Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
Review
Vikram M. Sawant
vikramsawant77@yahoo.com
Guidance by,
Ar.Nupur C.
Minimal waste and inspection challenges - Individual units are cast, cured,
and transported to the job site, where they are assembled utilising a variety of
erection machines. Prefabricated buildings produce less waste than structures
constructed using traditional methods because all of the necessary elements for
construction arrive on site preassembled. Aside from the ease of construction and
energy savings, prefabricated structures are always built in accordance with certain
design codes, ensuring that there are no issues when the project is examined by
government officials.
Reliable Construction Plan - There are extremely few risks of time schedule
variations because the casting of the individual units takes place in a controlled
environment that is not affected by weather problems. The average structure would
be built in the quickest period possible if such disruptions were not there. Workers
are placed in a low-risk atmosphere during the construction process, which
increases their emotions of safety and comfort. As a result of all of these elements,
it is assured that the structure will receive all of the required care and attention to
the details that it requires in order to be constructed properly.
Workflow - The off-site fabrication process may take place in the warehouse
in tandem with on-site activities. This has the potential to significantly cut the
overall construction time of a project.
Reduced resale value - The majority of people believe they are of poor
quality and strength, making reselling them extremely difficult. High initial
investment -Using prefabrication technology necessitates a significant initial cost.
Because building materials are cast in a warehouse and then brought to the
job site for final erection and installation, prefabrication construction technology
produces less waste on the job site. As a result, not only time but also money is
saved. When compared to the old approach, the cost of a structure produced
utilizing prefab technology is significantly lower, and the construction time is also
significantly shorter. The prefab construction technology helps to reduce negative
environmental impacts and provides an environmentally acceptable structure. As a
result, prefab building is far more efficient and long-lasting. If this technology is
used for repetitive tasks, higher quality control can be obtained. From the study
one may conclude that the prefab technology is economical than conventional cast
in place method, but still there are certain aspects as mentioned earlier which may
be taken into consideration while using this technology. The sustainability aspects
viz. social, economic and environmental may promote prefab technology as a
promising alternative in construction industry. Although the study concludes that
prefab technology is more cost-effective than the traditional cast-in-place process,
there are still some factors to consider when employing this technology, as noted
earlier. The social, economic, and environmental aspects of sustainability may
promote prefab technology as a feasible alternative in the construction business.