Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Undue Influence

    Uploaded by

    ANIS IZZATI BINTI AHMAD RAFFI
    6 views1 page
    The document discusses the burden of proof in criminal cases and the standard of beyond reasonable doubt. It notes that in a criminal case where a person (A) tests positive in a urine test for drugs, the burden is on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that A took drugs, as there could be reasonable doubts such as the urine belonging to someone else. The document also briefly mentions the concept of voidable contracts under undue influence and provides guidelines for answering issues-based and advice-based law questions, including identifying the issue, relevant law, applying the law to the facts, supporting with cases, and drawing a conclusion.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses the burden of proof in criminal cases and the standard of beyond reasonable doubt. It notes that in a criminal case where a person (A) tests positive in a urine test for drugs, the burden is on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that A took drugs, as there could be reasonable doubts such as the urine belonging to someone else. The document also briefly mentions the concept of voidable contracts under undue influence and provides guidelines for answering issues-based and advice-based law questions, including identifying the issue, relevant law, applying the law to the facts, supporting with cases, and drawing a conclusion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Undue Influence

    Uploaded by

    ANIS IZZATI BINTI AHMAD RAFFI
    The document discusses the burden of proof in criminal cases and the standard of beyond reasonable doubt. It notes that in a criminal case where a person (A) tests positive in a urine test for drugs, the burden is on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that A took drugs, as there could be reasonable doubts such as the urine belonging to someone else. The document also briefly mentions the concept of voidable contracts under undue influence and provides guidelines for answering issues-based and advice-based law questions, including identifying the issue, relevant law, applying the law to the facts, supporting with cases, and drawing a conclusion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Burden of proof- beban pembuktian tu mesti ada pada pendakwa

    Cthnya, A kena tangkap. Check urine test dia positive. Burden of proof ada pd pendakwa to prove A
    amik dadah.

    Beyond reasonable doubt=melangkaui keraguan munasabah

    ^cthnya ragu2 urine tu orang lain punya

    In general, contract yg masuk bawah undue influence ni considered as voidable.

    Tapi up to donor untuk

    Voidable/void questions

    -Identify Issue (fraud/

    kalau byk issue dlm 1 soalan(cth dures+fraud), buat satu2

    -1st issue apa and law relate to it

    -How to apply the law to the question

    -Support dgn case

    -Conclusion

    Kalua soalan advice,

    You might also like