Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis and interpretation is the most important phase of the research process, which
involves the computation of the certain measures along with the searching for patterns of
relationship that exists among data groups. Analysis is the process of summarization, evaluation
and interpretation of the information collected in such a way that they provide answers to their
search problem. Interpretation is the process of reducing the data to an intelligible and interpretable
form so that the relations of their search problems can be studied tested and conclusion drawn.
Statistical analysis helps researchers make sense of quantitative information. Without statistics
This chapter deals with the analysis and interpretation of data collected from 35 adolescent
boys from a Government Children’s home at kollam district. Data were tabulated, analyzed and
interpreted by using descriptive and inferential statistics based on the objectives of the study.
ORGANIZATION OF DATA FINDINGS
The data collected were organized and presented under the following sections.
distribution
AMONG ADOLESCENTS
Data on analysis of knowledge regarding mental hygiene among adolescents were analyzed by
ADOLESCENTS
Data on analysis of attitude towards mental hygiene among adolescents were analyzed by
hygiene among adolescents were analyzed by mean, standard deviation and paired ‘t’ test
SECTION V: EFFECTIVENESS OF VIDEO ASSISTED TEACHING ON ATTITUDE
Data on the effectiveness of video assisted teaching on attitude towards mental hygiene
among adolescents were analyzed by mean, standard deviation and paired ‘t’ test
Data on correlation between the knowledge and attitude regarding mental hygiene among
ADOLESCENTS
Data on association between the knowledge regarding mental hygiene and selected
demographic variables among adolescents were analyzed by Chisquare test and Fisher’s exact test.
Data on association between the attitude towards mental hygiene and selected demographic
variables among adolescents were analyzed by Chisquare test and Fisher’s exact test.
SECTION I: DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS OF
ADOLESCENTS.
education, parents marital status, education of mother, education of father, occupation of mother,
occupation of father, type of family, family status, number of siblings, personal habits, adjustment
problem, sleep pattern, history of running, previous knowledge about mental hygiene were
40 (13)
35
30 (10)
P
E (9)
R 25
C
E 20
N
T 15
A
G 10 (3)
E
5
0
12-13yrs 14-15yrs 16-17yrs 18-19yrs
AGE IN YEARS
Figure 3: Bar diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of adolescents
Figure 3 depicts that among 35 adolescent, 26% (9) of them belongs to the age group 12-13
years, 29% (10) of them belongs to the age group 14-15 years, 37% (13) of them belongs to the age
group 16-17 years, and 9% (3) belongs to the age group of 18-19 years.
(13)
40
(11) (11)
35
P
E 30
R
C 25
E
N 20
T
A 15
G 10
E
(0)
5
0
Hindu Christian Muslim Others
RELIGION
Figure 4 indicates that among 35 adolescents, 37% (13) of them were Hindu, 31%
(11) of them were Christian, 31% (11) of them were Muslim and none of them were from
other religion.
60
55 (18)
50
45 (15)
P
E 40
R 35
C
E 30
N 25
T
A 20
G 15
E 10 (2)
5
0
Upto 8th std SSLC HSE
EDUCATION
Figure 5 indicates that among 35 adolescents, 51% (18) of them were studying 8 th std,
43% (15) of them were studying SSLC, and 6% (2) of them were studying higher secondary
education.
17%(6)
26%(9)
Joint
Nuclear
Extended
57% (20)
TYPE OF FAMILY
Figure 6 shows that among 35 adolescents, 57% (20) of them were from nuclear
family, 26% (9) of them were from joint family and 17% (6) of them were from extended
family.
(27)
80
70
P 60
E
R 50
C
E 40
N
T 30
(6)
A 20
G (2)
E 10 (0)
0
Broken family Single parent Normal family Blended family
family
FAMILY STATUS
Figure 7 shows that among 35 adolescents, 6% (2) of them were from single parent
family, 77% (27) of them were from normal family, 17% (6) of them were from blended
Figure 8 shows that among 35 adolescents, 86% (30) of their parents were had normal
marital status, 6% (2) of their parents were remarried, 6% (2) of their parents were divorced,
3% (1) of their parents were widowed, and none of them were had unmarried and separated
(18)
60
50 (12)
40
P
E 30
(4)
R 20 (0) (1)
C 10
E
N 0
T te n n
ov
e w
A era atio atio b no
G Illi
t uc uc d
a t' k
ed ed an n
E l y n Do
oo da
r
tio
sch n a
y co du
ar r se G ra
im e
Pr gh
Hi
EDUCATION OF FATHER
Figure 9 shows that among 35 adolescents, 34% (12) of their father were illiterate,
51% (18) of their father completed primary school education, and 11% (4) of their father
educated upto higher secondary education, 3% (1) of them not known about their father
50 (15)
40
P 30
E 20
R
C 10 (1) (0)
E
N 0
T
A
G
E
EDUCATION OF MOTHER
Figure 10: Cylindrical Diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of
Figure 10 shows that among 35 adolescents, 54% (19) of their mother were illiterate,
43% (15) of their mother completed primary school education, and 3% (1) of their mother
educated upto higher secondary education and none of their mother had graduation and
above.
P
E 80 (25)
R 70
C
E 60
N 50
T
A 40
G 30 (7)
E
20
10 (1) (1) (1)
0
ee
ee
ow
ed
ed
oy
oy
oy
oy
kn
pl
pl
pl
pl
nt
m
Em
Em
em
Do
tE
Un
te
lf
en
Se
iva
rm
Pr
ve
Go
Figure 11: Cylindrical diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of
government employees, 20% (7) of their father were private employees, 71% (25) of their
father were self employed, 3% (1) of their father were unemployed and 3% (1) of them were
P (21)
60
E
R
C 50
E
N 40
T (12)
A
G 30
E
20
10 (2)
(0)
0
Goverment Private Self Employeed Un Employeed
Employee Employee
OCCUPATION OF THE MOTHER
Figure 12: Bar diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of mothers
private employees, 34% (12) of their mother were self employed, 60% (21) of their mother
1
2
31%(11)
>2
No siblings
37%(13)
NUMBER OF SIBLINGS
Figure 13: Doughnut diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of
Figure 13 shows that among 35 adolescents, 20% (7) of them had 1 sibling,
37% (13) of them had 2 siblings, 31% (11) of them had ≥ 2 siblings and 11% (4) of them had
no siblings.
Table1: Frequency and percentage distribution of adolescent with reference to the
(n=35)
1 Substance 5 14
2 Alcohol 12 34
3 Smoking 16 46
4 Others 0 0
5 No bad habits 1 3
Table 1 shows that among 35 adolescents, 14% (5) of them had the habit of using
substance, 34% (12) of them had the habit of alcohol, 46% (16) of them had the habit of
smoking, 3% (1) of them did not have any bad habits and 3% (1) of them were not willing to
Figure 14: Bar diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of
Figure14 reflects that among 35 adolescents, 14% (5) of them had adjustment
problem with society, 37% (13) of them had adjustment problem with family, 43% (15) of
them had adjustment problem with friends 6% (2) of them did not have any adjustment
problems.
Adequate
In Adequate
49%(17) 51%(18)
SLEEP PROBLEM
Figure 15: Pie diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of adolescent
Figure 15 describe that among 35 adolescents, 51% (18) of them had adequate sleep
Figure 16: Bar diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of
Figure16 reflects that among 35 adolescents, 17% (6) of them had the history of
running away from home and 83% (29) of them didn’t have the history of running away from
home.
(35)
100
P 90
E 80
R
C 70
E 60
N 50
T
A 40
G 30 (0)
E 20
10
0
Yes No
PREVIOUS KNOWLEDGE
Figure 17: Pyramid diagram showing the frequency and percentage distribution of
Figure17 reflects that among 35 adolescents, all of them 100% (35) had no previous
among adolescents
(n=35)
PRETEST POSTTEST
KNOWLEDGE
a. Inadequate
knowledge 27 77 00 00
(0-10)
b. Moderate
knowledge 08 23 23 66
(11-20)
c. Adequate
Knowledge 00 00 12 34
(21-29)
Table 2 reveals that among 35 adolescents in, pretest 77% (27) of them had
inadequate knowledge and 23 % (8) of them had moderate knowledge and none of them had
adequate knowledge regarding mental hygiene. Whereas in posttest 66% (23) of them had
moderate knowledge, 34% (12) of them had adequate knowledge and none of them had
Data on analysis of attitude towards mental hygiene among adolescents were analyzed by
among adolescents
(n=35)
PRETEST POSTTEST
a. Unfavorable 0
attitude (0-18) 35 100 0 00
b. Favorable 00 00 3 100
attitude ( 19-36) 5
(Maximum score= 36)
Table 3 reveals that among 35 adolescents in pretest, 100% (35) of them had
unfavourable attitude towards mental hygiene. Whereas in posttest, all 100% (35) of them
ADOLESCENTS
hygiene among adolescents were analyzed by mean, standard deviation and paired t test
H1: The mean posttest knowledge score regarding mental hygiene is significantly higher than
H01: There is no significant difference between the pretest and posttest knowledge score
The null hypothesis and research hypothesis was stated to test the statistical difference
between the mean pretest and posttest knowledge score regarding mental hygiene among
(n=35)
Pretest 8.23
3.35
Posttest 17.71
5.22
Table 4 depicts that the mean, standard deviation (SD), mean difference,‘ t’ value
than the mean pretest knowledge score (M1±SD1=8.23±3.35). The computed mean
difference was (MD1=9.48) and ‘t’ value 19.06, (p=0.001) was significant. Hence null
hypothesis (H01) was rejected and research hypothesis (H1) was accepted.
It was inferred that the video assisted teaching was effective in improving the
among adolescents were analyzed by mean, standard deviation and paired t test
H2: The mean posttest attitude score regarding mental hygiene is significantly higher than the
H02: There is no significant difference between the pretest and posttest attitude score
The null hypothesis and research hypothesis was stated to test the statistical difference
between the mean pretest and posttest attitude score regarding mental hygiene among
(n=35)
Value Value
Table 5 depicts that the mean, standard deviation (SD), mean difference,‘ t’ value
and‘ p’ value of mental hygiene among adolescents. The mean posttest attitude score
(M2±SD2=22.86±5.32) was higher than the mean pretest attitude score (M 1±SD1=7.14±4.04)
with mean difference (MD2=15.714) and ‘t’ value 26.291, (p=0.001) was significant. Hence
null hypothesis (H02) was rejected and research hypothesis (H2) was accepted.
It was inferred that the video assisted teaching was effective in changing the attitude
ADOLESCENTS
Data on correlation between the knowledge and attitude regarding mental hygiene
H3: There is a significant correlation between the knowledge and attitude regarding mental
H03: There is no significant correlation between the knowledge and attitude regarding mental
The null hypothesis and research hypothesis was stated to test the correlation between
the knowledge and attitude regarding mental hygiene among adolescents and interpreted at
(n=35)
Sl no Variables Correlation ‘p’
Coefficient(r) Value
1 Knowledge
0.742 0.058
2 Attitude
Table 6 indicate that correlation between the knowledge and attitude score. Computed
correlation coefficient r= 0.742 (p= 0.058) indicates a positive correlation between the
knowledge and attitude regarding mental hygiene among adolescents. Hence null hypothesis
Therefore when the level of knowledge regarding mental hygiene among adolescents
increases, the attitude regarding mental hygiene among adolescents also be increased.
SECTION VIII: ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE KNOWLEDGE
Data on association between the knowledge regarding mental hygiene and selected
demographic variables of adolescents such as family status, parents marital status, education
and adjustment problem were analyzed by Chisquare test and interpreted at 0.05 level of
significance.
Data on association between the knowledge regarding mental hygiene among adolescents
father, sleeping pattern, history of running away from home were analyzed by using Fisher’s
H4: There is a significant association between the knowledge regarding mental hygiene and
H04: There is no significant association between the knowledge regarding mental hygiene
The null hypothesis and research hypothesis was stated to test the association between
knowledge regarding mental hygiene and selected demographic variables among adolescents
adjustment problem (χ2=9.510, p=0.023) at 0.05 level of significance. Hence null hypothesis
(H04) rejected and research hypothesis (H4) was accepted for this variable.
(χ2=9.510, p=0.023) at 0.05 level of significance. Hence research hypothesis (H4) rejected and
adolescents.
(n=35)
1. Sleep pattern
(a) Adequate 8 10
(b) Inadequate 11 6 0.194
2. History of running
away from home?
(a) Yes 3 3
(b) no 16 13 0.582
Table 8 reveals that there was no significant association between the knowledge
regarding mental hygiene and selected demographic variables of adolescents such as sleeping
pattern (p=0.194) and history of running away from home (p=0.582), at 0.05 level of
significance. Hence null hypothesis (H04) was accepted and research hypothesis (H 4) was
demographic variables of adolescents such as family status, parents marital status, education
and adjustment problem were analyzed by Chisquare test and interpreted at 0.05 level of
significance.
Data on association between the attitude towards mental hygiene among adolescents and
father, sleep pattern, history of running away from home were analyzed by using Fisher’s
H5: There is a significant association between the attitude towards mental hygiene and
H05: There is no significant association between the attitude towards mental hygiene and
The null hypothesis and research hypothesis was stated to test the association
between attitude towards mental hygiene and selected demographic variables among
adolescents (n=10)
(χ2=7.560, p=0.023) at 0.05 level of significance. Hence null hypothesis (H 05) rejected and
(χ2=2.102, p=0.552) at 0.05 level of significance. Hence research hypothesis (H5) rejected and
adolescents.
(n=35)
1. Sleep pattern
(a) Adequate 12 6
(b) Inadequate 4 13 0.012 ⃰
2. History of running
away from home?
(a) Yes 2 4
(b) no 14 15 0.418
Table 10 reveals that there was a significant association between the attitude towards
mental hygiene and selected demographic variables of adolescents such as sleep pattern
(p=0.012) at 0.05 level of significance. Hence null hypothesis (H 05) was rejected and research
There was no significant association between the attitude towards mental hygiene and
selected demographic variables of adolescents such as history of running away from home
(p=0.418) at 0.05 level of significance. Hence research hypothesis (H 05) was rejected and null