You are on page 1of 31
SIEMENS Purchasing Specification £2PS1007175-65955.doc Conveyed confidently as wade sooret ‘Acceptance level for NOT— EN ISO 28 1007175 5817:2004/EN1090-2(UT accept cf. EN 1712) and EN 180 10042:2005/EN1090-3 Designer muiK Date: 24.05.2012 Turbine: Standard EGNno 55 Doc. rf. ECN date: 25.05.2012 1. SCOPE 14. General ‘This specification specifies the technical requirements for VT, MT, PT and UT based on the requirements in EN ISO 5817, EN ISO 10042 and EN 12062, Clause 4 and relevant appendixes defined NDT-requirements at testing of fusion-welded joints in steel and is based on the requirements given in EN 1SO 8817 and EN 12062. Clause 5 and relevant appendixes defined NOT-requirements at testing of ‘usion-welded joints in aluminum and is based on the requirements given jn EN ISO 10042 and EN 12062. 12 Cross-references Modifications For cross-references to tables or clauses in this specification no reference will be given to the document number (ZPS) of the specification. For cross-references to tables or clauses in other than this document a subsequent reference will be given to the number of the document in question, e.g. “Table 1 of EN ISO 5817:2004." Clause 6 describes new modifications of this document compared to the previous revision of the specification, Siemens Wind Power A/S ‘GAT Rights Reserved 2008, 1031 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification ‘2PS1007175-85955.coo CConveyed confidently as wade secret 2 NORMATIVE REFERENCES. 24. General Normative references are cited at appropriate places in the text. The references and the litles of the relevant publications have been listed below. For dated references, any subsequent amendments to or revisions. of these publications only apply to this specification if they have been included through amendment or revision. For undated references the latest cecition of the publication, which is referred to, applies. © ENISO 5817:2004, Welding - Fusion-welded joints in steel, nickel, ‘itanium and their alloys (beam welding exciuded) - Quality levels for imperfections; EN 1712:1988, Non-destructive examination of welds - Ultrasonic ‘examination of welded joints - Acceptance levels; + EN 1712/A1:2002, Non-destructive testing of welds - Ultrasonic testing of welded joints - Acceptance levels; ‘* EN 1712/A2:2004, Non-destructive testing of welds - Ultrasonic testing of welded joints - Acceptance levels; '¢ EN ISO 10042:2005, Welding - Arc-welded joints in aluminium and its alloys - Quality levels for imperfections; * ENISO 17637:2011, Non-destructive testing of welds - Visual testing of fusion-welded joints; '* ENISO 17638:2009 Non-destructive testing of welds ~ Magnetic particle testing; = ENISO 17640:2011, Non-destructive testing of welds - Ultrasonic testing - Techniques, testing levels, and assessment; + ENISO 17659:2004, Welding - Niutilingual terms for welded joints with ilustrations: = EN ISO 23277:2009, Non-destructive testing of welds - Penetrant testing of welds - Acceptanes levols; © EN ISO 23278:2009, Non-destructive testing of welds - Magnetic particle testing of welds - Acceptance levels; © EN/571~1:1998, Non destructive testing - Penetrant testing - Part 1: General principies; * EN 1011-1:1998, Welding - Recommendations for welding of metalic materials - Part 1: General guidance for arc welding; EN 1495:1998, Non-destructive examination of welds - Radiographic examination of welded joints; + DS/EN 1435/A1:2002, Non-destructve testing of welds Radiographic testing of welded joints; ‘* SVEN 1435/A2:2004, Non-destructive testing of welds - Radiographic testing of welded joints; ‘* EN 12062:1997: Welding - Recommendations for welding of metallic Siemens Wind Power A/S ‘GA Rights Resorved 2008 2/34 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification ‘ZPS{007175.85958.d0¢ Conveyod confidential es rade secret materials - Part 1: General guidance for arc welding; EN 12517-1:2006, Non-destructive testing of welds - Part 1: Evaluation of welded joints in stool, nickel, titanium and their alloys by radiography - Acceptance levels, lemens Wind Power A'S 8 AI Rights Reserved 2008 3131 SIEMENS ere Conveyed confidentially as trade secret DEFINITIONS 34. MT The term “MT” means magnetic testing. 32. PT ‘The term “PT” means penetrant testing 33, ‘swP ‘The term “SWP" means Siemens Wind Power, 3 RT ‘The term “RT” means Radiographic testing 35. ut The term “UT” means ultrasonic testing 36. vt The term “VT" means visual testing, ‘@ Al Rights Resorves 2008 4131 SIEMENS ae rnsansesetie 4. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS - NDT-REQUIREMENTS AT TESTING OF FUSION-WELDED JOINTS IN STEEL AND THEIR ALLOYS: 44a. General MT, RT, UT, and PT of welds must not be started before the requirement to ‘minimum hold time after welding as defined in Table 1 are met. The acceptance level and examination standard to be used for steel constructions must be in accordance with the requirements given in Table 2 Before performing the NDT, a procedure for performance of the NDT shall bbe available for operator in question. ‘Table 1, Hold time before NDT for steel constructions, ] Hold time (hours) ! Weld size(mm)® | Heat input Q(Kjimm)" Yield strength _ i s460MPa | > 460MPa aorss6 All___ | Cooling period only 24 [ _ <3 8 2 6 12 = m a | a) Size applies to the nominal throat thickness: a of a filet weld or the nominal material thickness: s of 1 full penetration weld. For individual partial penetration butt wolds the governing criterion is the ‘nominal weld depth: a, but for pairs of partial penetration butt welds welded simultaneously itis the ‘sum of the weld throats: a. b) Heat input Q to be calculated in accordance with Clause 19 of EN 1011-1:1998. c) The time between weld completion and commencement of NOT must be stated in the NDT report. In the case of “coating period only” this will last until the weld is cool enough for NDT to commence. 42. Severity level___In the case that Severity level “SWP-EC-3.Cat 90° has been specified; SWP-EC:3-Cat then the weld shall meet the requirements given for SWP-EC-3, 90112 requirements at given the drawing, and the requirement for Excess weld ‘metal (butt weld): "h < 0.1 b, but max. mm.” In the case that Severity level “SWP-EC-3-Cat 112" has beon specified; then the weld shall meet the requirements given for SWP-EC-3, requirements at given the drawing, and the requirement for Excess weld ‘metal (butt weld): “The weld must be ground flush Siemens Wind Power A/S (© AIRights Resorves 2008 5/31 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification ‘2PS1007175-65965.dee Conveyed confidently 8 rade secret Table 2, Requirements for the performance of NDT for Steel Feature Seventy level ] SWPEC+ SWPEC2 SWPEC-S i VT |Acceplance |Level D:EN ISO Level C:ENISO _|Level B: ENISO 5817 and the addlional levels |5817 andthe (6817 and the, requirements in Appendix, 2dditional addtional requirements in| requirements in AppendixAt.1 | AppendixA.1.4 Examination | Examination technique must be performed in accordance with EN ISO 17637 techniques | MT [Acceptance |Level 3X as Level 2X as specified in EN ISO 25278 levels | specified in EN ISO 227, Examination | Examination technique must be performed in accordance with EN ISO 17638 and techniques | additional requirements given in Appencix 5.1 PT [Acceptance |Level 8x as Level 2X as specified in EN ISO 25277 Hlevels | spectied in EN ISO 20077. [Examination | Examination technique must be performed in accordance with EN 871-1 and techniques "| additional requirements given in Appendix A.7.1 RT [Acceptance |Level 3 as specified [Level 2as specified [Level 1 as specified in EN 12517 tevele fin EN 12517 in EN 12517 Examination | Examination Examination Examination technique: Level 8 techniques’ |technique: Level A technique: Level | accarding lo EN 1435, according to EN B'according to EN 485 1485 UT [Acceptance | Level 3: EN 1712+A1/#A2 and additional | Level 2: EN 1712+A1/4A2 and addlional levels [requirements given in Appendix A.8.1"_| requirements given in Appensix 9.1 Examination | Examination technique: Level B according to EN ISO 17640 and adalional techniques | requirements given in Appendix A.11.4 " However, the maximum area for a single exposure shall correspond to the requirement of class A of EN 1435. Siemens Wind Power A/S ‘© AT Rights Reserves 2008 6/31 SIEMENS Purchsing seein CConveyed confidently as vase secret TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS, NDT-REQUIREMENTS AT TESTING OF FUSION-WELDED JOINTS IN ALUMINUM 5A. General NDT of a weld must not be performed on constructions until it has cooled to room temperature. The acceptance level and examination standard to be used for aluminum constructions must be in accordance with the requirements given in Table 3 Before performing the NDT, a procedure for performance of the NDT shall be available for operator in question. Table 3, Requirements for the performance of NOT for Aluminum Feature Severity level | SwP-ec4- | Swp-ect- | swP-ec2. | swp-ec2 | swr-ec-s.| swr-ecs: std High sid High std High Vi [Acceptance | Level D: ISO 10042 and | Level C: 180 10042 and | Level B: ISO 10042 and the levels | the addtional requiroments | the additional requirements | additional requirements in in Appendix A2.1 in Appendix A.2.1 Appendix A2.1. Examination | Examination technique must be performed in accordance with EN ISO 17637. The techniques | measuring of the throat thickness "a shall be in accordance with EN ISO 17659. PT | Acceptance | Level 3X as specified in EN | Level 2X as specified in EN ISO 23277. : levels 180 28277 Examination | Examination technique must be performed in accordance with EN §71-1 and technique | additional requirements given in Appondix A.7.4 RT [Acceptance [Level 3 as specified in EN Level 2as specified in EN. |Level 1 as spectfied in EN levels 12517 12517 12517 Examination [Examination technique: | Examination technique: | Examination technique: techniques |Leve! 8 according toEN | Level B according toEN Level B according toEN | 1435 1435 1436 UT Acceptance | Level 3: EN 1712*A1/#A2 and additional requirements | Level 2: EN 1712+A1/+A2 levels given in Appendix A.9.1 and additional requirements given in Appendix A.8.1 Examination | Examination technique: Level B according to EN 1714 and additional requirements techniques | given in Appendix A.12.4 6 ——_MoDiFicaTION Desert [Meditations | ZPS 10717545055 General update of the speticaton | ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S (Al Rights Reserves 2008 731 SIEMENS ot Yoana Conveyed confientialy as irade secret Appendix A1.1_ — Tee ‘VT ~ Acceptance levels ~ EN ISO 5817 :2004 ANA. VISUAL EXAMINATION AAA General This section describes to the acceptance levels c-f EN ISO 5817:2004 for use at visual examination of welds. ANA, NORMATIVE REFERENCES: AA21. General Normative references are cited at appropriate places in the text. The references and the fitles of the relevant publications have been listed below. For dated references, any subsequent amendments to or revisions of these publications only apply to this specification if they have been included through amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the publication, which is referred to, applies. * EN ISO 5817:2004, Welding - Fusion-welded joints in steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys (beam welding excluded) - Quality levels for imperfections; #180 6520-1:1998, Welding and allied processes - Classification of geometric imperfections in metallic materials - Part 1: Fusion welding, MA3. ‘TESTING TECHNIQUE A134 General ‘The acceptance level of the visual examination must be in accordance with at relevant drawings, EN ISO 5817 and the additional requirements given in Table A1.1-1 For this table the definition given in EN ISO 5817 for used symbols (d, 8, a, etc.) apply. ‘The requirements given at drawing must take priority to the requirements 2 | X: Maximum 2 mm, | | Aiowabie number of imperfections is described | in foot note 2. | | Maximum dimensions of a! >3 | d<0.3s, butmax3mm_ d 502s, butmax2mm | single pore for: d<03 a, butmax3 mm ds0.2a, butmax 2mm ~ butt welds = YK must be > 2 YX must be > 2 X: Maximum 2:mm, X: Maximum 2 rm, | Allowable number of ‘Aowable number of j imperfections is described | imperfections is described in foot note 2. in foot note 2. TF | OS End rater | (Picture — See the S02 t, maxZmm Nat permitted Pipe 5817 standard) Number of allowable imperfections where n> 0.1 tbat below the * For wes >500 men: Max Simpottections per any 6000 mm of weld, or walds < 600 mm: Max 1 imperfection per wet ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S. (GAL Rights Reserved 2008 9131 SIEMENS Table A1.1-1, Additional requirements - EN ISO 5817 - Continued Wo] ReLioO_imperfechons Reman T Tints Tor neocons Tor ually bvel 6520-1 | desionaton | | fem SWPEC SWPECZ SWPECS 15 | 401 = 05 Only detectable by micro Not permitted Not permited 7 | Bort Continuous 305 | Shor imperfedtions ort imperfections: Not permitted undercut | required. This is not hs02 t,max 1mm hsO.4t,max 1 mm regarded as a 5012 Intermittent _ | systematic imperfection undercut 18 | 5013 ‘Shrinkage | (Picture - See the ISO | >3 | Shor imperfections groove 5817 standard) hhs0.24, but max. 1 mm ‘Slemens Wind Power A/S AL Rights Reserved 2008, SIEMENS ee Conveyed confidently as trade secret Table A1.1-1, Additional requirements - EN ISO 5817 - Continued No | Ref. toiSO | imperiections 7 Remarks Tt ‘Limits for imperfections for quality level 520-1 | designation | om SWP-EC4 ‘SWP-EC-2 SWPEC-3 712 | 505i Tneorrect | 2 205 ETO ae 130" wold too ‘Smooth transition is ‘Smooth transition is | required at B required at 6 | a2 110° transition is ‘Smooth transition is ap required at 6 is | 606 Overlap (Picture —“See the ISO |20.5 | Not permitted 5817 standard) 118 | 56 Rook parosily | Spongy formation atthe | 20.5 | Not permitted root of a weld due to ' 19 ofthe weld etal 770 [ si7 Poorresiart 5 05 | Notpamitied 1:22 | 601 T Stray are = ©0.5-| Not permitied 123 [602 Spatter = 20.5 | Not permitied ‘Not permitted 1s Wind Power A/S ts Reserves 2008 11131 SIEMENS rancher ree oe CConveyed confidently 8 rade sonret Appendix A2.1 VT Acceptance level -EN ISO 10042:2005 A114. VISUAL EXAMINATION ALAA General ‘This section describes to the acceptance levels c.f EN ISO 10042 for Use at visual examination of welds. AAS. NORMATIVE REFERENCES: A154 General Normative references are cited at appropriate places in the text. The references and the tiles of the relevant publications have been listed below. For dated references, any subsequent amendments to or revisions of these publications only apply to this specification if they have been included through amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the publication, which is referred to, applies. ‘© EN ISO 10042:2008, Welding - Arc-welded joints in aluminium and its alloys - Quality levels for imperfections; © 180 6520-1:1998, Welding and alliod processes - Classification of geometric imperfections in metallic materials - Part 1: Fusion welding, AA. TESTING TECHNIQUE A164 General ‘The acceptance level of the visual examination must be in accordance with at relevant drawings, EN ISO 10042 and the additional requirements given in Table A2.1-1, For this table the definition given in EN 10042 for used symbols (4, 5, a, ote.) apply. ‘The requirements given at drawing must take priority to the requirements given EN ISO 10042 and this spectication ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S AU Rights Resorves 2008, 12/34 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification ‘ZPS1007175-65955 doe CConveyed confidently 2s trade secret Table A2.1-1, Additional requirements - EN ISO 10042 ra) a ese wo | "80° | tmperecton rr jo Eee meeeas inmy |SWPEC-Hti) SWHECI. |SWP-EC2sd| SWP-EC2 |SWPECS] SwP-ECo 0 Sin righ igh 1 Surface mpertectons 12 [104 [Crater cack [Seotomin ENISO 10042 | 05 [Not pomied [te |aoi? [Sutace Powe |Seetetin EN 180 1002 | 205 [a<035 butmadnm |ds01s,banet mm |es0te bumant mm ‘eset Y= Hn Geosabumaxdmn — |dsO.tabamextmm — |dz0te.bumact mn must bo >2 xmas bo >2 Yoru bo >2 | Maxima 2m Xe Maxi 2m Xena 2m | Allowable numberof Alowatie nue of Atowabie number of inporecions's dcrcbedin |imprtecionsis desubodin —|importecions fs desebed In foot note 3. foot note 3. foot note 3. 17 [005 [Endcap |= Bn V= Wn | 30s [ne0s tmadam E02 & max Sm = 1. Y/X must be > 2 YX must be > 2 7 [ai JlackolFuson [See dagan i ENIGO teow! | S05 | ices et_| (reomplts Not pormitog fusion) * For welds > 500 mm: Max’ impertections per any 8000 mm of weld, For welds 25mm: {20,48 oF Oda, but max6mm_[I0.3¢ oF Oda, but macdmm [I= 0.1860" 0,188 max? mm 2 Tack See diagram in ENISO 10042 | 05 Not permited penetration ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S GA Rights Reserved 2008 1631 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification 7175-65055, doe Conveyed confidently as trede secre! Table A2.1-1, Additional requirements - EN ISO 10042 - Continued No | eo” | Imperfections Ref. to | Remarks t Limits for mperfections for qualty level shall not exceed O.4t or O.4a, ‘Aso the imperfections must only be short imperfections ees | designation Imm) | SWP-EC-1-std] SWP-EC-1- | SWP-EC-2-std| SWP-EC-2. | SWP-EC-3-std| SWP-EC3- High High High 3 Imperfections in Joint Geometry |3a [507 [Linear See text and diagram inEN | 20.5 |hs0.4t tomax 4mm, unless ]h< fo max. 3 mm, unless [h = inment [150 10042 moro strict tolerances are stated | m tolerances are stated | max 1,5 mm, unless more strict Jon the drawing con the drawing tolerances are stated on the Plates and longitudinal welds drawing See text and diagram inEN | 205 |hs0.4t tomax 4mm, unless [n= 0.3t tomax. 3mm, unless |hs0,1t ISO 10042 ‘more strict tolerances are stated | more strict tolerances are stated | max 2 mm, unless more strict Con the drawing on the drawing {tolerances are stated on the Circumferential welds drawing 32 [617 ‘See text and diagram inEN | 20.5 |h=imm+0,2amax Smm — |hs0,5mm+0,15amax 2mm — [hs0,Smm +0,tamax. 1 mm ISO 10042 4 Multiple Imperfections faa Muttpie ‘See diagram in EN ISO 10042 | 20.5 |The sum ofthe accoptable Not permited Not permitted impertections imperfections in any cross section is not acceptable to compensated for non-acceptable gabs ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S AI Rights Reserved 2008 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification ‘2PS1007175-65955.c0° Conveyed confidently as rade secret Appendix A5.1 MT — Testing technique ~ EN ISO 17638 ABA. SCOPE A514. General This appendix defines examination conditions and performance of the magnetic particle testing, when it must be preformed in line of direction with EN ISO 17638. A512. NORMATIVE REFERENCES. ABA-2.4 General Normative references are cited at appropriate places in the text. The references and the tiles of the relevant publications have been listed below. For dated references, any subsequent amendments to or revisions of these publications only apply to this specification if they have been included through amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the publication, which is referred to, applies. © EN ISO 9934-1, Non-destructive testing - Magnetic particle testing - Part 1: General principles. © EN ISO 9934-2, Non-destructive testing - Magnetic particle testing - Part 2: Detection media: © ENISO 9934-3, Non-destructive testing - Magnetic particle testing - Part 3: Equipment; * EN ISO 17638, Non-destructive testing of welds ~ Magnetic partide testing, ATAS. TESTING SYSTEMS ATASA. General [Used syntax The testing system (equipment/detection media) to use at the examination of a specific construction will be described with use of the syntaxes listed in Table A5.1-1, and Table A5.1-2, e.g “t- If nothing is specified then the testing system “1-C” or “-F* must be used. ipment Requirements [Alternating current (A.C) electromagnetic yoke with flexible logs. Current flow equipment with prods. Magnetic equipment with flexible cable or coil Central conductor, Magnetic induction. Equipment enabling multiple magnetizing techniques. ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S GAL Rights Reserved 2008 18/31 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification 'ZPS1007175-68955.coo Conveyed confientilly s rade secret ATA. A184 ATA. ATAT.A ATA-T2, ATA. ATAB.AL ATA8.2 ATA8.. Table AS.1-2, Detection media Used syntax Requirements c Colored detection media as per the requirements in EN ISO 9934-2, The use of dry powder is not acceptable. F Fluorescent detection media as per the requirements in EN ISO 9934-2 CALIBRATION General The magnetizing equipment must conform the requirements in EN ISO 17638. Itis required that testing of the lifting power must be made at the yoke's maximum pole spacing. EXAMINATION CONDITIONS Facilities Using of colored detection media Its required that the necessary testing facilties have been established, so the personnel are able to perform the examination in an ‘environment meeting the requirements for viewing conditions as per EN 3058, ‘The facility must have a size that does not reduce the operator's ability to camry out a correct examination, twill not be acceptable to use a higher UV-A radiation and a higher ambient white light with the fluorescent examination technique, even it itcan be shown that contrast between indications and the surroundings are maintained. When a colored detection media is used for the examination, itis required that the zone to be examined must be covered with a layer of white paint with a maximum thickness of 50um. PERFORMANCE OF EXAMINATION General Time for examination — Fluorescent technique Tangential magnetic field ‘The examination conditions and performance of the examination must be in accordance with EN ISO 17638, EN 9934-1, and the additional requirements defined in A7.1-8.2 to A7.1-8.8, It is required that prior to examination with fluorescent technique that the operator waits as minimum 5 minutes inside the testing facility before performing the examination. Note: This requirement is to ensure that the operator's eyes become adapted to the reduced background lighting. The examination must be carried out when a tangential magnetic field strength of 2kAvm to 6kA/m is obtained in the area to be tested. iemens Wind Power A/S ‘GAM Richis Reserved 2008 19/31 SIEMENS ATAB.4. Viewing conditions AT ABS. Field direction Purchasing Specification 'ZPS1007175-65955,doc CConveyed confidentially as wade sock ‘The examination must be carried out with the naked eye or at a maximum magnification of x3 with viewing conditions in conformity with EN 3058. The product must not be exposed to brighter illumination until the investigation is done with fluorescent detection media, The approximate direction of magnetization related to the weld direction must, whenever practicable, be as specified in EN ISO 17638, When using the testing equipment defined with the syntax "1" in Table ‘AS.1-1, itis required that the magnetizing of the surface must be done in two perpendicular directions. AT ABE. Overall performance Before start-up of any examination session an overall performance test test ATAB7. Using of prods ATABS, Reporting Siemens Wind Power A/S ‘@AI Rights Reserved 2008 of the system sensitivity must be carried out on sit, ‘The test must be designed to ensure a proper functioning of the entire chain of parameters including the equipment, the magnetic field strength, and direction, surface characteristics, detecting media, and illumination ‘Also that the adequacy of the surface flux density has been established in the outer zone of the inspection area through one or more of the methods listed hereafter before the testing of a specific construction is started a) By measuring the tangential field strength as close as possible to the surface. information on this is glven in EN ISO 9934-3, b) By measuring the tangential field strength and intensity through the use of a Castrol strip type 2 or Castrol strip type A. ©) By the use of other methods based on established principles, approved by SWP in writing, e: Itis not acceptable or possible to use a measurement of the field strength, orttold cross" for ‘When using the testing equipment defined with the syntax "2" in Table ‘AS.1-1, itis required that areas where the prods have had contact with the construction and the areas located in a diameter of 10 mm 360° around this area are grounded. ‘Thereafter the area must be re-tested by the use of testing equipment defined with the syntax"t", where it must be verified that this area is meeting the specified severity level A test report describing the subjects in clause 5.14 of EN ISO 17638 must be compiled 20131 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification ZPS1007175.85866 doc conveyed conidentialy as rade soot Appendix A7.1 The PT-~ Testing technique ~ EN 571-1 ATAA. SCOPE ATAAA General This appendix defines examination conditions and performance of the peneirant testing, when it must be preformed in line of direction with, EN 571-1 ATA2, NORMATIVE REFERENCES ATA-2A General Normative references are cited at appropriate places in the text. The references and the titles of the relevant publications have been listed below. For dated references, any subsequent amendments to or revisions of these publications only apply to this specification if they have been included through amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the publication, which is referred to, applies. + EN 571-1, Non destructive testing - Penetrant testing - Part 1 General principles; * EN ISO 3452-2, Non-destructive testing - Penetrant testing - Part 2: Testing of penetrant materials, ATA. TESTING SYSTEMS ATABA. General ‘Only approved product families, or product families released by SWP, ‘must be used forthe testing. ‘The testing products to be used must be included in Table 1 of EN 571- 1, with the reservations listed hereafter. ‘¢ The use of Penetrant designated as “Type Ill” (Dual purpose color contrast Penetrant) is not acceptable © The use of Developer designated as "a" (Dry)" is not acceptable. ATA-3.2, Sensivity The used product must, as a minimum, be able to indicate a sensitivity level 3 for a penetrant type 1 and sensitivity level 2 for penetrant type: 2, achieved by testing the reference block type 1 as described in EN. 180 3452-2, ATA, EXAMINATION CONDITIONS ATA4A Facilities, Itis required that the necessary testing facilities have been established, so the personnel are able to perform the examination in an environment meeting the requirements for viewing conditions as per EN 3059. ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S 1 Al Riphis Reserved 2008, 21031 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification 77PS1007175.85985.0o° Conveyed canidniily as Vad secrat The facility must have a size that does not reduce the operator's ability to carry out a correct examination. Iwill not be acceptable to use a higher UV-A radiation and a higher ambient white light with the fluorescent examination technique, even if, itcan be shown that contrast between indications and the surroundings are maintained. ATAS. PERFORMANCE OF EXAMINATION ATASA General ATA5.2. Time for examination Fluorescent technique AT1-5.3. Viewing conditions ATA. Overall performance test ATS. Reporting ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S GALRighis Resorved 2008, ‘The examination conditions and performance of the examination must be in accordance with EN 571-1, and the additional requirements defined in A7.1-5.2 (0 A7.1-5.5 Itis required that prior to examination with fluorescent technique that, the operator waits as minimum 5 minutes inside the testing facility before performing the examination. Note: This requirement is to ensure that the operator's eyes become adapted to the reduced background lighting. The examination must be carried out with the naked eye or at a maximum magnification of x3 with viewing conditions in conformity with EN 3059. The product must not be exposed to brighter illumination until the investigation is done with fluorescent detection media, Before start-up of any examination session an overall performance test of the system sensitivity must be carried out on site, The test must be designed to ensure a proper functioning of the entire chain of parameters including the equipment, surface characteristics, detecting media, and ilumination where it as a mirimum is required that the operator performs the verification listed hereafter. ‘* The actual penetrant system sensitivity must be verified by the use of reference blook type 2 acc. to EN ISO 3452-3; '* The viewing conditions and functionality of the equipment must be verified.” ‘Attest report describing the subjects in clause 9 of EN 571-1 must be compiled. 22/31 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification 72PS1007175-85055.doc Conveyed confidentially a rade secret Tile UT— Acceptance levels ~ EN 1712 9A. Aa A9.1-2. A921. 49.13. A9.1-3.1 9.13.2. a Appendix A941 SCOPE General ‘This section describes to the acceptance levels c.f EN ISO 11666, for Use at ultrasonic testing of welds, NORMATIVE REFERENCES. General Normative references are cited at appropriate places in the text. The roferences and the titles of the relevant publications have been listed below. For dated references, any subsequent amendments to or revisions of these publications only apply to this specification if they have been included through amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the publication, which is referred to, applies. + EN 1712:1988, Non-destructive examination of welds - Ultrasonic ‘examination of welded joints - Acceptance levels; ‘+ EN 1712/A1:2002, Nondestructive testing of welds - Ultrasonic testing of welded joints - Acceptance levels; * EN 1712/A2:2004, Non-destructive testing of welds - Ultrasonic testing of welded joints - Acceptance levels; TESTING TECHNIQUE General Characterization The acceptance level of the ultrasonic examination must be in accordance with EN 1712 and the additional requirements listed A9.1- B210A9.1-33, ‘When taking indication above the evaluation level into account planar indications indication is not acceptable. For non-planar indication the acceptance level in EN 1712 must apply. Characterization of indication must be made in accordance with EN 180 23279. ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S ALRights Reserves 2008, 23/31 SIEMENS Parcrasretaon rests ane Conveyed confdersaly 26 trade seoret 9.13.3, Recording levels The recording levels listed hereafter apply at the examination and evaluation Recording level for methods 1 - Acceptance level 2 and level 3: + Reference level - 10 dB for indications of the type © Crack (type 100, 1S0 5817); © Lack of fusion (type 401, ISO 5817); © Lack of penetration (ype 402, ISO $817); + Reference level ~ 6 dB for indications of the type © Allother type of defects. Recording level for methods 2 - Acceptance level 2 and level 3: © Reference level ~ 4 dB for indications of the type © Crack (type 100, ISO 817); © Lack of fusion (type 407, ISO 5817); © Lack of penetration (type 402, ISO 5817), * Reference level 0 d8 for indications of the type © All other type of defects. Recording level tandem examination: ‘+ Avmritten agreement defining the recording level shall be made ‘with SWP before tandem examination is started. ‘Siemens Wind Power A/S AU Rights Reserved 2008 24131 SIEMENS Pete Svein Conveyed confidently a8 ade seer Appendix A11.1 The UT— Performance of the ultrasonic examination - EN ISO 17640 ANNA. SCOPE Att ttt Generat ‘This appendix defines examination conditions and performance of the ultrasonic examination, when the testing must be preformed in line of direction with EN ISO 17640, NORMATIVE REFERENCES. General Normative references are cited at appropriate places in the text. The references and the titles of the relevant publications have been listed below. For dated references, any subsequent amendments to or revisions of these publications only apply to this specification if they have been included through amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the publication, which is referred to, applies. * ENISO 17640, Non-destructive testing of welds ~ Ukrasonic testing ~ Techniques, testing levels and assessment; * ENISO 23279, Non-destructive testing of welds ~ Ultrasonic testing ~ Characterization of indications in welds. TESTING TECHNIQUE General Examination conditions and performance of the examination must be in accordance with EN iSO 17640, and the additional requirements defined in A11.1-3.2 to A11.1-3.10. AN11-3.2. Setting of reference The examination must be performed by using Technique 1 or level ‘Technique 2 where the probes described in Table A11.1- 1 must be used when the setting of references and the actual evaluation is performed. In case of disagreements between the manufacturer and SWP ‘concerning sizing of defects the probes defined Table A11.1- 2 must be used for sizing of the defects. The examination must not be performed by using Technique 3 or Technique 4 unless a working procedure and acceptance levels for the examination level have been agreed in writing with SWP before starting up of the examination jemens Wind Power A/S. AM Rights Reserved 2008, 25/31 SIEMENS Purchasing Specification ‘ZPS1007175-65055 coe Conveyed confidentially as trade seer A11.1-3.3. AN11-3.4, ANN1-35. AN14-36. Table A11.1- 1, Ultrasonic probes frequencies i Requirements - Technique 1 Thickness range, t Tranevorse wave probe | Longitudinal wave probe inmm frequency in MHz frequency in Mhz 6

You might also like