Q:1 Everyone has experienced moments in their lives when

they felt excluded from a group think about an experience

when you felt like an outsider. What made you feel that way?
Did someone help you to become part of the group? If so,
how did they do this? If not, what would have helped you
feel like you belong?

Ans: Soo here is something I am going to share for the very first time that i was
in the group of modern (upper class)friends. They were very kind and sweet by
nature in the start it was very nice to met them. They all were good to me but as
soon as time passed and as they felt me like i am a middle class boy they start to
ignoring me and as they were too foodie and most of there times outings and
hangouts and i know my limits soo most of the events and outings was going
without me. So as time passed they slowly start neglecting me it was the worst
time ever that your good friends are going to ignore you just because of your
status. I belong to a middle class family and that was not my fault ..Time passed
and I became stranger to them I was my fault too that I was thinking that status
has no value to friendship but I was really hurting for me because first time
happened to me like that the last few months some of them start taunting like
have you ever put A iPhone I your hands I was a joke to them they laughed but
was a worst feeling for me most of time they used to show-off the prices of things
as they know i can't afford but actually I was the dumb (joker) to them and they
were entertaining there self and taunted me slow and gradually they  start
remembering me in there meetups and All and that day I felt There is no value of
a person but the money decides you are a human or not
Then one member of that group was noticing that all things happening to me he
supported me and make me realize that there are good humans too that value
humans not status and money at all He was a champ no doubt he left that group
too and stayed with me as a true friend and make me realize that actually I don't
need a group and friends like them Alhamdulillah blessed to have such a
supportive friend like him.
Q:2 Think of a leader whom you would consider to be a role
model, someone who practises what he or she preaches and
lives by high standards. Think of local, national, or historical
exemplars. What is it about the role model you identified
that qualifies that person as an exemplary leader? What
values does he or she profess, and what practices does he
or she consistently live by?

Ans: (SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL)

Throughout his long career, he held a variety of posts and was a skilled public
servant. Winston Churchill enrolled at the Royal Military College of Sandhurst in
December 1894 and graduated with honours in December 1894. Later in his
career, he saw combat in Cuba, India, Egypt, Sudan, the front lines of World War I,
and even participated in one of the final British cavalry charges in history2.
Churchill was elected to Parliament at the age of twenty-five and began his career
as a politician in the House of Commons.
SELF CREATED PERSON
Leaders are created by themselves. Winston Churchill was far from a "self-made
guy." He was born to aristocratic parents at Blenheim Palace. Nonetheless, he was
formed by himself, as much as anybody could be. He overcame several obstacles,
from an unappealing physical endowment to a distracting speech impediment, to
become the heroic figure envisioned in his romantic imagination. This self-
creation process never finished. He was always changing in major ways,
unhindered by the predictability and consistency requirements that constrain so
many others. This also allowed him to rebound from setbacks that most others
would have considered career-ending.
COURAGE IN FIRST VIRTUE
Who can deny that if people were asked to define Churchill in one word, bravery
would be the most likely response
He displayed bravery in a variety of ways, as have many other strong leaders. His
career included stints as a soldier, writer, and politician. In his last contribution, as
warlord of the British Empire during WWII, the diverse threads were neatly
intertwined. His bravery lasted into his final premiership, in the 1950s, when he
strove to restore ties between the US and the Soviet Union.
All of his achievements may be understood as stemming from a common root of
courage—advanced through a similar trait: boldness.
VISION TRANSMISSION
Churchill saw the world as a parade of heroes and heroines, spectacle and ritual,
bright hues and vivid depictions. Some of this was undoubtedly caused by his
feelings of neglect, if not abandonment, by a beautiful, lively mother and a
turbulent, doomed father. His romantic tendencies are particularly evident in his
account of his marriage to the formidable Clementine Hozier Churchill.
SUPERIOR INTELLECT
Churchill did not attend university. Nonetheless, he was well-educated and mostly
self-directed. As a result, his thinking was not constrained by tradition. His
unlimited curiosity and excitement were not coerced into conformity and
conventionality by pedants.
He has exceptional understanding. His diverse global experiences broadened it.
His temperament, strengthened with the certainty of an aristocrat who reached
maturity amid the height of the British Empire, drove him to proclaim his
frequently surprising points of view.
Churchill was drawn into questionable ventures and understandings due to the
same traits and freedom of thinking in the face of established opinion. Notable
instances are his obstinate, dead-end opposition to India's dominion status and
his mistaken backing of King Edward VIII during the crisis caused by his connection
with Wallis Simpson. In the 1930s, his political isolation was exacerbated by such
untrustworthy assessments. Tragically, they undoubtedly undermined the
credibility of his early predictions about the approaching storm in Nazi Germany.
ILLUMINATING THE PRESENT AND FUTURE
Churchill was a history buff. He regularly spoke to past events and people as if
they were there with him. They were, in reality, by his side, surging through the
currents of his preternaturally active intellect and imagination. Even as the
unfolding destiny of Churchill's political project—protecting the existence of the
British Empire—raised his fears, his immersion in history enabled him to see far
into the future. It made him incessantly adaptable and inventive, attributes that
are not typically linked with a fundamentally conservative viewpoint.
MASTER THE WRITTEN WORD
Churchill loved history. He frequently spoke to former events and persons as
though they were present with him. They were, in fact, right by his side, rushing
through the currents of his extraordinarily active mind and imagination. Even as
the developing fate of Churchill's political project—protecting the British Empire's
existence—raised his worries, his absorption in history enabled him to see far into
the future. It made him ceaselessly adaptive and imaginative, qualities not
normally associated with a fundamentally conservative outlook.
MASTER THE SPOKEN WORD
Churchill's greatest leadership influence came from his ability to talk. Churchill
"mobilised the English language and launched it into combat," President Kennedy
stated, echoing Edward R. Murrow.
Churchill said that he was not a natural orator. He meant that he was not the type
of speaker, like David Lloyd George, who could connect emotionally with an
audience in real time, receiving and responding to their increasing emotions. One
wonders if this was a residual effect of his hard-won victory over a distracting lisp
and the attendant self-consciousness.
Churchill, on the other hand, meticulously planned his speeches and writing for
his audiences. On closer examination, many of his famed witticisms appear to
have been planned rather than spontaneous.
The value was established mostly via the interaction of Churchill's shifting
thoughts and words while he penned the speech, rather than through the
interaction of his relationship with an audience during delivery. He usually wrote
by dictation. He called this "living from mouth to hand."
A PRELUDE TO INSPIRING OTHERS
One may consider resilience to be a major part of Churchill's life and work,
however one imagines he would prefer a straightforward, unambiguous,
onomatopoetic adjective such as grit.
Churchill's journey of self-creation and self-assertion was defined by ever-
increasing displays of resolve against all obstacles, against polite and professional
opinion—and occasionally even against logic itself. Had fate not invited him to
official leadership in the war against Hitler in 1940, his trials and blunders may
have been considered as a lost career.