1. A legal notice is being served to Mr. M.G. Sadashivan for dishonoring two cheques of Rs. 400,000 each that were issued to settle an agreement between Mr. Sadashivan and client Mr. Shankarlal Choudhary.
2. The cheques were dishonored with the reason "funds insufficient".
3. The notice demands payment of Rs. 800,000 along with charges and interest within 15 days, or legal action will be taken under the Negotiable Instruments Act in court.
1. A legal notice is being served to Mr. M.G. Sadashivan for dishonoring two cheques of Rs. 400,000 each that were issued to settle an agreement between Mr. Sadashivan and client Mr. Shankarlal Choudhary.
2. The cheques were dishonored with the reason "funds insufficient".
3. The notice demands payment of Rs. 800,000 along with charges and interest within 15 days, or legal action will be taken under the Negotiable Instruments Act in court.
1. A legal notice is being served to Mr. M.G. Sadashivan for dishonoring two cheques of Rs. 400,000 each that were issued to settle an agreement between Mr. Sadashivan and client Mr. Shankarlal Choudhary.
2. The cheques were dishonored with the reason "funds insufficient".
3. The notice demands payment of Rs. 800,000 along with charges and interest within 15 days, or legal action will be taken under the Negotiable Instruments Act in court.
Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonour of Cheque.
Dear Sir,
Under instructions and authority from my client Mr.
Shankarlal Choudhary, partner of Bhagyalaxmi Developers, Kharghar (hereinafter called as my ‘Client’), I do hereby serve upon you the following notice of demand under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881:
1. My client states that, On 5th of October, 2015 a
Memorandum of Understanding agreement related to development of a plot, was made between my client and you the notice. As my client was very much interested in the project and showed his willingness to pay the amount which is as mentioned in the agreement. But afterwards my client found that as per your assurance the said project could not work further. My client got disturbed when he asked about your assurance; you the noticee failed to give satisfactory answers to my client and kept delaying the same. Whereby my client suffered heavy loss.
2. My client states that, an another agreement was
made between my client and you on 15 th July 2019 as you failed to comply with the prior MOU within stipulated time and therefore it was decided to terminate the prior MOU agreement to avoid unnecessary legal complications as well as to maintain cordial relation. Where it was agreed between my client and you with other terms that you will pay to my client a sum of Rs. 8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs) as an compensation towards the loss occurred to him.
3. As per the conditions of the agreement two cheques
were given by you to my client in order to discharge your partial liability. One cheque bearing 053677 of Rs. 400000/- was cancelled by you and you gave cheques of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs) each of dated 30/12/2019 vide cheque no. 053678 and of 15/11/2019 vide cheque no. 053679 of bank named The Federal Bank Limited of Nerul branch to my client. At the time of issuing these cheques you assured my client that the same is good for value and will be honoured as and when presented in the bank.
4. That when the aforesaid cheques, cheque bearing no.
053679 and 053678 were presented for encashment by my client to his banker i.e. Union Bank of India, the same was returned unpaid by the Banker with remarks/reasons "Funds Insufficient" vide its memo dated 26.12.2019 and 13.01.2020 respectively. This fact was brought to your notice by my client through a telephonic call.
5. That despite a number of telephonic reminders, you
considerably have failed to make the payment due to my client and did not accede to the genuine request of my client. Furthermore, you started to put the matter off and on, on the one pretext or the other.
6. That you have considerably failed to comply with the
provisions of the law and had also failed to discharge your liability from your account. Thus, you have issued a cheque which is bad for value and thereafter had got the same dishonoured intentionally and willfully.
7. That from your behaviour, it appears about your
wicked intentions, when you issued the said cheque for the amount which you did not have in your account and since you knew it very well, you have tried to commit not only a civil breach but also a criminal offence within the provision, meaning and interpretation of civil as well as criminal law.
8. That since the said cheques have been dishonoured
for the reasons of “Insufficiency of funds” you may be held liable civilly as well as criminally particularly under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and provisions of the Code of the Civil Procedure.
9. That on account of the above facts, you are liable to
be prosecuted under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 as amended up to date under which you are liable to be punished with imprisonment which may extend to two years or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of cheque or with both.
10. That under these circumstances, I call upon you to
make the payment of Rs. 8,00,000/- Rupees being the principal amount of the aforesaid two cheques, the charges for dishonour of cheque, along with future interest @ 15% p.a. from the date of notice till actual realization of the said amount, together with notice fee of Rs. 10,000/- to my client either in cash or by demand draft or Cheque which ever mode suits you better, within a period of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of receipt of this notice, failing which my client will be bound to take further necessary action under the provisions of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 against you in the competent court of law at your risk and cost.
A copy of this Notice has been preserved in my office