Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Setup Guide
DMTA015-01EN — Revision C
March 2011
Olympus NDT, 48 Woerd Avenue, Waltham, MA 02453, USA
© 2007, 2008, 2011 Olympus NDT, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this
publication may be reproduced, translated or distributed without the express
written permission of Olympus NDT, Inc.
This document was prepared with particular attention to usage to ensure the
accuracy of the information contained herein. It corresponds to the version of the
product manufactured prior to the date appearing on the title page. There could,
however, be some differences between the manual and the product if the product
has been modified thereafter.
Printed in Canada
All brands are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners and
third party entities.
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Table of Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7
Index ................................................................................................................... 63
iv Table of Contents
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Intended Use
Do not use the internal rotary inspection system for any purpose other than its
intended use.
Safety Symbols
The following safety symbols might appear on the instrument and in the instruction
manual:
The following safety symbols might appear in the documentation of the instrument:
The following safety symbols could appear in the documentation of the instrument:
The IMPORTANT signal word calls attention to a note that provides important
information or information essential to the completion of a task.
The NOTE signal word calls attention to an operating procedure, practice, or the like
that requires special attention. A note also denotes related, parenthetical information
that is useful but not imperative.
The TIP signal word calls attention to a type of note that helps you apply the
techniques and procedures described in the manual to your specific needs, or that
provides hints on how to use effectively the capabilities of the product.
Warranty Information
Olympus guarantees your Olympus product to be free from defects in materials and
workmanship for a period and with conditions specified in the Olympus terms and
conditions available at http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/terms/.
The Olympus warranty only covers equipment that has been used in a proper manner
as described in this instruction manual, and that has not been subjected to excessive
abuse, attempted unauthorized repair, or modification.
This instruction manual attempts to teach the proper operation of your Olympus
product. The information contained herein is intended solely as a teaching aid and
shall not be used in any particular application without independent testing and/or
verification by the operator or the supervisor. Such independent verification of
procedures becomes more important as the criticality of the application increases. For
this reason, Olympus makes no warranty, expressed or implied, that the techniques,
examples, or procedures described herein are consistent with industry standards, nor
that they meet the requirements of any particular application.
Olympus reserves the right to modify all products without incurring the
responsibility for modifying previously manufactured products.
Technical Support
Olympus is firmly committed to providing the highest level of customer service and
product support. If you experience any difficulties when using our product, or if it
fails to operate as described in the documentation, first consult the user’s manual, and
then, if you are still in need of assistance, contact our After-Sales Service. To locate the
nearest service center, visit the Service Centers page at: www.olympus-ims.com.
2
Place the probe on the deepest
defect, stop the acquisition, and
then measure the wall thickness.
Introduction
Because the internal rotary inspection system (IRIS) can be adapted to a wide range of
tubes, and because many parameters can be used to modify the way the system
works, building a correct setup can be difficult for inexperienced users. This guide
shows you how to optimize a new IRIS setup made with the MultiView setup wizard.
Once the setup file has been created, the optimization (software and hardware) can be
performed in three steps:
1. Place the turbine head in the sound part of the calibration tube, and then start the
acquisition.
2. Place the turbine head on the deepest defect, stop the acquisition, and then
measure the wall thickness.
3. Scan the calibration tube and perform the final verifications.
This setup guide explains how to change the software parameters without opening
the advanced (A-scan) control menu. The relevant parameters are available in the UT
Gain Settings dialog box. The UT Gain Settings dialog box (see Figure i-2 on page 7)
normally appears when a new IRIS setup is performed with the setup wizard;
however, it can also be recalled from the MultiView Operation menu.
Introduction 7
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Gain 1, Gain 2 and Blanking are the only three parameters that should be adjusted
(see Figure i-2 on page 7). All others are advanced parameters that can only improve
signal quality by 10 % at best. In most cases, adjusting the advanced parameters is not
worth the effort, while having the proper transducer and clearing bubbles should be
priority.
8 Introduction
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
The first optimization test consists of making sure the IRIS probe is positioned in the
sound part of the calibration tube and that the generated C-scan is clear.
1.2 Troubleshooting
Some problems can occur during C-scan verification. Please see the following list of
difficulties and how to settle them.
10 Chapter 1
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
• Some of the cables are not connected. Make sure all cables from the acquisition
unit (BNC cables) are connected to the UT transducer.
• The acquisition unit is not connected. Restart the unit. If this does not resolve the
problem, check the unit’s manual for troubleshooting instructions.
2. The C-scan is produced too slowly and the B-scan shows multiple waveforms (see
Figure 1-2 on page 11 and Figure 1-3 on page 12).
• Gain 1 is too low. Increase the value of the Gain 1 text box in 2 dB steps until
the C-scan is correctly generated. You should not need to exceed 40 dB with
standard Olympus NDT turbines and transducers.
• The turbine target pin is not clean. If the target pin appears rusted, remove the
rust with a fine sandpaper or replace the target pin.
Double B-scan
indicating sync. pin not
detected.
Figure 1-2 C-scan generated very slowly, and its distorted B-scan
12 Chapter 1
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Figure 1-4 C-scan with horizontal black stripes and distorted B-scan
3. C-scan with horizontal black stripes and B-scan with missing backwall echo.
• If the C-scan shows horizontal black stripes and the backwall echo of the
B-scan is missing (see Figure 1-5 on page 13), increase the value of Gain 2 in
2 dB steps. You should not need to exceed 55 dB.
• If this does not help, increase the value of Gain 1 in 2 dB steps (until you
reach 40 dB).
4. C-scan with horizontal black stripes, and B-scan with missing frontwall echo.
• If the C-scan shows horizontal black stripes and the frontwall echo of the
B-scan is missing (see Figure 1-6 on page 14), make sure the inner tube is
properly cleaned. Deposits and rust can obstruct the ultrasound beam.
• Try to center the probe as accurately as possible. Check the B-scan. If the tube
cut appears offset in comparison with the blue-dotted vertical lines, the probe
delay is not properly adjusted. To adjust the probe delay, refer to the
appendix on page 57 of this guide. For further details, refer to the MultiView
User’s Manual in the section on IRIS setup.
14 Chapter 1
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Problem reduced as
blanking increases.
16 Chapter 1
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
18 Chapter 1
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
The next step is to ensure that the C-scan is produced normally when the probe is
placed on the deepest defect of the calibration tube. Once acquisition is started, the
C-scan should appear sharp and clear, and in a different color than that of the sound
tube C-scan (see Figure 2-1 on page 20).
2.2 Troubleshooting
Some problems may occur during the C-scan verification. Please see the following list
of difficulties and how to settle them.
20 Chapter 2
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Problem reduced as
Gain 1 increases.
Figure 2-2 C-scan showing colored stripes as normal wall thickness (red)
2. C-scan with horizontal black stripes and B-scan with missing backwall echo.
• If the C-scan shows horizontal stripes and the backwall echo of the B-scan is
missing, increase the value of Gain 2 in 2 dB steps. You should not need to
exceed 55 dB.
• If this does not work, increase the value of Gain 1 in 2 dB steps until you
reach 40 dB.
3. C-scan with horizontal stripes of colored dots.
• If the C-scan shows horizontal stripes of colored dots (see Figure 2-3 on
page 22), increase the Blanking value in 0.1 mm (or 0.005 in.) steps. Do not set
the Blanking value longer than the minimum wall thickness at which you
want the probe to measure in the deepest defect.
• If this does not work, decrease both values of Gain 1 and Gain 2 in 2 dB steps.
Problem reduced as
blanking increases.
4. C-scan with horizontal black stripes and B-scan with missing frontwall echo.
• If the C-scan shows horizontal black stripes and the frontwall echo of the
B-scan is missing, make sure the inner tube is properly cleaned. Deposits or
rust may diffract the ultrasound beam.
• Try to center the probe as accurately as possible. Check the B-scan. If the tube
cut appears offset in comparison with the blue-dotted vertical lines, the probe
delay is not properly adjusted. To adjust the probe delay, refer to the
appendix on page 57 of this guide. For further details, refer to the MultiView
User’s Manual, in the section on IRIS setup.
5. C-scan with heavy horizontal black and colored stripes.
If the C-scan shows heavy horizontal black and colored stripes (see Figure 2-4 on
page 23), decrease the Blanking value in 0.1 mm (or 0.005 in.) steps. Do not
decrease the Blanking value under 1 mm (0.04 in.).
22 Chapter 2
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
24 Chapter 2
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
3. Final Verifications
The last step is a verification to ensure that the probe is able to detect and measure
every defect of the calibration tube. While the whole calibration tube is being scanned,
the user checks for data anomalies such as missing echoes, false triggering, and
inaccurate target-pin detection. Once the setup is tested, the color palette can be
optimized to give the best color contrast for defect detection. Figure 3-1 on page 25
shows an example of an appropriate acquisition of a calibration tube.
50 % 20 %
4 × “FBH” 20 %
pits
OD grooves
Final Verifications 25
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
1. Click the Color palette icon ( ) to open the C-scan Palette dialog box (see
Figure 3-2 on page 26).
2. In the From list box, enter the blanking value in mm (or in.).
3. In the To list box, enter the nominal value of the wall thickness.
4. In the Palette list box, select the color palette type: Rainbow or Rainbow
inverted.
1. If you notice irregularities in the C-scan data, repeat section 2 and 3 to adjust the
setup.
2. If you are still unable to obtain clean data, refer to the MultiView User’s Manual
section on advanced features of the IRIS setup.
It is difficult to obtain clear data from tubes that are dirty or rusted inside (see
Figure 3-3 on page 27).
26 Chapter 3
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
“Rainbow inverted”
color palette shows
defects in red shades
Figure 3-3 Boiler tube acquisition; loss of frontwall echo caused by internal
deposits
Final Verifications 27
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
28 Chapter 3
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
4.1 Introduction
This chapter is dedicated to intermediate or advanced users of the IRIS MS 5800 and
MultiView tube inspection system. It explains the different defect responses that can
be observed by IRIS technicians or analysts. Setup and analysis guidelines are given
for every situation.
This chapter is intended for users having at least a basic understanding of ultrasound
NDT technology and the IRIS system.
This chapter shows several “ray tracing” diagrams. These “ray tracings” are arrows
illustrating the direction of the focalized ultrasound beam emitted by the IRIS
transducer. The arrow itself indicates the center of the beam, where the ultrasound
waves are the strongest.
When the returned echo arrow points towards the turbine mirror, the signal is at its
absolute maximum. This results in a clear image on the B-scan and C-scan views.
On the other hand, when the inside (or outside) surfaces have a high angle (due to a
defect), the ultrasound beam can be deviated away from the turbine mirror. In
drawings, the arrow points in a direction different from the mirror. This does not
mean that no signals reach the mirror; ultrasound waves are more like a wave front,
which means that some signals still reach the mirror; however, at a much lower
amplitude.
Reflection misses
the turbine mirror
due to the higher
angle of the ID
surface: signal loss
is likely to occur
Reflection directed
towards the turbine Turbine mirror
mirror: signal (facing the page)
amplitude is
obtained
Tube section
Figure 4-1 Internal defects reflecting the ultrasound beam at different angles
IRIS turbines should always be kept centered to provide consistent detection around
the circumference. Probe centering cannot remain perfect under real conditions for
obvious reasons; however, care should be taken to obtain the best centering
conditions. The centering device shaft and/or its threads may eventually bend, in
which case they should be fixed or replaced.
The drawings below illustrate why the IRIS probes are so sensitive to centering.
Signal loss generally occurs when the ID surface reflects the ultrasound beam at a
high angle, which results in lower amplitude echoes reaching the turbine mirror.
30 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
A perfectly centered turbine (see Figure 4-2 on page 31) has maximum ultrasound
amplitude coming from all directions, while an off-centering condition (Figure 4-3 on
page 32) will cause echoes to be directed away from the turbine mirror at two
locations around the circumference, causing signal loss when off-centering is severe
(see Figure 4-4 on page 32).
B
Areas in red offer lower
sensitivity with signal
loss likely to occur.
A
C
Good sensitivity is
achieved on the left Reflected echoes are
and right sides as the directed away from the
reflected echoes are turbine mirror, lowering
directed toward the sensitivity.
mirror.
A: Mirror closest to ID
surface
C: Mirror at maximum
distance from ID surface D: Signal loss due to ID surface
reflecting UT beam at higher
angle
32 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
The turbine diameter alone has no effect on the signals. However, a larger diameter
turbine also has a larger diameter mirror, which results in greater chances of having
high amplitude echoes. Whether the cause of angled echo reflection is a defect or just
off-centering, larger mirrors always help obtain clearer B-scan and C-scan views.
Figure 4-5 on page 33 shows the effect that probe off-centering has on smaller mirror
turbines versus larger mirrors. A 17 mm turbine mirror (left) catches more signal
amplitude than the 12 mm turbine (right) when the probe is not properly centered.
Maximum signal
amplitude is more
easily obtained with a
larger mirror.
When selecting turbine size, always use the 17 mm model when possible. The 12 mm
turbine should only be used when the largest turbine cannot be inserted inside the
tube.
While OD pitting is easily detected with the IRIS method, signal loss is sometimes
observed on the edges of the defects. This is more likely to occur on deeper and
sharper pits. This is more easily understood by looking at the “maximum amplitude”
UT ray tracing as the turbine revolves inside the tube.
Figure 4-6 on page 34 shows that the maximum ultrasound wave intensity is obtained
at the deepest point of the defect (0°).
Round-bottom OD pit
Maximum ID and OD
echoes
Turbine’s 45°
mirror, face view
Figure 4-6 Maximum ultrasound wave intensity — deepest point of the defect
Figure 4-7 on page 35 shows that both the ID and OD echoes are received with a very
good signal amplitude.
34 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
ID echo
OD echo
Figure 4-7 ID and OD echoes received with a very good signal amplitude
Figure 4-8 on page 35 shows that the OD echo does not reach the mirror with the
maximum amplitude (signal loss could occur).
Total or partial
reflection
ID echo
OD echo
Figure 4-8 OD echo not reaching the mirror at the maximum amplitude
Figure 4-9 on page 36 shows that the maximum amplitude is resumed when the beam
is oriented outside the defect area.
OD pitting is at times characterized by a loss of the OD echo on the edges of the defect
(see Figure 4-10 on page 36).
36 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Figure 4-11 on page 37 shows that real OD pitting is easily detected with IRIS.
4.5.1 Analysis
Signal loss on the edges of the OD pitting is not a problem, as the deepest part of the
defect (the most important part) presents a “flatter” surface that reflects the
ultrasound beam with good amplitude.
In fact, the presence of signal loss, as on the above C-scan image (see Figure 4-11 on
page 37), can be used in analysis along with the red color as an indication of deeper
flaws.
Actual pitting in carbon steel often shows a semi-spherical section. Sizing internal
pitting is always more difficult than sizing OD defects, as there is likely to be more
signal loss from both interface echoes.
Figure 4-12 on page 38 shows that an ID pit’s deepest point is easily measured with
IRIS, as the ultrasound beam is oriented perpendicular to both surfaces.
ID and OD echoes
Figure 4-13 on page 39 shows that the signal is still very good when the ultrasound
beam is directed at a very low angle.
38 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
OD echo
ID echo
OD echo
Figure 4-13 Good signal when ultrasound beam directed at a very low angle
Figure 4-14 on page 39 shows that a small rotation of the mirror causes a drastic
attenuation of the ID echo. The OD echo will also travel on a longer time of flight.
ID echo
OD echo: longer
time of flight
Figure 4-15 on page 40 illustrates that the ID echo is composed of a beam containing
reflections from several directions. This figure demonstrates that the ID echo can be
detected with a longer time of flight.
ID echo: longer
time of flight
Figure 4-15 The ID echo can be detected with a longer time of flight
Figure 4-16 on page 40 shows that pitting causes a signal loss at the edges of the
defect.
Figure 4-17 on page 41 shows that the internal pitting is very similar to the OD pitting
on the WT C-scan.
40 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Figure 4-18 on page 41 shows that the ID nature of pitting becomes very apparent
when looking at the ID C-scan view with IRIS.
The ID C-scan
view
4.6.1 Analysis
Signal loss on the edges of the ID pitting is not a problem; as with OD pitting, the
deeper part of the defect will act as a reflector to the ultrasound beam.
The signal loss on the edge of the pit appears in black around the defects in the C-scan
view. This can actually help locate the pits quicker.
Sizing is performed
between the deepest
(middle) portion of the Estimated back-wall surface
pit and the estimated (dotted red)
back wall
• The actual pitting shows a more uneven or dirtier surface. This is likely to further
attenuate the echoes, particularly the OD echo, which in some cases may be lost or
42 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
detected with a doubled time of flight, due to the fact that the DAC amplifies the
second reflection. This is explained at the end of this chapter.
Use higher frequency transducers, for example 20 MHz, and use focal lengths that are
close to the ID value.
A higher GAIN 1 parameter helps to obtain a higher amplitude front wall echo.
However, this practice inevitably causes the back wall echo to be “overdetected,” in
which case “false OD readings” are likely to occur. Optimization to ID flaws is better
obtained using the proper transducer rather than one with higher gain.
However, internal damage can be detected and easily measured using the “ID”
C-scan view. Again, the color palette must be adjusted. A good palette adjustment can
be obtained with this simple rule:
When sizing internal defects, the “manual” measurement (blue cursor) is often
required, as shown in Figure 4-20 on page 44. OD signal loss prevents use of the
automatic measurement.
44 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Figure 4-21 Severe ID damage attenuates echoes (causing loss of back-wall signal)
The need to machine artificial defects at a lower cost often results in defects with
sharp edges that are rarely found in real damage situations. The sharp edges, or
angled surfaces, are detrimental to IRIS echoes, as they are directed outside the
turbine mirror. The following examples show the “maximum ultrasound amplitude”
ray tracing for some common calibration defects.
Areas of lower
sensitivity to back-
wall echo (in red).
The middle
section is easily
read, as both
Edges of the
front-wall (ID)
defect present a
and back-wall
higher reflection
(OD) echoes are
angle that directs
reaching the
the back-wall
mirror with the
echo outside the
maximum
mirror.
amplitude.
Figure 4-22 Signal loss or attenuation on edges of an OD flat mill calibration defect
Loss of OD echo
in the red-
colored regions
in Figure 4-22)
46 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Defect geometry causes an important loss of signal (see Figure 4-25 on page 47).
Loss of OD signals on
the corners of the
The areas in RED in defect: the middle
the above image cause section (deepest) can
loss of frontwall echo: still be read.
the dotted line indicates
the normal ID defect
profile.
The response to this kind of defect can be improved; however, it is important to keep
in mind that it does not represent the real pitting condition. In other words,
optimizing for such defects is a waste of time, as real internal pitting is much easier to
detect due to its rounder shape.
The following sample parameter changes were made to obtain a clearer ID echo, such
as that shown on the next image (see Figure 4-26 on page 48):
The GAIN 1 can be drastically increased (>10 dB) to obtain a full ID reading. Again;
however, this is not a good setup for the real condition, as the OD reading will be
“false-triggering” due to high signal amplitude.
48 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Only a few pixels in the middle section of the defect can be measured, as most of the
echoes are directed totally away from the turbine mirror.
Figure 4-27 Drilled holes are the worst calibration defects for IRIS
As seen in Figure 4-28 on page 49, most of the data is missing from the defect. Only
the middle and, fortunately the deepest section, can be measured.
Drilled holes should at all times be avoided with IRIS. The best pit shapes to use are
still round-bottom holes, which are especially necessary when located on the ID
surface.
Most signal
missing
Figure 4-28 A drilled-like internal hole — only a few pixels in the middle of the
defect indicate its depth
MultiView already includes all the necessary tools for proper ID or OD defect analysis
and sizing. However, here are some do’s and don’ts.
1. 2. 3. 4.
6.
7. 5.
50 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Echoes are
synchronized on the ID
signal for easier setup.
Inspection tab
Adjust material
velocity if WT
reading is not
accurate.
52 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Deeper OD defects or wall thinning can at times cause a strange effect called “double
back-wall” reading. This occurs because the first reflection of the OD surface is not
detected by the system due to it being either too weak or too early in time (deep
defect).
As sound bounces between the ID and OD surfaces, multiple reflections of the back
wall are generated. The system has a DAC (increasing gain over time), so the multiple
reflections (repetitions) often get amplified with greater amplitude than the first
reflection. This results in a detection of the double back-wall echo. As shown in
Figure 4-35 on page 54, the first reflection is too weak (low signal amplitude) to be
detected.
First back-wall
reflection is too weak
to be detected.
In the following figure, the double back-wall reflection is detected, because the first
reflection was either too weak or too early (deep defect) to be properly detected. Data
interpretation with the aid of manual measurement is necessary to accurately
measure defect depth (see Figure 4-36 on page 55).
54 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
This phenomenon, although complex, does not prevent you from sizing defects. First,
you must analyze the B-scan to determine the OD profile, and locate where the double
back-wall measurement has occurred. Because it is necessary to measure the deeper
section of the defect, it is likely that the double or, at times even triple reflections, will
be present at this location. This can be easily overrun using the manual cursor to
divide the B-scan thickness by two (double reflection), or even three (rare case of
triple reflection).
56 Chapter 4
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Target-pin Tube
echo echoes
The color of a cursor is not important for the setting of the target-pin gate
58 Appendix
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
60 Appendix
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
List of Figures
List of Figures 61
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
62 List of Figures
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
Index
A final 25
air fin cooler 43 in sound part of tube 9
severe ID damage 44 D
amplitude, maximum signal 29
deepest defect See defect, deepest
anomalies, C-scan with
defect, deepest
on deepest defect 20
anomalies on, C-scan with 20
in sound part of the tube 12
troubleshooting C-scan on 20
artificial defects 45
verification procedure on, C-scan 19
drilled holes (ID and OD) 48
wall-thickness on, inaccurate 23
ID flat-bottom hole 47
defects, artificial 45
OD flat mill defect 45
drilled holes (ID and OD) 48
B ID flat-bottom hole 47
back wall, double 54 OD flat mill defect 45
delay, setting the probe 57
C detection optimization
centered turbine 31 ID round-bottom pit 43
centering, probe 30 OD round-bottom pit 38
color palette 26 difficulties with C-scan production 10
cooler, air fin 43 document
severe ID damage 44 copyright ii
copyright ii part number ii
C-scan publishing date ii
anomalies, with revision ii
on deepest defect 20 double back wall 54
in sound part of the tube 12
F
difficulties with production 10
irregularities on data 26 fin cooler, air 43
troubleshooting severe ID damage 44
on deepest defect 20 G
in sound part of the tube 10
gate, setting the target-pin 58
verification
on deepest defect 19
Index 63
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
64 Index
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
selection 33 V
U verification
on deepest defect, procedure 19
Ultrasound menu, MultiView 51
final 25
Echo Finder tab 52
in sound part of the tube, procedure 9
Inspection tab 51
Options tab 53 W
Pulser/Receiver tab 52 wall thickness, inaccurate measurement 23
Trigger tab 52 warranty information 4
Index 65
DMTA015-01EN, Rev. C, March 2011
66 Index