Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Comparative Analysis

    Uploaded by

    sadiya almas
    6 views3 pages
    The document compares two IT parks, Kirispp IT Park and Kohinoor Square, on aspects such as orientation, landscape features, special features, materials used, number of floors, construction requirements, and parking capacity. Kirispp IT Park is oriented south with water bodies and landscaping for cooling, while Kohinoor Square is east-west oriented with rooftop gardens and heat resistant architecture. Both facilities differ in materials used, number of floors, construction methods, and parking capacity.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares two IT parks, Kirispp IT Park and Kohinoor Square, on aspects such as orientation, landscape features, special features, materials used, number of floors, construction requirements, and parking capacity. Kirispp IT Park is oriented south with water bodies and landscaping for cooling, while Kohinoor Square is east-west oriented with rooftop gardens and heat resistant architecture. Both facilities differ in materials used, number of floors, construction methods, and parking capacity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views3 pages

    Comparative Analysis

    Uploaded by

    sadiya almas
    The document compares two IT parks, Kirispp IT Park and Kohinoor Square, on aspects such as orientation, landscape features, special features, materials used, number of floors, construction requirements, and parking capacity. Kirispp IT Park is oriented south with water bodies and landscaping for cooling, while Kohinoor Square is east-west oriented with rooftop gardens and heat resistant architecture. Both facilities differ in materials used, number of floors, construction methods, and parking capacity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

    STUDY ASPECTS KIRISP IT PARK KOHINOOR SQUARE

    ORIENTATION South East-west


    LANDSCAPE Water body is provided at Vertical landscape
    entrance which lowers the Rooftop garden
    temperature
    Light green landscape is
    provided
    SPECIAL FEATURES Water treatment plant, Pillar less
    HAVAC system, Curve fins Architecture
    Double walled window which Heat resistant
    are non operable architecture
    LED lights are used to save Fastest vertical
    energy elevation
    Recycled water is used for
    irrigation

    MATERIAL Double-glazed panels, Post tension


    Concrete slabs,
    spandrel beams,
    concrete core
    NO. OF FLOORS 5 storeys 48 storeys
    CONSTRUCTION Frame structure Steel construction
    REQUIREMENTS
    Parking 3- buses, 10-cars, 3500
    LIVE CASE STUDY:
    1. CYBER CITY GURUGHRAM:
    Address: delhi
    Area :128 acres
    Year of start: 1997
    Year of completion: 2013
    2. CYBER TOWER, HYDERABAD:
    Address: Hyderabad
    Area: 3.23acres.

    You might also like