You are on page 1of 5

Assignment

Read the excerpts from Santiago Alvarez’ Katipunan and the Revolution: Memoirs of a
General, (pp. 82-88) and Teodoro Agoncillo’s History of the Filipino People, (pp.
184-
187) about the Tejeros Convention. Make a comparative matrix of the two sources.
Use
the following table below.

Historical On March 22, 1897, a convention was held in Tejeros in order to


event: settle the dispute between the two councils and to decide on
what
type of government should be installed. During the early phase
of
the convention the crowd became unruly,causing a recess. When
the convention resumed, Bonifaciowas assigned to preside in the
election of the officers of the new government that was to be set
up.
Before this, however,Bonifacio laid down the rule that the
assembly
should respect whatever would be the outcome of the
election.When Bonifacio was elected Secretary of Interior,
DanielTirona contested and argued that a lawyer should handle the
position. Bonifacio felt insulted and demanded an apology from
Tirona. Because of humiliation and anger, Bonifaciodeclared that
all
matters convened in the Tejeros Conventionwere null and void.
Together with his supporters, he left theestate house.

Primary Source Secondary Source


Historical Katipunan and theRevolution: History of the Filipino
source: Memoirs of a General People(Seeds of Discontent)
Author: Santiago Alvarez Teodoro A. Agoncillo

Date of the March 25-27, 1897 March 22- 23, 1897


event:
Objective of In this occasion the main
the event objective is to illuminate the
In this event the main objective
issues of whether a new
is to discuss the best measures
government should be set up or
to take to strengthen the
established to take the place
of
Magdiwang government facing
katipunan. Also the election
for
the enemy
the new established
government,
Republic of the Philippines.
Persons *Supremo Andres Bonifacio, *Artemio Ricarte
involved: *Messrs. Mariano Alvares,
*Messrs. Baldemero Aguinaldo, *Severino de las Alas
*Ariston Villanueva, *Baldomero Aguinaldo

*Mariano C. Trias, *Jose Del Rosario

*Secretary Jacinto Labreno, *Daniel Tirona


*Diego Mojica, *General Apoy
*Emiliano R. De Dios, *Antonio Montenegro
*Santiago V, Alvarez, *Mariano Alvares
*Artemio Ricarte, *Pascual Alvarez
*Santos Nocon , *Dionisio Alvarez
*Luciano San Miguel, *Adriano Guinto
*Pablo Mojica, *Emeterio Malla
*Severino De Las Alas, *Emiliano Reigo de Dios
*Santiago Rillo, *Santiago Alvares
*All of them the Magdiwang and *Diego Moxica
among the Magdalo,
*Mariano Reigo de Dios
*Daniel Tirona, and *Edilberto Evangelista
*Cayetamo Topilio. *Vito Belarmino
*With training sister of Rizal and *Crispulo Aguinaldo
*Josephine Bracken
*Gen. Blanco
*Ciriaco Bonifacio
*Procopio Bonifacio
*Candido Tirona
*Vicente Fernandez
*Esteban San Juan

Main The main argument in this topic Daniel Tirona disregarded the
argument: is all about the election that reminder of Supremo Andres
happened in Tejeros convention Bonifacio that whoever should
that was not honoured by the get elected to any position
Supremo Andres Bonifacio should be respected. Supremo
because of some conflict. The Andres Bonifacio declaire the
next day they revalidated the assembly dissolved and he
proceedings of the election annulled all that had been
meeting but only the Magdiwang approved and resolved by the
leaders attended. At the same council. Aguinaldo took their
oath
night the magdalo leaders held without Supremo Andres
their own meeting at the Paris Bonfacio.
house in Tariza. Magdalos
disregard Supremo Andres
Bonifacios decisions and they
took the Oath taking Ceremony
even without the knowledge of
Supremo Andres Bonifacio.
Bias: The book is all about the Teodoro Andal Agoncillo was a
Memoirs of a General Santiago noticeable 20th- century Filipino
Alvares, which is portion of historian, his view about the
Magdiwang, so fundamentally tejeros convention will
definitely
all of the information or data he base on other sources that he
wrote about this topic is base has so there will be a few
only his view about the things circumstances that the
that happen within the Tejeros information or data he has is not
convention and other occasion, dependable and valid. Some
there are a few factor which will information just like the dates
in
influence his bias almost the his book does not match the data
information that he will give given by General Santiago
since he’s part of Magdiwangs. Alvares.

Advantages: The advantage of the primary The advantage of a secondary


source is that you can assure source is that the author may
that the information it has is provide more data that the
liable and valid because it is primary source can’t have. He
from the person who witnessed has more views about the topic
or experienced the said event. since he will just not focus on
Also Readers can understand one side of the information but
every viewpoint or aspect of rather seek for more data.
what's going on as if they were Additionally the words use in
the
there when it happened. secondary source is more
reasonable or understandable
because he can interpret
difficult
words that he got from his other
sources

Disadvantages: The disadvantage of the primary The disadvantage of the


source is that it lacks from the secondary source is that there
is
viewpoint of other views similar some data that's not matched to
to how General Alvares clarified the primary source since the
his thoughts about the tejeros information that he will reach
to
conventions were his focus is all provide is already analyzed and
about the things that just deciphered.
happen in the event and
perhaps he has bias on how he
describe all the happening since
his part of Magdiwang.

You might also like