RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: GEN. CHEMISTRY 2 Adviser: KAREN ROSE T. ODI

Grade and Section: 11-STEM Highest Score: 49 Lowest Score: 35
School Year: 2019-2020 No. of Students No. of Test
21 50
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
Describe and differentiate the ty 1 21 100% 25% M
types of intermolecular forces 2 21 100% 25% M
3 21 100% 25% M
4 21 100% 25% M
5 21 100% 25% M
6 18 86% 11% M
7 21 100% 25% M
8 21 100% 25% M
9 21 100% 25% M
10 21 100% 25% M
11 18 86% 11% M
12 17 81% 6% M
13 21 100% 25% M
14 15 71% -4% NM
15 17 81% 6% M
16 15 71% -4% NM
17 15 71% -4% NM
Describe the properties of 18 15 71% -4% NM
liquids and explain the effect 19 20 95% 20% M
of intermolecular forces 20 21 100% 25% M
21 15 71% -4% NM
22 15 71% -4% NM
23 14 67% -8% NM
Explain the properties of wa- 24 12 57% -18% NM
ter with its molecular structure 25 18 86% 11% M
and intermolecular forces 26 18 86% 11% M
27 20 95% 20% M
Describe the difference in 28 15 71% -4% NM
structure of crystalline and 29 19 90% 15% M
amorphous solids 30 13 62% -13% NM
31 10 48% -27% LM
32 12 57% -18% NM
33 19 90% 15% M
Describe the different types 34 21 100% 25% M
of crystals and their proper- 35 21 100% 25% M
ties 36 19 90% 15% M
37 14 67% -8% NM
38 16 76% 1% M
39 19 90% 15% M
40 21 100% 25% M
41 13 62% -13% NM
Describe the nature of phase 42 17 81% 6% M
change 43 19 90% 15% M
44 14 67% -8% NM
45 21 100% 25% M
46 15 71% -4% NM
47 13 62% -13% NM
48 13 62% -13% NM
49 12 57% -18% NM
50 14 67% -8% NM
MEAN 41.10
MPL 82.19

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 1 2%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 19 38%
75% above Mastered (M) 30 60%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
KAREN ROSE T. ODI
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Department Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: PHYSICAL SCIENCE Adviser: MARICEL Q. BACOLOR

Grade and Section: 11-HUMSS Highest Score: 45 Lowest Score: 32
School Year: 2019-2020 No. of Students No. of Test
45 50
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
Give evidence for and explain 1 36 80% 5% M
the formation of the light ele- 2 27 60% -15% NM
ments in the big bang theory 3 30 67% -8% NM
4 36 80% 5% M
5 34 76% 1% M
6 30 67% -8% NM
Describe the ideas of the an- 7 34 76% 1% M
cient Greeks on the elements 8 33 73% -2% NM
9 35 78% 3% M
10 28 62% -13% NM
11 38 84% 9% M
Point out the main ideas in the 12 34 76% 1% M
discovery of the structure of 13 37 82% 7% M
the atom and its subatomic 14 38 84% 9% M
particles 15 29 64% -11% NM
16 38 84% 9% M
17 35 78% 3% M
Cite the contributions of JJ 18 25 56% -19% NM
Thomson, Ernest Rutherford, 19 30 67% -8% NM
Henry Mosely and Neils Bohr 20 31 69% -6% NM
to the understanding of the 21 25 56% -19% NM
structure of the atom 22 35 78% 3% M
Describe the nuclear model of 23 37 82% 7% M
the atom and the location of 24 32 71% -4% NM
its major components 25 28 62% -13% NM
26 28 62% -13% NM
27 34 76% 1% M
28 33 73% -2% NM
Describe the general types 29 29 64% -11% NM
of intermolecular forces 30 38 84% 9% M
31 30 67% -8% NM
32 38 84% 9% M
Give the type of intermolecu- 33 29 64% -11% NM
lar forces in the properties of 34 29 64% -11% NM
substances 35 22 49% -26% LM
36 30 67% -8% NM
37 36 80% 5% M
Explain the effects of inter- 38 26 58% -17% NM
molecular forces on the pro- 39 36 80% 5% M
perties of substances 40 31 69% -6% NM
41 36 80% 5% M
Explain how the uses of the ff. ma- 42 27 60% -15% NM
terials depend on their properties: 43 31 69% -6% NM
a. medical implants prosthesis 44 31 69% -6% NM
b. sports equipments c. electronic
devices d. construction supplies for
buildings and furniture e. household
45 30 67% -8%
gadgets NM
Determine if a molecule is po- 46 37 82% 7% M
lar or nonpolar given its 47 34 76% 1% M
structure 48 35 78% 3% M
49 38 84% 9% M
50 33 73% -2% NM
MEAN 35.91
MPL 71.82

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 1 2%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 26 52%
75% above Mastered (M) 23 46%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
KAREN ROSE T. ODI
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: GEN. PHYSICS 2 Adviser: DESIREE H. GUERINA

Grade and Section: STEM 12 Highest Score: 46 Lowest Score: 37
School Year: 2019-2020 No. of Students No. of Test
15 50
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
Describe using a diagram 1 15 100% 25% M
charging by rubbing and char- 2 14 93% 18% M
ging by induction 3 15 100% 25% M
4 15 100% 25% M
5 11 73% -2% NM
6 11 73% -2% NM
7 15 100% 25% M
8 15 100% 25% M
9 10 67% -8% NM
10 15 100% 25% M
11 15 100% 25% M
12 14 93% 18% M
13 15 100% 25% M
14 11 73% -2% NM
15 11 73% -2% NM
16 10 67% -8% NM
17 12 80% 5% M
Explain the role of electron 18 11 73% -2% NM
transfer in electrostatic char- 19 13 87% 12% M
ging by rubbing 20 14 93% 18% M
21 14 93% 18% M
22 15 100% 25% M
23 15 100% 25% M
Describe experiments to show 24 15 100% 25% M
electrostatic charging by in- 25 15 100% 25% M
duction 26 13 87% 12% M
27 11 73% -2% NM
State that there are positive 28 11 73% -2% NM
and negative charges, and 29 16 107% 32% M
that charge is measured in 30 13 87% 12% M
Coulombs 31 15 100% 25% M
32 13 87% 12% M
33 9 60% -15% NM
Predict charge distribution, 34 12 80% 5% M
and the resulting attraction 35 10 67% -8% NM
or repulsion, in a system of 36 14 93% 18% M
charged insulators and con- 37 16 107% 32% M
ductors 38 15 100% 25% M
39 11 73% -2% NM
40 11 73% -2% NM
41 11 73% -2% NM
42 14 93% 18% M
Describe an electric field as a 43 15 100% 25% M
region in which an electric 44 15 100% 25% M
charge experiences a force 45 14 93% 18% M
46 10 67% -8% NM
47 12 80% 5% M
48 11 73% -2% NM
49 12 80% 5% M
50 11 73% -2% NM
MEAN 43.40
MPL 86.80

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 0 0%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 17 34%
75% above Mastered (M) 33 66%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
KAREN ROSE T. ODI
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: PHYSICAL SCIENCE Adviser: MAE Z. BOTIS

Grade and Section: 11-ABM Highest Score: 41 Lowest Score: 34
School Year: 2019-2020 No. of Students No. of Test
24 50
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
Give evidence for and explain 1 23 96% 21% M
the formation of the light ele- 2 15 63% -13% NM
ments in the big bang theory 3 14 58% -17% NM
4 16 67% -8% NM
5 19 79% 4% M
6 21 88% 13% M
Describe the ideas of the an- 7 14 58% -17% NM
cient Greeks on the elements 8 18 75% 0% M
9 15 63% -13% NM
10 19 79% 4% M
11 18 75% 0% M
Point out the main ideas in the 12 19 79% 4% M
discovery of the structure of 13 20 83% 8% M
the atom and its subatomic 14 18 75% 0% M
particles 15 21 88% 13% M
16 18 75% 0% M
17 15 63% -13% NM
Cite the contributions of JJ 18 21 88% 13% M
Thomson, Ernest Rutherford, 19 14 58% -17% NM
Henry Mosely and Neils Bohr 20 20 83% 8% M
to the understanding of the 21 15 63% -13% NM
structure of the atom 22 15 63% -13% NM
Describe the nuclear model of 23 19 79% 4% M
the atom and the location of 24 14 58% -17% NM
its major components 25 16 67% -8% NM
26 19 79% 4% M
27 14 58% -17% NM
28 15 63% -13% NM
Describe the general types 29 17 71% -4% NM
of intermolecular forces 30 18 75% 0% M
31 14 58% -17% NM
32 18 75% 0% M
Give the type of intermolecu- 33 14 58% -17% NM
lar forces in the properties of 34 23 96% 21% M
substances 35 24 100% 25% M
36 20 83% 8% M
37 16 67% -8% NM
Explain the effects of inter- 38 17 71% -4% NM
molecular forces on the pro- 39 16 67% -8% NM
perties of substances 40 14 58% -17% NM
41 15 63% -13% NM
Explain how the uses of the ff. ma- 42 15 63% -13% NM
terials depend on their properties: 43 21 88% 13% M
a. medical implants prosthesis 44 22 92% 17% M
b. sports equipments c. electronic
devices d. construction supplies for
buildings and furniture e. household
45 24 100% 25% M
gadgets
Determine if a molecule is 46 24 100% 25% M
polar or nonpolar given its 47 23 96% 21% M
structure 48 21 88% 13% M
49 18 75% 0% M
50 21 88% 13% M
MEAN 37.50
MPL 75.00

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 0 0%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 22 44%
75% above Mastered (M) 28 56%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
KAREN ROSE T. ODI
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: PHYSICAL SCEINCE Adviser: SARAH G. ESPANOL

Grade and Section: 11-GAS A Highest Score: 38 Lowest Score: 31
School Year: 2019-2020 No. of Students No. of Test
42 50
Tested: Items:
% OF
NO. OF CORRECT MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS ITEM PLACEMENTS CORRECT LEARNING GAP
RESPONSE LEVEL
RESPONSE

Give evidence for and explain 1 35 83% 8% M

the formation of the light ele- 2 33 79% 4% M
ments in the big bang theory 3 24 57% -18% NM
4 31 74% -1% NM
5 35 83% 8% M
6 28 67% -8% NM
Describe the ideas of the an- 7 33 79% 4% M
cient Greeks on the elements 8 30 71% -4% NM
9 23 55% -20% NM
10 33 79% 4% M
11 24 57% -18% NM
Point out the main ideas in the 12 29 69% -6% NM
discovery of the structure of 13 33 79% 4% M
the atom and its subatomic 14 34 81% 6% M
particles 15 29 69% -6% NM
16 22 52% -23% NM
17 23 55% -20% NM
Cite the contributions of JJ 18 31 74% -1% NM
Thomson, Ernest Rutherford, 19 35 83% 8% M
Henry Mosely and Neils Bohr 20 33 79% 4% M
to the understanding of the 21 34 81% 6% M
structure of the atom 22 29 69% -6% NM
Describe the nuclear model of 23 26 62% -13% NM
the atom and the location of 24 19 45% -30% LM
its major components 25 24 57% -18% NM
26 25 60% -15% NM
27 31 74% -1% NM
28 25 60% -15% NM
Describe the general types 29 23 55% -20% NM
of intermolecular forces 30 30 71% -4% NM
31 28 67% -8% NM
32 18 43% -32% LM
Give the type of intermolecu- 33 23 55% -20% NM
lar forces in the properties of 34 30 71% -4% NM
substances 35 31 74% -1% NM
36 34 81% 6% M
37 33 79% 4% M
Explain the effects of inter- 38 34 81% 6% M
molecular forces on the pro- 39 33 79% 4% M
perties of substances 40 27 64% -11% NM
41 35 83% 8% M
Explain how the uses of the ff. ma- 42 23 55% -20% NM
terials depend on their properties: 43 27 64% -11% NM
a. medical implants prosthesis 44 27 64% -11% NM
b. sports equipments c. electronic
devices d. construction supplies for
buildings and furniture e. household
45 30 71% -4% NM
gadgets
Determine if a molecule is 46 25 60% -15% NM
polar or nonpolar given its 47 25 60% -15% NM
structure 48 32 76% 1% M
48 35 83% 8% M
50 29 69% -6% NM
MEAN 34.36
MPL 68.71

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 2 5%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 31 78%
75% above Mastered (M) 17 43%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
KAREN ROSE T. ODI
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: DISS Adviser: DEBBIE FRANCISCO

Grade and Section: 12 GAS A Highest Score: 40 Lowest Score: 29
School Year: 2022-2023 No. of Students No. of Test
43 50
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
1 35 81% 6% M
*Differentiate the nature and 2 32 74% -1% M
functions of Social Science 3 28 65% -10% NM
disciplines with the natural 4 35 81% 6% M
sciences and humanities 5 33 77% 2% M
6 36 84% 9% M
7 30 70% -5% NM
*Explain the major events and its 8 40 93% 18% M
contribution that led to
9 39 91% 16% M
the emergence of the social
science disciplines 10 32 74% -1% M
11 33 77% 2% M
*Analyze the basic concepts and 12 37 86% 11% M
principles of the major 13 36 84% 9% M
social science theories: 14 33 77% 2% M
a. Structural-functionalism 15 38 88% 13% M
b. Marxism 16 38 88% 13% M
c. Symbolic Interactionism 17 32 74% -1% M
*Apply the major social science
theories and its 18 35 81% 6% M
importance in examining socio-cultural, 19 33 77% 2% M
economic, and
20 37 86% 11% M
political conditions.
a. Structural-functionalism 21 39 91% 16% M
b. Marxism 22 36 84% 9% M
c. Symbolic
*Analyze Interactionism
the basic concepts and principles 23 30 70% -5% NM
of the major
24 33 77% 2% M
social science ideas:
*Apply the a. Psychoanalysis
social science ideas and its 25 33 77% 2% M
b. Rational Choice 26 34 79% 4% M
importance in
c. Institutionalismd. Feminist Theory
examining socio-cultural,
e. Hermeneutical
economic,
Phenomenology 27 34 79% 4% M
and political Systems
f. Human-Environment 28 34 79% 4% M
conditions.
*Analyze the basic concepts and 29 35 81% 6% M
principles of the major 30 38 88% 13% M
social science ideas: 31 33 77% 2% M
a. Psychoanalysis
32 33 77% 2% M
b. Rational Choice
c. Institutionalism 33 29 67% -8% NM
d. Feminist Theory 34 36 84% 9% M
*Apply the social science
e. Hermeneutical ideas and
Phenomenology 35 33 77% 2% M
its importance in
f. Human-Environment Systems
36 37 86% 11% M
examining socio-cultural,
37 33 77% 2% M
economic, and political
conditions. 38 34 79% 4% M
39 33 77% 2% M
40 29 67% -8% NM
41 35 81% 6% M
42 33 77% 2% M
*Analyze the basic concepts and 43 34 79% 4% M
principles of the major 44 27 63% -12% NM
social science ideas: 45 28 65% -10% NM
a. Psychoanalysis
46 37 86% 11% M
b. Rational Choice
c. Institutionalism 47 33 77% 2% M
d. Feminist Theory 48 26 60% -15% NM
e. Hermeneutical Phenomenology 49 34 79% 4% M
f. Human-Environment Systems
50 34 79% 4% M
MEAN 39.28
MPL 78.56

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 0 % of ML
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 5 % of ML
75% above Mastered (M) 25 100% of ML

Checked by: Prepared by:

Noted by:
NOEMI E. NALA
ALWAYN P. PALOMA SHS Teacher II
SHS Head GLORIA D. RAMORES
Principal II
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: CONTEMPORARY Adviser: KAREN ROSE ODI

Grade and Section: STEM 12 Highest Score: 50 Lowest Score: 33
School Year: 2018-2019 No. of Students No. of Test
17 50
Tested: Items:
% OF
NO. OF CORRECT MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS ITEM PLACEMENTS CORRECT LEARNING GAP
RESPONSE LEVEL
RESPONSE
Integrative art as applied to contemporary art 1 17 100% 25% M
2 16 94% 19% M
3 17 100% 25% M
4 15 88% 13% M
5 16 94% 19% M
6 16 94% 19% M
7 17 100% 25% M
8 17 100% 25% M
9 17 100% 25% M
10 12 71% -4% NM
11 14 82% 7% M
12 14 82% 7% M
13 16 94% 19% M
14 10 59% -16% NM
Contemporary Arts in the Philippines 15 12 71% -4% NM
16 16 94% 19% M
17 16 94% 19% M
18 12 71% -4% NM
19 15 88% 13% M
20 15 88% 13% M
21 15 88% 13% M
22 17 100% 25% M
23 12 71% -4% NM
24 12 71% -4% NM
25 13 76% 1% M
26 15 88% 13% M
27 15 88% 13% M
28 15 88% 13% M
29 17 100% 25% M
30 12 71% -4% NM
31 12 71% -4% NM
Different Contemporary Art Technique 32 15 88% 13% M
and Performance Practices 33 15 88% 13% M
34 12 71% -4% NM
35 15 88% 13% M
36 13 76% 1% M
37 13 76% 1% M
38 16 94% 19% M
39 16 94% 19% M
40 12 71% -4% NM
41 16 94% 19% M
42 13 76% 1% M
43 15 88% 13% M
44 13 76% 1% M
45 13 76% 1% M
46 16 94% 19% M
47 17 100% 25% M
48 17 100% 25% M
49 17 100% 25% M
50 11 65% -10% NM
MEAN 42.94
MPL 85.88

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 0 0%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 11 22%
75% above Mastered (M) 39 78%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
IRENE L. TAMON
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head ELEONOR L. ECO
Principal II
 No. of students
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
Note: 17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
Number of correct response: Total number of correct response / total 17 75%
number of items = Average no. of correct response 17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
% of correct response: Average no. of correct response / number of 17 75%
students * 100 17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
Learning Gap: 17 75%
17 75%
% of correct response - 75% 17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
Mean = Total of correct response / number of students 17 75%
17 75%
MPL = MEAN * 2 17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
FORMULA: 17 75%
Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse>74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrectresponse>50%,"NM","LM"))
17 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"LM") 17 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"NM") 17 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"M") 17 75%
% of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items 17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
17 75%
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: EAPP Adviser: SARA ESPANOL

Grade and Section: Highest Score: 25 Lowest Score: 8
School Year: 2018-2019 No. of Test
No. of Students 25 40
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT LEARNING GAP
PLACEMENTS LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
WRITING THE 1 24 96% 21% M
POSITION PAPER 2 23 92% 17% M
1.Defines what a 3 17 68% -7% NM
position paper is 4 14 56% -19% NM
2. identifies situations in
which a position paper
5 56% -19%
maybe effectively used in
present society 14 NM
6 18 72% -3% NM
7 8 32% -43% LM
8 10 40% -35% LM

3. gather manifestoes
and analyzes the
9 44% -31%
arguments used by
the writers
11 LM
10 15 60% -15% NM
11 19 76% 1% M
4. defends a stand or an
12 21 84% 9% M
issue by presenting 13 16 64% -11% NM
reasonable arguments
14 12 48% -27% LM
15 19 76% 1% M
16 18 72% -3% NM
17 17 68% -7% NM

5. determine the
objectives and
evidences structures 92% 17%
of various kinds of
reports
18 23 M
19 6 24% -51% LM
20 5 20% -55% LM
21 17 68% -7% NM
designs, tests and
revises survey 76% 1%
questionnaires 22 19 M
23 15 60% -15% NM
24 20 80% 5% M
25 14 56% -19% NM
26 4 16% -59% LM
27 16 64% -11% NM
28 18 72% -3% NM
conduct surveys,
experiments or 29 28% -47%
observations 7 LM
30 20 80% 5% M
 31 14 56% -19% NM
32 8 32% -43% LM
33 16 64% -11% NM
34 15 60% -15% NM
gathers information
from surveys,
35 56% -19%
experiments or
observations 14 NM
36 16 64% -11% NM
37 18 72% -3% NM
38 13 52% -23% NM
39 13 52% -23% NM
40 12
36 48% -27% LM
M
41 144% 69%
MEAN 38.04
MPL 76.08

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 10 20%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 21 42%
75% above Mastered (M) 19 38%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
IRENE L. TAMON
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 No. of students
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

25 75%
Note: 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

Number of correct response: Total number of correct response / total 25 75%

number of items = Average no. of correct response 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
% of correct response: Average no. of correct response / number of 25 75%
students * 100 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
Learning Gap: 25 75%

25 75%
% of correct response - 75% 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

Mean = Total of correct response / number of students 25 75%

25 75%
MPL = MEAN * 2 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
FORMULA: 25 75%
Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse>74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrectresponse>50%,"NM","LM"))
25 75%

No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"LM") 25 75%

No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"NM") 25 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"M") 25 75%
% of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25
25
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: Adviser:
ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND POFESSIONAL PURPOSES SARAH ESPANOL
Grade and Section: Highest Score: 46 Lowest Score: 12
School Year: 2018-2019 No. of Students No. of Test
43
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
1 23 58% -18% NM
2 20 50% -25% LM
1. Reading Academic Text 3 26 65% -10% NM
4 36 90% 15% M
5 39 98% 23% M
6 18 45% -30% LM
7 34 85% 10% M
8 33 83% 7% M
9 35 88% 13% M
10 28 70% -5% NM
11 38 95% 20% M
12 39 98% 23% M
13 40 100% 25% M
14 38 95% 20% M
15 41 103% 28% M
16 38 95% 20% M
17 35 88% 13% M
2. Writing the Reaction Paper/Review/Critique 18 25 63% -13% NM
19 30 75% 0% M
20 40 100% 25% M
21 25 63% -13% NM
22 35 88% 13% M
23 39 98% 23% M
24 32 80% 5% M
25 28 70% -5% NM
26 39 98% 23% M
27 34 85% 10% M
28 33 83% 7% M
29 29 73% -3% NM
30 38 95% 20% M
31 30 75% 0% M
32 38 95% 20% M
33 29 73% -3% NM
34 43 108% 33% M
35 22 55% -20% NM
36 40 100% 25% M
3. Writing Concept Paper 37 36 90% 15% M
38 26 65% -10% NM
39 36 90% 15% M
40 31 78% 3% M
41 36 90% 15% M
42 27 68% -7% NM
43 31 78% 3% M
44 42 105% 30% M
45 44 110% 35% M
46 39 98% 23% M
47 34 85% 10% M
48 41 103% 28% M
49 38 95% 20% M
50 41 103% 28% M
MEAN 42.30
MPL 84.60

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 2 4%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 11 22%
75% above Mastered (M) 37 74%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
IRENE L. TAMON
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head ELEONOR L. ECO
Principal II
 No. of students
40
40
40
40
40
Note: 40
40
40
Number of correct response: Total number of correct response / total 40
number of items = Average no. of correct response 40
40
40
% of correct response: Average no. of correct response / number of 40
students * 100 40
40
40
Learning Gap: 40
40
% of correct response - 75% 40
40
40
Mean = Total of correct response / number of students 40
40
MPL = MEAN * 2 40
40
40
FORMULA: 40
Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse>74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrectresponse>50%,"NM","LM"))
40
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"LM") 40
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"NM") 40
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"M") 40
% of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items 40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
No. of students
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: EAPP Adviser: IRENE L. TAMON

Grade and Section: GRADE 12-GAS Highest Score: 26 Lowest Score: 8
School Year: 2018-2019 No. of Students No. of Test
25 40
Tested: Items:
% OF
NO. OF CORRECT MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS ITEM PLACEMENTS CORRECT LEARNING GAP
RESPONSE LEVEL
RESPONSE
WRITING THE 1 18 72% -3% NM
POSITION PAPER 2 24 96% 21% M
1.Defines what a 3 14 56% -19% NM
position paper is 4 23 92% 17% M
2. identifies situations in which a
position paper maybe effectively 5 52% -23%
used in present society
13 NM
6 15 60% -15% NM
7 21 84% 9% M
8 11 44% -31% LM
3. gather manifestoes and
analyzes the arguments 9 96% 21%
used by the writers 24 M
10 18 72% -3% NM
11 13 52% -23% NM
12 17 68% -7% NM
4. defends a stand or an issue by
presenting reasonable arguments 13 15 60% -15% NM
14 18 72% -3% NM
15 18 72% -3% NM
16 9 36% -39% LM
17 24 96% 21% M
5. determine the objectives
and evidences structures of 76% 1%
various kinds of reports
18 19 M
19 17 68% -7% NM
20 21 84% 9% M
21 12 48% -27% LM
designs, tests and revises
40% -35%
survey questionnaires 22 10 LM
23 14 56% -19% NM
24 10 40% -35% LM
25 19 76% 1% M
26 23 92% 17% M
27 23 92% 17% M
28 10 40% -35% LM
conduct surveys,
experiments or 29 76% 1%
observations 19 M
30 15 60% -15% NM
31 16 64% -11% NM
32 21 84% 9% M
33 14 56% -19% NM
34 16 64% -11% NM
gathers information from
surveys, experiments or 35 68% -7%
observations 17 NM
36 18 72% -3% NM
37 20 80% 5% M
38 16 64% -11% NM
39 16 64% -11% NM
40 15 60% -15% NM
MEAN 35.12
MPL 70.24

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 8 16%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 21 42%
75% above Mastered (M) 21 42%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
IRENE L.TAMON
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 No. of students
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

25 75%
Note: 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

Number of correct response: Total number of correct response / total 25 75%

number of items = Average no. of correct response 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
% of correct response: Average no. of correct response / number of 25 75%
students * 100 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
Learning Gap: 25 75%

25 75%
% of correct response - 75% 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

Mean = Total of correct response / number of students 25 75%

25 75%
MPL = MEAN * 2 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
FORMULA: 25 75%
Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse>74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrectresponse>50%,"NM","LM"))
25 75%

No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"LM") 25 75%

No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"NM") 25 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"M") 25 75%
% of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items 25 75%
25 75%
25 75%

25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
25 75%
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: EAPP Adviser: JACQUILINE PANDI

Grade and Section: GAS 12- Y Highest Score
No. of 34 Lowest Score: 8
School Year: 2018-2019 Students No. of Test
22 40
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS ITEM PLACEMENTS CORRECT CORRECT
GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE

WRITING THE 1 20 91% 16%

M
POSITION PAPER 2 20 91% 16% M
1.Defines what a 3 16 73% -2% NM
position paper is 4 16 73% -2% NM
2. identifies situations in
which a position paper
maybe effectively used in
5 95% 20%
present society 21 M
6 18 82% 7% M
7 21 95% 20% M
8 15 68% -7% NM
3. gather
manifestoes and
analyzes the 9 91% 16%
arguments used by
the writers 20 M
10 8 36% -39% LM
11 13 59% -16% NM
4. defends a stand or an
12 19 86% 11% M
issue by presenting 13 11 50% -25% LM
reasonable arguments
14 15 68% -7% NM
15 16 73% -2% NM
16 19 86% 11% M
17 17 77% 2% M

5. determine the
objectives and
evidences structures 86% 11%
of various kinds of
reports
18 19 M
19 21 95% 20% M
20 11 50% -25% LM
21 15 68% -7% NM
designs, tests and
revises survey 82% 7%
questionnaires 22 18 M
23 10 45% -30% LM
24 17 77% 2% M
25 16 73% -2% NM
26 14 64% -11% NM
27 16 73% -2% NM
28 14 64% -11% NM
conduct surveys,
experiments or 29 55% -20%
observations 12 NM
30 15 68% -7% NM
31 16 73% -2% NM
32 21 95% 20% M
33 14 64% -11% NM
34 13 59% -16% NM
gathers information
from surveys,
35 73% -2%
experiments or
observations 16 NM
36 18 82% 7% M
37 20 91% 16% M
38 13 59% -16% NM
39 11 50% -25% LM
40 22
12 100% 25% M
NM
41 55% -20%
MEAN 32.20
MPL 64.40

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

 1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 7 14%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 21 42%
75% above Mastered (M) 22 44%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
IRENE L. TAMON
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head FLORDELISA V. MAGANA
Principal II
 No. of students

22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
22 75%

22 75%
Note: 22 75%
22 75%
22 75%

Number of correct response: Total number of correct response / total 22 75%

number of items = Average no. of correct response 22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
% of correct response: Average no. of correct response / number of 22 75%
students * 100 22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
Learning Gap: 22 75%

22 75%
% of correct response - 75% 22 75%
22 75%
22 75%

Mean = Total of correct response / number of students 22 75%

22 75%
MPL = MEAN * 2 22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
FORMULA: 22 75%
Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse>74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrectresponse>50%,"NM","LM"))
22 75%

No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"LM") 22 75%

No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"NM") 22 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F49,"M") 22 75%
% of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items 22 75%
22 75%
22 75%

22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
22 75%
25 75%
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: CONtEMpORARY Arts Adviser: MAE Z. BOTIS

Grade and Section: G-12 ABM Highest Score: 50 Lowest Score: 34
School Year: 2018-2019 No. of Students No. of Test
31 50
Tested: Items:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM LEARNING MASTERY
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS GAP LEVEL
RESPONSE RESPONSE
Integrative art as applied to contemporary art 1 23 74% -1% M
2 29 94% 19% M
3 30 97% 22% M
4 27 87% 12% M
5 29 94% 19% M
6 29 94% 19% M
7 25 81% 6% M
8 29 94% 19% M
9 31 100% 25% M
10 27 87% 12% M
11 23 74% -1% M
12 25 81% 6% M
13 30 97% 22% M
14 31 100% 25% M
Contemporary Arts in the Philippines 15 17 55% -20% NM
16 17 55% -20% NM
17 19 61% -14% NM
18 13 42% -33% LM
19 12 39% -36% LM
20 16 52% -23% NM
21 18 58% -17% NM
22 24 77% 2% M
23 19 61% -14% NM
24 29 94% 19% M
25 29 94% 19% M
26 29 94% 19% M
27 29 94% 19% M
28 30 97% 22% M
29 31 100% 25% M
30 24 77% 2% M
31 26 84% 9% M
Different Contemporary Art Technique 32 27 87% 12% M
and Performance Practices 33 29 94% 19% M
34 23 74% -1% M
35 26 84% 9% M
36 27 87% 12% M
37 23 74% -1% M
38 22 71% -4% NM
39 30 97% 22% M
40 31 100% 25% M
41 23 74% -1% M
42 31 100% 25% M
43 25 81% 6% M
44 24 77% 2% M
45 19 61% -14% NM
46 16 52% -23% NM
47 18 58% -17% NM
48 16 52% -23% NM
49 25 81% 6% M
50 29 94% 19% M
MEAN 39.81
MPL 79.61

Percentage Indicators No. of ML % of ML

1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM) 2 4%
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM) 11 22%
75% above Mastered (M) 37 74%
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Noted by:
IRENE L. TAMON
RAUL A. MALLAPRE SHS Teacher II
SHS Head ELEONOR L. ECO
Principal II
 No. of students
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
Note: 31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
Number of correct response: Total number of correct response / total 31 75%
number of items = Average no. of correct response 31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
% of correct response: Average no. of correct response / number of 31 75%
students * 100 31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
Learning Gap: 31 75%
31 75%
% of correct response - 75% 31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
Mean = Total of correct response / number of students 31 75%
31 75%
MPL = MEAN * 2 31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
FORMULA: 31 75%
Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse> 74% 31 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"LM") 31 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"NM") 31 75%
No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"M") 31 75%
% of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items 31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
31 75%
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: CONTEMPORARY Adviser: MARICEL BACOLOR

Grade and Section: HUMSS 12 Highest Score: 50
School Year: 2018-2019 No. of Students
21
Tested:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS
RESPONSE RESPONSE
Integrative art as applied to contemporary art 1 41 80%
2 45 88%
3 44 86%
4 43 84%
5 46 90%
6 49 96%
7 43 84%
8 29 57%
9 39 76%
10 33 65%
11 38 75%
12 39 76%
13 39 76%
14 40 78%
Contemporary Arts in the Philippines 15 40 78%
16 39 76%
17 43 84%
18 34 67%
19 45 88%
20 46 90%
21 50 98%
22 50 98%
23 45 88%
24 43 84%
25 46 90%
26 50 98%
27 34 67%
28 34 67%
29 45 88%
30 50 98%
31 43 84%
Different Contemporary Art Technique 32 45 88%
and Performance Practices 33 49 96%
34 50 98%
35 50 98%
36 50 98%
 37 45 88%
38 43 84%
39 44 86%
40 48 94%
41 49 96%
42 50 98%
43 50 98%
44 50 98%
45 45 88%
46 43 84%
47 45 88%
48 39 76%
49 43 84%
50 44 86%
MEAN 42.88
MPL 85.76

Percentage Indicators
1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM)
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM)
75% above Mastered (M)

Checked by:
Noted by:

RAUL A. MALLAPRE
SHS Head ELEONOR L. ECO
Principal II
MARICEL BACOLOR
Lowest Score: 26
No. of Test
50
Items:

LEARNING MASTERY
GAP LEVEL

5% M
13% M
11% M
9% M
15% M
21% M Note:
9% M
-18% NM
1% M Number of correct response: Total number of correct response
-10% NM number of items = Average no. of correct response
0% M
1% M
1% M % of correct response: Average no. of correct response / num
3% M students * 100
3% M
1% M
9% M Learning Gap:
-8% NM
13% M % of correct response - 75%
15% M
23% M
23% M Mean = Total of correct response / number of students
13% M
9% M MPL = MEAN * 2
15% M
23% M
-8% NM FORMULA:
-8% NM Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse>74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrec
13% M No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"LM")
23% M No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"NM")
9% M No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"M")
13% M % of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items
21% M
23% M
23% M
23% M
 13% M
9% M
11% M
19% M
21% M
23% M
23% M
23% M
13% M
9% M
13% M
1% M
9% M
11% M
8
6

No. of ML % of ML
0 0%
5 10%
45 90%
Prepared by:

IRENE L. TAMON
SHS Teacher II
 No. of students
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
ber of correct response / total 51 75%
. of correct response 51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
correct response / number of 51 75%
00 51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
se - 75% 51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
er of students 51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrectresponse>50%,"NM","LM"))
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
51 75%
 RIZAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Elena
ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULT

Subject: Org. and Mgt. Adviser: MS. MARICEL BACOLOR

Grade and Section: 12 - GAS (Humss) Highest Score: 39
School Year: 2017 - 2018 No. of Students
Tested:
NO. OF % OF
ITEM
TOPICS / SKILLS CORRECT CORRECT
PLACEMENTS
RESPONSE RESPONSE
1 0%
2 0%
3 0%
16 0%
1. Nature and concept of 17 0%
management 18 0%
19 0%
36 0%
37 0%
38 0%
4 0%
5 0%
6 0%
7 0%
8 0%
20 0%
2. The firm and its 21 0%
environment 22 0%
23 0%
24 0%
25 0%
26 0%
39 0%
40 0%
9 0%
10 0%
11 0%
12 0%
13 0%
14 0%
15 0%
27 0%
3. Planning
28 0%
29 0%
30 0%
31 0%
 3. Planning

32 0%
33 0%
34 0%
35 0%
MEAN 0.00
MPL 0.00

Percentage Indicators
1% - 50% Least Mastered (LM)
51% - 74% Nearing Mastery (NM)
75% above Mastered (M)

Checked by:
Noted by:

RAUL A. MALLAPRE
SHS Head ELEONOR L. ECO
Principal II
MS. MARICEL BACOLOR
Lowest Score: 13
No. of Test
40
Items:

LEARNING MASTERY
GAP LEVEL

-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM Note:
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM Number of correct response: Total number of correct response
-75% LM number of items = Average no. of correct response
-75% LM
-75% LM % of correct response: Average no. of correct response / num
-75% LM students * 100
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM Learning Gap:
-75% LM
-75% LM % of correct response - 75%
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM Mean = Total of correct response / number of students
-75% LM
-75% LM MPL = MEAN * 2
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM FORMULA:
-75% LM Mastery Level =IF(%ofcorrectresponse>74%,"M", IF(
-75% LM No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"LM")
-75% LM No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"NM")
-75% LM No. of Mastery Level =COUNTIF(F10:F59,"M")
-75% LM % of Mastery Level =No.ofML/no.of test items
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM
 -75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM
-75% LM

No. of ML % of ML
40 100%
0 0%
0 0%
Prepared by:

MAE ZANTUA BOTIS

SHS Teacher II
 No. of students
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
ber of correct response / total 43 75%
. of correct response 43 75%
43 75%
correct response / number of 43 75%
00 43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
se - 75% 43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
er of students 43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43
74%,"M", IF(%ofcorrectresponse>50%,"NM","LM")) 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%
43 75%