USER GUIDE FOR THE ITEM ANALYSIS TEMPLATE © Balajadia 2014

Directions:
the "Worksheet" heading with the necessary data for Division, District, School, Subject, Grade-Section, Exam Title, Period, School Year, Name of Teacher.
e checked and scored test papers from highest to lowest scorers.
te the highest 27% and the lowest 27%. Indicate the total number of students and the number of highest 27% in the "Worksheet" accordingly.
he responses of students in the highest 27% (vertical) per item number (horizontal) in the yellow cells. Encode "1" for a correct answer and "0" for a wrong answer. Please, note that if you leave
1 blank on a particular item, it means that there are no data for that item.
p 4 for the lowest 27% in the pink cells.
he "Main Report" tab below to check the final report ready for interpretation. There is nothing to modify in this page.

or Interpretation
as it is. - No revision is needed because the level of difficulty and the discriminating power are enough. Retain the item and can be used again in future exams.
ed with very slight revision. - You can right away accept and retain the item or make little changes depending on the level of difficulty.
ed with slight revision. - The item is retained with slight increase or decrease of difficulty as regards the P.
e accepted with minor revision. - The item may be retained or discarded as how you personally evaluate it. If retained, the level of difficulty and choices may be changed.
revision on the stem / choices. - If you think the item will be ratained, paraphrase the stem and replace the choices which no one chose for an answer.
major revision or discarded. - Total paraphrasing of the stem and replacement of non-selected choices should be made. Better yet, discard the item.
discard. - The item has to be discarded because it is either too easy or too difficult and is unable to distinguish the low performers from the high performers.
here are locked cells which you cannot modify to totally prevent errors and misencoding.The "Main Report" sheet is protected, therefore, no midification is necessary.

on for writing the descriptive analysis

e difficulty level of items
oup together the items having the same difficulty levels and infer on the topics or competencies the students achieved.
hlight the items of "moderate difficulty" and explain that these items can challenge the students enough to think analytically and critically. Nitko and Brookhart (2011) explain that items with
rate difficulty are better than those which are very easy or very difficult. In this way, students are genuinely tested of their analytical and critical thinking skills.
u may also describe easy items to be indicators of most learned concepts, likewise, difficult items signal the least learned competencies.
discrimination indices of items
oup together the items having the same discrimination indices and infer on the item on its ability to distinguish who thinks more analytically or don't.
ms that are very discriminating should be emphasized to discuss the credibility of the test in eliciting authentic learning abilities of students.
u may also mention about those which are discriminating and moderately discriminating to be reconsidered after some necessary revision.
er on the resulting items being non-discriminating and questionable.
final decision
oup together the items having the same decisions and infer on each item on its validity, reliability, and objectivity.
mmend the items that are to be accepted and retained right away.
e examples of revision of some items if there are.
te a general impression of the entire test.

and submission
he "Main Report" without any modification. Study the table(s).
he "Interpretation" tab below and accomplish your discussion as specified therein. Print.
t your report in the following order:
ain Report
terpretation and Desriptive Analysis Report
opy of the TOS and Test Paper with correct answers.
 Department of Education - Region III
Division of Zambales
Iba
Zambales National High School

ITEM ANALYSIS IN EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY

SecondPeriodical Test 2022-2023

Exam Title / School Year

Total Students (100%): Name of Teacher: JOSE D. ORBE JR.

149 Highest Scorers (27%): 40 Lowest Scorers (27%): 40 80 page 1/2

Total Total Total Difficulty Index Discrimination Index

Item # Correct Correct Correct Decision
(high) (low) (high+low) P Interpretation D Interpretation

1 40 14 54 0.68 Easy 0.65 Very Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.

2 35 17 52 0.65 Easy 0.45 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
3 25 15 40 0.50 Moderately Difficult 0.25 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
4 35 24 59 0.74 Easy 0.28 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
5 34 20 54 0.68 Easy 0.35 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
6 38 17 55 0.69 Easy 0.53 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
7 25 16 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.23 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
8 36 15 51 0.64 Easy 0.53 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
9 40 40 80 1.00 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating 6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
10 35 16 51 0.64 Easy 0.48 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
11 34 15 49 0.61 Easy 0.48 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
12 32 23 55 0.69 Easy 0.23 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
13 37 8 45 0.56 Moderately Difficult 0.73 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
14 19 14 33 0.41 Moderately Difficult 0.13 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
15 25 18 43 0.54 Moderately Difficult 0.18 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
16 27 14 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.33 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
17 23 15 38 0.48 Moderately Difficult 0.20 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
18 29 12 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.43 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
19 25 15 40 0.50 Moderately Difficult 0.25 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
20 23 16 39 0.49 Moderately Difficult 0.18 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
© Balajadia 2014
21 21 15 36 0.45 Moderately Difficult 0.15 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
22 24 11 35 0.44 Moderately Difficult 0.33 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
23 25 10 35 0.44 Moderately Difficult 0.38 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
24 21 17 38 0.48 Moderately Difficult 0.10 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
25 27 8 35 0.44 Moderately Difficult 0.48 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
26 35 6 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.73 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
27 34 7 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.68 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
28 24 12 36 0.45 Moderately Difficult 0.30 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
29 22 14 36 0.45 Moderately Difficult 0.20 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
30 23 14 37 0.46 Moderately Difficult 0.23 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
31 23 13 36 0.45 Moderately Difficult 0.25 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
32 22 14 36 0.45 Moderately Difficult 0.20 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
33 23 12 35 0.44 Moderately Difficult 0.28 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
34 32 9 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.58 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
35 24 9 33 0.41 Moderately Difficult 0.38 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
36 33 8 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.63 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
37 35 7 42 0.53 Moderately Difficult 0.70 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
38 35 9 44 0.55 Moderately Difficult 0.65 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
39 35 7 42 0.53 Moderately Difficult 0.70 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
40
41 34 9 43 0.54 Moderately Difficult 0.63 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
42 37 9 46 0.58 Moderately Difficult 0.70 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
43 33 8 41 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.63 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
44 35 9 44 0.55 Moderately Difficult 0.65 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
45 35 10 45 0.56 Moderately Difficult 0.63 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
46 15 40 55 0.69 Easy -0.63 Questionable 7.Totally discard.
47 23 12 35 0.44 Moderately Difficult 0.28 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
48 22 11 33 0.41 Moderately Difficult 0.28 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
49 32 18 50 0.63 Easy 0.35 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
50 36 25 61 0.76 Easy 0.28 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.

Summary of Results
1.Accepted as it is………………………….. 12 4.May be accepted with minor revision…… 5 7.Totally discard….. 1
16 0
page 2/2

2.Accepted with very slight revision……… 5.Major revision on the stem or choices….
3.Accepted with slight revision……………. 14 6.Needs major revision or be discarded….. 1
Signature/Date:
Item analysis in: EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY SecondPeriodical Test 2022-2023 JOSE D. ORBE JR.

© Balajadia 2014
Division: Division of Zambales District: Iba School: Zambales National High School

Subject / Grade - Section EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY Total Number of Students: 149

Exam Title / Period / School Year SecondPeriodical Test 2022-2023 Number of highest scorers (27%): 40
Name of Teacher JOSE D. ORBE JR. Number of lowest scorers (27%): 40
© Balajadia 2014
HIGHEST SCORERS LOWEST SCORERS
Total Total
item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Correct Correct
1 40 40 1 14 14
2 35 35 2 17 17
3 25 25 3 15 15
4 35 35 4 24 24
5 34 34 5 20 20
6 38 38 6 17 17
7 25 25 7 16 16
8 36 36 8 15 15
9 40 40 9 40 40
10 35 35 10 16 16
11 34 34 11 15 15
12 32 32 12 23 23
13 37 37 13 8 8
14 19 19 14 14 14
15 25 25 15 18 18
16 27 27 16 14 14
17 23 23 17 15 15
18 29 29 18 12 12
19 25 25 19 15 15

© Balajadia 2014
20 23 23 20 16 16
21 21 21 21 15 15
22 24 24 22 11 11
23 25 25 23 10 10
24 21 21 24 17 17
25 27 27 25 8 8
26 35 35 26 6 6
27 34 34 27 7 7
28 24 24 28 12 12
29 22 22 29 14 14
30 23 23 30 14 14
31 23 23 31 13 13
32 22 22 32 14 14
33 23 23 33 12 12
34 32 32 34 9 9
35 24 24 35 9 9
36 33 33 36 8 8
37 35 35 37 7 7
38 35 35 38 9 9
39 35 35 39 7 7
40 40
41 34 34 41 9 9
42 37 37 42 9 9
43 33 33 43 8 8
44 35 35 44 9 9
45 35 35 45 10 10
46 15 15 46 40 40
47 23 23 47 12 12
48 22 22 48 11 11
49 32 32 49 18 18
50 36 36 50 25 25

© Balajadia 2014
Total>>> 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total>>> 697 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

© Balajadia 2014

© Balajadia 2014
 Department of Education - Region III
Division of Zambales
Iba
Zambales National High School

ITEM ANALYSIS IN EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY

SecondPeriodical Test 2022-2023
Exam Title / School Year

Interpretation and Descriptive Analysis

Test Difficulty

THERE ARE 36 OUT OF 50 TEST QUESTIONS THAT ARE CONSIDERED AS DIFFICULT QUESTION.

Test Discrimination

Final Impression

Analyzed and reported by:

JOSE D. ORBE JR.
Teacher