Results

Graph 1

In the graph above, the average carcass weight from the two treatments is compared. T1 R1 has a
carcass weight of 1.7kg, whereas T2 R2 has a weight of 2kghaving a difference in 0.3kg . T1 R2
has an average weight of 2.2 kg having a 0.6 more kg than T2R1 which is 1.6kg.

Graph 2
 45,000 Series 1
40,000 41,496
35,000
30,000 32,528

25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
T1 T2
Series 1

The income generated by treatment one is more than that of treatment two, as shown in graph 2.
Treatment one earns $41,496 per year, whereas treatment two earns $32,528 per year. The total
revenue is $74,024, which is a $8,968 difference. The income from T1 is higher because the
carcass weight of the birds that received this therapy was significantly higher than those who
received T2. Because the carcass weight was increased, the birds became fatter and produced
more meat.

Graph 1
The money earned from the sale of non-value added meat and value added meat is shown in
graph 3. The income obtained from the sale of unseasoned chicken is lower than the income
gained from the sale of seasoned meat. The sale of non-value added chicken brought in $26,752
in revenue, whereas the sale of seasoned meat brought in $55,980. The total cost is $82,732
because the difference between the two prices is $29,228.