Universities should not be required to accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject because it would be impractical and unfair. Requiring gender parity in enrollments would force universities to increase class sizes for courses that attract only one gender and could prevent students from attending their preferred programs. While gender equality in higher education is important, admissions should consider qualifications rather than gender to avoid discrimination and unfairness.
Universities should not be required to accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject because it would be impractical and unfair. Requiring gender parity in enrollments would force universities to increase class sizes for courses that attract only one gender and could prevent students from attending their preferred programs. While gender equality in higher education is important, admissions should consider qualifications rather than gender to avoid discrimination and unfairness.
Universities should not be required to accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject because it would be impractical and unfair. Requiring gender parity in enrollments would force universities to increase class sizes for courses that attract only one gender and could prevent students from attending their preferred programs. While gender equality in higher education is important, admissions should consider qualifications rather than gender to avoid discrimination and unfairness.
Topic: Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in
every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the quantity of men admitted to universities should be equated with that of women. I completely oppose this belief due to its being impractical and unfair. To commence with, trying to fit a university with an even number of both genders seems not likely to happen under any circumstances. In fact, a plethora of educational institutions provides manifold courses that necessitate a limited number of attendants and among which attract only one sex. Were the policy to be implemented, it would be inescapable that universities have to increase the capacity of their classes to adapt to it as well as struggling to achieve the evenness of both genders, even if the course might not be appealing to the other sex. For example, the majority of women these days enroll in nursing courses, which would unarguably create significant hurdles for the school to balance both male and female students. Granted, it is widely advocated that accepting even male and female students would promote gender equality and provide both sexes with a chance to have equal opportunities, I believe this notion is flawed. It would be counterproductive since in reality most universities set specific requirements on their enrollees regardless of their gender and students have to make an effort to attend their desirable universities. Choosing students based on their sex, therefore, could trigger discrimination and engender unfairness. Instead, maintaining the status quo should be preferred as both men and women would be given equal chances. In brief, I concede that equating men with women in universities’ courses seems unrealistic and it would backfire on those who believe that it could reduce gender inequality.
Some People Think That Students in Single-Sex Schools Perform Better Academically. Others, However, Believe That Mixed Schools Provide Children With Better Social Skills For Adult Life.
Summary: Fair Play: A Game-Changing Solution for When You Have Too Much to Do (and More Life to Live) by Eve Rodsky: Key Takeaways, Summary & Analysis Included