Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A
Dissertation
Presented to the
Graduate School
CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
Main Campus, R. Palma St., Cebu City
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for
the Degree of
DOCTOR IN DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION
CHANEY A. GULFAN
November 2022
ii
APPROVAL SHEET
ACCEPTED and APPROVED in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
Doctor of Development Education major in Administration and Supervision.
Comprehensive Examination: ________________
Date of Oral Examination: ________________
ABSTRACT
This research assessed the home environment and its influence on the
level of academic achievement in English 4, Science 5, and Mathematics 6
(EnSciMa) among Key Stage 2 learners at Tayud Elementary School, Liloan
Central Elementary School and Yati Elementary School, Liloan, Cebu for
School Year 2022-2023 as basis for an enhancement plan on home
environment. Findings of this study reveal that the teacher-respondents belong
to the age group of 41-50 years old, female, married, obtained units in master’s
degree, have been linked with the institution for more than 6 years, have a
performance rating of very satisfactory, and have been into district and division
trainings, seminars, and workshops. In terms of the level of the level of
influence of home environment, the respondent-groups strongly agree that all
indicators - friendly home environment, home facilities, parents’ attention and
care, motivational behavior, and financial status – influence the level of
academic performance of the learners. In terms of the level of academic
achievement of the learners, most of them obtained a near mastery grade of
80-89 in all competencies of English, Science, and Mathematics. In terms of
testing relationship between the level of influence of home environment and the
level of academic achievement of learners, it gained a significant relationship
which means that the level of influence of home environment significantly
influence the level of academic achievement of the learners in English, Science,
and Mathematics. In terms of the challenges and barriers experienced by the
respondents in terms of influence of home environment in improving the
academic achievement of their learners, most of them believe that the poor
study habits and lack of interest of learners are their main concerns. Based on
the salient findings of the study, it can be concluded that the level of influence of
home environment and the level of academic achievement of learners resulted
into rejection of the null hypothesis which means that it gained a significant
relationship. This means further that the level of influence of home environment
significantly influence the level of academic achievement of the learners in
English, Science, and Mathematics.
.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researcher wants to express her great gratitude to the following persons who
made this dissertation a possible one and for their assistance in making this study a
success.
To the Chairman, Dr. Rosein A. Ancheta Jr., for his outstanding leadership in
To Dr. Rebecca DC. Manalastas, Dean of Graduate School for the challenge to
and untiring guidance in all stages of this study and for encouraging me to complete
Central School and Yati Elementary School, and the Teaching Force for their
To the respondents, the two hundred parents, teachers, and learners of Tayud
Elementary School, Liloan Central School and Yati Elementary School of Liloan District
gave their precious time to answering the questionnaire and allowing me to distribute it
To my dear family, who have provided me with their financial assistance, trust,
and understanding.
THE RESEARCHER
v
DEDICATION
ADVISER
To my
To the
To our
HEAVENLY FATHER,
THE RESEARCHER
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE . . . . . . . . i
APPROVAL SHEET . . . . . . . ii
LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . v
LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . vi
INTRODUCTION
Theoretical Background . . . . . 3
THE PROBLEM
Null Hypothesis . . . . . . 15
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Design . . . . . . . 17
Environment . . . . . . . 19
Respondents . . . . . . . 21
Instrument . . . . . . . 22
Statistical Treatment . . . . . 23
Scoring Procedures . . . . . . 24
DEFINITION OF TERMS . . . . . . . 25
Related Literature . . . . . . 27
Related Studies . . . . . .
34
Summary . . . . . . . 82
Findings . . . . . . . 82
Conclusion . . . . . . . 84
Recommendations . . . . . . 84
viii
Rationale . . . . . . . 85
Objectives . . . . . . . 86
Scheme of Implementation . . . . 87
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . 90
APPENDICES . . . . . . . . 94
A. Letter of Transmittal . . . . . . 95
B. Questionnaire . . . . . . . 96
LIST OF TABLES
TABLES PAGE
1 Distribution of Respondents . . . . 21
2 Scoring Procedure . . . . . . 24
x
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURES PAGE