MONKAYO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL- SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

KENNETH DAVE REPOLLO MANATAD

HARLENE GLAIZA QUIDAY PANAL
MARILYN ESTRELLA CONCHING
ANGELICA PERALES PATELUNA
JEZZEL SAGARAL SALMASAN
ELLA MAE RUBIN CAÑONES
JENNIE ROSE MAKEY DALI
J-ANN IBAÑES NAZARETH
JAY ANN CAPUYAN

The Effect of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4P’s) to the

Academic Performance of Senior High School Student Beneficiaries

in Monkayo National High School

Practical Research 2 Adviser:

Mariecriz Balaba-Banaez

JANUARY 2023
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREMILINARIES PAGE
Title Page i.
Table of Contents ii.

INTRODUCTION 1
Background of the Study 1
Objectives of the Study 3
Research Hypothesis 4
Significance of the Study 4
Scope and Delimitation 5
Time and Place of the Study 5
Operational Definition of Terms 6
Conceptual Framework 7

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 9

METHODOLOGY 16

Research Design 16
Research Respondents 16
Research Instruments 18
Data Gathering Procedures 20
Statistical Treatment 21

REFERENCES 22

APPENDIX 27

Survey Questionnaire 27
 INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

Children are entitled to an education, which is a human right (UN

Human Rights, 2019). The Philippine Constitution, adopted in 1987,

stipulates in Article XIV, Section 1 that "The State should preserve and

promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels, and shall

take appropriate efforts to make such education accessible to all"

(Department of Education, 2017). Academic Performance of every student

is vital and it is measured by a grade earned in the course (Lamas, 2015).

However, children living in poor background including the family have

lower occupational and educational aspirations than the children from

affluent family (Li & Qui, 2018). Schools in low/income neighborhoods will

have a concentration of children in poverty who run the risk of having a

lower level of school achievement and motivations for achievement

(McKenzie, 2019).

The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program is a human development

program of the national government that provides conditional cash grants

to the poorest of the poor, to improve the health, nutrition, and the

education of children aged 0-18 (DSWD, 2021). It is patterned after the

conditional cash transfer schemes in Latin American and African

countries, which have lifted millions of people around the world from

poverty (Dela Torre, 2016). Education is the answer of the existing poverty

in the country and to attain such Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program is a

great help (Orbeta, Melad, & Potestad, 2021). Under the 4Ps, the DSWD
provides cash grants to beneficiaries consisting of P6,000 a year, or P500

per month, to households for health and nutrition expenses and P3,000

per school year or P300 a month for each child’s educational expenses. In

addition, a maximum of three children per household is allowed. And in

order to remain a beneficiary of the 4Ps program, household-recipients

need to comply with their co-responsibilities which are 85 percent school

attendance (DSWD, 2021).

The poverty incidence of families in Davao Region was estimated at

13.7 percent, or roughly one out of five families was estimated to be poor in

2018 (Philippine Statistic Authority, 2020). Some poor students stop going

to school because they have to work, which leaves them without the

literacy and numeracy skills needed to improve their situation (Alip, 2022).

In Monkayo, Davao de Oro, some students are facing financial struggle,

thus affecting their participation in class activities (Philippine Statistic

Authority, 2020). Studies have shown that poor children from financially

disadvantaged homes begin school academically and behaviorally behind

their more affluent peers, and the gap continues to widen over the school

years (Duncan, Kalil, & Ziol-Guest, 2016).

In light of this, the researcher made the decision to carry out this

study in order to learn more about the effects of the Philippine

government's conditional transfer program on beneficiaries' educational

outcomes as well as its poverty-reduction strategy. Since there is no study

conducted to cover the effects of 4P's to students’ academic performance in

Monkayo National High School- Senior High, this study aims to determine

whether students at Monkayo National High School- Senior High take

advantage of this opportunity to succeed academically, whether the

program is beneficial to them, whether beneficiaries are enrolled in classes,

whether they are receiving the correct amount of cash assistance, and

whether the beneficiaries' academic performance has improved.

Objectives of the Study

This study seeks to determine which domain in the Pantawid

Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) that significantly influence the Academic

Performance of the student beneficiaries in Monkayo National High School-

Senior High. Specifically, this study seeks to:

1. Identify the level of 4P’s in terms of:

1.1. Financial Assistance; and,

1.2. Health Benefits; and

1.3. Education.

2. Assess the level of Students’ Academic Performance in terms of:

2.1. Class attendance;

2.2. General average; and,

2.3. Academic Engagement

3. Determine the significant relationship between the 4P’s and the

Academic Performance.

4. Determine which domain in the 4P’s that significantly influences the

Students’ Academic Performance.

 Research Hypothesis

The following hypothesis will be tested at 0.05 level of significance:

1.There is no significant relationship between 4P’s and Academic

Performance.

2.There is no domain in the 4P’s that significantly influences the Academic

Performance.

Significance of the Study

This study is beneficial to the following:

Government. As the greatest position in society, the government the 4P’s

program and has the findings of this study will be of tremendous

significance to them. The result of this study can be the basis in the

modification of the conditions in giving cash grants.

Teachers. Teachers can benefit by developing creative ways to manage the

responsibility to each student effectively. Even if beneficiaries are

provided and supported by the government, they still need equal

guidance to perform well in school.

4P's Students Beneficiaries. The result of this research can be of help to

student in understanding that coming to school daily may be a

guarantee that they will also have good academic performance. And

may the result give them the overview of how the government is

supporting their studies and that they must do their part by

studying well.
Future Researchers. As investigators of knowledge, this study can form

either basis on their idea for future research. They would do this

same action research project again using the facts that the

researchers have now.

Scope and Delimitation

The coverage of this study will be the Senoir High School of

Monkayo National High School but it is delimited only to 4P's student

beneficiaries who were enrolled in the School Year 2022-2023. Pantawid

Pamilyang Pilipino Program(4P's) has been described by many authors, but

this study uses only the indicators by Balacuit (2018). Moreover, Academic

Performance may be understood in different ways, but this study is

delimited only to indicators according to (Tadese, Yeshaneh, & Mulu,

2022).

Time and Place of the Study

This study will be conducted in the school year 2022-2023 in

Monkayo National High School-Senior High, located at L. Sarmiento St.,

Poblacion, Monkayo, Davao de Oro. It has an old and new building that

occupies the space. More than 30 classrooms, a faculty office, Canteen,

computer laboratory, beauty care room, science laboratory, school

center, and many others. It has two Grade levels compose of Grades 11

and 12. It offers Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) Track and Academic

Track. Furthermore, the students are coming from different tribes such as
Mandaya, Surigaonon, Cebuano, Bisaya and Bagobo. Among these tribes,

Mandaya and Bisaya are the most dominant. The students are coming

from a lower class family that lead them to become a 4P’s member, there

are some that are coming from a middle class family from different

Barangays in Municipality of Monkayo, Davao De Oro. There are some

other students coming from nearby localities such as Montevista,

Compostela, and Nabunturan.

Operational Definition of Terms

To facilitate a better understanding of this study, the following terms

at this moment defined operationally.

Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4P's) refers to the national

program that provides conditional cash grants to the poorest.

Academic Performance refers to students’ outcome of education. It is

their achievement across various academic subjects.

 Conceptual Framework

Independent Variable Dependent Variable

Pantawid Pamilyang Academic

Pilipino Program (4P's) Performance

 Financial Assistance  Class Attendance

 Health Benefits  General Average

 Education  Academic Engagement

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework the Study

Figure1. shows the research paradigm of the study. It consists of two

variables, the independent and dependent variables. The independent

variable of this study is the 4P's that is patterned after the work of Balacuit

(2018). This variable has three indicators, namely Financial Assistance,

Health Benefits, and Education. The Financial Assistance refers to income

support to individuals and families to meet their basic needs while

encouraging their maximum degree of independence. Health benefits refer

to any benefits under a coverage plan. Education is both the act of

teaching knowledge to others and the act of receiving knowledge from

someone else.

On the other hand, dependent variable of this study is the Academic

Performance, based on the work of Tadese, Yeshaneh, and Mulu (2022).

This variable has the following indicators; First, Class Attendance refers as
the physical presence of the students in the class. Second, General Average

refers to the final grade in each learning area or subject. Lastly, Academic

Engagement means the degree of the attention, curiosity, interest, option,

and the passion that students show when they are learning or being

taught.
 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4P's)

Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) as a conditional cash

transfer (CCT) program that transfers cash to beneficiary families if they

follow its conditionalities, this program helps the penniless people and

most of them are living in squatter area and family who can't provide their

basic needs (Lequit, 2021). The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program in

the Philippines, known as the 4Ps, is a conditional cash transfer program

developed by the World Bank and the government of the Philippines in

2007 (Diaz, 2021). The beneficiaries are able to receive two types of grants,

including a health grant of ₱500 per household per month and an

education grant of ₱300 per child per month for 10 months (Borgen

Project, 2022). Mikee Romero, one of the writers of the law

institutionalizing 4Ps, told the Philippine News Agency in September 2020

that the program’s ₱169.3 billion budget for 2021 also includes ₱41 billion

for social protection programs like medical, transportation and burial

assistance and ₱4.3 billion for disaster response, such as the provision of

relief goods (Guo, 2021). The high school children beneficiaries are given

an allowance for schooling higher than the allowance for elementary grade

children (Blanquisa Jr., 2022). For high school, allowance is P1,000 every
quarterly while elementary is P500 quarterly (Blanquisa Jr., 2022). The

strengths and weaknesses of the 4Ps program include gratitude expressed

by household beneficiaries to the government for launching the program

(Blanquisa Jr., 2022).

Financial Assistance

Financial aid delivery relies on social protection and payments

systems and the extent to which these are already in place and functioning

effectively (Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, 2020). The 4P’s main

objective is to provide financial assistance to the impoverished to “improve

the health, nutrition and the education of children aged 0-18.” And in the

Philippines, targeted financial assistance to help poor students finish high

school could double their potential income and lift them out of chronic

poverty (DSWD, 2021). The 4Ps financial consists of a PHP750 health and

nutrition grant and educational grants for a maximum of three children

per household: PHP700 for senior high school, PHP500 for junior high

school, PHP300 for elementary, and a PHP600 rice subsidy (Philippine

News Agency, 2022). The 4Ps itself which aims to reduce poverty and

improve access to education and health care of the poorest of the poor

families by providing them cash grants for their basic educational and

health care needs. Additionally, the cash grants primarily facilitated access

to education and health care services of the children (Malinao,

Remandaban, & Abocejo, 2022).

Health Benefits
 Health benefits refer to any benefits under a coverage plan. And these

usually consist of some combination of dental, medical, and vision care

offered (Acupido, Cabilangan, & Tamabo, 2020). Philippine Health

Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) and Department of Social Welfare and

Development (DSWD) have recently formalized a joint undertaking for the

benefit of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) grantees (Orbeta,

2018). Pantawid beneficiaries are covered by PhilHealth as Sponsored

members until December 2013 (Orbeta, 2018). They are issued their

Member Data Record and PhilHealth Identification Number which will

serve as their pass when availing of health care benefits at any accredited

facilities in the country (Remonte, Medina, & Garfin, 2018). Participants

benefit from health seminars and development sessions in their

communities. Recipients are far more likely to be enrolled in the PhilHealth

health insurance program, further increasing their chances of receiving

suitable healthcare expanded the range of healthcare services beneficiaries

attended, including weight monitoring and receiving critical dietary

supplements (Olfindo & Fernandez, 2011). Pantawid beneficiaries also

enjoy primary care benefits such as consultations, regular blood pressure

monitoring, and promotive health education on breastfeeding and

counseling on lifestyle modification and smoking cessation (Orbeta, 2018).

Medicines for diseases like asthma and acute gastroenteritis with no or

mild dehydration, upper respiratory tract infection/pneumonia and urinary

tract infection are also provided for by accredited healthcare providers

(Pascua, 2022).
Education

Education has always been strongly viewed as a pillar of national

development and a primary avenue for social and economic mobility

(Acosta, 2016). A clear evidence of the value placed on education is the

proportion of the national government budget going to the sector (De Luna,

Mendoza, & Malupay, 2018). According to Article XIV, Sec. 5, paragraph 5

of the Philippine Constitution the Department of Education (DepEd), the

country's biggest bureaucracy, is given the highest budget allocation

among government agencies catch year as required by the 1987 Philippine

Constitution (Malubay, Mercado, & Macasaet, 2015). 4Ps gives Php

300/month as support for the education of pupils from 3-4 years, thus as

a condition, a child enrolled in elementary school must maintain class

attendance rate at least 85% per month and as expected by schools they

can pay their contribution and provide school requirements (projects,

school supplies, allowance, etc.).In addition, along with Republic Act 6655

or the Free Secondary Education Act, these laws reaffirm the policy of the

State to protect and promote the rights of all Filipinos by providing

children free and compulsory education in the elementary and high school

level (Santiago & Gabarcz, 2016).

Academic Performance

Academic performance is the extent to which a student, teacher, or

institution has attained their short or long-term educational goals and is

measured either by continuous assessment or cumulative grade point

average (CGPA) (Tadese, Yeshaneh, & Mulu, 2022). Scholars agree that

students’ academic achievement is a ‘net result’ of their cognitive and non-

cognitive attributes as well as the socio-cultural context in which the

learning process takes place (Liem, 2019). The good academic performance

of students at the Senior High School is of paramount importance in every

educational system. Meanwhile, numerous factors influence the academic

performance of students and have been researched, but many problems

persist (Brew, Nketiah, & Koranteng, 2021). Students’ academic

performance is a key feature in education (Cheng, Wang, & Liu, 2019).

Academic performance is the knowledge gained which is assessed by

marks by a teacher and/or educational goals set by students and teachers

to be achieved over a specific period of time (Kumar & Agarwal, 2021). They

added that these goals are measured by using continuous assessment or

examinations results (Narad & Abdullah, 2016).

Class Attendance

The association between students’ class attendance and academic

performance had been the subject of several studies in a wide variety of

courses (Wilder, 2014). Reports from previous studies had proven that

attendance is a significant variable which affects academic outcomes

(Duran-Narucki, 2008). Schmidt and Vargas (2018) proposed that time

spent going to lectures contributed to a successful achievement in a

Macroeconomic Principles course. Bunce, Baird, and Jones (2015) tested

the relationship between absences and grades in 496 undergraduate

psychology students and found that low class attendance seemed to cause

lower grades but low grades also appeared to cause more frequent

absences from class suggesting that classroom attendance and grades can

interact to produce a decrease in academic achievement in some students.

These findings were supported by Romer (2015) which proved that there

exists strong relationship between attendance and performance among

students who took Intermediate Macroeconomics course.

General Average

The General Average is computed by dividing the sum of all final

grades by the total number of learning areas. And the Final Grade in each

learning area and the General Average are reported as whole numbers

(Llego, 2022). Grade averaging is the practice of calculating semester, end-

of-term, or end-of-year course grades by taking the sum of numerical

grades awarded in a course and then dividing that sum by the total

number of grades awarded (Mathews & Eggers, 2016). It is also used to

determine student's academic performance, honor roll, class rank, Latin

honors in schools/universities (Schneider & Hutt, 2014). General average

is also indicated in report cards in various high schools. (Oxford

Dictionaries, 2015). The General average means of the numerical

equivalents of a student's grades for a given period. High school General

average is considered to be the best predictor of how well students

performed in college (Belfield & Crosta, 2012). This finding did not only
apply to the result of the first-year college grades, but also for the long-

term college results as well as the whole four-year college duration (Geiser

& Santelices, 2007).

Academic Engagement

Students’ academic engagement has increasingly concerned

educators and researchers for the past few years since the onset of the 21 st

century (Kuh, 2009). The attention being focused on this field of inquiry is

due to its significance as an intervening function in elevating academic

success, reducing school drop-outs and institutionally engaging status

among educational system (Viega & Rodriguez, 2012). Student engagement

is concerned with the interaction between the time, effort and other

relevant resources invested by both students and their institutions

intended to optimize the student experience and enhance the learning

outcomes and development of students and the performance, and

reputation of the institution (Trowler, 2010). Students’ academic

engagement depends on a variety of factors that are related to personal

learner characteristics, the teacher, the teaching methodology, peers, and

other features in the learning environment (Amerstorfer & Freiin, 2021).

Components that influence academic engagement can be cognitive,

metacognitive, affective, social, task-related, communicative, and foreign

language-related. Rather than existing in isolated spheres, the factors

contributing to an individual’s academic engagement intertwine and

overlap (Amerstorfer & Freiin, 2021). The relationships students cultivate

with others are prominent in several of these areas (Rimm-Kaufman &

Sandilos, 2022). Positive interpersonal relationships enhance individuals’

enthusiasm for learning, which benefits sustainable learning success and

self-confidence (Mercer & Dörnyei, 2020). The relationships between

students and teachers and the perceptions students have of their teachers

seem to be particularly influential on students’ engagement in academic

undertakings (Amerstorfer & Freiin, 2021). Problem-based learning (PBL), a

teaching approach particularly suitable for tertiary education, involves

students in authentic problem-solving processes and fosters students’ self-

regulation and teamwork (Kurt, 2020). Intensive relationship-building is

one of the key characteristics of this student-centered approach

(Amerstorfer & Freiin, 2021).

 METHODOLOGY

Research Design

This study used a predictive correlation research design. Predictive

correlation is use to determine the degree to which two variables are

related and to test whether there is a linear relationship between the

variables in the population as a whole (Bewick, Cheek, & Ball, 2011). This

technique is useful in this study to know the effects of Pantawid Pamilyang

Pilipino Program (4P's) to the Students' Academic Performance of Senior

High School student beneficiaries in Monkayo National High School.

Research Respondents

The respondents of this study will be the Senior High School Student

4P’s National High School of Monkayo, Davao de Oro. Slovin's formula will

N
be use on determining the sample size. It is n= , where n as the
1+ N e 2
sample size; and e as the margin of error, which is 0.05. Moreover,

stratified random sampling will be use in determining the sample size per

section. Furthermore, the lottery/fishbowl method will be use in identifying

the names of the respondents of this study. The following table shows the

distribution of samples per section.

Distribution of Sample per Section

Section Total Percentage Number

Population of Samples
GRADE 11
Almario 15 2% 5
Amorsolo 20 2.7% 7
Arellano 55 7.6% 20
Bernal 16 2.2% 6
Brocka 16 2.2% 6
Celerio 17 2.3% 6
Hernandez 14 1.9% 5
Kasilag 61 8.5% 22
Legaspi 24 3% 8
Lumbera 11 1.5% 4
Molina 13 1.8% 5
Poe 6 0.8% 2
Romulo 10 1.3% 3
Santos 18 2.5% 6
Tolentino 15 2% 5
Valera 43 6% 15
GRADE 12
Aquarius 28 3.9% 10
Aries 49 6.8% 17
Aurora 25 3.4% 9
Cancer 17 3% 8
Capricorn 22 3% 8
Gemini 15 2% 5
Leo 32 4.4% 11
Libra 26 3.6% 9
Lyra 26 3.6% 9
Pisces 30 4% 10
Sagittarius 26 3.6% 9
Scorpio 18 2.5% 6
Taurus 38 5% 13
Virgo 24 3.3% 8

N= 715 100% 257

Research Instrument

The researchers used the survey questionnaire adopted from

Balacuit (2018). The questions were divided into three (3) indicators. It is

composed of item number 1 to 5 for Financial Assistance , item number 6

to 10 for Health Benefits, and item number 11 to 15 for Education.

Meanwhile, in determining the student beneficiaries academic

performance, the researchers use the questionnaire of Nisar, Mahmood,

and Dogar (2017). It is composed of 15 items, a multiple choice

questionnaire with five options from which the students were expected to

choose the best answer.

To know the level of perceived benefits of the Pantawid

Pamilyang Pilipino Program to the Grade 11 and 12 student beneficiaries

in Monkayo National High School-Senior High School, the following

interpretation scale will be followed:

Scale Range Descriptive Descriptive

Meaning Interpretation

5 4.20 – 5.00 Vey High This means that the

Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program is
extremely beneficial.

4 3.40 – 4.19 High This means that the

Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program is
highly beneficial.

3 2.60 – 3.39 Moderate This means that the

Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program is
moderately
beneficial.

2 1.80 – 2.59 Low This means that the

Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program is
less beneficial.

1 1.00 – 1.79 Very Low This means that the

Pantawid Pamilyang
 Pilipino Program is
unbeneficial.

To know the Academic Performance of Grade 11 and 12 student

beneficiaries in Monkayo National High School-Senior High School, the

following interpretation scale will be followed:

Scale Range Descriptive Descriptive

Meaning Interpretation

5 4.20 – 5.00 Vey High This means that the

academic
performance is in the
advanced stage.

4 3.40 – 4.19 High This means that the

academic
performance is in the
proficiency stage.

3 2.60 – 3.39 Moderate This means that the

academic
performance is in the
average stage.
2 1.80 – 2.59 Low This means that the
academic
performance is in the
beginning stage.

1 1.00 – 1.79 Very Low This means that the

academic
performance is in the
no mastery stage.

Data Gathering Procedure

Before the survey questionnaires were distributed to the

respondents of the study, the researchers writes a request letter to the

Campus Administrator of MNHS-SH, Monkayo requesting a

recommendation letter that would be used as a form of formal permission

to the principal of Monkayo National High School-Senior High School to

allow the researchers to conduct a survey to the Grade 11 and Grade 12

beneficiaries students of their school. Then, the researchers asks from the

office of the registrar of Monkayo National High School- Senior High

School, Monkayo, Davao de Oro the complete list of Grade 11 and 12

students beneficiaries who were enrolled in the school year 2022-2023 to

determine the number of respondents which are going to survey. Then the

researchers asks an assistance from the teacher in each section for the

distribution of the survey questionnaires to the students to know the

Effects of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program to the Academic

Performance of Senior High School Student Beneficiaries. Moreover, the

researchers personally collected the completed questionnaires. The data

was collected and recorded in coordination with the data processor.

Statistical Treatment

The statistical data was analyzed with the help of the following

tools:

Mean. Mean is the preferred method with the very purpose of calculating

the center of the data set. This tool was used to assess objectives 1

and 2.

Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (Pearson R.). This tool

is use to see whether there is a relationship between two variables.

The said tool will be employed to measure the third objective.

Regression Analysis. It attempts to model the influence between two

variables by fitting a linear equation to the observed data. This tool

tests the fourth objective of this study.

The descriptive interpretation in inferring the degree of its

significant relationship is provided below (Medina, 2013):

Correlational Coefficient Descriptive Interpretation

0.00= r Almost negligible

0.00< r <0.20 Very weak correlation
0.20< r <0.40 Weak correlation
0.40< r <0.60 Moderately strong correlation
0.60< r <0.80 Strong correlation
0.80< r <1.00 Very strong correlation
r = 1.00 Perfect correlation
REFERENCES

Acosta, I. C. (2016). Seeing through a magnifying lens: A qualitative inquiry

of K-12 readiness of faculty members from higher education
institutions in the Philippines. Researchers World, 7(4), 1.
Acupido, R. J., Cabilangan, R., & Tamabo, H. (2020). Analysis on the
Implementation of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program: A
Research Review. The ASTR Research Journal, 4(1), 1-1.
Alip, J. (2022). Breaking barriers: Education and poverty. Manilla Bulletin.
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student
perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher
relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in psychology,
12, 4978.
Balacuit Jr, C. (2018). Contributing factors in basic education through 4Ps
(Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program) implementation.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 79-
86.
Belfield, C. R., & Crosta, P. M. (2012). Predicting Success in College: The
Importance of Placement Tests and High School Transcripts. CCRC
Working Paper No. 42. Community College Research Center,
Columbia University.
Bewick, V., Cheek, L., Ball, J. (2011). Statistics review 7: Correlation and
regression. Critical care, 7(6), 451.
Blanquisa Jr, I. B., & Berdin, I. M. (2022). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps) Household Beneficiaries in Malilipot. Available at
SSRN 4055381.
Borgen Project. (2022). PANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM IN
THE PHILIPPINES. borgenproject.org.
Brew, E. A., Nketiah, B., & Koranteng, R. (2021). A literature review of
academic performance, an insight into factors and their influences
on academic outcomes of students at senior high schools. Open
Access Library Journal, 8(6), 1-14.
Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer
approach in higher education and its effects on academic
performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958-1978.
Cheng, C. H., Wang, Y. C., & Liu, W. X. (2019). Exploring the related
factors in students’ academic achievement for the sustainable
education of rural areas. Sustainability, 11(21), 5974. Consultative
Group to Assist the Poor. (2020). Empowering the poor through
financial services. CGAP.org.
Dela Torre B. (2016). Financing education through the Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4Ps). International Journal of Humanities and
Social Science,6(5), 99-108.
De Luna, A., Rael, F., Mendoza Jr, V., & Malupay, M. (2018).
Accountability, Affordability and Accessibility of Higher Education
in a Local University: A Local Government Initiative toward Socio-
Economic Development and Sustainability. Educational Access and
Excellence, 1, 189.
Department of Education. (2017) . The 1987 Constitution of the Republic
of the Philippines – Article XIV. Officialgazette.gov.ph
Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2021). Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program.Officialgazette.gov.ph.
Diaz, R. (2021). Effects of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) and
other Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) Programs of Low and
Middle–Income Countries on Human Development. Sapienza:
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 2-11.
Duncan, G. J., Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. (2008). Economic costs of early
childhood poverty. Issue Paper, 4.
Durán-Narucki, V. (2008). School building condition, school attendance,
and academic achievement in New York City public schools: A
mediation model. Journal of environmental psychology, 28(3), 278-
286.g.
Geiser, S., & Santelices, M. V. (2007). Validity of High-School Grades in
Predicting Student Success beyond the Freshman Year: High-
School Record vs. Standardized Tests as Indicators of Four-Year
College Outcomes. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.
6.07. Center for studies in higher education.
Guo, J. (2015). Pantawid pamilyang Pilipino program (4Ps): Assistance to
pupil’s education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts, and
Sciences, 2 (3), 1-5.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about
student engagement. Journal of college student development, 50(6),
683-706.
Kumar, S., Agarwal, M., & Agarwal, N. (2021). Defining and measuring
academic performance of Hei students-a critical review. Turkish
Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT),
12(6), 3091-3105.
Kurt, S. (2020). Problem-Based Learning (PBL). Educational
Technology.net.
Lamas, H. A. (2015). School Performance. Journal of Educational
Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones, 3(1), 351-385.
Lequit, J. (2021). Conditional Cash Transfer Program in the Philippines.
Academia Education.
Liem, G. A. D. (2019). Academic performance and assessment. Educational
Psychology, 39(6), 705-708.
Li, Z., & Qiu, Z. (2018). How does family background affect children’s
educational achievement? Evidence from Contemporary China. The
Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5(1), 1-21.
Llego, M. A. DepEd Interim Guidelines on Giving of Awards and
Recognition in Light of the Basic Education Learning Continuity
Plan for School Year 2020-2021.
Malinao, A. P., Remandaban, R. R. V., & Abocejo, F. T. (2022). The
Conditional Cash Transfer Program for Poverty Alleviation in the
Philippines: A Policy Evaluation. International Journal of Social
Science Research and Review, 5(11), 509-516.
Malubay, G. J. J., Mercado, K. A. O., & Macasaet, E. (2015). Factors
affecting the decision of freshmen students in pursuing hospitality
and tourism programs in Lyceum of the Philippines University-
Laguna: Basis for enhancement. LPU–Laguna Journal of
International Tourism and Hospitality Management, 3(1), 23-48.
Mathews, C., & Eggers, S. M. (2016). Effects of PREPARE, a multi-
component, school-based HIV and intimate partner violence (IPV)
prevention programme on adolescent sexual risk behaviour and
IPV: cluster randomised controlled trial. AIDS and Behavior, 20,
1821-1840.
McKenzie, K. (2019). The Effects of Poverty on Academic Achievement. BU
Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 11(2), 21-26. Medina, E.
(2013). An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. Journal
of internet services and applications, 4, 1-13.
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in
contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Narad, A., & Abdullah, B. (2016). Academic performance of senior
secondary school students: Influence of parental encouragement
and school environment. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary
Studies in Humanities, 8(2), 12-19.
Nisar, N., Khalid Mahmood, M., & Dogar, A. H. (2017). Determinants of
Students' Academic Achievement at Secondary School Level.
Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 145-158.
Orbeta, A. C. (2018). Social protection system in the Philippines: An
assessment. In Social Protection Goals in East Asia (pp. 133-164).
Routledge.
Orbeta, A. C., Melad, K. A. M., & Potestad, M. (2021). Correlates of Test
Performance of 15-year-old Students in the Philippines: Evidence
from PISA (No. 2020-57). PIDS Discussion Paper Series.
Pascua, R.(2022). Validation of the HERA Phase I epoch of reionization 21
cm power spectrum software pipeline. The Astrophysical Journal,
924(2), 85.
Philippine News Agency. (2022). Poor families to get P200 more monthly
aid. Pna.gov.ph.
Philippine Statistic Authority. (2020). 2018 Poverty Estimates of Davao
Region. PSA.gov.ph.
Remonte, M. A., Medina, A., & Garfin, A. M. C. (2018). The challenges of
the Philippines' social health insurance program in the era of
universal health coverage. Public health action, 8(4), 175-180.
Rimm-Kaufman S., & Sandilos L. (2022). Improving Students'
Relationships with Teachers to Provide Essential Supports for
Learning. American Psychological Association.
Romero, L. S. (2015). Trust, behavior, and high school outcomes. Journal
of Educational Administration.
Santiago, R. T., & Garbacz, S. A. (2016). Parent‐teacher relationships in
elementary school: An examination of parent‐teacher trust.
Psychology in the Schools, 53(10), 1003-1017.
Schmidt, D. R., & Vargas, D. L. (2018). Correlation between student
collaboration network centrality and academic performance.
Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020112.
Schneider, J., & Hutt, E. (2014). Making the grade: A history of the A–F
marking scheme. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(2), 201-224.
Tadese, M., Yeshaneh, A., & Mulu, G. B. (2022). Determinants of good
academic performance among university students in Ethiopia: a
cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-9.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The higher
education academy, 11(1), 1-15.
UN Human Rights. (2019). Education is a Human Right. United Nations
org.
Viega, M., & Rodríguez, B. (2012). Documento Electronico y Firma Digital:
Cuestiones de seguridad en las nuevas formas documentales.
Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic
achievement: a meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377-
397.
 APPENDIX

Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4P’s)

Please fill out the following information. This will be used for data
organization and analysis purposes only. Your information will be kept
secure, and all identifiers will be removed from reports, and from your
responses at the end of this study.

By participating in this survey, you are giving your implied

consent to be a participant in this study. You are also giving your consent
to be contacted at the end of this course to take the survey again. You may
withdraw from the study at any time.

Name:_____________________________________Section:______________________
Grade:________________________Age:__________Gender:____________________

Instructions: Read each item carefully and indicate the response (Strongly
Disagree, Disagree, Uncertain, Agree, and Strongly Disagree) which best
describes your feeling toward each statement. Do not spend too long on
the given item. Check your responses on the table.

Financial Assistance Strongly Strongly

The students… Agree Agree Uncertain Disagree Disagree
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1.Parents/guardians are
able to give them daily
school allowance.

2.Can afford the school

projects.

3.Have a confident I
going to school with
his/her complete school
supplies.

4.Can immediately pay

their school obligation.

5.Families can buy their

basic needs (foods,
clothing, etc.)

Health Benefits Strongly Strongly

The Students… Agree Agree Uncertai Disagree Disagree
(5) (4) n (2) (1)
(3)
1.Receive deworming
pills twice a year.

2. Eat his/her meal

three (3) times a day.

3. Have a healthy
lifestyle.

4. Cannot be easily
infected by diseases due
of having a complete
health services.

5. Eat nutritious foods

of available garden in
their backyard.

Education Strongly Strongl

The Students… Agree Agree Uncertain Disagre y
(5) (4) (3) e Disagre
(2) e
(1)
1. Able to attend
classes everyday.

2. Interested to study
everyday.

3. Are socially active

physically and
mentally.

4. Motivated in going
to school.

Student Beneficiaries Academic Performance

Student Beneficiaries Strongly Strongly
Academic Agree Agree Uncertain Disagree Disagree
Performance (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. I am motivated to go
to school everyday.
2. I made myself ready
in all my subjects.
3. I pay attention and
listen during every
discussion.
4. I want to get good
grades in every subject.
5. I actively participate
in every discussion
6. Asking questions to
clarify.
7. Contribute to group
work and decision
making.
8. Participate actively
in learning.
9. Complete classwork
and homework in
allotted time.
10. Cooperate with
others.
11. Demonstrate
appropriate listening
skills.
12. Worked harder
than you thought you
could to meet an
instructor's standards
or expectations.
13. Discussed grades
or assignments with a
teacher.
14. Asked questions in
class or contributed to
class discussions.
15. Came to class
without completing
readings or
assignments.