Final Megha-Ganjam03.09

SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF RUSIKULYA RIVER CROSSING TOWER
LINE AT- PANDIA, GANJAM. BERHMPUR, ODISHA.
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
CLIENT
MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURES LTD

S-2, TECHNOCRAT INDL.ESTATE
BALANAGAR, HYDERABAD – 500037
TELANGANA
INDIA.
 GEO CONSULTANT
MC
MAKS CONSULTANT
A SOIL TESTING QUALITY CONTROL LAB.
Approved by Govt.of Odisha, Bhubaneswar.
An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Consultant firm.
PLOT NO-1937/9295, SATYAVIHAR, , N.H.-5
RASULGARH, BHUBANESWAR-751010, ODISHA,
Phone - (0674) 2579390 , 94371-06990
Email : maks_consultant@yahoo.com
SUB- Soil Strata FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RUSIKULYA RIVER CROSSING TOWER LINE AT- PANDIA, GANJAM. BERHMPUR, ODISHA .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SLNo PARTICULARS PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 03
2. FIELD INVESTIGATION 03
3. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 04
4. FIELD WORK 05
5. LABORATORY TEST 06
NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER(BH -01) AT-PANDIA
ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA 09
RECOMMENDATION 11
FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORE LOG PROFILE 12
INDEX PROPERTIES 13
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 14
S.B.C. CALCULATIONS 15
NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER(BH -02) OPPOSITE SITE OF PANDIA
ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA 22
RECOMMENDATION 24
FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORE LOG PROFILE 25
INDEX PROPERTIES 26
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 26
S.B.C. CALCULATIONS 28
Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 2

INTRODUCTION
We feel our self-fortunate enough for investigating the sub-Soil strata FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF RUSIKULYA RIVER CROSSING TOWER LINE AT- PANDIA,GANJAM. BERHMPUR, ODISHA.The sub-
soil investigation works were taken up by Maks Consultant, Satyavihar, Bhubaneswar,
Odisha. The proposed project site was an undulated roughly level ground.
OBJECTIVES OF THIS SUB SOIL EXPLORATION

The objective of this Geo-technical investigation is to optimize the foundation system
for proposed Project with-in the safe bearing capacity of the soil and allowable settlement,
It consists of the following
 Determination of type, size and depth of foundation- system by analyzing the soil
properties
 To suggest a conclusive recommendation for the type of foundation system to be
adopted which would be economically viable and structurally safe for the proposed
structures of the projects at the proposed site.
Limitations of Investigation
The scope of Geo-technical exploration is confined within the framework of
agreement and Technical specification of the client. All the field and laboratory experiments
has been carried out as per the relevant Indian Standard Code of practice. However the
direction of Engineer-in-charge of the Client has been given due emphasis.
Nature of investigation work
The over all investigation consists of the following:
i. Visual reconnaissance of the site.
ii. Field Work-boring boreholes and collection of soil and core samples
iii. Laboratory experiments, determination of soil parameters.
iv. Decision on foundation system to be adopted in the present case using Our
Engineering judgment, based on the current practice.
The detailed Geo-technical investigation work that was carried out consists of two parts.
1. Field investigation, it consists of
 Location : Two numbers of bore holes with due consultation with Chief
Authority of client.
 Boring / drilling up to 10.0 m. below N.G.L
 Conducting standard penetration test at the locations @ 1.5m interval.
 Collecting SPT from the Boreholes.
 Observation of the depth of water table in the borehole.

2. Laboratory investigation it consists of
(i) For Soil

 Grain size analysis.
 Determination of Bulk/dry density.
 Determination of void ratio.
 Determination of soil moisture content
 Determination of liquid limit.
 Determination of plastic limit
 Determination of specific gravity
 DFS Test.
FIELD WORK
1. SELECTION OF BOREHOLE
Two numbers of Bore-holes has been selected by the Engineer in charge in order to
obtain comprehensive sub-soil data for this site with a provision of borings up to 10.0
meters depth.
(I) BORING:
It is the main part of sub- soil investigation work as the soil samples were collected
for different tests at different levels. The sub-soil exploration work at the proposed site was
carried out by wash boring per IS: 1892 – 1979 .
2. STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS:

Standard penetration test plays a major role in sub- soil investigation
determination of safe bearing capacity of soil in non cohesive type soil ,particularly in non-
cohesive granular sandy soil and where the UDS could not be collected either due to non
cohesive nature of soil .The SPT tests were conducted as per IS: 2131-1981 respectively,
in different levels of the bore holes in a continuous manner using spilt-spoon samplers at
locations . The SPT sampler was lower inside the boreholes after drilling the required level
and is driven by a 65.00 kg. Hammer with a free fall of 750 mm. driving 450 mm in three
stages 150 mm each and the number of blows for each 150mm penetration for 2nd& 3rd 150
mm drive recorded as “N”. Refusal were considered for N>50.

4. COLLECTION OF SOIL SAMPLES

4.i. SPT Samples
For investigation Standard Penetration Tests conducted at different 1.50 m intervals
or at change of soil strata as per of IS; code in the bore hole & samples were collected for
laboratory analysis.
4.ii. Disturbed soil Samples

Disturbed representative soil samples in sufficient quantity from the borehole has been
collected at 1.50 m. interval for different tests. The soil samples collected were stored in
Polyethylene bags with proper sign and identification.

LABORATORY TESTS
The laboratory-tests were conducted on selected representative disturbed soil
samples collected from the Borehole drilled were at the proposed site. The tests include
Grain size analysis, Natural moisture content, D.F.S, Specific Gravity and Liquid limit, Plastic
limit, Plasticity index, Particles size distribution and compressive st. tests on representative
samples were also carried out. All the tests conducted confirming to the requirements of I.S
specification in the Laboratory approved by Govt. of Orissa. The results of all these tests
have been annexed separately.
1. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS:

The grain size analysis of different soil samples were done as per the requirement of
IS: 2720 (Pt-IV) 1985 – method of test for soil Grain size analysis.
The details of the test results has been shown test result sheet separately.
2. NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT:
The natural moisture content were determined from different soil samples of the
Borehole at different depths as per IS: 2720(Pt-II)-1973: The results of all these tests has
been annexed separately.
3. DETERMINATION OF BULK DENSITY:
The Bulk densities has been determined from different soil samples of the Boreholes
at different depths in the laboratory from the soil samples as per IS: 2720(Pt-II)-1973.
4. DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
The specific gravity of the soil samples has been determined at different levels as per
IS: 2720(Pt-III)-1980. The result of all these tests has been annexed separately.

5. LIQUID-LIMIT / PLASTIC LIMIT:The liquid and plastic limits of soils has been
determined as per the relevant as per IS: 2720(Pt-v)-1985 Code of practice. The results of
all these tests have been annexed separately.
6. DIFFERENTIAL FREE SWELL TEST:

The tests were conducted as per IS: 2720 (Part-40
& 41) 1977. It deals with the method of test for the
determination of free swell index of soil. Free swell is the
increase in volume of a soil without any external
constraints due to swelling of clays .It can be identified
at the outset by an investigation of those soils likely to
posse’s undesirable expansion characteristics. The results of all these tests has been
annexed separately.
7- DETERMINATION OF SHEARSTRENGTH PARAMETERS:
Unconsolidated and un-drained tests were carried out from soil samples collected as per Pt-
X , XI ,XII, XIII,& part-35 of IS: 2720 with three different cell pressures of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5
kg/sq.cm and result are shown separately in tabular and graphical manner.
8. BEARING CAPACITY
The supporting power of a soil or rock is referred to as its bearing capacity .The term
bearing capacity is defined after attaching certain qualified prefixes. The allowable N . S. B.
C / SBC of soil strata has been computed at different depth using SPT value “N” and index
parameters as per the requirements of IS: 2131 & 6403 – 1981 considering the shallow
type foundation at different depths with taking factor of safety ” f “of soil samples of the
bore holes at different depths. The result of all NSBC / SBC of all these tests has been given
separately.

NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER

AT-PANDIA
BH -01

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA

One number of Bore hole up to 10.0 meter depth below NGL were drilled to
determine the comprehensive soil data from test results in a realistic manner. From the
laboratory study of soil properties such as Grain Size Analysis, DFS Test, Specific Gravity,
S.M.C. and Waterberg’s limits shows a consistently increasing trend with depth. The average
values of the index parameters are shown below.
PLASTICITY
DFS IN %
NMC IN %
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
DENSITY
PLASTIC
[gm/cc]
LIQUID
INDEX
LIMIT
LIMIT
BULK
%
1 Maximum value 21.8 2.66 1.86 37.0 22.0 14.11 18.0
2 Minimum value 14.0 2.61 1.76 25.0 20.6 12.0 0.0
3 Average Value 17.9 2.63 1.81 31.0 21.3 13.05 9.0
40
35 31.0
30
25 21.3
17.9
20
13.05
15 9.0
10
2.63 1.81
5
0
NMC IN % SPECIFIC BULK DENSITY LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY DFS IN %
GRAVITY [gm/cc] % INDEX
Maximum value Minimum value Average Value
In this bore hole it was seen that two layers i.e sandy clay & Sand has seen from top
soil level up to explored depth of 10.0 mtr. (The details of soil layer have been mention in
Field bore log chart). The SPT values “N” has not exceed the limiting value of 50 in this bore
hole. The N values show regular trend with different depth of bore hole. The DFS Values of
bore hole soil samples are lower with limiting zone. The allowable S. B. C of soil strata has
been computed at different depth using SPT value “N” , C, phi and index parameters as per
the requirements of IS: 2131 & 6403 – 1981 considering the shallow type foundation at
different depths are shown graphically below.

DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

20.0 18.0
18.0
16.0 14.0
14.0 12.0
12.0 10.0
SBC IN MT/SQM
10.0
8.0 6.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5
SBC 6.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 18.0
DEPTH IN METER SBC
 The Safe Bearing Capacity of soil are 6.0 , 10.0 ,12.0 ,14.0 & 18.0MT/sqm at 1.5 , 3.0
, 4.5 , 6.0 & 7.5 mtr depth from the lowest level of the existing NGL respectively.
 The SBC values of the area located nearby bore hole may be judiciously considered for
the design requirements.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Analyzing all the soil parameters from different angles it is recommended that:
 The Safe Bearing Capacity of soil are 6.0 , 10.0 ,12.0 ,14.0 & 18.0MT/sqm at 1.5 , 3.0
, 4.5 , 6.0 & 7.5 mtr depth from the lowest level of the existing NGL respectively for
structures.
 Isolated footing foundation with minimum size 2.00mtr x 2.00mtr has been
considered for computing the SBC value.
 From the analysis of the test result it is suggested that the type of foundation and
dimension of the footing for the proposed structure may be decided at the design
level ascertaining the test result of the bore hole presented in the test report.
 Shallow foundation will be designed as per IS: 6403-1981.
 Pile foundation will be designed as per IS: 2911.
 The Raft foundation should be designed as per IS: 2950 [Pt-1].
 The effect of Wind, Earth-quake Land-Slide (possibility) if any should considered for
structure

RECORD OF BORING
NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER, AT-PANDIA
BH - 01
Description of Thickness of Depth in Type of Nos No. of blows N. Value Ground
Strata. stratum. mtr from sample . related to depth water
Ground of penetration. level.
Surface UDS SPT 15cm 15cm 15cm In Mtr.
0.0
Sandy Clay
1.5 - S/DS 01 3 4 4 8
UDS
3.0 UDS - 02 - - - Collected
4.10 - - - - - - -
4.5 - S/DS 03 2 3 6 9
3.10 M
Sandy soil 5.30 - - - -

- - -
6.0 - S/DS 04 3 5 6 11
7.5 - S/DS 05 4 6 9 15
Course sandy
clay
9.0 - S/DS 06 8 9 11 20
10.0 - S/DS 07 9 11 17 28

SIEVE ANALYSIS
BH-01
(Test are as per IS:2720 part 2-1973, 3/Sec. 2-1980, 4-1985, 11-1971/13-1986 & 40-1977)
BH SAMPLE % by wt. passing through different I.S. sieve
REFERENCE
10mm 4.75mm 2.0mm 425 micron 75 micron
1 1.5 100 100 98.1 95.6
69.9
1 3.0 100 94.0
100 97.5 67.5
1 4.5 100 92.2
100 98.5 23.4
1 6.0 98.3 82.0
100 93.0 62.3
1 7.5 97.5 65.8
100 91.5 48.7
1 9.0 96.2 62.9
100 93.6 43.4
1 10.0 95.8 60.1
100 92.0 40.0

INDEX PROPERTIES
BH-01
BH Sample F.M.C. in Bulk Cohesion Angle L.L. in P.L. IN P.I. in D.F.S. in Sp. Gravity
reference % density in in % % % % of soil
Gm/cc Kg/Cm2
- -
1 1.5 21.8 1.76 37.0 22.0 14.0 18.0 2.61
0.260 7.0
1 3.0 20.9 1.77 37.0 22.0 14.0 17.0 2.61
- -
1 4.5 14.0 1.86 25.0 - NP 0.0 2.65
- -
1 6.0 19.9 1.78 35.8 21.7 14.11 15.0 2.64
- -
1 7.5 17.8 1.80 33.0 21.0 12.0 13.0 2.65
- -
1 9.0 18.0 1.82 33.0 21.0 12.0 12.0 2.65
- -
1 10.0 17.5 1.83 32.8 20.6 12.2 14.0 2.66
PLASTICITY
NMC IN %
DFS IN %
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
DENSITY
PLASTIC
[gm/cc]
LIQUID
INDEX
LIMIT
LIMIT
BULK
%
1 Maximum value 21.8 2.66 1.86 37.0 22.0 14.11 18.0
2 Minimum value 14.0 2.61 1.76 25.0 20.6 12.00 0.0
3 Average Value 17.9 2.63 1.81 31.0 21.3 13.05 9.0
40 37.0
35
30
25 21.8 22.0
25.0 18.0
20
20.6 14.11
15
10 14.0
12.0
5 2.66 1.86
0 2.61 1.76
NMC IN % SPECIFIC BULK DENSITY LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY DFS0.0
IN %
Maximum value Minimum value

SBC CALCULATION
NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER ,AT-PANDIA
BH-01
DEPTH IN METER SBC IN MT/Sqm
1.5 6.0
3.0 10.0
4.5 12.0
6.0 14.0
7.5 18.0
DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

18.0
18.0
16.0 14.0
14.0 12.0
SBC IN MT/SQM
12.0 10.0
10.0
8.0 6.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5
SBC 6.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 18.0
DEPTH IN METER SBC

Calculation of SBC from SPT Result

BH NO-01,DEPTH-1.5
Input Data
SPT Value From Field (N) : 8
Factor Of Safety (FS) : 2.5
Width Of Foundation (B) : 2Mtr.
Length Of Foundation (L) : 2Mtr.
Depth Of Foundtion (D1) : 1.5Mtr.
Top Filling Soil Depth (D2) : 0.7Mtr.
Natural Moisture Content(NMC) : 21.8%
Bulk Density Of Soil(WD) : 1.76gm/cc
Spcific Gravity Of Soil (G) : 2.61
Data from Laboratory Investigation
Dry density of the soil, Yd = (WD/[1+(NMC/100)]) : 1.445 gm/cm3
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.8062
Submergible Density, Ysm = ([(G+VR)/(1+VR)]-1) : 0.8914gm/cm3
Correcton 'N' value
Effect of vertical OverBurden = (Ysm * D)/1000 : 0.0713 Kg/Cm2

OverBurden Factor (OBF) : 1.75
N ' = (N* OBF) : 14.0
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 14.5
Ø : 31.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.0707
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
Effect of water table
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 21.38
Ny : 27.526
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.0713 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1783 Kg/Cm2
Ulimate Net Bearing capacity
UNBC = (q*(Nq-1)*Sq*dq*lq) +
: 2.918 Kg/Cm2
(1/2*By*Ny*Sy*dy*ly*W')
From Equation, SBC = ((5.4 *
: 6.2419 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)
Actual SBC : 6.0 MT/m2

Calculation of SBC from UDS Result

BH NO-01,DEPTH-3.0
Input Data
Value of C : 0.260Kg/Cm2
Value of Ø : 7Degree
Depth Of Foundation(D) : 3.0Mtr.
Factor Of Safety(FS) : 2.5
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.7828
Submergible Density, Ysm = ([(G+VR)/(1+VR)]-1) : 0.9031 gm/cm3
Shape factor
Shape of Base = Square(Assumed) Sc : 1.3
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dc = ( 1+[0.2*(D/B)* v NQ] ) : 1.3391
dq = dy : 1
Inclination factor
lc = lq = ly : 1
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nc : 7.234
Nq : 1.93
Ny : 0.758
N'c : 6.49
N'q : 1.57
N'y : 0.45
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.2709 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1806 Kg/Cm2
LSF =(0.666*C*N'c*Sc*dc*lc) + q(N'q-1)*Sq*dq*lq +
: 2.1579
(0.5*By*N'y*Sy*dy*ly*W')
GSF :
SBC = [ LSF + q ] / FS : 10.0 MT/m2


BH NO-01,DEPTH-4.5
Input Data
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.6242
Correcton 'N' value

N ' = (N* OBF) : 13.5
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 14.25
Ø : 31.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.1723
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 21.38
Ny : 27.526
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.1981 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.2032 Kg/Cm2
: 6.9909 Kg/Cm2
: 11.6486 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)


BH NO-01,DEPTH-6.0
Input Data
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.7783
Correcton 'N' value

N ' = (N* OBF) : 16.5
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 15.75
Ø : 32.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.1804
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 24.36
Ny : 32.652
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.1844 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1844 Kg/Cm2
: 7.5231 Kg/Cm2
: 13.8171 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)


BH NO-01,DEPTH-7.5
Input Data
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.7343
Correcton 'N' value

N ' = (N* OBF) : 22.5
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 18.75
Ø : 32.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.1804
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 24.36
Ny : 32.652
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.1903 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1903 Kg/Cm2
: 7.7638 Kg/Cm2
: 18.2469 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)


OPPOSITE SITE OF PANDIA
(BH -02)

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA

(NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER OPPOSITE SITE OF PANDIA)
BH -02
One number of Bore hole up to 10.0 meter depth below NGL were drilled to
determine the comprehensive soil data from test results in a realistic manner. From the
laboratory study of soil properties such as Grain Size Analysis, DFS Test, Specific Gravity,
S.M.C. and Waterberg’s limits shows a consistently increasing trend with depth. The average
values of the index parameters are shown below.
PLASTICITY
DFS IN %
NMC IN %
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
DENSITY
PLASTIC
[gm/cc]
LIQUID
INDEX
LIMIT
LIMIT
BULK
%
1 Maximum value 21.5 2.65 1.84 35.8 22.2 13.8 20.0
2 Minimum value 14.8 2.61 1.76 26.0 21.0 12.0 0.0
3 Average Value 18.15 2.63 1.80 30.9 21.6 12.9 10.0
40
35 30.9
30
25 21.6
18.15
20
12.9
15 10.0
10
2.63 1.8
5
0
NMC IN % SPECIFIC BULK DENSITY LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY DFS IN %
Maximum value Minimum value Average Value
In this bore hole it was seen that two layers i.e sandy clay & Silty sand has seen from
top soil level up to explored depth of 10.0 mtr. (The details of soil layer have been mention
in Field bore log chart). The SPT values “N” has not exceed the limiting value of 50 in this
bore hole. The N values show regular trend with different depth of bore hole. The DFS
Values of bore hole top soil samples are lower with limiting value. The allowable S. B. C of
soil strata has been computed at different depth using SPT value “N”, C, phi and index
parameters as per the requirements of IS: 2131 & 6403 – 1981 considering the shallow type
foundation at different depths are shown graphically below.

DEPTH ~SBC PLOT 17.0

18.0
15.0
16.0
14.0
12.0 10.0 10.0
SBC IN MT/SQM
10.0
8.0
6.0 4.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5
SBC 4.0 10.0 10.0 15.0 17.0
DEPTH IN METER SBC
 The Safe Bearing Capacity of soil are 4.0 , 10.0 , 10.0 ,15.0 & 17.0 MT/sqm at 1.5 ,
3.0 , 4.5 , 6.0 & 7.5 mtr depth from the lowest level of the existing NGL respectively.
 The SBC values of the area located nearby bore hole may be judiciously considered for
the design requirements.

RECOMMENDATIONS
NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER OPPOSITE SITE OF PANDIA
BH -02
Analyzing all the soil parameters from different angles it is recommended that:
 The Safe Bearing Capacity of soil are 4.0 , 10.0 , 10.0 ,15.0 & 17.0 MT/sqm at 1.5 ,
3.0 , 4.5 , 6.0 & 7.5 mtr depth from the lowest level of the existing NGL respectively
for structures.
 Isolated footing foundation with minimum size 2.00mtr x 2.00mtr has been
considered for computing the SBC value.
 From the analysis of the test result it is suggested that the type of foundation and
dimension of the footing for the proposed structure may be decided at the design
level ascertaining the test result of the bore hole presented in the test report.
 Shallow foundation will be designed as per IS: 6403-1981.
 Pile foundation will be designed as per IS: 2911.
 All RCC works should be designed as per IS: 456-2000.
The effect of Wind, Earth-quake Land-Slide (possibility) if any should considered for High
rise building.

RECORD OF BORING
BH NO- 02
NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER (OPPOSITE SITE OF PANDIA
Description of Thickness of Depth in Type of Nos No. of blows N. Value Ground
Strata. stratum. mtr from sample . related to depth water
Ground of penetration. level.
Surface UDS SPT 15cm 15cm 15cm In Mtr.
0.0
Silty sand
1.5 - S/DS 01 1 2 2 4
Sandy Clay
3.0 - 02 - - - UDS
4.5 - S/DS 03 2 2 4 6
3.0 M
5.30 - - - - - -
Course Sandy
Clay 6.0 - S/DS 04 4 6 6 12
7.50 - S/DS 05 4 6 8 14
9.0 - S/DS 06 5 7 9 16
10.0 - S/DS 07 5 7 11 18

SIEVE ANALYSIS
NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER (OPPOSITE SITE OF PANDIA)
BH NO- 02
(Test are as per IS: 2720 part 2-1973, 3/Sec. 2-1980, 4-1985, 11-1971/13-1986 & 40-1977)
BH SAMPLE % by wt. passing through different I.S. sieve
REFERENCE
10mm 4.75mm 2.0mm 425 micron 75 micron

2 1.5 100 100 98.9 65.2
67.5
3.0 99.0 97.5 96.7
2 100 65.1
4.5 100 97.5 95.8
2 100 62.3
6.0 98.1 97.8 90.5
2 100 59.2
7.5 97.3 95.2 88.0
2 100 60.0
9.0 96.5 92.8 86.5
2 100 57.8
10.0 98.9 95.4 93.0 82.8

2 54.4

INDEX PROPERTIES
BH NO- 02 )
Cohesion Angle
Bulk in
Sample F.M.C. in L.L. in P.L. IN P.I. in D.F.S. in Sp. Gravity
BH. density in Kg/Cm2
reference % % % % % of soil
Gm/cc
-
2 1.5 14.8 1.84 26.0 - NP 0.0 2.65
0.255 7.0
2 3.0 21.5 1.76 35.8 22.0 13.8 20.0 2.61
- -
2 4.5 21.0 1.77 35.5 22.2 13.3 19.0 2.61
- -
2 6.0 18.9 1.77 35.0 22.0 13.0 20.0 2.62
- -
2 7.5 19.0 1.79 34.8 21.7 13.1 15.0 2.63
- -
2 9.0 19.0 1.80 34.7 21.5 13.2 14.0 2.63
- -
2 10.0 18.7 1.81 33.0 21.0 12.0 12.0 2.64
PLASTICITY
NMC IN %
DFS IN %
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
DENSITY
PLASTIC
[gm/cc]
LIQUID
INDEX
LIMIT
LIMIT
BULK
%
1 Maximum value 21.5 2.65 1.84 35.8 22.2 13.8 20.0
2 Minimum value 14.8 2.61 1.76 26.0 21.0 12.0 0.0
3 Average Value 18.15 2.63 1.80 30.9 21.6 12.9 10.0
40 35.8
35
30
25 21.5 22.2
20.0
26.0
20
21.0 13.8
15
10 14.8
2.65 12.0
5 1.84
0
2.61 1.76
NMC IN % SPECIFIC BULK DENSITY LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY DFS0.0
IN %
Maximum value Minimum value

SBC CALCULATION
BH NO- 02
DEPTH IN METER SBC IN MT/Sqm
1.5 4.0
3.0 10.0
4.5 10.0
6.0 15.0
7.5 17.0
DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

17.0
18.0
15.0
16.0
14.0
SBC IN MT/SQM
12.0 10.0 10.0

10.0
8.0
6.0 4.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5
SBC 4.0 10.0 10.0 15.0 17.0
DEPTH IN METER SBC

BH-02, DEPTH-1.5
Input Data
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.6534
Correcton 'N' value

N ' = (N* OBF) : 6.8
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 10.9
Ø : 30.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.0693
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 18.4
Ny : 22.4
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.0798 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1996 Kg/Cm2
: 2.7379 Kg/Cm2
: 4.0839 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)

Calculation of SBC from UDS Result

BH-02, DEPTH-3.0
Input Data
Value of C : 0.255Kg/Cm2
Value of Ø : 7Degree
Depth Of Foundation(D) : 3.0Mtr.
Factor Of Safety(FS) : 2.5
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.8017
Submergible Density, Ysm = ([(G+VR)/(1+VR)]-1) : 0.8936 gm/cm3
Shape factor
Shape of Base = Square(Assumed) Sc : 1.3
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dc = ( 1+[0.2*(D/B)* v NQ] ) : 1.3391
dq = dy : 1
Inclination factor
lc = lq = ly : 1
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nc : 7.234
Nq : 1.93
Ny : 0.758
N'c : 6.49
N'q : 1.57
N'y : 0.45
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.2681 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1787 Kg/Cm2
LSF =(0.666*C*N'c*Sc*dc*lc) + q(N'q-1)*Sq*dq*lq +
: 2.1182
(0.5*By*N'y*Sy*dy*ly*W')
GSF :
SBC = [ LSF + q ] / FS : 10.0 MT/m2


BH-02, DEPTH-4.5
Input Data
Natural Moisture Content(NMC) : 21%
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.7842
Correcton 'N' value

N ' = (N* OBF) : 10.5
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 12.75
Ø : 31.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.1767
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 21.38
Ny : 27.526
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.1805 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1805 Kg/Cm2
: 6.3636 Kg/Cm2
: 10.1577 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)


BH-02, DEPTH-6.0
Input Data
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.76
Correcton 'N' value

N ' = (N* OBF) : 18.0
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 16.5
Ø : 32.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.1804
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 24.36
Ny : 32.652
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.1841 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1841 Kg/Cm2
: 7.5108 Kg/Cm2
: 14.8523 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)


BH-02, DEPTH-7.50
Input Data
Void Ratio, VR = ((G/Yd)-1) : 0.7484
Correcton 'N' value

N ' = (N* OBF) : 21.0
N'' = (N'/2+7.5) : 18.0
Ø : 32.0
Shape factor
Sq : 1.2
Sy : 0.8
Depth factor
dq=dy= (1+(0.1*(D/B)*v NQ)) : 1.1804
Inclination factor
lq=ly : 1.0
W' : 0.5
Bearing factor
Nq : 24.36
Ny : 32.652
Effective Surcharge
q = (Ysm/1000)*D : 0.1865 Kg/Cm2
By = (Ysm/1000)*B : 0.1865 Kg/Cm2
: 7.6087 Kg/Cm2
: 17.0672 MT/m2
N2*B+16(100+N2)*D)/1000)


Final Megha-Ganjam03.09

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Megha-Ganjam03.09

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURES LTD

NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER(BH -01) AT-PANDIA

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA 09

FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

BORE LOG PROFILE 12

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 14

NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER(BH -02) OPPOSITE SITE OF PANDIA

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA 22

FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

BORE LOG PROFILE 25

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 26

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 2

OBJECTIVES OF THIS SUB SOIL EXPLORATION

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 3

(i) For Soil

2. STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS:

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 4

4. COLLECTION OF SOIL SAMPLES

4.ii. Disturbed soil Samples

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 5

1. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS:

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 6

6. DIFFERENTIAL FREE SWELL TEST:

7- DETERMINATION OF SHEARSTRENGTH PARAMETERS:

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 7

NEAR RUSHIKULYA RIVER

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 8

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA

Maximum value Minimum value Average Value

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 9

DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 10

considered for computing the SBC value.

 Shallow foundation will be designed as per IS: 6403-1981.

 Pile foundation will be designed as per IS: 2911.

 The Raft foundation should be designed as per IS: 2950 [Pt-1].

 The Raft foundation should be designed as per IS: 2950 [Pt-1].

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 11

Sandy soil 5.30 - - - -

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 12

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 13

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 14

DEPTH IN METER SBC IN MT/Sqm

DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

DEPTH IN METER SBC

Calculation of SBC from SPT Result

Correcton 'N' value

Effect of vertical OverBurden = (Ysm * D)/1000 : 0.0713 Kg/Cm2

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 16

Calculation of SBC from UDS Result

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 17

Calculation of SBC from SPT Result

Correcton 'N' value

Effect of vertical OverBurden = (Ysm * D)/1000 : 0.1981 Kg/Cm2

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 18

Calculation of SBC from SPT Result

Correcton 'N' value

Effect of vertical OverBurden = (Ysm * D)/1000 : 0.1844 Kg/Cm2

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 19

Calculation of SBC from SPT Result

Correcton 'N' value

Effect of vertical OverBurden = (Ysm * D)/1000 : 0.1903 Kg/Cm2