Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 2 CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY
Module 2 CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY
swhistlesoft.com
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 2
Throughout Philippine history, the name Dr. Jose Rizal occupied a permanent place
in the lives of every Filipino. His life and his works had brought great impact in the making
of our country’s own history and eventually to the formation of our national identity. His
writings, particularly his novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo were viewed by
many historians as the guiding force which united the Filipinos towards a common cause.
At the young age of 35 he was shot dead in Bagumbayan, a martyr act that later on placed
him in a pedestal and made him deserved all kinds of veneration. For the Filipinos, his
martyrdom in 1896 is something that no one should forget, making him the national hero
through a “consensus” decision. But who could have thought that a sickly boy born in
Calamba, Laguna and raised from a well-educated and distinguished family will turn to be
the most celebrated Filipino hero?
Many history writers and biographers agreed that Jose Rizal could have the
necessary traits in becoming a hero. He is a versatile genius with innate talents in every
field. If to describe Rizal’s abilities, a long list will tell that he was an architect, artists,
businessman, cartoonist, educator, economist, ethnologist, scientific farmer, historian,
inventor, journalist, linguist who able to master 22 languages and other native dialects,
musician, mythologist, nationalist, naturalist, novelist, ophthalmic surgeon, poet,
propagandist, psychologist, scientist, sculptor, sociologist, and theologian. With all these
incredible talents on him, we may wonder how his genomic features are formed. His
parents, Don Francisco and Donya Teodora may possibly have the best genes to contribute.
His uncles Gregorio, Manuel and Jose Alberto could be really supportive that they
influenced the young Rizal in honing his skills in arts and sports and ought him developed
a habit of reading, while his brother Paciano turned to be an effective social influencer.
While Rizal may have been molded into an excellent human
being, his experiences as a child in Calamba, as a student in
Manila and Madrid and a foreigner living in Europe for years
had pushed him to hold his pen and used this for a
greater cause. Rizal lived in the later part of 19th century, a time
when the idea of “freedom” was prohibited and which was
something to be fought for. When he was 11 years old, he heard
about the three Filipino priests who were sentenced to death,
charged them of a crime they never did. His mother Donya
Teodora was imprisoned for two years in the town of Sta. Cruz
in Laguna for a crime she also never did. When he was a student
in the University of Santo Tomas, he saw how the Dominican
Rizal Monument in Sta. Cruz, priests discriminated Filipino students. He then saw how
Laguna, one of the tallest Rizal
monuments in the world. Filipinos were being treated as slaves in their own land and he
never thought that men could really be free until he went to
Madrid. Rizal’s hope for the Filipinos during his time was to also experience the form of
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 3
freedom and liberty he had seen while in Europe. These experiences had made his eyes
more open and could have inspired him to even dedicate his own life for his fellowmen.
Rizal became an icon of heroism among the Filipinos and immortalizing him in
books and literatures were deemed necessary to pay respect and express gratitude for all
his contributions and sacrifices. As a Filipino, maybe the least that we can do is to read
Rizal, his life and his works, and learn, be inspired and lived from all the lessons we could
get from it. Though, in able to do this we should have a better grasp of Rizal’s life and to
have a better appreciation of him, we should also consider and understand how he had
lived his life. How did Rizal become the hero we knew? What forces made him involved
himself in the national struggle? To answer these queries, we should understand first the
period when Rizal had lived.
In a sociological point of view, to understand human behavior and to find out why
people do what they do, we should look at the social location, the corners in life that people
occupy because of where they are located in a society. Sociologist C. Wright Mills (1959)
put it this way: “The sociological imagination enables us to grasp the connection between
history and biography.” By history, Mills meant that each society is located in a broad
stream of events. By biography, Mills referred to our experiences, which give us
orientations to life. In short, people don’t do what they do because they inherited some
internal mechanism, such as instincts. Rather, external influences—our experiences
become part of our thinking and motivation. In short, the societies in which we grow up,
and our particular location in that society, lie at the center of what we do and how we think
(Henslin, 2010).
“One of the ironies of the cult rendered to Rizal as a national hero is that often his
words, rather than his thoughts, have been invoked without any consideration of the
historical context in which they were spoken or of the issues they addressed. Without an
understanding of that milieu one can scarcely understand Rizal’s enduring importance to
the Filipino people or the relevance of his ideas and ideals today” (Schumacher, 1991).
Borrowing a phrase used by Renato Constantino in a different context, it has often been
“veneration without understanding,” hence, no veneration at all.
In this chapter, we will discuss the nineteenth century
Philippines under Rizal’s context as explained by John Schumacher
in his essay “Rizal in the Context of the 19th Century Philippines.”
This essay was included in Schumacher’s collection of writings, The
Making of a Nation: Essays on Nineteenth Century Filipino
Nationalism published in 1991by the Ateneo de Manila University
Press. Essays collected in this book were centered on the emergence
of the Filipino national consciousness in the second half of 19th
century and the process underwent on how Filipinos were formed into
a nation. Moreover, the purpose of the discussion is to single out
some major economic, political, cultural and religious developments
of the nineteenth century that influenced Rizal’s growth as a nationalist and conditioned
the evolution of his thought. These varied aspects of development will be discussed
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 4
separately elucidating our country’s historical conditions during the last years of Spanish
colonization.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
As stated in Schumacher’s essay, the highpoint of the nationalist movement in the
late 19th century could hardly be possible without the economic growth which took place
in 19th century Philippines, particularly after 1830.
The Philippine foreign trade
from year 1825 to 1895 had
risen significantly with the
total trade (combined exports
and imports) amounting to
2,800,000 pesos in 1825 and
rose to 62,000,000 pesos in
1895. The growth of an export
economy in those years
Figures for Philippine foreign trade for the beginning, middle and end of 19th
brought increasing prosperity
century. Source: Schumacher, p.17 to the Filipino middle and
upper classes as well as to the
Western merchants who are chiefly British and American who organized it. This brought
to the Philippines both the machinery and the consumer goods which the industrialized
economies of the West could supply.
The prosperity which the new export economy had brought to some may be
illustrated by the case of Rizal’s Chinese ancestor Domingo Lam-co. When he had come
to the Binan hacienda in mid-18th century, the average holding of an inquilino was 2.9
hectares; after Rizal’s father had moved to the Calamba hacienda, the Rizal family in the
1890s rented from the hacienda over 390 hectares.
Philippine exports were agricultural products. Those who controlled large rice,
sugar and abaca growing lands in Central Luzon, Batangas, parts of the Bikol region,
Negros and Panay profited the most. These included not only the Filipino hacenderos and
the friar orders owning large haciendas but also the inquilinos of the friar haciendas. Many
of these inquilinos were equivalently hacenderos in their own right, passing on from one
generation to the next the lands they rented from the friar hacienda, and farming them by
means of their share-tenants or kasama.
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 5
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
Modernizing Filipinos saw the colonial policies of Spain as not only the causes of
the existing economic prosperity, but increasingly as positive hindrances preventing further
progress and even threatening what had already been achieved. Schumacher described how
the instability of the Spanish government and the tendency of corruption and incompetency
of the Spanish officials during the 19th century had affected colonial governance especially
in the Philippines.
In Spain, the Liberals succeeded Conservatives at irregular intervals as one or the
other proved incapable of coping with the problems of governing the nation. The
unsteadiness of these governments made it impossible to develop any inconsistent policy
for the overseas colonies. Worse, both parties used the Philippines as a handy dumping
ground to reward party hangers-on with jobs. Hence, each change of government brought
another whole new mob of job-seekers to the Philippines, ready to line their pockets with
Filipino money before they would be replaced by still others. Filipinos were then deprived
of those few positions they had formerly held in the bureaucracy while the vast majority of
Spanish bureaucrats had no interest in, or even knowledge of, the country they were
supposed to be governing.
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 6
Governor-Generals of the Philippines from 1850-1898: Observed how often the transition occurred within 5 years. From 1895-1898,
the country was ran by 6 Governor-Generals. Source: https://wiki2.org/en/Governor-General_of_the_Philippines
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 7
charitable works. The Jesuits were expelled from the Philippines and the rest of the Spanish
empire in 1768 and they finally returned in 1859 to take charge of the evangelization of
Mindanao with ideas and methods new to the Philippine educational system.
The Jesuits opened the Escuela Normal de Maestros in 1865 to provide Spanish-
speaking teachers for the new primary school system. The Escuela Normal represented a
hope of progress in the minds of many Filipinos, just as it would be opposed by those for
whom modern education for Filipinos posed a danger to the continuance of Spanish rule.
In effect graduates of the Normal School met opposition from many parish priests.
It was in the secondary schools that the ideas of nationalism were to awake, even
among those who had never gone to Europe. Rizal wrote in his Memorias that through his
studies of literature, science and philosophy “the eyes of my intelligence opened a little,
and my heart began to cherish nobler sentiments.” Also, during his fifth year at the Ateneo,
he mentioned that through these studies “my patriotic sentiments greatly developed.”
It was not that the Ateneo taught
nationalism or the liberal principles of progress
but in imparting to its students a humanistic
education in literature, science, and philosophy,
in inculcating principles of human dignity and
justice and the equality of all men, it effectively
undermined the foundations of the Spanish
colonial regime, even without the Spanish Jesuits
wishing to do so. As early as 1843, the Spanish
A class in session at the old-style classroom at the
official Juan de la Matta had proposed the closing Ateneo Municipal. Source: philippinestudies.net
of these institutions as being “nurseries… of
subversive ideas.” Though the accusation of subversion was often rashly bestowed on
Filipinos, it is clear that the university was communicating something that stirred up the
sparks of nationalism.
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 9
a scientific historical point of view, Rizal proves too much and veers toward the opposite
distortion from that of friars who had denied all civilization to the pre-Hispanic Filipinos,
he did lay a historical foundation in his Morga and other essays for a national consciousness
and pride in the race which was to prove important for the future. Rizal’s annotation of
Morga’s Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas will be discussed and analyzed in the succeeding
chapters.
RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENT
Schumacher mentioned in his essay the influence of both friar priest and Filipino
clergy in the development of nationalist thoughts during this period. Though they had
played completely different roles in the pursuit of national identity, their presence
stimulated the demand for equality and justice among the Filipinos. Also, Schumacher
asserted how the Filipino clergy and liberal reformists able to inspire the Propaganda
Movement in its initiative to carry the ideals of national identity and rights during their
time.
The growth of education was producing an
ilustrado class, not to be completely identified with
the wealthy, as the examples of Mabini and Jacinto
show. These ilustrados were increasingly anti-friar
at times even anticlerical or anti-Catholic. The
reason for this attitude among the ilustrados is to
be sought from the intermingling of the political
and the religious, a characteristic of the Spanish
Glorification of the Immaculate by Francisco Antonio Patronato Real most especially in the latter half of
Vallejo: Representation of the two powers, church and
state, symbolized by the altar and the throne. the 19th century.
Source: artsandculture.google.com
Gov. Rafael Izquierdo: “The religious orders have their defects, their vices
and their difficulties, but in the Philippines, they have two qualities which from
the political point of view are so great and so important that they oblige us
to prescind from whatever may be alleged against them. One of these
qualities is their unshakeable devotion to Spain; the other is their influence
on the natives, which even in the weakened state in which it is today, is still
sufficiently great to consider it a preserving factor.
Gov. Juan Alaminos: “No one, he felt, could deny their patriotism, “which
verges on fanaticism, and they make the Indio believe that only in loving the
Spaniards can he save his soul on the next life.”
One can see the paradox of Philippine Catholicism at the end of 19th century. On the one
hand, the ordinary Filipino who had not gone to Manila or abroad for higher education
remained in the traditional religious practices and beliefs of his forefathers and continued
to look up to his friar parish priest as father of his people and protector against oppressive
government officials. On the other hand, the Filipino ilustrado educated in Europe found
the Catholic practice of his day childish and incompatible with modern ideas. For the
nationalists, religion had come to signify a means to perpetuate the status quo, to maintain
Spanish power in the Philippines.
This undeniable influence of friar parish priest had on the ordinary Filipino could
explain why the friars inevitably became the main target of the Filipino nationalists
including Rizal.
Rizal then wrote to Blumentritt:
“I wanted to hit the friars since the friars are always making use of religion,
not only as shield but also as a weapon, protection, citadel, fortress,
armor etc. I was therefore forced to attack their false and superstitious
religion in order to combat the enemy who hid behind this religion… God
must not serve as shield and protection of abuses, nor must religion.”
Since the Propaganda Movement was also heir to the liberal reformist tradition, the degree
to which the Propagandists were truly nationalists or merely liberal reformists would only
be made clear once war had broken out with the Americans and the latter were offering the
reforms which had been sought in vain from Spain. To the reformists, the American offer
would be enough; it was what they had really been looking for all along. For the
nationalists, the struggle would go on till it became hopeless. Faced with a new colonial
power, the clergy continued to play its role in the rise of nationalism. Though the initiative
in the nationalist movement had passed from the Filipino priests to the young ilustrados in
Europe and Manila in the 1880s, the clergy remained a powerful force in the Revolution
and the major factor in keeping the masses loyal.
FINAL THOUGHTS:
Schumacher’s essay led us to reflect the conditions of our country especially in the
latter part of 19th century. Economic progress, political reforms, anti-friar sentiments and
modernization were pursued and became a struggle for many Filipinos during this time.
The experiences of abuse, oppression, inequality and cries of freedom created this period’s
reformists, liberals, anticlerical and nationalists.
Rizal favored reforms in Philippine society. He opposed the influence of the friars,
for he saw them as an obstacle to freedom and to progress. He was devoted to the
modernization of his country, so that, as he put it, “she might take her place among the
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 14
proud nations of Europe.” But what he sought above all was that his country should be free,
free from tyrants from abroad or at home, a country where there would not be any tyrants
because Filipinos would not allow themselves to be slaves. It was the growth of a free
people, proud of its past, working for its future, united in a common set of ideals. This
vision made him the center of the nationalist movement of his day and the principal
inspiration of the Revolution.
We should also not forget the people who had lived and died to influence and
inspire Rizal. Borrowing Paulo Coelho’s famous thought from his novel The Alchemist,
the universe had possibly conspired for us to have a Jose Rizal. The heartbreaks he felt as
a child, his disappointment as a student in Manila and his hardships while in Europe could
turn him as the “alay” of his time. So, given a chance to time travel and experience what
had Rizal been through, will you make yourself an “alay” too?
1. Make a graphic organizer/ table mapping of the changes in the nineteenth- century
Philippines, categorizing social, political, economic, cultural changes
2. Watch the film: “Ganito Kami Noon, Paano Kayo Ngayon?” directed by Eddie
Romero (1976). Make a reflection paper about the film with the following guide
questions:
a. Describe the nineteenth- century Philippines as represented in the film
b. Based on your reading and class discussion, what can you say about the
film’s representation of the nineteenth century?
c. What is the main question that the film seeks to answer? What is your own
reflection based on the film and your understanding?
REFERENCES:
Abbott, W. M. (2014). Demise of Fr John N Schumacher SJ. Retrieved August 03, 2020, from
http://ateneo.edu/news/demise-fr-john-n-schumacher-sj
C. Wright Mills, “The Promise,” The Sociological Imagination Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.
Nelson, Gloria Luz. “Mga Pananaw Hinggil sa Ugnayan ng Talambuhay at Lipunan,” in Diestro, D. et al. Si
Heneral Paciano Rizal sa Kasaysayang Pilipino. Los Banos: UPLB Sentro ng Wikang Filipino, 206.
P. Sztompka. “Great Individuals as Agencies of Change” in The Sociology of Social Change. Wiley, 1993.
Film: “Ganito Kami Noon, Paano Kayo Ngayon?” directed by Eddie Romero (1976)
Schumacher, John. “Rizal in the Context of the 19th Century Philippines” in The Making of a Nation: Essays
on Nineteenth-Century Filipino Nationalism. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1991.
CONDITIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING 19TH CENTURY | 16
NAME:___________________________________ DATE:__________________
COURESE/ YEAR/SECTION:________________ EXPLORE IT OUT 2