Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Play facilitation is the
in play.
Here are simple ways on
in play
Focus on the process (rather than the goal) of play. Ask
play.
Provide open-ended materials for play.
Supportive attitudes
materials
equipment
space
time
Observer
classroom.
A protector encourage safe and
respectful play.
Participant
environments
The principles of playing and
Outdoor natural play environments should provide a blend of natural areas, environmental
features and plants to interest children in learning about nature and its elements. Important
features include unstructured spaces and activities for creative learning and spontaneous play.
Natural environments provide opportunities for children to understand and respect the natural
environment and the interdependence between plants, people, animals and the land. Being
outdoors, especially in natural outdoor learning environments, provides the opportunity for
nature. In outdoor settings, children generally move more, sit less and engage in play for more
sustained periods. Depending on the location and design of the outdoor environment, they
potentially have more space and freedom for large and loud movement play. They engage in
more moderate to vigorous physical activity, have greater opportunities to gain mastery over a
wide range of gross and fine motor skills, and develop better motor co-ordination.
The special
role of
Playing outside gives your child the chance to explore
outdoor
child can play games, test their physical limits, express
play play can also mean more mess – and more mess often
outdoor spaces
Affordances within the environment are dynamic and unique to each person, and
motivation. Children will perceive what they can do in the environment in relation to
their individual characteristics. Hence, the same feature of the environment will
example, a small tree might afford climbing for a young child but not for a large
adult. Likewise, a tree may afford shelter in summer but not in winter when its
branches are bare or allow children to collect the fallen leaves in autumn.
Affordances that support play-based learning in the outdoor environment, various factors may influence
the design of the environment depending on whether it has been intentionally designed from the outset
as a space for children’s play and learning or has been adapted (and potentially constrained) to fit within
an environment not originally intended for children.The theory of affordances (Gibson, 2014) offers a
framework for considering the child-environment interaction since this theory concerns the individual's
perception of the environment. Affordance is defined as what the environment offers the individual and
what it provides or furnishes, either good or ill (Gibson, 2014). Affordance includes both the environment
and the child, meaning the affordance is unique and relative for each individual. An affordance emerges
from the interaction between the child and the environment, an interaction that is immediate, as
affordances are perceived directly in a natural flow of activity (Heft, 1989, 2003). The perception of
affordance is influenced by the child's intentions, previous experiences and the context. Because of the
dynamic and contextual considerations for affordance, Heft (2003) emphasises that affordances are not a
fixed functional property of a feature, rather they are a dynamic entity in the ongoing person and
environment process. Affordance may therefore be suitable for studying the interaction between the
environment. Such study has demonstrated how both physical and social affordances influence children's
physical activity levels (Bjørgen, 2016), how different places afford different activities.
Developing strategies for
danger.1 In this briefing, risks and hazards are defined, strategies to balance risks and
hazards are identified, and the need for risky but hazardless playgrounds is discussed.
Play scholars and activists define a hazard as a danger in the environment that could
seriously injure or endanger a child and is beyond the child’s capacity to recognize.8-12
Risk is then defined as the challenges and uncertainties within the environment that a
child can recognize and learn to manage by choosing to encounter them while
should reduce the number and magnitude of hazards of which a child might be unaware by
creating safeguards; while leaving elements of risk or challenge for the child to
challenging play positively influences their emotional reactions, physical capabilities, coping
skills, and capacity to manage adversity.10,13,15 As they grow older, children who can
master risky situations are less dependent on adults to manage hazards for them,16 and help
them safely and confidently navigate the world around them as they transition into
adulthood.In addition, a thoughtful justification for why some risks are acceptable can be the
foundation of a legal defense, should injury occur.6 Canadian courts understand that
children are developing their responsibility to be aware of their surroundings, and that there
is a difference between hidden risks (i.e., hazards) and visible risks that children can and
should identify on their own. The legal system allows for a differentiation between an
unkempt playspace that results in injury, and collisions and falls that are the result of
enthusiastic children engaging in challenging play. The reality of a reasonable court system
runs counter to the fears of schools and municipalities and should reduce the worry of
lawsuits.18 The attitude of Canadian courts also suggests that there is room for encouraging
beneficial risk or challenge in play spaces. While the legal system has yet to explicitly codify
the developmental benefits of risks or challenges, the common-sense practice of ‘kids will be