.22 OK
907 F3 C1 76 33 14 14 856 0.09 OK
898 F3 C1 85 33 14 14 856 0.10 OK
910 F3 C1 96 33 14 14 856 0.11 OK
901 F3 C1 99 33 14 14 856 0.12 OK
894 F3 C1 146 33 14 14 856 0.17 OK
903 F3 C1 192 33 14 14 856 0.22 OK
904 F3 C1 229 33 14 14 856 0.27 OK
895 F3 C1 216 33 14 14 856 0.25 OK
906 F2 C2 160 25 16 16 542 0.30 OK
909 F3 C1 189 33 14 14 856 0.22 OK
900 F3 C1 147 33 14 14 856 0.17 OK
902 F3 C1 145 33 14 14 856 0.17 OK
911 F3 C1 187 33 14 14 856 0.22 OK
913 F2 C2 135 25 16 16 542 0.25 OK
914 F2 C2 120 25 16 16 542 0.22 OK
915 F2 C2 395 25 16 16 542 0.73 OK
916 F3 C1 365 33 14 14 856 0.43 OK
917 F3 C1 383 33 14 14 856 0.45 OK
918 F2 C2 215 25 16 16 542 0.40 OK
919 F2 C2 167 25 16 16 542 0.31 OK
920 F2 C2 378 25 16 16 542 0.70 OK
921 F2 C2 378 25 16 16 542 0.70 OK
922 F2 C2 381 25 16 16 542 0.70 OK
923 F2 C2 370 25 16 16 542 0.68 OK
924 F3 C1 346 33 14 14 856 0.40 OK
925 F3 C1 365 33 14 14 856 0.43 OK
926 F2 C2 206 25 16 16 542 0.38 OK
930 F2 C2 161 25 16 16 542 0.30 OK
931 F2 C2 361 25 16 16 542 0.67 OK
932 F2 C2 362 25 16 16 542 0.67 OK
933 F2 C2 427 25 16 16 542 0.79 OK
937 F2 C2 439 25 16 16 542 0.81 OK
940 F3 C1 440 33 14 14 856 0.51 OK
941 F3 C1 456 33 14 14 856 0.53 OK
950 F2 C2 251 25 16 16 542 0.46 OK
942 F2 C2 191 25 16 16 542 0.35 OK
943 F2 C2 406 25 16 16 542 0.75 OK
944 F2 C2 426 25 16 16 542 0.79 OK
945 F2 C2 405 25 16 16 542 0.75 OK
946 F2 C2 392 25 16 16 542 0.72 OK
947 F2 C2 520 25 16 16 542 0.96 OK
948 F3 C1 525 33 14 14 856 0.61 OK
949 F3 C1 419 33 14 14 856 0.49 OK
951 F2 C2 227 25 16 16 542 0.42 OK
952 F3 C1 204 33 14 14 856 0.24 OK
953 F3 C1 513 33 14 14 856 0.60 OK
732 CF1 C3 136 18 17 14 297 0.46 OK
733 CF1 C2 242 18 16 16 301 0.80 OK
744 CF1 C2 380 18 16 16 301 1.26 NOT OK
743 CF1 C3 279 18 17 14 297 0.94 OK
Page | 44

as inadequate. *For clarity please see the soft copy
Figure 5.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Model Snapshot.
Page | 45
Figure 5.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Built Drawing.

Page | 46



Page | 47



Page | 48



Page | 49



Page | 50



Page | 51



Page | 52

Page | 53
5.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam

Figure 5.3.1 shows the condition of grade beam under lateral loading. All grade beams are
adequate loading for BNBC load combination.

TB1 2.91 1.604 1.455 0.778
GB1 1.94 0.474 0.97 0.774
Page | 54

Reinforcement denotes adequacy. All floor beams are adequate in positive reinforcement
requirement.
Page | 55
Page | 56
Page | 57

B1 1.94 1.400 0.970 0.818
B2 2.91 1.400 2.910 0.600
B3 2.91 1.000 2.910 0.800
B4 1.455 1.200 1.455 0.900
B1A 1.455 0.624 1.455 0.065
B1B 0.624 0.149 0.624 0.101
Page | 58

Following figures represent the condition of a typical floor slab (2nd Floor) according to 63 psf
live loading.
Figure 5.4.1: Deformed Shape for DL+LL
Maximum Deflecton At Mid Span Is: 0.38 inch [at service load]
𝐿 (19 ×12)+2
Allowable deflection: 240 = = 0.958 𝑖𝑛
240
𝑓𝑦 72500
𝑙𝑛 (0.8+ ) (12 ×19.17)×(0.8+ )
200000 200000
Minimum Slab thickness required= = =5.94 inch
36+9𝛽 36+(9×1)
Page | 59
Live Load (unit-in2/ft.)
Page | 60
Live Load (unit-in2/in.)
Page | 61
Page | 62
Table 5.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab

Provided Top
Provided Reinf. At Required
Slab Reinf. At Required
Middle-Bottom Reinf.
Direction Column Strip Reinf. (in2/ft)
(in2/ft) (in2/ft)
(in2/ft)
Direction-1 0.292 0.130 0.292 0.210
Direction-2 0.292 0.130 0.292 0.190
Page | 63

Ratio) according to BNBC guideline. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value
columns & bracings are overstressed as per BNBC guideline (recommended loadings & load
combinations).
Page | 64
The following figures shows the failure of columns & rafters up to the particular level.
Figure 5.5.2: Conditions of Steel Members

Page | 65
Figure 5.5.5: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-C.


Page | 66



Page | 67




Page | 68

Figure 5.5.16: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-O


Page | 69

Page | 70

are inadequate under lateral loading.
Figure 5.5.19: Conditions of Steel Bracings

Page | 71
6 CONCLUSION
According to NTPA loading condition (42 psf Live Load)-

 A large number of R.C.C. columns are inadequate.
 R.C.C. Floor beams are adequate.
 R.C.C. grade beams are adequate.
 Large number of steel column & Rafter are overstressed.
 Steel bracings are overstressed.
According to BNBC loading condition (63 psf Live Load)-

 A large number of isolated foundations are inadequate in size.
 Some foundations are inadequate in thickness for punching shear capacity.
 A large number of R.C.C. columns are inadequate.
 Only few R.C.C. Floor beams are slightly overstressed which are considered adequate.
 R.C.C. grade beams are adequate.
 Large number of steel column & Rafter are overstressed.
 Steel bracings are overstressed.
7 RECOMMENDATION
We recommend to rectify the overstressed member to comply the building with BNBC 2006 as
per the provided rectification design.
Page | 72
8 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AFTER RETROFITTING FOR 63 PSF

LIVE LOAD
8.1 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF FOUNDATION

Provided structural drawings of the project shows that Isolated Foundation on Timber pile is
used in this building (Figure 8.1.2). We have checked adequacy of footing size & thickness
considering BNBC Loading Condition. Soil test report of the building are available. The soil
test was tested and reported by “Grihayan Ltd.” On March 2017. Foundation under lift core is
calculated using SAFE software.
Figure 8.1.1: Footing Layout Plan
Page | 73
Figure 8.1.2: Node ID from ETABS Model
Page | 74
Table 8.1.1: Foundation size check for retrofitting

Provided
Label Type Size
sft ksf kip kip
579 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 136.61 9.28 OK
580 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 191.83 6.61 OK
581 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 175.24 7.24 OK
583 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 178.32 7.11 OK
584 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 176.47 7.19 OK
585 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 177.71 7.14 OK
586 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 175.67 7.22 OK
587 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 176.74 7.18 OK
588 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 227.25 5.58 OK
589 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 150.17 8.45 OK
590 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 139.60 9.08 OK
591 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 302.53 4.19 OK
592 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 220.75 8.96 OK
593 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 208.14 9.50 OK
722 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 209.02 9.46 OK
724 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 208.37 9.49 OK
725 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 208.56 9.48 OK
727 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 207.71 9.52 OK
729 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 207.52 9.53 OK
730 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 269.83 7.33 OK
731 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 227.69 5.57 OK
734 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 217.46 9.09 OK
735 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 199.39 9.92 OK
736 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 201.87 9.79 OK
737 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 200.13 9.88 OK
738 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 201.37 9.82 OK
739 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 200.19 9.88 OK
740 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 199.27 9.92 OK
741 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 212.90 9.29 OK
742 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 175.73 7.22 OK
745 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 216.78 9.12 OK
746 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 201.49 9.81 OK
747 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 201.98 9.79 OK
748 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 201.48 9.81 OK
749 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 201.55 9.81 OK
750 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 200.67 9.85 OK
751 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 200.29 9.87 OK
752 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 237.52 8.32 OK
753 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 162.20 7.82 OK
754 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 188.61 6.72 OK
755 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 233.14 8.48 OK
756 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 219.16 9.02 OK
757 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 206.30 9.58 OK
758 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 208.05 9.50 OK
759 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 205.79 9.61 OK
760 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 207.83 9.51 OK
761 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 206.22 9.59 OK
762 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 208.20 9.50 OK
763 F6 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 260.51 7.59 OK
764 F5 95.0 5.34 2.5 1268.25 169.72 7.47 OK
765
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 173.07 11.11 OK
776
766
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 282.71 6.80 OK
777
779
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 303.44 6.34 OK
768
780
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 300.93 6.39 OK
769
Page | 75
Provided
Label Type Size
sft ksf kip kip
781
770 F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 389.73 4.93 OK
782
783
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 358.71 5.36 OK
771
772
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 307.68 6.25 OK
784
785
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 313.66 6.13 OK
773
774
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 338.95 5.67 OK
786
767
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 299.67 6.42 OK
778
775
F4 144.0 5.34 2.5 1922.40 203.94 9.43 OK
787
595 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 181.70 7.33 OK
603 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 178.72 7.45 OK
788 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 179.40 7.42 OK
789 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 177.71 7.49 OK
790 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 229.85 5.79 OK
791 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 229.57 5.80 OK
792 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 117.09 11.37 OK
793 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 166.37 8.00 OK
794 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 179.91 7.40 OK
795 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 179.66 7.41 OK
796 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 204.46 6.51 OK
797 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 204.77 6.50 OK
798 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 192.43 6.92 OK
799 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 196.41 6.78 OK
800 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 272.77 4.88 OK
801 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 199.60 6.67 OK
802 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 260.04 5.12 OK
803 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 259.95 5.12 OK
804 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 207.63 9.52 OK
805 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 227.55 5.85 OK
806 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 293.28 4.54 OK
807 F1 99.8 5.34 2.5 1331.66 200.94 6.63 OK
808
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 179.34 10.27 OK
809
810 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 232.28 8.51 OK
811 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 235.66 8.39 OK
812 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 240.93 8.21 OK
813 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 275.62 7.17 OK
814
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 250.58 7.35 OK
815
816 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 325.98 6.07 OK
870 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 258.96 7.64 OK
871 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 243.50 8.12 OK
872 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 251.56 7.86 OK
873 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 270.34 7.31 OK
874
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 277.68 6.63 OK
875
876 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 293.88 6.73 OK
877 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 312.92 6.32 OK
878 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 226.57 8.73 OK
879 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 253.70 7.79 OK
880 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 219.44 9.01 OK
Page | 76
Provided
Label Type Size
sft ksf kip kip
881 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 222.94 8.87 OK
882
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 274.50 6.71 OK
883
884 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 280.85 7.04 OK
885 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 266.59 7.42 OK
886 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 263.75 7.50 OK
887 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 237.77 8.32 OK
888 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 252.65 7.83 OK
889 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 252.85 7.82 OK
890
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 285.78 6.45 OK
891
892 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 251.97 7.85 OK
893 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 250.38 7.90 OK
912 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 298.46 6.62 OK
905
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 231.88 7.94 OK
896
906
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 230.58 7.99 OK
897
908
899
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 373.39 4.93 OK
907
898
910
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 322.56 5.71 OK
901
894
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 255.28 7.22 OK
903
904
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 175.55 10.49 OK
895
906 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 70.42 28.08 OK
909
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 235.11 7.84 OK
900
902
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 201.43 9.15 OK
911
913 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 268.91 7.35 OK
914 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 226.04 8.75 OK
915 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 263.83 7.49 OK
916
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 270.18 6.82 OK
917
918 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 255.45 7.74 OK
919 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 254.63 7.77 OK
920 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 230.29 8.59 OK
921 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 261.69 7.56 OK
922 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 221.52 8.93 OK
923 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 225.40 8.77 OK
924
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 265.11 6.95 OK
925
926 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 240.16 8.23 OK
930 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 242.94 8.14 OK
931 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 291.01 6.79 OK
932 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 300.74 6.57 OK
933 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 306.25 6.46 OK
937 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 311.81 6.34 OK
940
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 319.17 5.77 OK
941
950 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 267.94 7.38 OK
942 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 288.58 6.85 OK
943 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 281.86 7.02 OK
944 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 257.70 7.67 OK
945 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 340.69 5.80 OK
946 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 335.03 5.90 OK
947 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 282.19 7.01 OK
948
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 314.93 5.85 OK
949
951 F2 148.1 5.34 2.5 1977.25 323.25 6.12 OK
952
F3 138.0 5.34 2.5 1842.30 205.41 8.97 OK
953
571
572
576
575
574
CF1 900.0 5.34 2.5 12015.00 953.12 12.61 OK
573
732
733
744
743
Page | 77
Table 8.1.2: Punching shear check for retrofitting

Foundation
Thickness Remark
579 F5 C3 197 18 21 18 335 0.59 OK
580 F5 C3 280 18 21 18 335 0.84 OK
581 F5 C3 256 18 21 18 335 0.76 OK
583 F5 C3 261 18 21 18 335 0.78 OK
584 F5 C3 258 18 21 18 335 0.77 OK
585 F5 C3 260 18 21 18 335 0.78 OK
586 F5 C3 257 18 21 18 335 0.77 OK
587 F5 C3 259 18 21 18 335 0.77 OK
588 F5 C3 329 24 21 18 551 0.60 OK
589 F5 C3 217 18 21 18 335 0.65 OK
590 F5 C3 204 18 21 18 335 0.61 OK
591 F5 C2 445 24 20 20 558 0.80 OK
592 F6 C2 331 18 20 20 340 0.97 OK
593 F6 C2 314 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
722 F6 C2 315 18 20 20 340 0.93 OK
724 F6 C2 314 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
725 F6 C2 314 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
727 F6 C2 313 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
729 F6 C2 313 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
730 F6 C2 396 24 20 20 558 0.71 OK
731 F5 C2 333 18 20 20 340 0.98 OK
734 F6 C2 326 18 20 20 340 0.96 OK
735 F6 C2 300 18 20 20 340 0.88 OK
736 F6 C2 304 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
737 F6 C2 301 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
738 F6 C2 303 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
739 F6 C2 302 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
740 F6 C2 300 18 20 20 340 0.88 OK
741 F6 C2 321 18 20 20 340 0.94 OK
742 F5 C2 258 18 20 20 340 0.76 OK
745 F6 C2 325 18 20 20 340 0.96 OK
746 F6 C2 303 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
747 F6 C2 304 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
748 F6 C2 303 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
749 F6 C2 304 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
750 F6 C2 302 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
751 F6 C2 302 18 20 20 340 0.89 OK
752 F6 C2 353 24 20 20 558 0.63 OK
753 F5 C2 237 18 20 20 340 0.70 OK
754 F5 C2 278 18 20 20 340 0.82 OK
755 F6 C2 351 24 20 20 558 0.63 OK
756 F6 C2 329 18 20 20 340 0.97 OK
757 F6 C2 311 18 20 20 340 0.91 OK
758 F6 C2 314 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
759 F6 C2 310 18 20 20 340 0.91 OK
760 F6 C2 313 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
761 F6 C2 311 18 20 20 340 0.91 OK
762 F6 C2 314 18 20 20 340 0.92 OK
763 F6 C2 386 24 20 20 558 0.69 OK
764 F5 C2 248 18 20 20 340 0.73 OK
765 F4 C1 97 18 18 18 321 0.30 OK
776 F4 C1 154 18 18 18 321 0.48 OK
766 F4 C1 171 18 18 18 321 0.53 OK
777 F4 C1 246 18 18 18 321 0.77 OK
779 F4 C1 269 18 18 18 321 0.84 OK
768 F4 C1 179 18 18 18 321 0.56 OK
780 F4 C1 266 18 18 18 321 0.83 OK
Page | 78

Foundation
Thickness Remark
769 F4 C1 179 18 18 18 321 0.56 OK
781 F4 C1 183 18 18 18 321 0.57 OK
770 F4 C1 179 18 18 18 321 0.56 OK
782 F4 C1 209 18 18 18 321 0.65 OK
783 F4 C1 353 24 18 18 531 0.66 OK
771 F4 C1 173 18 18 18 321 0.54 OK
772 F4 C1 176 18 18 18 321 0.55 OK
784 F4 C1 278 18 18 18 321 0.87 OK
785 F4 C1 284 18 18 18 321 0.89 OK
773 F4 C1 178 18 18 18 321 0.55 OK
774 F4 C1 206 18 18 18 321 0.64 OK
786 F4 C1 291 18 18 18 321 0.91 OK
775 F4 C1 118 18 18 18 321 0.37 OK
787 F4 C1 177 18 18 18 321 0.55 OK
595 F1 C3 265 22 21 18 474 0.56 OK
603 F1 C3 260 22 21 18 474 0.55 OK
788 F1 C3 260 22 21 18 474 0.55 OK
789 F1 C3 257 22 21 18 474 0.54 OK
790 F1 C3 329 22 21 18 474 0.69 OK
791 F1 C3 328 22 21 18 474 0.69 OK
792 F1 C1 168 22 18 18 456 0.37 OK
793 F1 C3 242 22 21 18 474 0.51 OK
794 F1 C3 262 22 21 18 474 0.55 OK
795 F1 C3 262 22 21 18 474 0.55 OK
796 F1 C3 299 22 21 18 474 0.63 OK
797 F1 C3 300 22 21 18 474 0.63 OK
798 F1 C3 282 22 21 18 474 0.59 OK
799 F1 C3 286 22 21 18 474 0.60 OK
800 F1 C3 394 22 21 18 474 0.83 OK
801 F1 C3 294 22 21 18 474 0.62 OK
802 F1 C3 382 22 21 18 474 0.80 OK
803 F1 C3 382 22 21 18 474 0.81 OK
804 F2 C3 304 25 21 18 592 0.51 OK
805 F1 C3 333 22 21 18 474 0.70 OK
806 F1 C3 429 22 21 18 474 0.91 OK
807 F1 C1 292 22 18 18 456 0.64 OK
808 F3 C1 126 33 18 18 933 0.14 OK
809 F3 C1 132 33 18 18 933 0.14 OK
810 F2 C2 349 25 20 20 599 0.58 OK
811 F2 C2 351 25 20 20 599 0.59 OK
812 F2 C2 358 25 20 20 599 0.60 OK
813 F2 C2 409 25 20 20 599 0.68 OK
814 F3 C1 175 33 18 18 933 0.19 OK
815 F3 C1 193 33 18 18 933 0.21 OK
816 F2 C2 474 25 20 20 599 0.79 OK
870 F2 C2 390 25 20 20 599 0.65 OK
871 F2 C2 365 25 20 20 599 0.61 OK
872 F2 C2 379 25 20 20 599 0.63 OK
873 F2 C2 406 25 20 20 599 0.68 OK
874 F3 C1 202 33 18 18 933 0.22 OK
875 F3 C1 208 33 18 18 933 0.22 OK
876 F2 C2 430 25 20 20 599 0.72 OK
877 F2 C2 458 25 20 20 599 0.76 OK
878 F2 C2 342 25 20 20 599 0.57 OK
879 F2 C2 380 25 20 20 599 0.64 OK
880 F2 C2 331 25 20 20 599 0.55 OK
881 F2 C2 336 25 20 20 599 0.56 OK
882 F3 C1 213 33 18 18 933 0.23 OK
883 F3 C1 193 33 18 18 933 0.21 OK
884 F2 C2 413 25 20 20 599 0.69 OK
885 F2 C2 392 25 20 20 599 0.66 OK
Page | 79

Foundation
Thickness Remark
886 F2 C2 397 25 20 20 599 0.66 OK
887 F2 C2 357 25 20 20 599 0.60 OK
888 F2 C2 381 25 20 20 599 0.64 OK
889 F2 C2 381 25 20 20 599 0.64 OK
890 F3 C1 220 33 18 18 933 0.24 OK
891 F3 C1 203 33 18 18 933 0.22 OK
892 F2 C2 375 25 20 20 599 0.63 OK
893 F2 C2 373 25 20 20 599 0.62 OK
912 F2 C2 442 25 20 20 599 0.74 OK
905 F3 C1 161 33 18 18 933 0.17 OK
896 F3 C1 188 33 18 18 933 0.20 OK
906 F3 C1 151 33 18 18 933 0.16 OK
897 F3 C1 195 33 18 18 933 0.21 OK
908 F3 C1 89 33 18 18 933 0.10 OK
899 F3 C1 111 33 18 18 933 0.12 OK
907 F3 C1 152 33 18 18 933 0.16 OK
898 F3 C1 206 33 18 18 933 0.22 OK
910 F3 C1 229 33 18 18 933 0.25 OK
901 F3 C1 246 33 18 18 933 0.26 OK
894 F3 C1 174 33 18 18 933 0.19 OK
903 F3 C1 207 33 18 18 933 0.22 OK
904 F3 C1 151 33 18 18 933 0.16 OK
895 F3 C1 111 33 18 18 933 0.12 OK
906 F2 C2 105 25 20 20 599 0.18 OK
909 F3 C1 151 33 18 18 933 0.16 OK
900 F3 C1 202 33 18 18 933 0.22 OK
902 F3 C1 156 33 18 18 933 0.17 OK
911 F3 C1 139 33 18 18 933 0.15 OK
913 F2 C2 403 25 20 20 599 0.67 OK
914 F2 C2 341 25 20 20 599 0.57 OK
915 F2 C2 398 25 20 20 599 0.66 OK
916 F3 C1 225 33 18 18 933 0.24 OK
917 F3 C1 177 33 18 18 933 0.19 OK
918 F2 C2 385 25 20 20 599 0.64 OK
919 F2 C2 384 25 20 20 599 0.64 OK
920 F2 C2 346 25 20 20 599 0.58 OK
921 F2 C2 392 25 20 20 599 0.65 OK
922 F2 C2 334 25 20 20 599 0.56 OK
923 F2 C2 340 25 20 20 599 0.57 OK
924 F3 C1 222 33 18 18 933 0.24 OK
925 F3 C1 172 33 18 18 933 0.18 OK
926 F2 C2 361 25 20 20 599 0.60 OK
930 F2 C2 365 25 20 20 599 0.61 OK
931 F2 C2 436 25 20 20 599 0.73 OK
932 F2 C2 448 25 20 20 599 0.75 OK
933 F2 C2 456 25 20 20 599 0.76 OK
937 F2 C2 465 25 20 20 599 0.78 OK
940 F3 C1 268 33 18 18 933 0.29 OK
941 F3 C1 204 33 18 18 933 0.22 OK
950 F2 C2 399 25 20 20 599 0.67 OK
942 F2 C2 432 25 20 20 599 0.72 OK
943 F2 C2 420 25 20 20 599 0.70 OK
944 F2 C2 386 25 20 20 599 0.64 OK
945 F2 C2 499 25 20 20 599 0.83 OK
946 F2 C2 491 25 20 20 599 0.82 OK
947 F2 C2 420 25 20 20 599 0.70 OK
948 F3 C1 238 33 18 18 933 0.26 OK
949 F3 C1 226 33 18 18 933 0.24 OK
951 F2 C2 473 25 20 20 599 0.79 OK
952 F3 C1 171 33 18 18 933 0.18 OK
953 F3 C1 129 33 18 18 933 0.14 OK
732 CF1 C3 183 18 17 14 297 0.62 OK
733 CF1 C2 300 18 16 16 301 0.99 OK
744 CF1 C2 396 24 20 20 558 0.71 OK
743 CF1 C3 332 18 21 18 335 0.99 OK
Page | 80
Foundation Capacity under Lift Core:
Foundation under lift core has been checked using SAFE.

Considering 1” allowable settlement; soil subgrade modulus at foundation depth is:
2.5 ×5.34
1 = 160.2 Kip/ft3
12
Allowable bearing pressure= 6.675 [F.O.S. =2.00]
Figure 8.1.3: Bearing Capacity Check
Maximum Bearing Pressure Considering All Lateral loads is 1.768 Kip/ft2
Page | 81
Figure 8.1.4: Punching Shear Capacity Check
Page | 82

as inadequate. *For clarity please see the soft copy
Figure 8.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Built Drawing.
Page | 83
Figure 8.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Model Snapshot.
Page | 84


Page | 85


Page | 86


Page | 87


Page | 88


Page | 89


Page | 90


Page | 91


Page | 92


Page | 93


Figure 8.2.23: Condition of Column in Grid F

Page | 94
Figure 8.2.24: Condition of Column in Grid G

Figure 8.2.25: Condition of Column in Grid L

Figure 8.2.26: Condition of Column in Grid M

Page | 95
8.3.1 Evaluation of Grade Beam and Tie Beam

Figure 8.3.1 shows the condition of grade beam under lateral loading. All grade beams are
adequate loading for BNBC load combination.

TB1 2.91 1.604 1.455 0.778
GB1 1.94 0.474 0.97 0.774
Page | 96

Reinforcement denotes adequacy.
Page | 97
Page | 98
Page | 99

B1 1.94 1.400 0.970 0.818
B2 2.91 1.400 2.910 0.600
B3 2.91 1.000 2.910 0.800
B4 1.455 1.200 1.455 0.900
B1A 1.455 0.624 1.455 0.065
B1B 0.624 0.149 0.624 0.101
Page | 100

Following figures represent the condition of a typical floor slab (2nd Floor) according to 63 psf
live loading.
Figure 8.4.1: Deformed Shape for DL+LL
Maximum Deflecton At Mid Span Is: 0.38 inch [at service load]
𝐿 (19 ×12)+2
Allowable deflection: 240 = = 0.958 𝑖𝑛
240
𝑓𝑦 72500
𝑙𝑛 (0.8+ ) (12 ×19.17)×(0.8+ )
200000 200000
Minimum Slab thickness required= = =5.94 inch
36+9𝛽 36+(9×1)
Page | 101
Live Load (unit-in2/ft.)
Page | 102
Page | 103
Page | 104
Table 8.4.1: Adequacy Check for Slab

Provided Top
Provided Reinf. At Required
Slab Reinf. At Required
Middle-Bottom Reinf.
Direction Column Strip Reinf. (in2/ft)
(in2/ft) (in2/ft)
(in2/ft)
Direction-1 0.292 0.130 0.292 0.210
Direction-2 0.292 0.130 0.292 0.190
Page | 105
8.5 CHECKING ADEQUACY SHEAR WALL
Figure 8.5.1: Vertical Reinforcement Figure 8.5.2: Shear Reinforcement

Requirement on Grid 1a Requirement on Grid 1a
Page | 106

Requirement on Grid 3a Requirement on Grid 3a
Page | 107

Requirement on Grid Ca Requirement on Grid Ca
Page | 108

Requirement on Grid Cb Requirement on Grid Cb
Provided Shear reinforcement in shear wall: 0.26 in2/ft

Required Vertical reinforcement in shear wall: 0.62 in2/ft
So, provided reinforcement in shear wall is adequate.
Page | 109

Ratio) according to BNBC guideline. According to standard practice, column with P-M-M value
columns & bracings are overstressed as per BNBC guideline (recommended loadings & load
combinations).
Page | 110
The following figures shows the condition of columns & rafters up to the particular level.

Figure 8.6.4: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-C
Page | 111




Page | 112



Page | 113



Page | 114
Figure 8.6.15: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-O


Page | 115


Page | 116

Figure 8.6.18: Conditions of Steel Bracings on Grid-1
Page | 117
Page | 118
Page | 119
8.7 SERVISIBILITY CHECK

Occupancy Category, OC IV = 0.015 (I,II=0.025,III=0.020,IV=0.015)
Deflection Amplification Factor, Cd = 2.5 (SMRF=5.5, IMRF=4.5, OMRF=2.5)

Response Modification Factor,R = 5 (SMRF=12, IMRF=8, OMRF=5rc/6stl)
Height (0.03hsx/R)< Min.

Governing ∆1 ∆2 ∆=∆2~∆1
LEVEL Difference 0.004hsx(BN OC*hsx(ASCE)/Cd Allowable Remark
Lateral Load (in) (in) (in)
(ft) BC) Drift (in)
EQx 14.67 0.115 0.794 0.679 0.70416 1.05624 0.70416 OK
GB TO 1F
EQy 14.67 0.204 0.79 0.586 0.70416 1.05624 0.70416 OK
EQx 10 0.794 1.026 0.232 0.48 0.72 0.48 OK
1F TO 2F
EQy 10 0.79 0.956 0.166 0.48 0.72 0.48 OK
EQx 12.33 1.026 1.35 0.324 0.59184 0.88776 0.59184 OK
2F-3F
EQy 12.33 0.956 1.24 0.284 0.59184 0.88776 0.59184 OK
EQx 12.33 1.35 1.39 0.04 0.59184 0.88776 0.59184 OK
3F-ROOF
EQy 12.33 1.24 1.27 0.03 0.59184 0.88776 0.59184 OK
EQx 49.33 0.115 1.39 1.275 2.36784 3.55176 2.36784 OK
GB-ROOF
EQy 49.33 0.204 1.27 1.066 2.36784 3.55176 2.36784 OK
𝐻 6335 𝑚𝑚
For steel shed maximum allowable deflection= 100 = = 63.35 𝑚𝑚
100
Maximum Deflection on X Direction: 35.5 mm [Adequate]
Maximum Deflection on Y Direction: 46.6 mm [Adequate]
Page | 120
9 ADEQUACY CHECK OF ANCHOR BOLTS AFTER RETROFITTING
Figure 8.7.1: Capacity of Anchors in Tension

BP-01:
Joint ID = 17-I
Number of bolts = 4 Nos (4-20mm)
Capacity of each 20mm bolt = 14.4 kip
Total allowable capacity = 4*14.4 = 57.6 kip
Maximum Available Tension = 44 kip < Allowable Limit (OK)
BP-02:
Joint ID = 3-E
Maximum Available Tension = 26.8 kip < Allowable Limit (OK)
Page | 121
BP-03:
Joint ID = 10-O
Maximum Available Tension = 26.8 kip < Allowable Limit (OK)
10 ADEQUACY CHECK OF GUSSET PLATE (BRACING) AFTER

RETROFITTING
Welding Calculation:
Calculation of welding adequacy is given below-
Design capacity of weld = 0.75*(0.707*W*L*0.6*Exx) kip
=0.75*(0.707*1/16*1*0.6*70) kip
=0.75*1.855 kip
=1.39 kip
So, the capacity of 1/16” weld with 1” length = 1.39 kip
The capacity of 4/16” or 1/4” weld with 1” length = 1.39*4 kip = 5.56 kip
Welding Capacity Check between Gusset Plate and End Plate:

Maximum axial force from analysis file = 47.8 kip
Provided length of weld for end plate with gusset plate = 6”
Capacity of provided weld = 5.56*6*(4 faces) = 133.44 kip > 47.8 kip (OK)
Welding Capacity Check between Gusset Plate and Bracing:

Maximum axial force from analysis file = 47.8 kip
Provided length of weld for end plate with gusset plate = 12”
Capacity of provided weld = 5.56*12*(2 faces) = 133.44 kip > 47.8 kip (OK)
11 DISCLAIMER
The assessment engineer made the above observations & recommendations from Core test, NDT
results & mathematical modelling of the building. We applied our best engineering judgments.
We do not bear responsibility for any deviation from the predicted behaviour of the structure
caused by uncertainties of performance or calamities.
Page | 122

DEA-Report of Crown Mills BD - PART C 10-06-2018

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DEA-Report of Crown Mills BD - PART C 10-06-2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT OF

CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD.

Project type: 3 Storied RCC Building Including Roof Top Shed.

Location: PLOT NOS. 17-19 & 36-38, SECTOR 2, Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Client: CROWN MILLS (BD) LTD.

Y OUR S AFETY IS OUR C ONCERN

3.5 METHOD OF ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 10

4.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB .......................................................................... 30

5 EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR 63 PSF LIVE LOAD ................. 37

5.3 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF R.C.C. BEAMS.................................................................. 54

5.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB .......................................................................... 59

8.4 CHECKING ADEQUACY OF SLAB ........................................................................ 101

8.7 SERVISIBILITY CHECK .............................................................................................. 120

List of Figures and Tables

Figure 3.1.1: Beam-Column Framing System of the Building ........................................... 5

Figure 3.1.2: Roof top Framing System .............................................................................. 5

Figure 3.1.3: 3D View of Analytical Model ..................................................................... 6

Figure 3.4.1: Calculation of Time Period-T for Steel Part.................................................. 9

Figure 3.8.1: Applied Live Load in 5th Floor .................................................................... 13

Figure 3.8.2: Deflected Shape of the building .................................................................. 14

Figure 4.2.1: Column Layout Plan from as Model Snapshot. .......................................... 16

Figure 4.2.2: Column Layout Plan from Built Drawing. .................................................. 17

Figure 4.2.3: Condition of Column in Grid 1.................................................................... 17

Figure 4.2.4: Condition of Column in Grid 2.................................................................... 18

Figure 4.2.5: Condition of Column in Grid 3.................................................................... 18

Figure 4.2.6: Condition of Column in Grid 4.................................................................... 18

Figure 4.2.7: Condition of Column in Grid 5.................................................................... 19

Figure 4.2.8: Condition of Column in Grid 6.................................................................... 19

Figure 4.2.9: Condition of Column in Grid 7.................................................................... 19

Figure 4.2.10: Condition of Column in Grid 8.................................................................. 20

Figure 4.2.11: Condition of Column in Grid 9.................................................................. 20

Figure 4.2.12: Condition of Column in Grid 10 ............................................................... 20

Figure 4.2.13: Condition of Column in Grid 11 ............................................................... 21

Figure 4.2.14: Condition of Column in Grid 12 ............................................................... 21

Figure 4.2.15: Condition of Column in Grid 13 ............................................................... 21

Figure 4.2.16: Condition of Column in Grid 14 ............................................................... 22

Figure 4.2.17: Condition of Column in Grid 15 ............................................................... 22

Figure 4.2.18: Condition of Column in Grid 16 ............................................................... 22

Figure 4.2.19: Condition of Column in Grid 17 ............................................................... 23

Figure 4.2.20: Condition of Column in Grid 18 ............................................................... 23

Figure 4.2.21: Condition of Column in Grid 19 ............................................................... 23

Figure 4.2.22: Condition of Column in Grid 20 ............................................................... 24

Figure 4.3.1: Condition of Grade Beams. ......................................................................... 25

Figure 4.3.2: Condition of 1st Floor Beams....................................................................... 26

Figure 4.3.3: Condition of 2nd Floor Beams. ..................................................................... 27

Figure 4.3.4: Condition of 3rd Floor Beams. ..................................................................... 28

Figure 4.3.5: Condition of Roof Floor Beams. ................................................................. 29

Figure 4.5.1: Steel Column Layout Plan ........................................................................... 30

Figure 4.5.2: Conditions of Steel Members ...................................................................... 31

Figure 4.5.3: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-A ..................................................... 31

Figure 4.5.4: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-B ................................................. 32

Figure 4.5.5: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-C ................................................. 32

Figure 4.5.6: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-D ..................................................... 32

Figure 4.5.7: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-E ...................................................... 32

Figure 4.5.8: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-F ...................................................... 32

Figure 4.5.9: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-G ..................................................... 33

Figure 4.5.10: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-H ................................................... 33

Figure 4.5.11: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-I ..................................................... 33

Figure 4.5.12: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-J ..................................................... 33

Figure 4.5.13: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-K ................................................... 34

Figure 4.5.14: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-L .................................................... 34

Figure 4.5.15: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-N ................................................... 34

Figure 4.5.16: Conditions of Steel Members in Grid-P .................................................... 34