You are on page 1of 1

Chemical Education Today

Letters
→) vs Equations (⫽)
Reactions (→ Laidler. However, the solution proposed in their report (3)
was that the two should be denoted by slightly different types
A paper by Toby (1) has referred to the important dis- of arrow, one with a simple arrowhead (→) and the other with
tinction between chemical reactions and chemical equations. a filled arrowhead (➝). At best, this method of distinction
In this, Toby states, “Reactions are signified by an arrow would seem (no pun intended) a rather blunt weapon and in
meaning ‘becomes’ … whereas equations are signified by an certain fonts the difference might not be clearly apparent.
equals sign…”, and has credited this distinction to Diemente A recent chemical kinetics text (4) has adopted a differ-
(2). However, neither author seems to have employed this ent solution, using an equals sign for the overall reaction:
mode of distinction in a totally consistent way.
H2 ⫹ Br2 ⫽ 2HBr
In chemistry, we may use chemical equations in various
ways. In some instances we regard it as very important that whereas an arrow, →, is used in each of the reaction steps
our equation denotes the process that actually occurs, and that are proposed to constitute the mechanism, and for any
this would usually apply in kinetic studies. On the other elementary process. This would seem to be in accord with
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

hand, we may sometimes wish to evaluate the standard en- the policy advocated by Toby (1).
thalpy change of a reaction process that could not conceiv-
ably be achieved in the laboratory. So for simplicity, let me Literature Cited
Downloaded via UNIV DE ALICANTE on February 6, 2023 at 21:30:41 (UTC).

confine my remarks to the area of kinetics, which is the one 1. Toby, S. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 188–190.
to which Toby (1) has referred. 2. Diemente, K. J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75, 319–321.
Some reactions are known to be elementary processes, 3. Laidler, K. J. Pure and Applied Chem. 1981, 53, 753–771.
occurring in a single step involving precisely those species writ- 4. Logan, S. R. Fundamentals of Chemical Kinetics; Longman:
ten on the left-hand side of the balanced equation, and some Harlow, England, 1996.
are known not to be. For the latter, an important and neces-
sary distinction is that between the overall reaction process S. R. Logan
and the individual reactions steps by which this process is School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster
achieved. This was recognized, for example, by the IUPAC Coleraine, N. Ireland BT52 1SA
Sub-Committee on Chemical Kinetics, chaired by K. J. sr.logan@ulster.ac.uk

1258 Journal of Chemical Education • Vol. 80 No. 11 November 2003 • JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu

You might also like