You are on page 1of 8

appendix

Curricular Plans for Teaching with an Intercultural


Communication Orientation

The following proposed four-year curricular plan for teaching an L2/Lx


with an intercultural communicative competence-orientation is based on
benchmarks set forth in the Common European Framework of Reference
for Languages and the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign
Languages (where information is available). It is useful to remember that
it takes approximately 600 to 900+ contact hours to reach intermediate-
high or B2 levels of proficiency, at which point students can interpret and
create lexically sophisticated and accurate language (cf. Goertler, Kraemer,
& Schenker, 2016).

313

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core
terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015
Pedagogical focus

Year Vocabulary Grammar Pragmatics

1 • Focus intensively on lexical develop- • Foster grammar development by using • Make pragmatics an explicit, emphasized
ment, using sociolinguistically and sociolinguistically contextualized models component of language learning and use.
culturally contextualized vocabulary. as input and scaffolding for output in • Focus on chunked, formulaic expres-
• Prioritize high-frequency, everyday various modalities. sions, basic speech acts (e.g., greeting,
vocabulary, developing a repertoire • Prioritize structures that are used most thanking, inviting, asking for help, leave-
of synonyms, antonyms, and com- often in everyday communication; taking).
mon collocations. include words and phrases that frequently • Recognize broader and narrower cultural
• Introduce learners to formal and co-occur with these structures (e.g., trends (e.g., typical politeness formulae in
casual styles (incl. slang) in ‘stan- adverbs of time with narrating the past). ‘standard’ varieties), while noting the
dard’ varieties of languages. • Introduce learners to the most common importance of individual preferences in
• Introduce skills for conducting mini- genres they are likely to encounter (e.g., pragmatics; raise learners’ awareness of
ethnographies on authentic resources newspapers, Instagram posts for personal situational variables that affect
to identify different language vari- use) or specialized texts (e.g., for students interaction.
eties and styles, and multimodal of tourism or other professions). • Recognize how multiturn, multiparticipant
analyses to recognize the interaction Recognize different grammatical expec- interactions are structured, using richly
of multiple semiotic systems of tations (e.g., computer-mediated com- contextualized models as scaffolding for
meaning-making in the L2/Lx per- munication is less prescriptive than an written and spoken output.
taining to the lexicon. academic essay). • Identify learners’ communicative and prag-
• Help learners reflect on their L1, • Introduce learners to morphosyntactic pat- matic needs in the L2/Lx, and help them
comparing it to the L2/Lx lexicon. terns in ‘standard’ varieties of languages, explore genres of texts they are likely to
• Foster language play and engagement including different standards of pluricentric encounter outside the classroom (e.g.,
with vocabulary of interest for languages, and some formal and casual emailing professors and peers or interacting
learners. styles in these varieties. with clients at a health clinic).
• Help students develop skills for conducting • Include humorous authentic sources to

terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015


mini-ethnographies with authentic explore the L2/Lx.
resources to identify L2/Lx practices, and • Help students develop skills for conduct-
multimodal analyses to recognize how ing mini-ethnographies on authentic
multiple semiotic systems interact to create resources to identify who uses the L2/Lx,
grammatical meaning in the L2/Lx. how, and when, and multimodal analysis
to recognize how multiple semiotic sys-
tems create pragmatic meaning.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core
2 • Develop lexicon further, introducing • Expand learners’ knowledge of grammar • Introduce learners to pragmatic features
academic or professional vocabulary, structures, including more nuanced past, (e.g., hedging, politeness formulae,
depending on learners’ objectives. present, and/or future tenses, a wider speech acts) in ‘standard’ varieties of lan-
• Continue introducing richly contex- range of cases if applicable in the language guages, with some stylistic and regional
tualized vocabulary, multiword and (teach most common first, rarer later), or variation.
idiomatic expressions, in a manner; common moods and aspects. • Expand learners’ understanding and use
introduce word meanings farther • Help learners recognize connections of internal and external modifiers (e.g.,
from the core, including abstract between varieties of the L2/Lx and the downgraders, intensifiers, subjunctive
concepts (primarily receptively). social identities they represent. forms if they are used in politeness).
• Help learners make connections • Build receptive knowledge of stylistic var- • Introduce learners to common themes
between language varieties and iation (casual v. formal language) and and types of humor in the L2/Lx-
social identity, expanding receptive learn about appropriate contexts of use. speaking cultures (e.g., common frames,
knowledge of lexical variation and Discuss explicitly involuntary (e.g., L2/ scripts, and sources of humor in the host
contexts of use. Lx use of the language) and voluntary society). Discuss the importance of
• Increase leaners’ ability to reflect on flouting of grammar forms, such as rap humor as a part of one’s identity, build
their L1 lexicon, exploring similarities music or poetry. awareness of the role of humor in helping
and differences, including intracul- • Deepen learners’ ability to conduct eth- people get through challenging times,
tural variation. nographies and multimodal analyses, such as studying abroad.
• Encourage learners to research voca- using authentic sources, examining how • Continue enhancing learners’ skills to
bulary in-depth that they find inter- grammar contributes to meaning in dif- conduct mini-ethnographies and multi-
esting and/or useful. ferent types of texts (e.g., advertisements, modal analyses to analyze L2/Lx
poetry, lyrics, journal articles). pragmatics.
3 • Emphasize productive knowledge of • Emphasize productive knowledge of • Increase learners’ knowledge of and use of
vocabulary, in diverse casual and grammar in diverse casual and formal broader and narrower cultural trends
formal contexts, including multi- contexts, including an increasingly wider (e.g., politeness formulae and adjacency

terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015


word and idiomatic expressions. range of grammatical structures. pairs in regional varieties of language, in
• Push fluency and accuracy, breadth • Emphasize fluency and accuracy, breadth different standards of pluricentric lan-
a well as depth of lexical knowledge. and depth of grammatical knowledge guages, both formal and casual styles).
(including metalanguage).

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core
(cont.)

Pedagogical focus

Year Vocabulary Grammar Pragmatics

• Expand learners’ knowledge of low- • Introduce learners to lower-frequency, • Expand learners’ awareness of situational
frequency, professional and academic professional, and academic structures variables that affect interaction at the
vocabulary, especially targeted to (e.g., embedded clauses), especially tar- local level (e.g., intentional impoliteness).
their personal interests and language geted to their personal interests and lan- • Help learners recognize a broader range
use needs. guage needs. of pragmatic functions in particular con-
• Increase learners’ knowledge of vari- • Increase learners’ knowledge of varieties texts: e.g., What linguistic forms are used
eties of language (in terms of the of grammar use in diverse contexts (e.g., in interaction at a party with friends, at
lexicon), which is appropriate in spoken by whom, when, where, under the doctor’s office, or in an interview with
what contexts (e.g., spoken by what circumstances, with which interlo- an immigration officer? How does our
whom, when, for what communica- cutors, for what communicative pur- audience influence what language we use?
tive purposes) using extended data, poses) using ethnographic analyses of • Expand learners’ understanding of
such as television serials or a novel, extended data, such as television serials or humor in different media – introduce
expanding the repertoire of genres. a novel, expanding the repertoire of learners to a broader range of humor (e.g.,
• Deepen learners’ ability to analyze genres. taboo topics, ‘appropriateness,’ and
the relationship between the lexicon flouting social norms to shape sociopoli-
and cultural values (e.g., language tical practices).
and power). • Develop learners’ skills to conduct mini-
• Build leaners’ lexicon to be able to ethnographies, including with native

terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015


understand and discuss current speakers of the L2/Lx, and more in-depth
social, political and economic issues. multimodal analyses to understand how
to communicate pragmatic intent in the
L2/Lx.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core
4 • Continue building lexical knowledge • Continue refining learners’ grammatical • Expand learners’ knowledge of pragmatic
in diverse casual and formal contexts, knowledge in diverse casual and formal functions to debate, disagree, suggest,
expanding creative language use and contexts. offer advice, etc., which can be face-
metaphorical expression (analyze the • Study model texts and speeches and have threatening, so the nuance between dis-
cultural values they reflect). learners edit their own writing and speech agreeing with humor versus strongly
• Continue to build lexical fluency, based on those models, focusing on assertive language, just to name one
expanding depth of knowledge to grammatical accuracy, to prepare for example, should be examined.
include historical perspectives on academic and professional • Explore in depth the pragmatic skills par-
culturally significant words and communication. ticular to professions that learners might
phrases (e.g., democracy or • Expand learners’ breadth and depth of undertake: What skills do musicians
nationalism). grammatical knowledge to include his- need? Mathematicians? School teachers,
• Expand learners’ knowledge of rele- torical developments and change, so that when interacting with children, their
vant academic or professional voca- they can access older texts. parents, or school administrators?
bularies (e.g., natural or social • Expand knowledge of grammatical struc- • Expand learners’ understanding of
sciences, diplomacy). tures that are relevant for their own aca- humor as a sociopolitical tool, used in
• Increase learners’ knowledge of lan- demic or professional purposes (e.g., ‘appropriate’ and ‘inappropriate’ ways,
guage varieties, including historical structures that might be unique in law, both reflecting and shaping cultural and
developments of social, political, and medicine, diplomacy). sociopolitical practices. What – if any –
economic cultural patterns and their • Improve learners’ knowledge of varieties are the consequences for flouting
effect on the lexicon, using critical of language (in terms of grammar), expectations?
and ethnographic analyses of multi- including historical and sociopolitically • Enhance learners’ skills to analyze
ple data sources. Explore similarities divergent contexts, using ethnographic authentic resources to identify who uses
and differences among the cultures analyses of multiple data sources. the L2/Lx, how, and when via multiple
they are increasingly familiar with. semiotic systems of meaning-making in
• Foster critical awareness of how lin- the L2/Lx as it pertains to pragmatics.

terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015


guistic codes disguise bias and power
structures.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core
Pedagogical focus

Year Paralinguistic features Nonverbal communication Cultural background knowledge

1 • Address paralinguistic features expli- • Address nonverbal communication expli- • Address cultural knowledge explicitly in
citly in course materials (e.g., how citly in course materials. course materials.
intonation differs in questions, • Expose learners to authentic materials, so • Expose learners to authentic materials, so
answers). that they can familiarize themselves with that they can familiarize themselves with
• Use authentic materials to familiarize nonverbal communication used by other potential sources of information used by
learners with the rate and volume of speakers of the L2/Lx. other speakers of the L2/Lx.
speech used by other L2/Lx speakers; • Introduce common symbols, icons, and • Introduce commonly known informa-
include extensive pre-viewing and indexes that are meaningful in L2/Lx- tion about both everyday and unique
viewing tasks to support authentic speaking communities, focusing on cur- events (e.g., important historical events
materials instead of adapting or sim- rent practices, as well as the cognitive and and geographical facts; famous authors,
plifying them. affective responses members of the cul- writers, members of popular culture;
• Explore the use of affective devices in ture have to these signs (e.g., the sche- everyday needs, such as names of grocery
computer-mediated communication. mata they activate and emotional stores, electronics websites).
• Introduce basic conversation man- reactions to the signs). • Help students develop the skills for ana-
agement devices, especially ones • Help students develop skills to analyze lyzing authentic resources and interacting
used to hold the floor while thinking, authentic resources as they pertain to with members of the community to gain
and the most common backchannel- L2/Lx nonverbal communication. cultural knowledge.
ing devices to signal continued
interest in conversation.
• Help students develop skills for ana-
lyzing authentic resources for para-
linguistic features of the L2/Lx.
2 • Introduce learners to paralinguistic • Help learners recognize more nonverbal • Introduce learners to further resources
features in more diverse interac- communication in sociolinguistic contexts, that help build cultural knowledge (e.g.,

terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015


tional situations (e.g., where to speak emphasizing the need to understand them differing perspectives, with the sociocul-
quietly/loudly, what the implications in particular interactional situations. tural context explained, such as journals
of fast or slow speech might be). • Explore how personal presentation, kine- or websites with different political
• Explore how personality and emotions sics, haptics, and proxemics are enacted biases).
might influence intonation patterns. in various L2/Lx cultural situations, • Explore how everyday and unique events
• Include opportunities for students to expected behaviors and potential conse- (e.g., historical events and geography)
express affect in computer-mediated quences for flouting those expectations. impact the perspectives, practices, and
communication. products of the culture, how members of

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core
• Expand the range of conversation • Analyze practices related to proxemics a culture view themselves or their culture,
management devices used in differ- and orientation to time. and their interactions with other cultures.
ent social contexts and how their use • Continue enhancing learners’ skills to • Examine how the culture has viewed
might be perceived. conduct mini-ethnographies and multi- famous authors, writers, members of
• Continue enhancing learners’ skills modal analyses on authentic resources to popular culture and how these views have
to conduct mini-ethnographies and identify how nonverbal communication changed over time.
multimodal analyses on authentic is realized among members of different • Help students develop further skills to
resources to identify how paralin- L2/Lx-speaking communities. analyze authentic resources for gaining
guistic features impact the emotional cultural background and contextual
tone of speakers’ or online users’ knowledge; improve skills of discovery.
utterances in the L2/Lx.
3 • Expand learners’ knowledge of con- • Refine learners’ knowledge and use of • Refine learners’ knowledge of potential
versation-management devices: how nonverbal communication among differ- resources that help build background
to interject effectively, express nega- ent participants and in various social and contextual information.
tive responses to a speaker’s utter- contexts • Explore in depth current and historical
ances, or convey personal interest. • Expand learners’ knowledge of how per- cultural forces that have shaped and con-
• Explore how paralinguistic features sonal presentation, kinesics, haptics and tinue to shape the culture’s perspectives,
can be used to express positive proxemics can be used to convey specific practices, and products.
(affiliative) and negative (e.g., sar- social meaning, including polite and • Enhance learners’ skills to conduct mini-
casm, social distance) affect, includ- impolite behaviors and their ethnographies and multimodal analyses
ing how these features are expressed consequences. on authentic resources to increase their
across interactional situations (i.e., • Continue to explore subcultural variation cultural knowledge, both at the societal
when, how, and with whom). in the use of nonverbal communication and individual levels (i.e., analyze broader
• Introduce learners to diverse dialect (regional and other cultural groups) and social forces, as well as how knowledge of
and register variation as well as non- what social connotations different enact- local factors impacts intercultural
native accents. Examine critically ments of nonverbal communication communication).
how accents are perceived and what carry. • Guide learners to reflect on current social,
social connotations they carry among • Continue to improve learners’ ability to political, and economic issues, exploring
L2/Lx speakers as well as in learners’ conduct mini-ethnographies and multi- similarities and differences among the

terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015


L1 contexts. modal analyses on authentic resources to practices of their own and other cultures.
• Enhance learners’ skills to analyze increase their knowledge of who uses • Foster critical digital literacy (e.g., aware-
authentic resources to increase their nonverbal communication in what ways ness of sources of online materials, bias
knowledge of various contexts-of-use and which social situations. represented in these sources).
of paralinguistic features.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core
(cont.)
Pedagogical focus

Year Paralinguistic features Nonverbal communication Cultural background knowledge

4 • Continue to expand learners’ knowl- • Continue to expand learners’ knowledge • Explore the impact of popular culture
edge of nuanced paralinguistic fea- of nonverbal communication, including (including changes over time) on every-
tures (e.g., interviews, celebrations), a historical overview of the origins of day perspectives, practices, and products.
including increasingly wider ranges various features of nonverbal communi- • Learn in-depth about current events,
of emotions they encounter in diverse cation: signs, personal presentation, their historical origins, and possible
interactional contexts. kinesics, haptics, proxemics, and chrone- future trajectories.
• Explore in depth the paralinguistic mics (e.g., from literary or historical • Explore subcultural variation in how
features that might be characteristic documents). members of the culture might view the
of professions learners might under- • Explore nonverbal communication that same events (current and historical) dif-
take: Are there particular ways nurses might be characteristic of various profes- ferently and why.
speak? Business people? sions or in diverse interpersonal commu- • Continue enhancing learners’ ability to
• Expand learners’ critical understand- nicative settings. conduct research, mini-ethnographies,
ing of how paralinguistic features are • Continue to improve learners’ ability to and multimodal analyses in order to
evaluated by society, both positively conduct mini-ethnographies and multi- increase their cultural knowledge, using
and negatively, and explore social modal analysis of nonverbal communi- reliable sources.
movements that try to change discri- cation in the L2/Lx in increasingly diverse • Increase learners’ ability to reflect –
minatory practices. (A positive recent interactional situations. increasingly independently – on current
development has been the addition of social, political, and economic issues,
multilingual speakers, representing exploring similarities and differences
a richer tapestry of accents in some among the practices of their own and
television series, such as the British- other cultural groups (including intra-
French crime drama series Death in cultural variation).
Paradise.) • Continue to increase learners’ critical

terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780360.015


• Enhance learners’ ability to conduct digital literacy (e.g., by examining bias).
mini-ethnographies, interactional
sociolinguistic and multimodal ana-
lyses of paralinguistic features inde-
pendently in the L2/Lx in
increasingly diverse interactional
situations.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Connecticut, on 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44:34, subject to the Cambridge Core

You might also like