Professional Documents
Culture Documents
or any part of this module is not authorized without the permission from
LESSON
INTRODUCTION TO
1 MICROBIOLOGY
11
HOURS
Aquaculture is the culture of aquatic organisms per unit water area per unit time
for maximum profit. The economically important finfishes and shellfishes, whose body
physiology is adjustable to varied environmental conditions, are considered as
aquaculture candidate species. So, an overall knowledge on the physiology of such
species is required to improve the culture practices.
INTRODUCTION TO MICROBIOLOGY
What is Microbiology?
Things aren’t always the way they seem. On the face of it,
‘microbiology’ should be an easy word to define: the science (logos) of
small (micro) life (bios), or to put it another way, the study of living things
so small that they cannot be seen with the naked eye. Bacteria neatly fit
this definition, but what about fungi and algae? These two groups each contain members
that are far from microscopic. On the other hand, certain animals, such as nematode
worms, can be microscopic, yet are not considered to be the domain of the microbiologist.
Viruses represent another special case; they are most certainly microscopic (indeed,
most are submicroscopic), but by most accepted definitions they are not living.
Nevertheless, these too fall within the remit of the microbiologist.
In the central section of this book you can read about the thorny issue of microbial
classification and gain some understanding of just what is and what is not regarded as a
microorganism.
Medicine
Environmental science
Food and drink production
Fundamental research
Agriculture
Pharmaceutical industry
Genetic engineering
Aquaculture
The popular perception among the general public, however, remains one of
infections and plagues. Think back to the first time you ever heard about
microorganisms; almost certainly, it was when you were a child and your parents
impressed on you the dangers of ‘germs’ from dirty hands or eating things after they’d
been on the floor. In reality, only a couple of hundred out of the half million or so known
bacterial species give rise to infections in humans; these are termed pathogens, and
have tended to dominate our view of the microbial world.
How do we know?
Microbiology in perspective: to the ‘golden age’ and beyond
We have learned an astonishing amount about the invisible world of
microorganisms, particularly over the last century and a half. How has this happened?
The penetrating insights of brilliant individuals are rightly celebrated, but a great many
‘breakthroughs’ or ‘discoveries’ have only been made possible thanks to some (frequently
unsung) development in microbiological methodology. For example, on the basis that
‘seeing is believing’, it was only when we had the means to see microorganisms under a
micro-scope that we could prove their existence.
Figure 2. Pasteur’s swan-necked flasks. Broth solutions rich in nutrients were placed in flasks and
boiled. The necks of the flasks were heated and drawn out into a curve, but kept open to the atmosphere.
Pasteur showed that the broth remained sterile because any contaminating dust and microorganisms
remained trapped in the neck of the flask as long as it remained upright
This also disproved the idea held by many that there was some element in the air
itself that was capable of initiating microbial growth. In Pasteur’s words ‘the doctrine of
spontaneous generation will never recover from this mortal blow. There is no known
circumstance in which it can be affirmed that microscopic beings came into the world
without germs, without parents similar to themselves.’ Pasteur’s findings on wine
contamination led inevitably to the idea that microorganisms may be also be responsible
for diseases in humans, animals and plants.
The notion that some invisible (and therefore, presumably, extremely small) living
creatures were responsible for certain diseases was not a new one.
Long before micro-organisms had been shown to exist, the Roman philosopher
Lucretius (∼98–55 BC) and much later the physician Girolamo Fracastoro (1478–1553)
had supported the idea.
Fracastoro wrote ‘Contagion is an infection that passes from one thing to another’
and recognised three forms of transmission: by direct contact, through inanimate objects
and via the air. We still class transmissibility of infectious disease in much the same way
today. The prevailing belief at the time, however, was that an infectious disease was due
to something called a miasma, a poisonous vapour arising from dead or diseased bodies,
or to an imbalance between the four humours of the body (blood, phlegm, yellow bile and
black bile). During the 19th century, many diseases were shown, one by one, to be
caused by microorganisms.
In 1835, Agostino Bassi showed that a disease of silkworms was due to a fungal
infection, and 10 years later, Miles Berkeley demonstrated that a fun-gus was also
responsible for the great Irish potato blight.
Joseph Lister’s pioneering work on antiseptic surgery provided strong, albeit
indirect, evidence of the involvement of microorganisms in infections of humans. The use
of heat-treated instruments and of phenol both on dressings and actually sprayed in a
mist over the surgical area, was found greatly to reduce the number of fatalities following
surgery. Around the same time, in the 1860s, the indefatigable Pasteur had shown that a
parasitic protozoan was the cause of another disease of silkworms called pebrine´, which
had devastated the French silk industry.
The first proof of the involvement of bacteria in disease and the definitive proof of
the germ theory of disease came from the German Robert Koch. In 1876 Koch showed
the relationship between the cattle disease anthrax and a bacillus which we now know
as Bacillus anthracis. Koch infected healthy mice with blood from diseased cattle and
sheep, and noted that the symptoms of the disease appeared in the mice, and that rod
shaped bacteria could be isolated from their blood. These could be grown in culture,
where they multiplied and produced spores. Injection of healthy mice with these spores
(or more bacilli) led them too to develop anthrax and once again the bacteria were
isolated from their blood. These results led Koch to formalise the criteria necessary to
prove a causal relationship between a specific disease condition and a particular
microorganism.
Despite their value, it is now realised that Koch’s postulates do have certain
limitations. It is known for ex-ample that certain agents responsible for causing disease
can’t be grown in vitro, but only in host cells. Also, the healthy animal in Postulate 3 is
seldom human, so a degree of extrapolation is necessary – if agent X does not cause
disease in a laboratory animal, can we be sure it won’t in humans? Furthermore, some
diseases are caused by more than one organism, and some organisms are responsible
for more than one disease. On the other hand, the value of Koch’s postulates goes
beyond just defining the causative agent of a particular disease, and allows us to ascribe
a specific effect (of whatever kind) to a given microorganism. Critical to the development
of Koch’s postulates was the advance in culturing techniques, enabling the isolation and
pure culture of specific microorganisms. The development of pure cultures revolutionised
microbiology, and within the next 30 years or so, the pathogens responsible for the
majority of common human bacterial diseases had been isolated and identified. Not
without just cause is this period known as the ‘golden age’ of microbiology!
Koch’s greatest achievement was in using the advances in methodology and the
principles of his own postulates to demonstrate the identity of the causative agent of
tuberculosis, which at the time was responsible for around one in every seven human
deaths in Europe.
Although it was believed by many to have a microbial cause, the causative agent
had never been observed, either in culture or in the affected tissues. We now know that
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the tubercle bacillus) is very difficult to stain by conventional
methods due to the high lipid content of the cell wall surface. Koch developed a staining
technique that enabled it to be seen, but realised that in order to satisfy his own
postulates, he must isolate the organism and grow it in culture. Again, there were
technical difficulties, since even under favourable conditions, M. tuberculosis grows
slowly, but eventually Koch was able to demonstrate the infectivity of the cultured
organisms towards guinea pigs. He was then able to isolate them again from the dis-
eased animal and use them to cause disease in uninfected animals, thus satisfying the
remainder of his postulates.
Although most bacterial diseases of humans and their aetiological agents have
now been identified, important variants continue to evolve and emerge. Notable examples
in recent times include Legionnaires’ disease, an acute respiratory infection caused by
the previously unrecognised genus, Legionella, and Lyme disease, a tick borne infection
first described in Connecticut, USA in the mid-1970s. Also, a newly recognised pathogen,
Helicobacter pylori, has been shown to play an important (and previously unsuspected)
role in the development of peptic ulcers. There still remain a few diseases that some
investigators suspect are caused by bacteria, but for which no pathogen has been
identified.
Following the discovery of viruses during the last decade of the 19th century, it
was soon established that many diseases of plants, animals and humans were caused
by these minute, non-cellular agents.
The major achievement of the first half of the 20th century was the development
of antibiotics and other antimicrobial agents, a topic discussed in some detail in Chapter
14. Infectious diseases that previously accounted for millions of deaths became treatable
by a simple course of therapy, at least in the affluent West, where such medications were
readily available.
If the decades either side of 1900 have become known as the golden age of
microbiology, the second half of the twentieth century will surely be remembered as the
golden age of molecular genetics. Following on from the achievements of others such as
Griffith and Avery, the publication of Watson and Crick’s structure for DNA in 1953
heralded an extraordinary 50 years of achievement in this area, culminating at the turn of
the 21st century in the completion of the Human Genome Project.
As we have seen, a recurring theme in the history of microbiology has been the
way that advances in knowledge have followed on from methodological or technological
developments, and we shall refer to a number of such developments during the course
of this book. To conclude this introduction to microbiology, we shall return to the
instrument that, in some respects, started it all. In any microbiology course, you are sure
to spend some time looking down a microscope, and to get the most out of the instrument
it is essential that you understand the principles of how it works.
HISTORY OF MICROBIOLOGY
2. John Needham (1713-1781) showed that mutton broth boiled in flasks and
then sealed could still develop microorganisms, which supported the theory of
spontaneous generation.
3. Lazzaro Spallanzani (1729-1799) showed that flasks sealed and then boiled
had no growth of microorganisms, and he proposed that air carried germs to
the culture medium; he also commented that external air might be needed to
support the growth of animals already in the medium; the latter concept was
appealing to supporters of spontaneous generation.
5. John Tyndall (1820-1893) demonstrated that dust did carry microbes and that
if dust was absent, the broth remained sterile-even if it was directly exposed
to air; Tyndall also provided evidence for the existence of heat-resistant forms
of bacteria.
3. Louis Pasteur - showed that the péine disease of silkworms was caused
by a protozoan parasite
Immunological studies:
1. Infectious diseases: The etiological agent of most infectious diseases has been
ascertained. Current research focuses on understanding the molecular mechanisms by
which disease is caused.
2. Chemotherapy: Discovery of antibiotics; antibiotic resistance
3. Immunology develops as a science.
4. Physiology and biochemistry: Using microbes as a model, many physiological and
biochemical processes have been elucidated.
5. Genetics: Many of the advances in molecular genetics were made using bacteria as
models. A few of the many:
a. 1941: Beadle and Tatum – 1 gene = 1 enzyme
b. 1943: Luria and Delbruck – mutations are spontaneous in nature
c. 1944: Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty – DNA is the genetic material
d. 1961: Jacob and Monod – the operon and gene regulation
6. Molecular biology: Many of the advances in molecular biology were made using
bacteria as models. A few of the many:
a. 1970: Restriction enzymes discovered
b. 1979: Insulin synthesized using recombinant techniques
c. 1990: Gene therapy trials begin
d. 1995: The nucleotide sequence of the first free-living organism
(Haemophilus influenzea) published
Microbiology is the study of organisms that are so small they cannot be seen with
the naked eye. These minute organisms are called Microorganisms or microbes. These
microbes are categorized into two. Cellular, which may either be prokaryotes (bacteria,
cyanobacteria and Archean) or eukaryotes fungi, protozoa and algae; and acellular,
which includes viruses.
There is an increase in demand for microbiologists globally. Related disciplines such as;
• GENETICS: Mainly involves engineered microbes to make hormones, vaccine,
antibiotics and many other useful products for human being.
• FOOD SCIENCE: It involves the prevention of spoilage of food and food borne
diseases and the uses of microbes to produce cheese, yoghurt, pickles and beer.
• IMMUNOLOGY: The study of immune system which protect the body from
pathogens.
The environment:
• Microbes are responsible for the cycling of carbon, nitrogen phosphorus
(geochemical cycles)
• Maintain ecological balance on earth
• They are found in association with plants in symbiotic relationships, maintain
soil fertility and may also be used to clean up the environment of toxic compounds (bio-
remediation).
• Some are devastating plant pathogens, but others act as biological control
agents against these diseases.
Medicine:
Food:
• Microorganisms have been used to produce food, from brewing and wine
making, through cheese production and bread making, to manufacture of soy sauce.
• Microbes are also responsible for food spoilage.
Biotechnology:
• Bacteria
• Bacillus cereus (B. cereus)
• Brucella species (Brucella spp)
• Campylobacter spp
• Clostridium botulinum (C. botulinum)
• Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens)
• Escherichia coli O157:H7 (E. coli O157:H7) and other
Shiga-toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) (including O26,
O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145)
• Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes)
• Salmonella spp
• Shigella spp
• Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus)
• Yersinia enterocolitica (Y. enterocolitica)
Viruses
• Hepatitis A and D
• Norovirus
• Rotaviruses
Tapeworms
Taenia spp.
Roundworms
Trichinella spp
Protozoa
• Toxoplasma spp
• Sarcocystis spp
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that the most
common foodborne illnesses for which an organism has been identified are those caused
by the bacteria Campylobacter, Salmonella, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli O157:H7 and
the norovirus.
THE MICROSCOPE
OVERVIEW OF MICROSCOPE
Their ability to function is because they have been constructed with special
components that enable them to achieve high magnification levels. They can view very
small specimens and distinguish their structural differences, for example, the view of
animal and plant cells, viewing of microscopic bacterial cells.
Microscopes are generally made up of structural parts for holding and supporting
the microscope and its components and the optical parts which are used for magnification
and viewing of the specimen images. This description defines the parts of a microscope
and the functions they perform to enable visualization of specimens.
Microscope Parts and Function
There are three structural parts
of the microscope (head, base,
and arm).
2. Eyepiece tube – it is the eyepiece holder. It carries the eyepiece just above the
objective lens. In some microscopes such as the binoculars, the eyepiece tube is
flexible and can be rotated for maximum visualization, for variance in distance. For
monocular microscopes, they are none flexible.
3. Objective lenses – These are the major lenses used for specimen visualization.
They have a magnification power of 40x-100X. There are about 1- 4 objective
lenses placed on one microscope, in that some are rare facing and others face
forward. Each lens has its own magnification power.
4. Nose piece – also known as the revolving turret. It holds the objective lenses. It is
movable hence it can revolve the objective lenses depending on the magnification
power of the lens.
5. The Adjustment knobs – These are knobs that are used to focus the microscope.
There are two types of adjustment knobs i.e fine adjustment knobs and the coarse
adjustment knobs.
6. Stage – This is the section on which the specimen is placed for viewing. They have
stage clips hold the specimen slides in place. The most common stage is a
mechanical stage, which allows the control of the slides by moving the slides using
the mechanical knobs on the stage instead of moving it manually.
7. Aperture – This is a hole on the microscope stage, through which the transmitted
light from the source reaches the stage.
9. Condenser – These are lenses that are used to collect and focus light from the
illuminator into the specimen. They are found under the stage next to the diaphragm
of the microscope. They play a major role in ensuring clear sharp images are
produced with a high magnification of 400X and above. The higher the magnification
of the condenser, the more the image clarity. More sophisticated microscopes come
with an Abbe condenser that has a high magnification of about 1000X.
10. Diaphragm – it is also known as the iris. It is found under the stage of the
microscope and its primary role is to control the amount of light that reaches the
specimen. It is an adjustable apparatus, hence controlling the light intensity and the
size of the beam of light that gets to the specimen. For high-quality microscopes, the
diaphragm comes attached with an Abbe condenser and combined they are able to
control the light focus and light intensity that reaches the specimen.
11. Condenser focus knob – this is a knob that moves the condenser up or down thus
controlling the focus of light on the specimen.
13. The rack stop – It controls how far the stages should go preventing the objective
lens from getting too close to the specimen slide which may damage the specimen.
It is responsible for preventing the specimen slide from coming too far up and hit the
objective lens.
Effective teaching and learning of science involves a perpetual state of show and
tell. Good schools combine classroom teaching with laboratory experiments to ensure
that their students grasp each and every concept thoroughly. It is also believed that
laboratory teaching and experiments that are being conducted there help encourage deep
understanding in children. Students are able to retain the knowledge for longer when they
see the experiments being performed in front of their eyes.
Science lab equipment allows students to interact directly with the data gathered.
They get a first-hand learning experience by performing various experiments on their own.
Students are made to use the models and understand different scientific theories and
concepts. It is also found that school science lab equipment and supplies make teaching
and learning easy both for the teachers, as well as for the students. There are several
scientific theories and concepts that are difficult to explain directly from the books.
Magnifying Glass
This learning activities will fall on your laboratory activities. (100 points)
Instructions:
1. On a short bondpaper, make a margine using a black marker (0.5 inch in
all sides)
2. Using your phone, search for the different types of microscope and
choose at least two (2) and draw.
3. Label each parts of the microscope.
4. Below your drawing, define the uses/functions of each parts of
microscope.
5. Make sure to indicate your source or reference at the lower right side of
your bondpaper.
Name: Date:
Year and Section: Rating:
THE MICROSCOPE
RUBRIC:
POINTS INDICATOR
95-100 Exceptional and impressive. Completed ahead of time.
90-94 Work/project exceeds the standards; through and effective
application of knowledge and skills are evident.
85-89 Project meets the standard.
80-84 Work/project is acceptable.
75-79 Work project shows partial application of knowledge and skills;
lacks depth or incomplete and needs considerable development
Face to Face