Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1,40
1,20
1,00
0,7 mm + 14 um + 13 um
0,80 0,7 mm + 22 um + 10 um
0,60 0,5 mm + 12 µm + 12 µm
0,5 mm + 20 µm + 9 µm
0,40
0,3 mm + 10 µm + 10 µm
0,20 0,3 mm + 15 µm + 7 µm
0,00
- 2,0 4,0 6,0 8,0 10,0 12,0 14,0
Figure 4. Anisotropic heat transfer is an example
Coil thickness [mm]
geometry.
Figure 3. Effective transverse thermal conductivity of
coils wound from various wires. The two insulator and A representative linear motor coil can now be
glue layer thicknesses are chosen to find the maximum modeled in the following geometry, see figure 5.
and minimum values of conductivity within the
geometric tolerances of the wire.
From figure 3 we can see that wire diameter
is not the biggest influence on the transverse
thermal conductivity. Instead, it is insulator
thickness (within manufacturer tolerance!)
heat flow from the far side is facilitated by the
aluminum motor housing.
3. Supporting measurements
3.1 Coils
1,4
0,3 mm wire
1,2 0,7 mm wire By modeling the coil of a linear motor as a
1
block of anisotropic metamaterial rather than a
0,8
collection of insulated conductive wires, a huge
0,6
reduction in computational complexity is
0,4
0,2
achieved.
0
We can verify a 2D heat transfer model of
0 2 4 6 8 stacked wires using a measurement of heat
Coil Thickness [mm]
transfer through a coil. We are still working on a
Figure 12 . Selective measurement results for two better measurement that will be able to show the
different coils, showing the poor quality due to large accuracy of the calculation.
errors. We can verify a 3D heat transfer model using
The error bars in figure 12 are unacceptably the above anisotropy against measurements of
large. For only one coil type we have been able our motors. Agreement is within 25%.
to do a measurement with reasonable uncertainty
so far (25%), by putting a large number of coils 8. References
in parallel between the plates, thereby
minimizing alternative heat paths and 1. W. van der Hoek (Philips), Polygonal Electric
maximizing the heat flow under examination. Coil, US Patent No. US2930014, (1960)
After error correction, this yields 1 W/m· K.
This is on the low end of what is consistent with 9. Acknowledgements
the computational model, see figure 3.
We are currently in the process of The profile wire coil winding technique was
manufacturing an improved setup. partly developed using funds from the Dutch
WBSO/RDA programs.
3.2 Motors