Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nada Oman Badr, Basma Omar Abd EL-Hameed, Zuhair EL Sheshtawy, Ibrahim El bougdadiy, Mohamed Bayoumy
Pharos University, Alexandria EGYPT, nadabadr899@yahoo.com, basma-alex@hotmail.com, ZuhairEl-
Sheshtawi2015@yahoo.com,ibrahimelbogdady@yahoo.com, mohamedbayoumy93.mb@gmail.com
Supervisor: Dr.Tarek Belal, tarek.belal@pua.edu.eg
Supervisor: Dr.Sameh tawfeek, sameh_tawfeek@hotmail.com
1. DRY CELL
It considered the main element in HHO-Generation
system, and there are two categories of cells; wet cell - and -
dry cell [refer to plates positioning with the
electrolyte],Data based on several experiments show that:
11 plates (316) S.S is the best choice to eliminate any heat
loss and inhibit the electrical conductivity to ensure good
water electrolysis process which uses an electric current to
dissociate the water molecules into H2 and O2 as follow:
Fig.5 dry cell assembly
2 H2O → 2 H2 + O2
E) INSTALLATION IN VEHICLE
fuel consumption(g/min
and reduce the suction at the hydroxy gas inlet to the 28
27.5
manifold.
27
26.5
26
25.5
25
0 0.5 load 1 1.5
Fig.12 fuel consumption vs different load at (1100 RPM)
28
addition. 27.5
27
26.5
26
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 25.5
25
Even modern petrol engines are unfortunately not 0 0.5 load 1 1.5
burning petrol fuel to its full potential. The average petrol Fig.13 fuel consumption vs different load at (1400 RPM)
engine in a car is about 18% to 20% efficient. That leaves a
lot of room for improvement and HHO fuel is a good way
of improving the efficiency. The reason for this is simple; Fig.13, showing the average fuel consumption at 1400
the hydrogen is highly flammable and has a much higher RPM with different loads is reduced with HHO by 3.5%
heating value. less than the fuel consumption without HHO.
The hydrogen explosion is so fast that it fills the with HHO without HHO
combustion cylinder at least 3 times faster than the petrol Linear (with HHO) Linear (without HHO)
explosion and subsequently ignites the petrol fuel from all 28.5
fuel consumption(g/min)
Fuel consumption(g/min)
25
loads
20
with hho without(hho)
Linear (with hho ) Linear (without(hho)) 15
30
Fuel consumption(g/min)
10
25 1000 1500 2000 2500
Car speed(RPM)
20
Fig.17 fuel consumption vs different (RPM) at 2/3 load
15
As shown in fig.17, at 2000 RPM the reduction in fuel
10
consumption with HHO is (6.35%), at another speed 1400
1000 1500 2000 2500
Car speed(RPM) RPM (1.85%), and at speed 1100 RPM reduction in fuel
Fig.15 fuel consumption vs different (RPM) at no load consumption is (0.216 %).
12
10
25
1000 1500 2000 2500
Car speed(RPM)
20
Fig.18 fuel consumption vs different (RPM) at full load
15
VI. CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT