JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3453 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3453 LPM CE 47/2014 Originator SCC Revised by
Date 11/11/2016 Date
Section Pipe capicity Design (Under Hing Keng Shek Road) Checker YKF Re-checked by

Date 11/11/2016 Date

Provide 1500 mm diameter Concrete Pipe

Assume the pipe is 2/3( 100 %) full with respect to the height of pipe

q d= 1.5 m

2/3d = 1.50 m

q = acrcos (( 2/3d - 1/2d) / 1/2d) where 1/2d= 0.75 m

= 0 o

a = 90 o

A = p d2 /4 x (180+ 90.0 x 2) / 360 + ( 0.5d ^2- 2/3d^2)^0.5 x (0.5d-2/3d) x 2 / 2

= 1.7671 m2

P = p d x (180 + 90.00 x 2) / 360

= 4.7124 m

R = A/P (hydraulic radius (m) )

= 0.375 m

n = 0.013 (Manning‟s roughness coefficient)

(DSD 2013, SEWERAGEMANUAL Table 6)
S = 1: 7 = 0.14286 (hydraulic gradient)

For Manning equation

v = R2/3S1/2/n (DSD 2013, SEWERAGEMANUAL Clause 5.2.1 (2))

= 15.12 m/s

Q= v A
= 26.718 m3/s
= 26718 L/s
= 2E+06 L/min >45600 L/min OK!
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3453 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3453 LPM CE 47/2014 Originator SCC Revised by
Date 11/11/2016 Date
Section Pipe capicity Design (Under Hing Keng Shek Road) Checker YKF Re-checked by

Date 11/11/2016 Date

 INLET OUTLET
GL FROM DIA(mm) IL(Mpd) TO DIA(mm) IL(Mpd) LENGTH (m) GRADIENT(1IN)
CP-C-1 76.57 - 225 UC 76.98 CP1 225 UC/600 UC 76.35 17.5 39
CP1 76.50 CP-C-1 600 UC 75.90 CP2 600 UC 75.80 42.5 25
CP2 74.69 CP1 600 UC 74.09 CP3 600 UC 73.99 20 5
CP3 70.15 CP2 600 UC 69.55 CP4 600 UC 69.45 23.5 67
CP4 69.70 CP3 600 UC 69.1 CP5 450 D 69.00 20 11
CP5 67.70 CP4 450 D 67.25 CP6 600 UC 67.20 12.5 83
CP6 67.70 CP5 600 UC 67.05 - 450 D 66.95 -

INLET OUTLET
GL FROM DIA(mm) IL(Mpd) TO DIA(mm) IL(Mpd) LENGTH (m) GRADIENT(1IN)
CP-C-1 76.57 - 225 UC 76.98 CP1 225 UC/600 UC 76.35 17.5 39
CP1 76.50 CP-C-1 600 UC 75.90 CP2 600 UC 75.80 42.5 25
CP2 74.69 CP1 600 UC 74.09 CP3 600 UC 73.99 20 5
CP3 70.15 CP2 600 UC 69.55 CP4 600 UC 69.45 23.5 67
CP4 69.70 CP3 600 UC 69.10 CP5 450 D 69.00 20 11
CP5 67.70 CP4 450 D 67.25 CP6 600 UC 67.20 12.5 83
CP6 67.70 CP5 600 UC 67.05 - 450 D 66.95 -
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

1. Introduction

The Stability analysis will be carried out for the feature no.
7SE-D/C27

Slope Stability for Sections 1 - 1 and 2 - 2

will be assessed by using the computer programme
Slope/W with assumed shear strength parameters,
inferred geological and groundwater conditions.

2. Method of Analysis

The computer programme Slope/W

is used for the slope stability analysis.
The Morgenstern -Price Method is adopted to
determine the minimum Factor of Safety

3. Existing Slope Geometry, Assumptions on Soil Profile

Shear Strength Parameters and Groundwater Conditions

3.1 Existing Slope Profile

Refer to Figure 2 for the location of slope. The critical

section, Sections 1-1 and 2-2 were analyzed. The existing
profile of the section is shown in Figure 4 and 5.

3.2 Geological Model

The inferred soil profile for

Sections 1 - 1 and 2 - 2 is based on the
results of the ground investigation initiated for the feature
under CEDD Contract No. GE/2014/09.

3.3 Assumptions on Shear Strength Parameters

The soil strength adopted for the analysis are as follow:

RS c' = 4 kPa f' = 34 o

g' = 18 kN/m³

CDT c' = 5 kPa f' = 35 o

g' = 18 kN/m³

3.4 Assumptions on Groundwater Conditions

For purpose of the stability assessment, the deisgn groundwater table has been
assumed to be approximately one-third of the slope height.
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

1. Soil Nail Designs

1.1 Introduction

From the stability analysis presented in Section 3.0, the existing

feature 7SE-D/C27 has inadequate factor of safety which is below
the current government standards (F.O.S => 1.2)
Therefore, LPMit works by installation of soil nails will be required in
order to improve the stability of the feature.

1.2 Methodology

The slip surfaces obtained from the Stability Assessment attached in

Appendix H are adopted for the LPM design.
The length of soil nails for Sections 1 - 1 and 2 - 2 will
be designed in order to achieve the F.O.S. => 1.4 in meeting the
government standards.

1.3 Soil Nail Design Assumption

1.3.1 The stability forces required to upgrade the existing

feature are modelled using assumed anchor load with variable
magnitude.

1.3.2 High yield bars complied with BS 4449 are used for soil nails,
which are hot dip galvanized are required in BS 729.
A reduction of 2mm radius as sacrificial thickness for steel corrosion is allowed.
Diameter of Bar= 25 mm

1.3.3 Diameter of drillhole = 100 mm

with provision minimum grout cover of 10mm

1.3.4 Grade 30 cement grout with water/cement ratio

not exceeding 0.45 is used

1.3.5 The effect of shear and bending of nails across the critical surface
is considered insignificant and is neglected in the design.

1.3.6 The soil nails are bonded behind the Design Slip of FOS > 1.40 after upgrading.

1.3.7 The required factors of safety are

I) Overall Stability = 1.4

II) Bond Failure between 2.0 RS

=
grout and soil 1.5 CDT

III) Bond Failure between

= 2.0
grout and steel

IV) Tensile Failure = 1.5

1.3.8 Compressive strength for grout, fcu = 30 N/mm2

1.3.9 With reference to GEO Technical Guidance Note No. 15 (TGN 15), slips scarps within
a crest influence zone (D) of two times the feature height (H) (i.e., D = 2H) are checked
in the stability assessment.

1.4 Tensile capacity for steel bar

 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

ft = 500 N/mm²

= 500.0 N/mm²
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

Apply ft = 500 N/mm²

For B25 Soil Nails,

Effective diameter = 21 mm (Allow 2mm sacrficial radius)

Allowable force, Tt = ( p / 4 x 21 ² ) x 500/1000 / 1.50

= 115.45 kN

Therefore, Allowable force, Tt = 115.45 / 1.5 = 76.97 kN / m

1.5 Skin friction between soil & grout

Diameter of drillhole= 100 mm

with provision minimum grout cover of 10mm

The following soil parameters are selected in the soil nail analysis:

Soil 1 RS c' = 4 kPa ; f' = 34 o

; g = 18 kN/m3

Soil 2 CDT c' = 5 kPa ; f' = 35 o

; g = 18 kN/m3

Ultimate Pull-out force

Tf = [ p D c' + 2 D sv' tan f' ] lb

where D = Diameter of drillhole

c' = effective cohesion of soil
sv' = vertical effective stress in the soil calculated from
the mid-portion of the bonded length of the soil nails
f' = effective friction angle of soil
lb = Provided Bond Length

Schedule of Soil Nails

No. of Length of Nail Length Bond Diameter of Diameter of

Section Row Soil Nail in Active Zone Length Bar Drill Hole
la lb
(m) (m) (m) (mm) (mm)
1-1 T1 10 3.80 6.20 25 100
T2 10 4.40 5.60 25 100
T3 12 4.40 7.60 25 100
T4 12 4.20 7.80 25 100
2-2 T1 10 6.50 3.50 25 100
T2 12 7.20 4.80 25 100
T3 14 7.40 6.60 25 100
T4 14 7.00 7.00 25 100
T5 14 5.70 8.30 25 100
T6 14 4.10 9.90 25 100

Section 1-1 ( 1.5 m Horizontal Spacing) ( Bond at RS )

Row lb H1 H2 Hw sv' Tf Tallow= Tf /2.0
T1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Soil/grout allowable Soil nail force
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

Section 1-1 ( 1.5 m Horizontal Spacing) ( Bond at CDT ) bond (kN/m) in Slope/W
Row lb H1 H2 Hw sv' Tf Tallow= Tf /1.5 (RS) (kN/m) Accept?
T1 6.20 1.70 2.90 1.60 67 67.74 45.16 30.11 25.00 yes
T2 5.60 1.80 4.10 3.00 76 68.55 45.70 30.47 25.00 yes
T3 7.60 1.80 5.90 4.70 92 109.43 72.95 48.64 40.00 yes
T4 7.80 1.80 7.00 5.70 101 123.01 82.01 54.67 45.00 yes

Section 2-2 ( 1.5 m Horizontal Spacing) ( Bond at RS )

Row lb H1 H2 Hw sv' Tf Tallow= Tf /2.0
T1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
T6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Soil/grout allowable Soil nail force
Section 2-2 ( 1.5 m Horizontal Spacing) ( Bond at CDT ) bond (kN/m) in Slope/W
Row lb H1 H2 Hw sv' Tf Tallow= Tf /1.5 (RS) (kN/m) Accept?
T1 3.50 1.50 4.60 3.20 78 43.63 29.09 19.39 15.00 yes
T2 4.80 1.50 6.50 5.00 94 70.73 47.15 31.43 25.00 yes
T3 6.60 1.50 8.20 6.70 108 109.82 73.21 48.81 40.00 yes
T4 7.00 1.50 9.40 7.90 117 125.89 83.92 55.95 50.00 yes
T5 8.30 1.50 10.50 8.70 129 162.98 ### 72.44 60.00 yes
T6 9.90 1.20 11.60 9.00 140 210.20 ### 93.42 70.00 yes
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

1.6 Skin friction between nail & grout

TGR = [ 2.25 η1 η2 fctd Pr L ] / FGR

where η1 = coefficient related to the quality of the bond condition and the position of the bar
during concreting in accordance with Clause 8.4.2 of BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
(BSI, 2004)
η2 = coefficient related to the bar diameter in accordance with Clause 8.4.2. of
BS EN 1992-1-1:2004 (BSI, 2004)
fctd = the design value of concrete tensile strength in accordance with Clause 3.1.6(2)P
of BS EN 1992-1-1:2004 (BSI, 2004) and NA to BS EN 1992-1:2004 (BSI, 2005)
Pr = effective perimeter of the soil-nail reinforcement
L = bond length of the soil-nail reinforcement in the passive zone
FGR = factor of safety against pullout failure at grout-reinforcement interface

η1 = 1.0 Pr = ( 25 - 2 x 2) x p
η2 = 1.0 = 65.97 mm
fctd = αct fctk,0.05 /γc
= 1.2 FGR = 2.0

Section 1-1 TGR TGR Tworking

Row L per nail per m per m Accept?
T1 6.20 552 368 25 yes
T2 5.60 499 333 25 yes
T3 7.60 677 451 40 yes
T4 7.80 695 463 45 yes

Section 2-2 TGR TGR Tworking

Row L per nail per m per m Accept?
T1 3.50 312 208 15 yes
T2 4.80 428 285 25 yes
T3 6.60 588 392 40 yes
T4 7.00 623 416 50 yes
T5 8.30 739 493 60 yes
T6 9.90 882 588 70 yes
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date

1.7 Soil Nail Head Design

Use typical details as shown in CEDD standard drawing in hydroseeding surface.

- Nail head size is determined from the design Table 5.7 (Geoguide 7)
For f' = 33 o

c' = 1 kPa
q = 40 o to 55 o
Bar Dia. = 25 mm
Soil Head Size
800 x 800 (mm)

1.8 Pull-out Test Design

Test Nail Siz = 32 mm fy = 500 N/mm²

assume UTS=55%
Drillhole Diameter = 100 mm

Tp = 362 Ta = 9

Soil 1 RS c' = 4 kPa ; f' = 34 o

; g = 18 kN/m3

Soil 1 CDT c' = 5 kPa ; f' = 35 o

; g = 18 kN/m3

Ultimate Pull-out force

Tf = [ p D c' + 2 D sv' tan f' ] lb

where D = Diameter of drillhole

c' = effective cohesion of soil
sv' = vertical effective stress in the soil calculated from
the mid-portion of the bonded length of the soil nails
f' = effective friction angle of soil
lb = nail length beyond critical slip
Section 1-1
Row lb H1 Hw sv' Tf TSG T1 T2 Elevation
T1 2.00 2.40 0.40 39 13.09 6.54478 9 18 181.5

Section 2-2
Row lb H1 Hw sv' Tf TSG T1 T2 Elevation
T2 2.00 3.80 0.80 60 18.81 9.4047 13 26 181.5
 JACOBS CALCULATION SHEET

Office Hong Kong Job No 3380 Page No.

Rev No
Job Title 3380 LPM CE 30/2012 Originator YYL Revised by
Date 3/8/2016 Date
Section Feature No. Checker YKF Re-checked by

7SE-D/C27 Date 3/8/2016 Date