Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acknowledgement........................................................................................................ 3
Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 4
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 5
2. Literature review ................................................................................................... 7
2.1 Virtual Reality and shopping ........................................................................................ 7
2.2 V commerce and E commerce ..................................................................................... 9
2.3 Virtual Reality and Technology .................................................................................. 10
2.4 Consumer experience and VR technology ............................................................... 11
2.5 The changing retail environment in light of VR integration ................................... 13
2.6 Theories ........................................................................................................................ 17
2.7 SOR MODEL ................................................................................................................. 17
3. Methodology ........................................................................................................ 18
3.1 Ethics and Validity ....................................................................................................... 19
3.2 SOR MODEL ................................................................................................................. 20
3.3 Devices used in the studies ....................................................................................... 20
3.4 Products used in the literature .................................................................................. 21
3.5 Environments used ..................................................................................................... 21
3.6 External Stimulus ........................................................................................................ 22
3.7 Psychological factors ................................................................................................. 22
3.8 Behavioural Factors .................................................................................................... 22
4. Findings ............................................................................................................... 23
4.1 Q How various VR technologies have been applied so far in the context of
shopping? ........................................................................................................................... 23
4.2 Q How can VR improve the shopping experience? ........................................... 30
4.3 Q What sort of shopping experience can VR provide in comparison to other
retail venues? ..................................................................................................................... 33
5. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 35
5.1 Drawbacks .................................................................................................................... 37
5.2 Shop Design ........................................................................................................... 38
Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 42
Reference list .............................................................................................................. 43
Acknowledgement
First and foremost, I want to thank my family and God the Almighty from the bottom
of my heart. Because of my confidence in them, I have been abundantly blessed by
their grace, and as a consequence, I have been able to successfully finish this study.
I also want to thank them for being there for me through good times and bad, offering
me emotional support when I needed it and not just when they felt like it.
Throughout my time at Loughborough University, this degree and project have been
the most challenging academically. However, I was able to finish my education to the
best of my abilities thanks to the constant support of my family and friends. I am
appreciative of their ongoing encouragement and motivation to see my goals
through. I also want to express my gratitude to Professor Ofer, who has functioned
as both my supervisor and mentor for my research during my master's thesis. As I
worked to finish this project, Ofer was a steady source of support and advice. His
unfailing confidence in my abilities has motivated me to complete my job to the
highest calibre possible. Additionally, I want to extend my sincere appreciation to all
of my classmates from the Loughborough MBA class of 2022. They had offered me
continual support while I worked on my job.
Abstract
E-commerce and brick-and-mortar businesses both now have the ability, thanks to
the development of virtual reality, to circumvent their respective restrictions by
adopting the characteristics of one another via the medium of the virtual world. Now,
e-commerce may give store-like features such as physical presence, touch, and an
atmosphere that is similar to the real world, while physical retailers can build virtual
stores so that they can be accessed from anywhere in the world. The research takes
note of these recent developments and investigates the latest applications and
utilizations of virtual reality in an effort to address the question of how VR may
improve consumer engagement in the retail sector. The research provides a full
grasp of Virtual Reality in the retail sector by reviewing the existing literature and
providing an overview of its condition today. Under this heading, it provides answers
to topics such as "How different VR technologies have been utilised so far in the
context of shopping," and "What kind of shopping experience can VR deliver in
compared to traditional retail venues?" "How can VR enhance the shopping
experience?"
1. Introduction
Ivan Sutherland, around the middle of the 1960s, published a pivotal manuscript in
which he attempted to describe virtual reality as a window through which a user
perceives the virtual world as if it looked, felt, and sounded real and in which the user
could act realistically. This is where the concept of virtual reality (VR) can be traced
back to (Packer and Jordan, 2002)
Since that time, and in accordance with the application area, several definitions have
been formulated: for instance, Bowman and McMahan defined virtual reality as a
virtual environment that immerses users to the extent that they have the feeling of
"being there" (Bowman and McMahan, 2007); Bishop and Fuchs defined virtual
reality as "real-time interactive graphics with 3D models, combined with a display
technology that gives the user the immersion in the model world and direct
manipulation" (Bishop and Fuchs, 1992).
Although these definitions are distinct from one another, they emphasise three
characteristics that are shared by virtual reality (VR) systems: immersion, the feeling
of being present in an area, and the ability to interact with that world. To be more
specific, immersion refers to the number of senses that are aroused, the interactions
that take place, and the degree to which reality resembles the stimuli that are utilised
to mimic worlds. This characteristic may be affected by the characteristics of the
technological system that is employed to shield the user from the outside world
(Slater, 2009).
The virtual reality (VR) market has been expanding in tandem with the fast
development of the underlying technology. It is anticipated that the size of its
worldwide market would expand from 7.3 billion US dollars in 2018 to 120.5 billion
US dollars in 2026. (Fortune Business Insights, 2019). At this point in time, in the
middle of the year 2022, virtual reality (VR) is recognised as one of the technological
megatrends that is advancing the digitalization of all aspects of human existence
(Koivistoa and Hamaria, 2019). To this day, virtual reality technology is being used in
a variety of contexts, including those of the entertainment and advertising industries,
the construction industry, product design and presentation, and the tourist industry
(Stapleton, 2002). It is generally agreed that shopping and retail are two of the most
potential application areas for VR in the context of a corporate setting (Cowan and
Ketron, 2019). According to Ben-Ur 2017, the trend in mainstream commerce has
been moving away from conventional shopping channels and toward virtual reality.
Virtual worlds (such as Buzz 3d retail; astra fit and diakse) have also been taking use
of the conventional restrictions of the setting of brick-and-mortar stores by giving
endless options of items combined with a variety of effective recommendation
algorithms. When compared to traditional stores with brick-and-mortar locations,
online retailers obviously have access to a greater variety of products and do not
have the same restrictions on shelf space. Similarly, as the expectations of
consumers on online shopping platforms have been raised currently due to the
emergence of diverse digital shopping channels such as virtual reality (VR),
augmented reality (AR), and mobile technologies (MT), these platforms are more
focused on enriching the consumers' hedonic shopping experiences (Ben-Ur, Mai,
and Yang, 2015). This is in contrast to the following traditional consumers' attributes,
namely convenience and discount prices that online shopping can provide. Even if
the objective is to provide consumers with a shopping experience that is consistent
across numerous channels, the most important thing is to discover the most effective
strategy to mix in-store and online shopping in order to provide an integrated and
engaging retail environment. (Braze, n.d.)
Literature reviews focus on a topic and provide theoretical material for pertinent
research, addressing the current level of knowledge in a certain area, providing
research findings, and defining future research (Fink, 2019). The literature review is
a technique that includes gathering data, doing descriptive analysis, establishing
categories, and evaluating materials in order to discover themes, topics, and issues
in the literature.
Virtual technology, not virtual reality technology, is used in the early stages of virtual
reality, which mostly include less immersive forms of the technology. The non-
immersive virtual environment allows users to interact simply with conventional input
devices like their mouse and keyboard. Virtual information is shown on a standard-
sized computer screen or monitor in this environment (Suh and Prophet, 2018, Zeng
and Richardson, 2016). Previous studies have simply linked virtual reality (VR)
shopping with a virtual visualisation display or web 3D technology for online retailers
(Wang and Datta, 2010). The shopping experience is, in general, the result of
interactions between a person and an item that take place in a particular setting or
retail environment (such as an online or physical store, shop, shopping mall,
supermarket, or shopping platform) and over the course of a specific amount of time
(Arnould & Thomson, 2005). Consumers have a tough time physically and mentally
immersing themselves in a virtual retail environment since the usual desktop-based
virtual reality technology can only offer a small portion of the field of view. This
makes it difficult for customers to make purchases (FOV). Because of the constraints
imposed by technologies and pieces of equipment, it is evident that a select few
studies have made use of a greater number of displays or monitors in order to
simulate an immersive shopping experience by expanding the visual field
(Altarteer,2016). As a result, content relating to the early stages of VR technology
that did not address the provision of an immersive experience in the virtual retail
environment.
Despite the fact that the discussion and conception of virtual reality are primarily
focused on visual output and display technology, the VR user experience frequently
includes other modalities, such as haptic devices, motion controllers, sound devices,
and so on. This is the case even though these other modalities coexist in the VR
user experience. Vision alone is not always enough to provide a richer virtual reality
experience. Furthermore, as will become apparent in this review, despite the fact
that virtual reality technology in contemporary discussions is primarily anchored in
visual technologies, logically and conceptually, virtual reality technology is and
should be agnostic of and unrestricted by any single human sense.
Virtual reality and customer engagement are not new study issues and have been
extensively studied over the last two decades; nonetheless, owing to the rising rivalry
amongst e-commerce platforms, there has been a need to advance knowledge in
this specific area. In addition, despite the fact that the majority of large companies
have established their virtual platforms, they still lack outstanding in-store
experience. Therefore, the study aim is:
To achieve this, the study will review the current state of literature to provide a
comprehensive understanding of Virtual Reality in the retail segment and will try to
answer the following questions.
Q How various VR technologies have been applied so far in the context of shopping?
2.6 Theories
The previous study has made use of many important theories and research
frameworks that are relevant to the process of acquiring virtual reality experiences.
Even though none of these are used in this particular study, these theories are
essential for connecting the disparate points in the understanding of virtual reality
and have been used in previous literature to connect the findings. Even though none
of these are used in this study, these theories are essential for connecting the
disparate points in the understanding of virtual reality. These ideas have been very
necessary in demonstrating the advantages that virtual reality may provide. A
number of theoretical frameworks, such as affective evaluation theory, presence
theory, flow theory, self-persuasion theory, uses and satisfaction theory, and
expectation-confirmation theory, have been adapted for usage in the realm of virtual
reality in a number of pieces of academic writing. In order to explain the
cybersickness that may be caused by virtual reality, many different explanations
have been proposed, including those based on the concepts of sensory conflict,
postural instability, and poison (see e.g., Israel et al., 2019). In addition, certain
studies developed hypotheses based on pre-existing theoretical frameworks such as
the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) model, the theory of reasoned action (TRA)
model, the technology acceptance model (TAM) model, the unified theory of
acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model, and the perceived shopping
value model.
3. Methodology
This research will use secondary data analysis and will focus mostly on qualitative
data. Secondary analysis of qualitative data is the use of existing data to obtain
answers to other research questions than those posed in the initial study (Hinds,
1997). Authors have utilised secondary analysis to data when they want to: explore
interests separate from the initial study (Hinds, 1997); bring a fresh viewpoint or
conceptual emphasis to the original research question. the primary reason for
depending on secondary analysis is that virtual reality shopping platforms are not
widely accessible to consumers as it requires a Head-mounted controller (HMD) and
haptic devices to access the virtual stores. Additionally, given the brief duration, it is
more practical and accessible. However, we have access to datasets from previous
study that we may utilise for our own research.
This study seeks to uncover academic literature on virtual reality and retail studies.
For this investigation, secondary data sources were investigated for pertinent
information. Academic databases, search words, and filters were described in a
sample approach at the beginning of the research. A basic literature review on virtual
reality and retail was conducted as the first stage. This requires a search of
academic publications using the keywords "virtual reality" and "retail," "virtual reality"
and "shopping," "virtual reality" and "e-commerce," "virtual reality" and "marketing,"
"virtual world" and "customer interaction," and "virtual reality" and "consumer
experience." To reduce the influence of database bias, three databases, British
Index, Google Scholar, and Scopus, were selected based on their popularity in the
academic research community.
To represent the current status of VR/AR research, the literature study focused on
articles published after 2016 mainly. Thus, 70% of the articles were from 2013 and
after.
From August 15 to September 15, 41 noteworthy journal articles were gathered. The
search phrases were input into Google Scholar and filtered using the aforementioned
criteria. Select publications of high quality that do literature reviews, starting with the
most recent studies and working backwards. Relevant PDF documents have been
downloaded. During the journal research, significant referenced publications were
located, retrieved, evaluated, and then downloaded. When the snowball sampling
path ceased to provide results, the following search phrase was analysed in the
same manner. The search phrases were then placed into other search engines to
discover every relevant article. To maintain currency throughout the analytic process,
continue to research pertinent material. Throughout the resource gathering phase,
only academic materials (journal articles, conference papers, magazines, and
academic books) were authorised. This was done to guarantee that the publication's
emphasis remained scholarly and scientifically grounded.
After gathering all pertinent academic material, it would be thoroughly evaluated and
categorised in accordance with the research questions. The research results would
then be confirmed and linked with the hypotheses to get a conclusion.
Monitor, Projector, CAVE, and Head-Mounted Display (HMD) are the four most
prevalent VR system types in the present literature. Nevertheless, the usage of
HMD(Head-mounted Displays) has expanded in recent years. The majority of the
evaluated material focused on HMD. Other information, including auditory, tactile,
and olfactory stimuli, was delivered by additional devices. The research have not
clearly indicated what level of immersion constitutes virtual reality.
HTC Vive, Smartphone-based, and oculus rift HMD were used. Large screen
Powerball, two projectors with polarised glasses, and one wall display of CAVE were
the projectors utilised. There were three large displays and four walls in the CAVE,
and the monitors were TFT LCD and 3D monitors.
To provide customers with a more realistic VR experience, there is a great need for
multimodal input devices that enable them to interact with the many items in the VR
world. These input devices vary from a basic mouse to a neural connection. Input
devices may vary from those controlled by hands, legs, and eyes to those controlled
by general body motions. In the majority of research (40%) VR controllers that are
included with the HMD bundle are used. Some studies have also used gloves and
hand trackers, which offer more precise monitoring of finger movements such as
gripping, holding, and turning goods. In a few research, buying choices were made
using mobile devices.
In 35% of the publications, food was often picked as a buying item. In addition to
food (van Herpen,2016), apparel, alcohol and drinks such as beer and wine (Bigné,
2016, Martnez-Navarro,2019) were utilised to study consumer psychology and
behaviour. In addition, things such as stationery, luxury bags, electronics, and
automobile components have been examined in several of the research..
4.1 Q How various VR technologies have been applied so far in the context of
shopping?
VR is well-received by customers because to their novelty (Yim, Chu, & Sauer,
2017), which improves purchasing incentives (Altarteer, Charissis, Harrison, & Chan,
2013). In addition, customers believe that utilising digital technologies will be more
fun in the future (Perks, 2016), and industry experts expect that features such as
these will affect the way in which people make purchases (Parro & Santoro, 2015).
The public has the impression that the virtual world is still in its infancy since virtual
reality still needs significant technological and operational advancements.
(Papagiannidis, 2017). Despite the fact that the technology is still in its infancy,
several companies have taken the intelligent choice to incorporate it.
VR Showrooms
The concept of virtual reality (VR) showrooms, which are immersive spaces meant to
display items or services in 360 degrees, is not a new one. However, until recently,
business owners generally saw this technology as a useful marketing tool and a
crowd-pleaser at events. (T. Kumar, 2021) In-person encounters were favoured by
customers when making purchase decisions, despite the fact that certain
businesses, such as luxury fashion brands and automobile dealerships, offered
virtual showrooms as an innovative method to see their wares. The retail industry, on
the other hand, rediscovered virtual reality (VR) showrooms as viable alternatives to
shopping in-person throughout the course of the pandemic, which accelerated the
technology's mainstream adoption. (T. Kumar, 2021)
Virtual showrooms have been most enthusiastically adopted by the apparel industry,
which places a significant amount of reliance on them to organise virtual trade
exhibits, wholesale appointments, and media events. Between May and June of
2020, there was a rise in demand that was 2,000% higher for the platform that
BrandLab, one of the leading VR showroom platforms, uses to hold virtual fashion
events. Other vendors have observed an increase in demand that is comparable to
BrandLab's. Virtual reality showrooms may be able to give realistic experiences at a
fraction of the cost of a live fashion show by using high-resolution 3D images and
video, overlay product descriptions, zoom-in, fabric close-ups, and other experience
customisation options.
IKEA
The Takeleap-created IKEA Virtual Reality shopping experience enables consumers
to pick their home layout and furnishings in actual size, and then get a list of all
chosen goods with their unique reference code and pricing list.
The IKEA showrooms in Jordan, Morocco, and Kuwait had a peculiar issue: their
showrooms were situated on the outskirts of the cities, and the locals were unfamiliar
with the protocol of IKEA's DIY business model. Another significant difficulty was that
many inhabitants were ignorant of IKEA's existence and extensive product
categories. Initially, IKEA believed that the greatest solution to this issue was to use
Augmented Reality to educate its target clients. TAKELEAP offered a VR Experience
and a 360-degree VR tour as an alternative solution after doing more research. The
IKEA VR Experience was implemented at retail centres in Amman, Marrakesh,
Tangier, Casablanca, and Kuwait, resulting in a 20% increase in IKEA's foot traffic
and revenues. (demodern, 2020)
TOMS
TOMS, a shoe company recognised for its humanitarian activities, used VR
technology to launch its "Virtual Giving Trip" digital contribution campaign. This
charity drive began by providing a new pair of shoes for every pair of shoes bought.
Then, its staff and partners will tour the globe on this humanitarian mission,
distributing new shoes to children and observing their own efforts. TOMS works with
Within (formerly VRSE), a VR technology start-up, to build an in-store virtual reality
experience using VR technology in order to enable their consumers to engage in this
significant trip. Using virtual reality goggles, clients may virtually experience this
contribution tour. (Nafarrete, 2015)
The TOMS virtual donation tour exemplifies what businesses can do with VR
technology. This immersive sensation is the power of virtual reality, which not only
offers consumers a novel experience but also influences their emotional reactions.
TOMS has effectively proven the brand's affection with its consumers and
encouraged them to develop a deeper emotional connection. By enabling consumers
to experience a charity trip directly and feel the effect of their donations, the business
is energised by its charitable activities, therefore developing a deep emotional
connection with its customers. (Nafarrete, 2015)
Virtual Try-on
Virtual reality may show "what could be." Within the realm of virtual reality (VR), the
term "virtual try-ons" (VTOs) refers to 3D pictures that depict the usage of certain
objects. The purpose of these pre-sale try-ons is to give customers an idea of how
the products will work or how they will fit in an attempt to influence their purchase
choices (Yim, Chu, & Sauer, 2017). According to the findings of the research, there
are a substantial number of applications for VTOs. AR 3D models improve both
themselves and the surrounding environment, enabling buyers to virtually try on a
variety of items, including but not limited to furniture, clothes, and cosmetics (for
example, the IKEA Catalog, Uniqlo's Magic Mirror, and Sephora Virtual Artist).
Customers are immersed in virtual reality settings in a VR VTO, which simulates
what it would be like to really use the product (e.g., IKEA VR Experience, Volvo
XC90 Test Drive).
Sales Channel
AR and VR applications can make it easier to bring products or services to market so
that consumers can buy them. The goal of these applications is to make immediate
use of the customer engagement that VR can achieve at the pre-sale level, such as
during virtual try-on, customer-as-designer schemes, or various marketing practises.
AR and VR applications can also make it simpler to bring products or services to
market so that consumers can buy them (Yim, Chu, & Sauer, 2017). As a
consequence of this, they may serve as sales channels, which are included into the
purchase path of the client via quick actions to buy (e.g., Sephora Virtual Artist, IKEA
Virtual Reality Store).
Customer-as-Designer
AR/VR applications may be used to increase the value of goods by including
consumers in the process of value generation. The AR/VR tools are provided by a
corporation, and clients may design the final product or create a unique user
experience with the product (Bezamat, 2019). The "customer-as-designer" use case
may occur pre-sale (e.g., NikeID In-store AR) and/or post-sale (e.g., Lego AR
Studio).
Nike
Nike has introduced a virtual marketplace where products can be purchased only
using Air Max credits. All goods in the shop has been digitised, floating in the space
and permitting 360° PC or mobile phone viewing. This includes AM720-themed
water bottles, socks, and stickers, all created in partnership with the brand's creative
network. It employs virtual avatars of its various partners, such as London-based
designer Mini Swoosh, England player Raheem Sterling, and DJ Peggy Gou, as
sales associates to guide clients throughout the purchasing trip (Dezeen, 2021)
These marketing programmes, along with others like them, that allowed for in-depth,
hands-on demonstrations of products and services routinely raised sales and
contributed to the development of brand awareness. In spite of the many advantages
they provide, most in-store installations have been discontinued due to worries about
customers' health and safety. The majority of businesses have already shifted their
focus to digital consumer experiences, which has resulted in the birth of unique
immersive advertising channels. Although it is very likely that stores will return to
business as usual once the epidemic has passed, it is also very likely that they will
not. The desire for excitement in consumers is catered to by businesses via the
usage of immersive gamification, which also enables customers to get involved with
the product that is being delivered.
Balenciaga
In promotion of their autumn/winter 2021 collection, Balenciaga has made
Afterworld: The Age of Tomorrow, a virtual reality (VR) video game, publicly
accessible on its website. The user navigates a future terrain and completes easy
missions by creating an avatar and donning Balenciaga's newest clothing. (Madsen,
2020)
Walmart
Since 2017, Walmart has been using virtual reality to increase the number of training
centres and learning modules for routine and atypical operations, such as Black
Friday and holiday rush.
With over a million of their retail associates and managers having completed
immersive training, Walmart reports improved knowledge and skill retention, higher
staff satisfaction, and a significant reduction in training time, eliminating the need for
employees to work late or study on their days off. (azmi, 2021)
Aside from that, the conversion to VR training offers huge future cost reductions
since, once designed, the modules are easily scalable and need minimum
maintenance and teacher participation. VR is the greatest alternative for providing
remote training for both remote employees and teleworkers, since it needs no
additional equipment outside a headset and controllers. (azmi, 2021)
Virtual-Reality Merchandising
Product merchandising is a critical marketing activity that must rely on consumer
data to be successful in both online and physical locations. However, whereas digital
retail professionals have access to a multitude of insights based on meticulously
observed client behaviour, physical store merchandisers often fail to collect
meaningful information even during focus group testing owing to the sensitivity of the
data. (T. Kumar, 2021)
Adopted for the sake of marketing research, virtual reality may address this data
vacuum, reducing the need for speculation. With headsets monitoring users' eye
movements, in-store merchandisers are able to reliably analyse customer perception
and intent and calculate ideal product placement based on this data. In addition,
because to the adaptability of virtual reality design, marketers may easily modify test
case variables and experiment with various situations. 2017 (Bonetti, Warnby, and
Quinn)
Kellogg
Kellogg intended to launch their new Pop-Tarts Bites product, so they teamed with
Accenture and Qualcomm for a virtual reality (VR) solution to assist them determine
how to position the product on the shelves. Together, the tech firms constructed a
lifelike virtual supermarket, replete with aisles, shelves, and items, where participants
in focus groups could "shop" while wearing VR headsets connected with an
innovative eye-tracking analytics technology. The best location for Kelloggs' Pop-
Tarts Bites, according to the data gathered from this virtual study, was a bit lower
than conventional surveys showed, and the company's sales increased by 18%
during the testing period after implementing these findings. In addition to customer
research, virtual reality may be used to create planograms or patterns for product
placement on shelves. Working in a 3D environment, merchandisers can simply
move items and signs across shelves and aisles and construct appropriate shelf
layouts much more quickly, without having to deal with actual inventory and shelves.
(akhtar, 2020)
2 They are able to better understand the way a product may be utilised thanks to
the interactivity of VR, and if the product's fit can be evaluated, customers should
feel more at ease making purchasing decisions. (Martínez-Navarro et al,2019).
3 When it comes to triggering cognitive and conative responses from customers,
virtual businesses are far more effective than physical ones. (Meißner et al,2020)
4 virtual reality image of the shop provided a more pleasant shopping experience,
raising the purchase intentions, a higher intention to visit the physical shop, and a
higher level of online visit satisfaction than customers who only saw the standard
photo or the 360-degree photo of the shop. (Meißner et al,2020)
5 Customers who use virtual reality (VR) with a high degree of immersion pick from
a more extensive range of products and are less price sensitive. However, there
was no increase in participant satisfaction with their choices while using
extremely immersive VR. (Moes & van Vliet, 2017)
6 People who were put in a virtual reality retail setting reported higher levels of
being present in the experience compared to those who were put in a more
traditional, physical store atmosphere. In addition, the magnitude of this beneficial
effect is not influenced by people's perceptions of their own technical self-
efficacy. (Pizzi et al, 2019)
7 pleasure is a crucial psychological aspect for users; virtual reality shopping has
the potential to dramatically increase the joy that customers obtain from
shopping. (Hsu et al,2020)
8 Eight of the participants had personal interactions with the virtual store assistant,
and as a result, they rated their shopping experience more favourably overall. In
addition, they spent more time and money on their purchases. Only at the
stationery store did touch have an effect on customers' length of stay. (Fang et al,
2020)
13 Some of the participants said that their in-store behaviour accurately represented
their real purchase choices, whereas others denied that this was the case.
Slater's thesis that powerful telepresence leads to more realistic behaviour was
validated by the findings of this investigation (2009) Virtual reality may enhance
the realism of shelf allocation reactions. Participants purchased more things,
spent more money, and reacted more strongly to price discounts in both the
virtual reality and photographic representations than they did in the actual shop.
(Herpen et al,2016)
16 state that utilitarian (task-related and rational) and hedonic (fun-aspect) values
play substantial roles in moulding consumers' attitudes and behavioural intentions
about the use of virtual reality technology (Peukert et al, 2019)
4.3 Q What sort of shopping experience can VR provide in comparison to other retail
venues?
There are contradictory findings on the distinction between virtual reality and other
purchasing channels, such as physical shops and the Internet. While considerable
literature exists on the comparison between VR shops and physical stores, research
on the comparison between VR stores and eCommerce is in its infancy. Not only can
VR offer a comparable shopping experience to that of a real store, but in some
circumstances, it can also produce better results than traditional shopping interfaces.
Comparing online and in-store buying experiences reveals that v-Commerce may
need to correct for some of what e-Commerce performs poorly. This is because e-
Commerce cannot include tangible and tactile aspects, thus shoppers cannot
compare items based on their quality, size, and style.
1. Among the studies that compared the VR shopping environment to the real
shopping environment (typically as the control group), three demonstrated that
participants have similar experiences in the VR environment and the real shopping
environment, indicating that a VR shop can serve as a representation of a real
shopping environment (e.g., Bressoud, 2013, Lombart et al, 2020, Pizzi et al., 2019).
2. In certain respects, five research have demonstrated that virtual reality shopping
may be more beneficial than traditional shopping (see Bramley et al., 2018, Martnez-
Navarro et al., 2019, Pizzi et al., 2019a)
3. Existing research indicates that virtual reality may increase the experience value
of purchasing. However, a VR store seems to have no benefit over traditional stores
when it comes to the efficiency of product searches (Tonkin et al., 2011).
5. Discussion
The study aimed to determine how virtual reality (VR) may boost consumer
engagement in the retail sector. Due to the constraints of e-commerce and brick-
and-mortar establishments, previous research has shown the dire need for virtual
reality (VR) in retail. Due to the advent of digital media and e-commerce, there has
been a fall in interest in physical stores; therefore, conventional distribution channels
are seeking to integrate novel methods such as virtual reality (VR).
To analyse how virtual reality may improve consumer engagement, it was important
to comprehend its present market uses. To determine the applicability, the papers
assess existing instances of retail businesses utilising virtual reality for a range of
objectives. It is recognised that virtual reality has valuable retail applications,
ranging from marketing and promotion to after-sale services. It has also assisted
brands with process management and staff training. Ikea's virtual reality showroom
aided in the promotion of its physical showrooms, which were inaccessible to
customers. Similarly, TOMS used a virtual reality (VR) campaign to launch a digital
contribution campaign, exemplifying how businesses may build a stronger emotional
connection with their consumers. Virtual try-on is an additional creative use that is
particularly needed in the garment business, since the try-ons provide buyers a pre-
sale concept of how the product will function or fit, so trying to influence purchase
choices. Nike, a prominent sports company, made novel use of VR by allowing
consumers to create their own gear in their virtual reality shop, resulting in a greater
sense of personalisation and product engagement. Balenciaga created a VR game
to advertise their fashion, which is an intriguing example of how businesses are
exploiting the use of VR in other sectors, such as gaming. VR is also allowing firms
to save money on employee training by allowing staff to participate online.
The research utilises the SOR model to assert that environmental cues (stimuli)
influence shopping behaviour results (responses). On the basis of this framework,
we have addressed which external stimuli have been studied in the past and which
psychological and behavioural variables might be influenced by these stimuli. Also
for the sake of brevity, the sample products utilised in the study, the simulated
environment in which the research has been conducted, and the equipment that
have been employed in previous studies have been described. Different hypotheses
have been related to determine how virtual reality might enhance the shopping
experience. According to prior research, the concept of consumer empowerment is
tied to the following five dimensions: (1) the sensory, (2) the emotional, (3) the
intellectual, (4) the behavioural, and (5) the social (Schimtt, 2011). These
characteristics centre upon client participation in the purchase process. After the
purchase is complete, a consumer's level of satisfaction, trust, and loyalty to a brand
all contribute to their total customer experience (Lemon and Verhoef, 2016). Using
VR technology, merchants may effectively use these dimensions to improve the
client experience. This can be accomplished by utilising the fundamental
characteristics of virtual reality, namely (a) immersion, which is the sensation of
being surrounded by a digital environment; (b) presence, which is the sensation of
existing in a virtual landscape; and (c) interactivity, which enables users to virtually
interact with objects and surroundings in real-time (Lee and Chung, 2008). (a)
consider (which is prompted by a stimulus), (b) evaluate/engage (which entails
evaluating the various in-store and online possibilities), and (c) purchase (Bousaleh
and Mathew, 2011).
The key influences on the intention to use virtual reality for online buying are
entertainment value, informativeness, perceived ease of use, and perceived utility.
Fang et al., 2020. Therefore, merchants must concentrate on satisfying these
specific requirements to engage consumers with the brand. According to previous
research, the interactivity of a virtual reality (VR) environment increases the
informativeness and fun of the experience, while also enhancing the customer's
understanding of the product, which ultimately simplifies and improves the
purchasing decision-making process. Retailers may utilise in-store assistants to
increase involvement, since it was shown that participants who were contacted by a
virtual shop assistant spent more time and money on purchases, and rated their
entire shopping experience as more pleasant. It has been shown that the VR
interactive environment provides more natural interactions than e-commerce, since
customers feel more immersed when utilising a head-mounted display and audio.
Additionally, a VR retail environment may generate a stronger sense of presence
than a conventional shopping environment, which can have a favourable effect on
consumer behaviour, resulting in more time spent and increased sales. Pizzi et al
(2019a) In a research conducted by Meißner et al. (2020), it was determined that in
more immersive surroundings, buyers choose a wider selection of items and are less
price sensitive. In addition, virtual shops have been shown to generate stronger
cognitive and conative reactions than actual stores. Martnez-Navarro et al. (2019),
which may increase the approach behaviour and client attitude further. Also, retailers
are recommended to improve their media richness, since it is directly related to
increased sales. Van Kerrebroeck et al (2017)
Past research comparing virtual reality shops to other sorts of shopping channels
had conflicting results. Some of them demonstrated that VR shops are superior to
traditional shopping channels, while others shown that VR stores had no meaningful
influence on consumer behaviour. A small number of studies have shown that virtual
reality (VR) shops can simulate the actual shopping experience, which may be seen
as a favourable indicator for firms seeking to move their shopping channel to VR.
Lombart, 2020 demonstrated that buyers' opinions of the product's look and quality
in virtual reality shops and actual stores were identical. A research by Martnez-
Navarro et al. shown that virtual reality boosts brand memory, which may lead to an
increase in brand loyalty. The same research also shown that VR is capable of
eliciting cognitive and affective reactions, which may be further categorised as
perceived value, benefits, and overall experience, memory recall, information
processing, familiarity, and felt intrusiveness (Pfeiffer et al., 2017).
5.1 Drawbacks
Past research has shown that the usage of virtual reality shops offers many benefits,
but some research has also highlighted the disadvantages that virtual reality stores
now face. Some of these disadvantages are a result of technical restrictions that may
be overcome with the development of technology. It might be claimed that these
shortcomings are the reason why virtual reality is not yet widespread in the retail
sector and has been mostly confined to the gaming and entertainment industries.
These obstacles dissuade many businesses from pursuing it.
Price is a significant disadvantage when selecting virtual reality sales outlets. Due to
the fact that it involves precise 3D modelling, experience designers, and software
designers, as well as usability and performance testing. In addition, shop
implementations of VR need the expensive acquisition of a sufficient quantity of
virtual reality-specific gear. The pricing barrier is anticipated to diminish in the future
as virtual reality becomes widespread.
A 2016 research by Liu and Uang shown that "cybersickness is caused by virtual
reality in the elderly" He proved that information disparities lead to cybersickness and
that a lack of control leads to temporal postural instability. It has been validated by
recent research, and this is a major worry for retailers given that motion sickness has
occurred in real-world situations.
Retailers may address this problem by selecting a more advanced type of positional
tracking, which can make the immersive experience more natural and pleasant, or by
reducing the duration of VR sessions to 20 minutes.
Behavioural Icons
The customer interacts with the aforementioned BI's utilising a technique of "look per
click." Look lasting longer than 500 milliseconds were deemed look-to-actions, and
when a user looks at interactive material, the appropriate actions are conducted.
The greatest obstacle for eCommerce and merchants is bilinear product/customer
coupling, or more particularly, selecting the appropriate product for the appropriate
consumer. By bringing a VR dimension to e-commerce, a third phenomenon will be
created including the surroundings. The triple phenomenon demonstrates the critical
requirement to watch customer interaction with the product and the virtual staging
environment in order to determine which product should be put in the virtual staging
environment that best presents it for each consumer. (Elboudali et al., 2020)
The store will have a tool for recording VR user interactions in order to derive data
on consumer behaviour as a whole. This instrument will provide merchants with an
instructive and unobtrusive means of comprehending customer behaviour .
Observing the consumer's gaze/direction permits extrapolation of the eye behaviour
patterns that lead to the purchase intent. (Elboudali et al., 2020)
Logging the consumer's gaze enables the extraction of the level of attention to
content in a virtual store and the identification of design elements to be considered
for a personalised experience (e.g., percentage of consumers looking to the right
when visiting a scene, regions of scenes most viewed, etc.). The navigation data
may be utilised to reconstruct the customer trip and relive the buying experience
through the eyes of the consumer. Such a technique may assist in identifying new,
consumer-retaining staging settings with significant effect. The measurement of the
time spent on distinct sections of the staging environment gives strategic product
placement information about where to replace and better promote items (i.e., style of
décor, type of interactive content, etc.) that influence purchase intentions.
During the VR shopping experience, the store will collect customer behaviour data
via the use of interactive content. It will employ interactive tools such as Product
information, ratings, and surveys to engage customers and collect qualitative
feedback on their buying reasons. For instance, the product information tool refers to
an interface of motivators, such as product description text, colour choices, use
modes, and price tag, which correspond to aspects that correlate to purchase-intent-
promoting drivers. Therefore, the method of interaction with each element and its
effect on customer behaviour are investigated. This permits the investigation of the
consumer's interaction with product qualities.
The store will examine the raw navigation, interaction, and consumer impact data to
derive key performance indicators (KPIs) such as the median number of clicks over a
period of time, the average time a consumer spends on the site, and the average
number of pages seen. The KPIs are then turned into illuminating graphics that
visually represent customer behaviour in the virtual shop.
The store would undertake a data-driven design approach based on the collected
customer information. The store will extract the criteria that control the ordering of
new products depending on the (product attributes, product categories and price
range). The store will then extract the rules that characterise current customer
behaviour inside the VR staging environment. By filtering general behaviour, the
store will determine the most popular VR staging spaces and decors. The store will
indicate the top modes of interaction (i.e., which product sheet features contributed
most to a purchase, which navigational strategies were used, etc.). Eventually, the
store will implement the new design rules that define the present triple dynamics into
the existing VR shop environment. This repeatedly cycles back to the initial phase of
the process, modifying the VR shop's design components based on user behaviour
data to encourage purchases. Consequently, depending on the recorded customer
behaviour, the user's purchasing experience will be tailored to the consumer in order
to increase purchase intentions.
Conclusion
Immersive and interactive virtual reality shops have been shown to be superior to
conventional shopping channels in the literature. It has become one of the most
significant approaches for eCommerce firms to achieve technical excellence, and
according to previous study, it is highly advised for merchants that want to improve
client engagement. Retailers could deploy virtual reality (VR) solutions in-store and
at home to give consumers with more natural interactions in familiar situations, which
may improve the shopping experience and boost sales. Retailers should elicit
Affective reactions to promote a satisfied cognitive state in consumers, which is
directly related to the desired behaviours. This may be accomplished by making the
environment more engaging, since this generates emotion, a deep feeling of
presence, and cognitive reactions that boost company performance, such as brand
memory, which influences buy intent.
These virtual surroundings must be energising and have elements that may generate
emotional experiences and good effects. Retailers must comprehend the variables
that impact customer perceptions, including comfort, content (environment,
information, product presentation, and product features), functionality (accessibility,
interactivity, personalised service, vividness), media richness, perceived value
(convenience, cost, and trust), social networking, and user experience (physical
presence, product involvement and product perception).
User experience is also a crucial term in this context. According to studies, "user
experience" refers to how a customer interacts with a product, its surroundings, and
a brand, as well as how this impacts the consumer's connection with the
environment. These examine how individuals think, feel, behave, socialise, and
physically feel in the retail environment. The incorporation of interactive elements
that combine VR and AR technologies with social media and website linkages has
the potential to improve the user experience; thus, retailers should concentrate on
including these features. On the other hand, according to Kolko (2011), researchers
should concentrate on developing experiences rather than creating physical objects.
Therefore, in order to create effective v-Commerce purchasing environments,
designers must consider how customers perceive things, attempt to comprehend
how consumers embrace technology, remain current on new technology and market
trends, etc. This will assist establish successful marketing and retail strategies to
enhance and improve the consumer shopping experience.
Reference list
akhtar (n.d.). Virtual Reality Merchandising with Kelloggs | Accenture. [online]
www.accenture.com. Available at: https://www.accenture.com/lv-en/case-
studies/consumer-goods-services/virtual-reality-merchandising-with-kelloggs.
azmi (n.d.). How Walmart embraces Immersive Learning | Strivr testimonial. [online]
Strivr. Available at: https://www.strivr.com/customers/walmart/ [Accessed 26 Sep.
2022].
Ben-Ur, J., Mai, E. (Shirley) and Yang, J. (2015). Hedonic Consumption in Virtual
Reality. Journal of Internet Commerce, 14(3), pp.406–423.
doi:10.1080/15332861.2015.1081792.
Bezamat, B. (2019). Nike launches virtual store where items can only be bought with
Air Max credits. [online] Current Daily. Available at:
https://thecurrentdaily.com/2019/03/04/nike-launches-virtual-store-where-items-can-
only-be-bought-with-air-max-credits/.
Bonetti, F., Warnaby, G. and Quinn, L. (2017). Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality
in Physical and Online Retailing: A Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda.
Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, [online] pp.119–132. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-
64027-3_9.
Bowman, D.A. and McMahan, R.P. (2007). Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is
Enough? Computer, 40(7), pp.36–43. doi:10.1109/mc.2007.257.
Cowan, K. and Ketron, S. (2019). A dual model of product involvement for effective
virtual reality: The roles of imagination, co-creation, telepresence, and interactivity.
Journal of Business Research, 100, pp.483–492. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.063.
Edelman, D. (2016). Branding in the Digital Age: You’re Spending Your Money in All
the Wrong Places. [online] Harvard Business Review. Available at:
https://hbr.org/2010/12/branding-in-the-digital-age-youre-spending-your-money-in-
all-the-wrong-places.
Elboudali, A., Aoussat, A., Mantelet, F., Bethomier, J. and Leray, F. (2020). A
customised virtual reality shopping experience framework based on consumer
behaviour: 3DR3CO. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing
(IJIDeM), 14(2), pp.551–563. doi:10.1007/s12008-020-00645-0.
Fortune Business Insights (2019). Virtual Reality Market Size, Share, Growth - VR
Industry Report 2026. [online] Fortunebusinessinsights.com. Available at:
https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/virtual-reality-market-
101378.
Fox, J., Arena, D. and Bailenson, J.N. (2009). Virtual Reality. Journal of Media
Psychology, [online] 21(3), pp.95–113. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95.
Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A.L. and Nordfält, J. (2017). The Future of Retailing. Journal
of Retailing, [online] 93(1), pp.1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.008.
Harley, D., Verni, A., Willis, M., Ng, A., Bozzo, L. and Mazalek, A. (2018). Sensory
VR. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded,
and Embodied Interaction. doi:10.1145/3173225.3173241.
Hoyer, W.D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M. and Singh, S.S. (2010). Consumer
Cocreation in New Product Development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3),
pp.283–296. doi:10.1177/1094670510375604.
Hsiao, M.-H. (2009). Shopping mode choice: Physical store shopping versus e-
shopping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,
45(1), pp.86–95. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2008.06.002.
Jortberg, M. (2001). The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business
a Stage Joseph B. Pine II and James H. Gilmore Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business
School Press, 1999, 252 pages ($24.95)Markets of One: Creating Customer-unique
Value through Mass Customization James H. Gilmore and Joseph B. Pine II (eds.)
Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 198 pages ($29.95). Journal of
Product Innovation Management, 18(2), pp.129–130. doi:10.1016/s0737-
6782(01)00088-1.
Kang, H.J., Shin, J. and Ponto, K. (2020). How 3D Virtual Reality Stores Can Shape
Consumer Purchase Decisions: The Roles of Informativeness and Playfulness.
Journal of Interactive Marketing, 49, pp.70–85. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2019.07.002.
Kim, W.G., Lee, C. and Hiemstra, S.J. (2004). Effects of an online virtual community
on customer loyalty and travel product purchases. Tourism Management, 25(3),
pp.343–355. doi:10.1016/s0261-5177(03)00142-0.
Kumar, A., Bezawada, R., Rishika, R., Janakiraman, R. and Kannan, P.K. (2016).
From Social to Sale: The Effects of Firm-Generated Content in Social Media on
Customer Behavior. Journal of Marketing, [online] 80(1), pp.7–25.
doi:10.1509/jm.14.0249.
Lau, K.W. and Lee, P.Y. (2012). The use of virtual reality for creating unusual
environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interactive
Learning Environments, 23(1), pp.3–18. doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.745426.
Lee, K.C. and Chung, N. (2008). Empirical analysis of consumer reaction to the
virtual reality shopping mall. Computers in Human Behavior, [online] 24(1), pp.88–
104. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.018.
Liu, C.-L. and Uang, S.-T. (2011). Effects of Presence on Causing Cybersickness in
the Elderly within a 3D Virtual Store. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.490–
499. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21619-0_61.
Madsen, A.C. (2020). 5 Things To Know About Balenciaga’s Virtual Reality AW21
Show. [online] British Vogue. Available at:
https://www.vogue.co.uk/news/gallery/balenciaga-autumn-winter-2020.
Melnick, K. (2017). Waterslide Down Oxford Street In Topshop’s In-Store VR
Experience. [online] VRScout. Available at: https://vrscout.com/news/waterslide-
topshop-vr-experience/ [Accessed 21 Sep. 2022].
Na, L. and Weihua, H. (2012). Virtual reality applications in simulated course for tour
guides. [online] IEEE Xplore. doi:10.1109/ICCSE.2012.6295385.
Nafarrete, J. (2015). TOMS Brings Virtual Reality Giving Trips to Retail Customers.
[online] VRScout. Available at: https://vrscout.com/news/toms-virtual-reality-giving-
trips/.
Packer, R. and Jordan, K. (2002). Multimedia : from Wagner to virtual reality. New
York: Norton.
Pizzi, G., Vannucci, V. and Aiello, G. (2019). Branding in the time of virtual reality:
Are virtual store brand perceptions real? Journal of Business Research.
doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.063.
Puccinelli, N.M., Goodstein, R.C., Grewal, D., Price, R., Raghubir, P. and Stewart, D.
(2009). Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying
Process. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), pp.15–30. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.003.
Qantas News Room. (2015). NEW QANTAS APP GIVES TRAVELLERS A VIRTUAL
EXPERIENCE OF AUSTRALIA BEFORE THEY FLY. [online] Available at:
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media-releases/new-qantas-app-gives-
travellers-a-virtual-experience-of-australia-before-they-fly/?Print=1 [Accessed 21
Sep. 2022].
Quidt, J. de (2016). Can virtual reality move beyond immersive experiences to tell
stories? [online] the Guardian. Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/20/can-virtual-reality-move-
beyond-immersive-experiences-to-tell-stories.
Ramadan, Z.B. and Farah, M.F. (2017). The Pokémonisation of the first moment of
truth. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 13(2), p.262.
doi:10.1504/ijwbc.2017.084417.
Regt, A. and Barnes, S.J. (2019). V-Commerce in Retail: Nature and Potential
Impact. [online] ideas.repec.org. Available at:
https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prochp/978-3-030-06246-0_2.html [Accessed 21 Sep.
2022].
Richir, S., Fuchs, P., Lourdeaux, D., Millet, D., Buche, C. and Querrec, R. (2015).
How to design compelling Virtual Reality or Augmented Reality experience?
International Journal of Virtual Reality, 15(1), pp.35–47.
doi:10.20870/ijvr.2015.15.1.2867.
Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C.S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D.,
Gaggioli, A., Botella, C. and Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective Interactions Using Virtual
Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior,
10(1), pp.45–56. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9993.
Routledge & CRC Press. (n.d.). Virtual Reality and the Built Environment. [online]
Available at: https://www.routledge.com/Virtual-Reality-and-the-Built-
Environment/Whyte-Nikolic/p/book/9781138668768 [Accessed 21 Sep. 2022].
Schnack, A., Wright, M.J. and Holdershaw, J.L. (2019). Immersive virtual reality
technology in a three-dimensional virtual simulated store: Investigating telepresence
and usability. Food Research International, 117, pp.40–49.
doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.028.
Schwager, A. and Meyer, C. (2007). Understanding Customer Experience. [online]
Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2007/02/understanding-
customer-experience.
Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in
immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, [online] 364(1535), pp.3549–3557. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0138.
Stuart, F.I. and Tax, S. (2004). Toward an integrative approach to designing service
experiences. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), pp.609–627.
doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.002.
T. Kumar, S. (2021). Study of Retail Applications with Virtual and Augmented Reality
Technologies. Journal of Innovative Image Processing, [online] 3(2), pp.144–156.
doi:10.36548/jiip.2021.2.006.
The Drum. (n.d.). Oreo brings its ‘Wonder Vault’ into virtual reality. [online] Available
at: https://www.thedrum.com/news/2016/02/19/oreo-brings-its-wonder-vault-virtual-
reality [Accessed 21 Sep. 2022].
The Irish Times. (n.d.). Househunting goes virtual with reality headsets. [online]
Available at: https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-
property/househunting-goes-virtual-with-reality-headsets-1.2556835 [Accessed 21
Sep. 2022].
Vrechopoulos, A.P., O’Keefe, R.M., Doukidis, G.I. and Siomkos, G.J. (2004). Virtual
store layout: an experimental comparison in the context of grocery retail. Journal of
Retailing, 80(1), pp.13–22. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.01.006.
Wang, Y.K. and Datta, P. (2010). The Mediating Role of Virtual Experience in Online
Purchase Intentions. Information Resources Management Journal, 23(4), pp.57–74.
doi:10.4018/irmj.2010100104.